RESUMO
Background: Fecal microbiota, live-jslm (RBL; REBYOTA®), is the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, single-dose, rectally administered, microbiota-based live biotherapeutic product for preventing Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) recurrence. Alternative routes of administration are of clinical interest. Objectives: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of RBL administration via colonoscopy. Design: Retrospective analysis of electronic medical records of participants administered RBL via colonoscopy under FDA enforcement discretion. Methods: The number of participants with treatment and/or procedure-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was evaluated. Treatment success and sustained clinical response, defined as the absence of CDI recurrence within 8 weeks and 6 months, respectively, were evaluated. Results: TEAEs were experienced by 75% (6/8) of participants; most were mild to moderate in severity, and none due to RBL or its administration. Most participants had treatment success (80%; 8/10); 75% (6/8) had sustained clinical response. Conclusion: Real-world safety and efficacy of RBL administered via colonoscopy were consistent with clinical trials of rectally administered RBL.
RESUMO
Background: Fecal microbiota, live-jslm (RBL; REBYOTA™), the first microbiota-based live biotherapeutic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to prevent recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) in adults, has been evaluated in 5 prospective clinical trials. A retrospective analysis considered the safety and efficacy of RBL administered under US Food and Drug Administration enforcement discretion to patients with rCDI and broad eligibility criteria mimicking real-world practice. Methods: We retrospectively identified adults with rCDI treated with RBL under enforcement discretion between November 1, 2015, and September 30, 2019, across 5 study sites. CDI diagnosis was based on site-specific practice. The primary safety set (PSS) included all patients who were naïve to previous RBL treatment and had continuously comprehensive medical records for 6 months following treatment. Results: The primary treatment cohort had 94 patients; the PSS included 64 patients with common comorbidities receiving diverse chronic therapeutics. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and comparable between comorbidity subgroups and the overall population. There were no serious adverse events related to RBL or the administration procedure. In the PSS, 82.8% of RBL-treated patients responded at 8 weeks, of whom 88.7% had sustained response through 6 months. The number of RBL doses administered had no marked effect on outcome. Conclusions: Together with prospective clinical trial outcomes, these findings support the efficacy and safety of RBL to prevent rCDI, with diagnostics and comorbidities representative of real-world clinical practice.
RESUMO
Diverticular disease-associated segmental colitis is a unique variant of chronic colitis limited to segments of the left colon that harbor diverticula. Histologically, this disease mimics chronic idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease and can be indistinguishable from ulcerative colitis or Crohn's colitis on histologic grounds alone. Patients typically present with hematochezia and cramping abdominal pain, and colonoscopic evaluation reveals inflammatory changes limited to the segment of bowel containing the diverticula, with rectal sparing. Although this disease does not appear to be an unusual form of diverticulitis but possibly an immunologically mediated process, many patients respond to treatment directed toward diverticulitis. A subset of patients requires immunosuppressive therapy and/or surgery, and a small subset progresses to develop classic ulcerative colitis. Because of the histologic overlap with ulcerative colitis and occasionally Crohn's colitis, it is essential that endoscopists provide a full description of the macroscopic appearance of the inflammatory changes at endoscopy, such as limitation to a segment of diverticular disease, so that the pathologist can provide a more informative interpretation of the biopsy.
