RESUMO
Millions of patients require implantable cardiac devices for management of cardiac dysrhythmias. These devices are susceptible to erosion, exposure, or infection and plastic surgeons are consulted when salvage is required. As of yet, an anterior muscle-splitting approach to effectively and safely relocate the device into the subpectoral position has not been described in the plastic surgery literature. The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of 7 patients who required repositioning of cardiac devices. Indications for repositioning included exposure, erosion, infection, hematoma at the time of primary placement (3), and one cosmetic revision. All patients were treated with subpectoral repositioning of the device into the subpectoral space via an anterior muscle-splitting approach. Six of 7 patients (86%) achieved successful long-term repositioning in the subpectoral position without recurrent exposure or hematoma and with good cosmetic results. One patient who had a prior history of multiple failed device placements required reoperation due to recurrent infection. The anterior muscle-splitting technique proposed by the authors for defibrillator or pacemaker salvage is a feasible technique with promising results. Plastic surgeons should be aware of this simple and effective approach.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Many medical disciplines, such as emergency medicine, trauma surgery, dermatology, psychiatry, family practice, and dentistry have documented attempts at assessing the level of bioterrorism preparedness in their communities. Currently, there is neither such an assessment nor an existing review of potential bioterrorism agents as they relate to plastic surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to present plastic surgeons with a review of potential bioterrorism agents. METHODS: A review of the literature on bioterrorism agents and online resources of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was conducted. Category A agents were identified and specific attention was paid to the management issues that plastic surgeons might face in the event that these agents are used in an attack. RESULTS: Disease entities reviewed were smallpox, anthrax, plague, viral hemorrhagic fever, tularemia, and botulism. For each agent, we presented the microbiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, potential for weaponization, medical management, and surgical issues related to the plastic surgeon. CONCLUSION: This article is the first attempt at addressing preparedness for bioterrorism in the plastic surgery community. Many other fields have already started a similar process. This article represents a first step in developing evidence-based consensus guidelines and recommendations for the management of biological terrorism for plastic surgeons.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study sought to identify and provide preventative recommendations for potentially devastating safety violations in the operating room. METHODS: A Medline database search from 1950 to current using the terms patient safety and operating room was conducted. All topics identified were reviewed. Three patient safety violations with potential for immediate and devastating outcomes were selected for discussion using evidence-based literature. RESULTS: The search identified 2851 articles, 807 of which were directly related to patient safety in the operating room. Topics addressed by these 807 included infectious complications (26%), fires (11%), communication/teamwork (6%), retained foreign objects (3%), safety checklists (1%), and wrong-site surgery (1%). Fires, gossypiboma, and wrong-site surgery were selected for discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Although fire, gossypiboma, and wrong-site surgery should be "never events" in the operating room, they continue to persist as 3 common patient safety violations. This study provides the epidemiology, common etiologies, and evidence-based preventative recommendations for each.
