The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Geographic Placement of Applicants to General Surgery Residency Programs.

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 greatly influenced medical education and the residency match. As new guidelines were established to promote safety, travel was restricted, visiting rotations discontinued, and residency interviews turned virtual. The purpose of this study is to assess the geographic trends in distribution of successfully matched General Surgery applicants prior to and after the implementation of pandemic guidelines, and what we can learn from them as we move forward. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of 129 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited, academic General Surgery Residency Programs across 46 states and the District of Columbia. Categorically matched residents' medical schools (i.e., home institutions), medical school states, and medical school regions as defined per the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), were compared to the same geographic datapoints as their residency program. Preliminary residents were excluded. Residents in the 2018, 2019, and 2020 cycles were sub-categorized into the "pre-COVID" group and residents in the 2021 and 2022 applications cycles were sub-categorized into the "post-COVID" group. The percentages of residents who matched at their home institution, in-state, and in-region were examined. SETTING: Multiple ACGME-accredited, university-affiliated General Surgery Residency Programs across the United States of America. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4033 categorical General Surgery residents were included. RESULTS: Of 4033 categorical residents who matched between 2018 and 2022, 56.1% (n = 2,263) were in the pre-COVID group and 43.9% (n = 1770) were in the post-COVID group. In the pre-COVID group 14.4% (n = 325) of residents remained in-home (IH), 24.4% (n = 553) in-state (IS), and 37.0% (n = 837) in- region (IR), compared to 18.8% IH (n = 333), 27.8% IS (n = 492), and 39.9% IR (n = 706) in the post-COVID group, respectively. Significant increases for IH and IS resident matching at 4.5% and 3.4%, respectively, were noted in the post-COVID period (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic, and the ensuing changes adopted to promote safety, significantly impacted medical student opportunities and the General Surgery residency application process. General Surgery match data over the last 5 years reveals a statistically significant increase in the percentage of applicants matching at in-home and in-state institutions after the pandemic.

Implementation of an Online Intraoperative Assessment of Technical Performance for Surgical Trainees.

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of surgical resident technical performance is an integral component of any surgical training program. Timely assessment delivered in a structured format is a critical step to enhance technical skills, but residents often report that the quality and quantity of timely feedback received is lacking. Moreover, the absence of written feedback with specificity can allow residents to seemingly progress in their operative milestones as a junior resident, but struggle as they progress into their postgraduate year 3 and above. We therefore designed and implemented a web-based intraoperative assessment tool and corresponding summary "dashboard" to facilitate real-time assessment and documentation of technical performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web form was designed leveraging a cloud computing platform and implementing a modified Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation instrument; this included additional, procedure-specific criteria for select operations. A link to this was provided to residents via email and to all surgical faculty as a Quick Response code. Residents open and complete a portion of the form on a smartphone, then relinquish the device to an attending surgeon who then completes and submits the assessment. The data are then transferred to a secure web-based reporting interface; each resident (together with a faculty advisor) can then access and review all completed assessments. RESULTS: The Assessment form was activated in June 2021 and formally introduced to all residents in July 2021, with residents required to complete at least one assessment per month. Residents with less predictable access to operative procedures (night float or Intensive Care Unit) were exempted from the requirement on those months. To date a total of 559 assessments have been completed for operations performed by 56 trainees, supervised by 122 surgical faculty and senior trainees. The mean number of procedures assessed per resident was 10.0 and the mean number per assessor was 4.6. Resident initiation of Intraoperative Assessments has increased since the tool was introduced and scores for technical and nontechnical performance reliably differentiate residents by seniority. CONCLUSIONS: This novel system demonstrates that an online, resident-initiated technical assessment tool is feasible to implement and scale. This model's requirement that the attending enter performance ratings into the trainee's electronic device ensures that feedback is delivered directly to the trainee. Whether this aspect of our assessment ensures more direct and specific (and therefore potentially actionable) feedback is a focus for future study. Our use of commercial cloud computing services should permit cost-effective adoption of similar systems at other training programs.

From the Operating Room to Online: Medical Student Surgery Education in the Time of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: On March 17, 2020 the Association of American Medical Colleges recommended dismissal of medical students from clinical settings due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Third-year (M3) and fourth-year (M4) medical students were at home, M4s were interested in teaching, and residents and faculty had fewer clinical responsibilities due to elective surgery cancellations. To continue M3 access to education, we created a virtual surgery elective (VSE) that aimed to broaden students' exposure to, and elicit interest in, general surgery (GS). METHODS: Faculty, surgical residents, and M4s collaborated to create a 2-wk VSE focusing on self-directed learning and direct interactions with surgery faculty. Each day was dedicated to a specific pathology commonly encountered in GS. A variety of teaching methods were employed including self-directed readings and videos, M4 peer lectures, case-based learning and operative video review with surgery faculty, and weekly surgical conferences. A VSE skills lab was also conducted to teach basic suturing and knot-tying. All lectures and skills labs were via Zoom videoconference (Zoom Video Communications Inc). A post-course anonymous survey sent to all participants assessed changes in their understanding of GS and their interest in GS and surgery overall. RESULTS: Fourteen M3s participated in this elective over two consecutive iterations. The survey response rate was 79%. Ninety-one percent of students believed the course met its learning objectives "well" or "very well." Prior to the course, 27% reported a "good understanding" and 0% a "very good" understanding of GS. Post-course, 100% reported a "good" or "very good" understanding of GS, a statistically significant increase (P = 0.0003). Eighty-two percent reported increased interest in GS and 64% reported an increase in pursuing GS as a career. CONCLUSIONS: As proof of concept, this online course successfully demonstrated virtual medical student education can increase student understanding of GS topics, increase interest in GS, and increase interest in careers in surgery. To broaden student exposure to GS, we plan to integrate archived portions of this course into the regular third-year surgery clerkship and these can also be used to introduce GS in the preclinical years.

Laparoscopic management of colonic lipomas: a case report and review of the literature.

Colonic lipomas are infrequent lesions, yet they are the second most common benign lesions of the colon after benign adenomatous polyps. Their treatment ranges from observation to segmental colectomy and has been a matter of debate since Bauer first reported them in 1757. With the advent of new technologies, therapeutic options now include observation, endoscopic removal, laparoscopic removal, and traditional open surgery. We present a case of colonic lipoma presenting with indeterminate symptomatology, its workup, treatment outcome, and a review of the current literature.

Defining the learning curve for laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenia purpura.

BACKGROUND: The current study was undertaken to define the learning curve for laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). METHODS: The data of 50 patients who underwent LS for ITP between March 1996 and February 2003 were reviewed. Patients were divided into sequential groups of 10. Operative time, estimated blood loss, conversion to open procedure, length of stay (LOS), time to oral intake, complications, and mortality rates were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean OR time in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th groups of 10 were significantly shorter than the 1st and 2nd groups of 10. There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, LOS, or time to oral intake between the groups. Three conversions to open splenectomy occurred; one each in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th groups of 10. Complications were evenly distributed between groups. There were no deaths. CONCLUSION: The learning curve for LS in patients with ITP is a minimum of 20 cases.

101 laparoscopic splenectomies for the treatment of benign and malignant hematologic disorders.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is the surgical approach of choice for patients with hematologic disorders requiring splenectomy. Patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) have normal to slightly enlarged spleens and benefit the most from LS. METHODS: We reviewed the perioperative outcomes in 101 patients who underwent LS between May 1996 and December 2002. Patients were divided into three groups--ITP, other benign, and malignant hematologic disorders--and compared. RESULTS: The ITP patients (n = 48) had significantly smaller spleens and operative times compared with the other groups. Splenomegaly in the other benign (n = 23) and malignant hematologic disorders (n = 30) groups was responsible for higher open conversion rates and greater need for hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy (HALS). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic splenectomy and HALS can be performed with good results for benign and malignant hematologic disorders. The benefits of HALS are similar to LS, so there should be a low threshold for HALS in patients with large spleens.

Intravenous methylene blue as an aid to intraoperative localization and removal of the adrenal glands during laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that intravenous methylene blue will facilitate adrenal gland identification and resection during laparoscopic adrenalectomy. METHODS: Five mini-Hanford pigs were anesthetized and monitored per an approved Internal Review Board protocol. Timing of color changes in the adrenals was recorded after administering methylene blue at three different doses: 2.5 mg/kg, 5.0 mg/kg, and 7.5 mg/kg. The time required for laparoscopic adrenalectomy with and without methylene blue was recorded. RESULTS: No color change occurred after the 2.5 mg/kg dose. For the 7.5 mg/kg versus the 5.0 mg/kg dose there was a more rapid bluish color change (mean time, 1.89 minutes versus 3.45 minutes; P = 0.03) and a longer duration of bluish color change (mean time, 12.20 minutes versus 6.19 minutes; P = 0.01). Laparoscopic adrenalectomy using methylene blue resulted in a 34.5% faster median resection time (10.13 minutes versus 15.47 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: Methylene blue concentrates in the adrenal glands and facilitates identification and resection of the adrenal glands by a laparoscopic approach.