Systematic diagnosis and therapy of lateral elbow pain with emphasis on elbow instability.

PURPOSE: In recalcitrant epicondylitis innumerable operative techniques have been published, nevertheless a certain percentage of patients remains symptomatic after operative treatment. We developed an individual, systematic diagnostic pathway including arthroscopic assessment of elbow stability to identify the optimal and respectively less invasive therapy. METHODS: We so far included 40 patients with recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis (mean age 46 ± 11). 5 patients had previous surgery. In all patients, we did an elbow arthroscopy and a systematic arthroscopic stability testing. 25 patients were treated exclusively arthroscopically once instability was excluded. In 13 patients with slight instability, we did an open debridement of the lateral tendon complex and local refixation. Two patients with severe instability were treated with open debridement and additional stabilization of the LUCL with a trizeps graft. With a minimum follow-up of 1 year, we assessed the DASH score and subjective patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 24 ± 12 months, mean duration of symptoms before surgery was 19 ± 18 months. The mean DASH score at follow-up was 22 ± 19.36 patients reported symptoms improvement, 34 patients would repeat surgery given the same situation; in 30 cases, patients expectations had been fulfilled. We did not observe any intraoperative complications or infections. One patient developed joint stiffness requiring reoperation. CONCLUSION: Using a systematic diagnostic pathway including assessment of elbow stability and consecutive individualized, respectively, less invasive surgical procedure we acquired high patients satisfaction and good clinical outcome with a low complication rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Digital templating in total knee and hip replacement: an analysis of planning accuracy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine how well pre-operative size selection for total knee and hip arthroplasties based on the digital imaging with and without additional referencing correlated with the size actually implanted. METHODS: Size selection planning of total knee arthroplasty by digital templating was documented in 46 cases with reference ball (group A) and in 48 cases without ball (group B). In addition, prospective analysis of pre-operative planning was conducted for 52 acetabular components with reference ball (group C) and 69 without ball (group D) as well as stem planning in 38 cases with ball (group E) and 54 cases without ball (group F). The data were analysed and compared with the size of the final component selected during surgery. RESULTS: The correlation between planned and implanted size for total knee arthroplasty in group A resulted in femoral anteroposterior (AP) r = 0.8622 and lateral r = 0.8333 and in group B AP r = 0.4552 and lateral r = 0.6950. Tibial in group A was AP r = 0.9030 and lateral r = 0.9074 and in group B AP r = 0.7000 and lateral r = 0.6376. For the acetabular components, the results in group C were r = 0.5998 and group D r = 0.6923. For stems, group E was r = 0.5306 and group F r = 0.5786. No correlation between BMI and the difference between planned and implanted size was found in any of the groups. CONCLUSION: In the case of total hip arthroplasty there was a relatively low correlation between planned and implanted sizes with or without reference ball. For total knee arthroplasties the already high precision of size planning was further improved by the additional referencing with a reference ball.