Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 31(2): 71-83.e17, 2024 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37931893

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: No consensus currently exists regarding patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) instruments. This structured review was conducted to identify the PROMs used by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated surgical treatment in patients with endometriosis. DATA SOURCES: Two parallel searches were conducted by a medical librarian using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane Library for RCTs published from 2000 to July 2022. One search focused on studies reporting quality of life (QoL), and the second search focused on studies reporting pain and sexual, bowel, and bladder function. METHOD OF STUDY SELECTION: During the title and abstract screening and reference check, 600 results were identified on PROMs relating to QoL and 465 studies on PROMs relating to pain and sexual, bowel, and/or bladder function and an evaluation of 17 and 12 studies conducted, respectively. The inclusion criteria involved selecting RCTs that focused on surgical intervention and assessing QoL, pain, and sexual, bowel, and/or bladder function using PROMs. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Covidence software was used to organize and identify duplicate articles through screening. We developed a data extraction form to collect key information about each included study, as well as the pertinent PROMs used in the study. Assessment of the risk of bias of each study was also performed. A total of 19 studies were identified involving 2089 participants and a total of 16 PROMs used across the studies; 9 of 19 studies (47%) were rated as having a low risk of bias. There were no high-risk studies identified in this review. CONCLUSION: This study identified a large number of RCTs in surgical treatment of endometriosis that used various PROMs to assess QoL, pain, and bladder, bowel, and sexual function. The PROMs used by high-quality RCTs for QoL include Endometriosis Health Profile-30, Endometriosis Health Profile-5, Short-Form 36, Short-Form 12, and EQ-5D; for bowel-related symptoms Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, and Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Severity Scoring System/Wexner; for bladder-related function Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, International Prostate Symptom Score, Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire, and Urinary Symptom Profile; and finally for sexual function Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire and Sexual Activity Questionnaire. Unlike other domains, only one tool (visual analog scale) was the dominant PROM used for the assessment of pain. In addition, the use of more than one PROM in each study to assess different aspects of patient's health and pain symptoms did not become prevalent until after 2015.


Assuntos
Endometriose , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Incontinência Urinária , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Endometriose/cirurgia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Dor , Qualidade de Vida , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente
2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 31(3): 205-212.e4, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38042477

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term urinary function for women having laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. DESIGN: Institutional Review Board-approved nested cohort study within a larger randomized controlled trial assessing urinary function following any benign laparoscopy for gynecological presentations. SETTING: Two tertiary-level university-affiliated hospitals. PATIENTS: Women with histologically confirmed endometriosis within the randomized controlled trial between April 2012 and November 2019, where baseline urinary function was determined. INTERVENTIONS: Women with histologically confirmed endometriosis were contacted between February and October 2020, and urinary function was re-assessed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Urinary function was assessed using validated questionnaires across the domains of filling, voiding, incontinence, and quality of life determined distant from surgery. Higher scores correlated with a greater severity of symptoms. From 518/711 (72.9%) women with histologically confirmed endometriosis, 289/518 (55.8%) consented to the nested study. At a mean of 50 months (range 12-103 months) post-operatively, 35 participants (12.1%) had sought treatment for bladder symptoms, and 81 participants (28.0%) reported at least one urinary tract infection since their index surgery. There was a significant worsening of symptoms for filling, voiding, incontinence, and quality of life pre-operative to post-operatively (2.27 vs 3.32, 0.93 vs 2.02, 1.06 vs 2.32, 0.83 vs 2.13 respectively, p <.001). There was no statistically significant difference in urinary questionnaire scores in participants with and without uterovesical endometriosis. There was no statistically significant difference in any parameter when comparing any revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine (rASM) stage of endometriosis. Participants who had post-operative urinary retention reported a higher mean voiding score than those who did not (3.24 vs 1.94, p = .017), while participants with post-operative urinary tract infection reported a higher mean frequency score than those who did not (5.17 vs 3.24, p = .016). CONCLUSION: This study suggests a decline in urinary function over time following laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis that is not dependent on the severity or location of the disease.


Assuntos
Endometriose , Laparoscopia , Incontinência Urinária , Infecções Urinárias , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Endometriose/cirurgia , Seguimentos , Resultado do Tratamento , Qualidade de Vida , Bexiga Urinária , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Incontinência Urinária/cirurgia , Infecções Urinárias/cirurgia
3.
Obstet Gynecol ; 143(1): e7-e17, 2024 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37797336

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on use of botulinum toxin to treat pelvic floor tension myalgia and persistent pelvic pain. DATA SOURCES: The ClinicalTrials.gov , PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched from inception to November 2022 by two independent assessors (B.L.K. and F.G.L.). Identified studies were screened by title and abstract and included after full-text review. Data extraction was subsequently performed and recorded in Microsoft Excel. METHODS: This study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines after registration in PROSPERO (CRD42022289132). All randomized studies, prospective studies with more than five participants, and retrospective studies with more than 10 participants published in English or French and assessing the use of botulinum toxin for the treatment of pelvic floor tension myalgia and persistent pelvic pain in women were included. Meta-analyses were performed on randomized data. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Of 4,722 articles identified, 24 satisfied inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials totaling 329 participants demonstrated no differences in patient- and clinician-reported outcome measures, including pain, dyspareunia, sexual function, and vaginal manometry. Mean duration of follow-up was 6 months. A qualitative analysis of 14 prospective and four retrospective studies including 804 participants is supportive of botulinum toxin; however, the quality of data is low, and there is marked heterogeneity between studies. CONCLUSION: Meta-analyses of randomized data do not support the use of botulinum toxin to treat pelvic floor tension myalgia and persistent pelvic pain. Failure of these data to confirm the findings of nonrandomized prospective studies that suggest a treatment benefit may be attributable to the absence of placebo control and confounding outcomes obtained from an active comparator group. Further randomized controlled trials with true placebo are strongly recommended. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42022289132.


Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Fármacos Neuromusculares , Feminino , Humanos , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapêutico , Mialgia/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Diafragma da Pelve , Dor Pélvica/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37379723

RESUMO

Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is an increasingly common clinical conundrum. The non-curettage surgical management of CSP can be categorised into hysteroscopic, vaginal, laparoscopic, and open removal modalities and the choice of treatment is surgeon-dependent. A systematic review of original studies reporting surgical treatment outcomes of CSP until March 2023 was conducted to evaluate the non-curettage surgical management of this highly morbid condition. A total of 60 studies of mostly weak methodological quality were identified involving 6720 CSP cases. Success rates were generally high across all treatment modalities although highest in vaginal and laparoscopic excisional approaches. Morbidity was most associated with haemorrhage although unplanned hysterectomy rates remained low across all treatment groups. Subsequent pregnancies are associated with morbidity despite being underreported and the impact of CSP treatment on future pregnancy is poorly understood. Substantive study heterogeneity precludes meta-analyses of pooled data and treatment superiority has not been demonstrated.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Gravidez Ectópica , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Histeroscopia , Cesárea , Cicatriz/complicações , Cicatriz/cirurgia , Gravidez Ectópica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
BJOG ; 130(9): 1112-1119, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36852512

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of urinary retention and postoperative urinary tract infection between women with immediate versus women with delayed removal of indwelling catheter following benign non-hysterectomy gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. DESIGN: This randomised clinical trial was conducted between February 2012 and December 2019, with follow-up to 6 weeks. SETTING: Two university-affiliated teaching hospitals in Sydney, Australia. POPULATION: Study participants were 693 women aged 18 years or over, undergoing non-hysterectomy laparoscopy for benign gynaecological conditions, excluding pelvic floor or concomitant bowel surgery. METHODS: Three hundred and fifty-five participants were randomised to immediate removal of urinary catheter and 338 participants were randomised to delayed removal of urinary catheter. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The co-primary outcomes were urinary retention and urinary tract infection. Secondary outcomes included hospital readmission, analgesia requirements, duration of hospitalisation and validated bladder function questionnaires. RESULTS: Urinary retention was higher after immediate compared with delayed removal of the urinary catheter (8.2% vs 4.2%, RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.0, p = 0.04). Although urinary tract infection was 7.2% following delayed removal of the urinary catheter and 4.7% following immediate removal of the urinary catheter, the difference was not statistically significant (RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.2, p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of urinary retention with the immediate compared with the delayed removal of the urinary catheter following benign non-hysterectomy gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. The difference in urinary tract infection was not significant. There is 1/12 risk of re-catheterisation after immediate urinary catheter removal. It is important to ensure that patients report normal voiding and emptying prior to discharge, to reduce the need for readmission for the management of urinary retention.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Retenção Urinária , Infecções Urinárias , Feminino , Humanos , Retenção Urinária/etiologia , Retenção Urinária/terapia , Cateterismo Urinário/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Urinários/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos
6.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 62(4): 574-580, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35474508

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a finite volume of surgery performed annually by trainees and certified specialists alike. The detailed assessment of this surgical substrate is important, since it guides true exposure in gynaecological surgical training and practice after fellowship. AIMS: This study quantifies the volume and profile of major gynaecological surgical procedures performed in Australia within a specified five-year period and discusses the implications for training and practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare data were examined to quantify the total number of major gynaecological procedures performed between 2013 and 2018. Medicare data were analysed to quantify the number of billed procedures. These data were compared with published Australian RANZCOG trainees and operative gynaecologists, to estimate the potential annual average exposure for each procedure. RESULTS: Major open, laparoscopic and vaginal surgeries constitute less than 27% of the 600 000 gynaecological procedures performed annually in Australia. Most major gynaecological surgeries are performed at rates lower than 12 cases per year for both trainees and specialists. Over the study period, laparotomies, vaginal hysterectomies and continence procedures decreased, and operative laparoscopies and laparoscopic hysterectomies increased. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of available major gynaecological procedures in Australia may not allow sufficient exposure for optimal training and practice for all trainees and specialists in operative gynaecology. This shortfall may compromise the ability to obtain and maintain proficiency in some core gynaecological operative procedures.


Assuntos
Ginecologia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Idoso , Austrália , Competência Clínica , Bolsas de Estudo , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/educação , Ginecologia/educação , Humanos
7.
Infect Dis Health ; 25(3): 158-167, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32160964

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The past 20 years have seen increasing Caesarean section (CS) rates in Australia. Increasing antenatal morbidity means that post-CS surgical site infection (SSI) is an issue impacting Australian women, mostly low-socioeconomic and regional communities. Recent trends supporting development of evidence-based bundled approaches to SSI reduction, have not proved efficacy nor supported bundle implementation. AIMS: This pilot study aimed to develop, implement and assess an evidence-based Caesarean Infection Prevention ("CIP") bundled intervention to reduce post-CS SSI rates in a high risk population. METHODS: The study was a pre-post-intervention study, including women undergoing CS at one referral hospital between December 1st 2016 and December 31st 2018. A 12 month retrospective pre-intervention review identified women who developed a post-CS SSI. A comprehensive literature review informed the development of the intervention, which was implemented in December 2017. Data was collected for the subsequent 12 months on women undergoing CS. RESULTS: A total of 710 procedures were monitored with 346 and 364 women in the pre and post-intervention groups respectively. Demographic and comorbidity variables remained consistent over time. Post-CS SSI rates significantly reduced post-intervention (5.5% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.007), the greatest benefit in class II and III obese patients (12.2% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.019). Higher hypertension rates (24% vs. 9%, p = 0.01) and lower maternal mean age (27 vs. 30, p = 0.01) were seen in patients with SSI. CONCLUSION: The "CIP" bundle effectively reduced post-CS SSIs in a high risk population. Our findings substantiate the need for development and evaluation of multifaceted, evidenced-based interventions to reduce post-CS SSIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12619001001189, July 2019.


Assuntos
Cesárea , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New South Wales/epidemiologia , Projetos Piloto , Gravidez , Serviços de Saúde Rural , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...