Is the Isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Associated with Outcomes from Intra-Abdominal Infection? No, But the Receipt of an Empiric Anti-Pseudomonal Agent Is.

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is isolated at variable rates from intra-abdominal infections (IAI). Not all recommended empiric regimens for IAI include anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa activity, for example, ceftriaxone and metronidazole. We hypothesized that within an adult population, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a relatively rare isolate and has no association with mortality, and thus, empiric therapy with anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa activity is not warranted. Patients and Methods: All IAI with positive cultures treated between 1997 and 2017 at a single institution were analyzed. This data set was divided into two cohorts, namely, those with cultures positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and those without. Demographics and in-hospital mortality were compared by Student t-test and χ2 analysis. Predictors of isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and in-hospital mortality were done by logistic regression (LR) analysis. Results: In total, 2,420 IAIs were identified, 104 (4.3%) with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 2,316 (95.7%) without. Major demographic differences between patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and those without included a higher rate of health-care-associated infections (87/104, 83.7% vs. 621/2316, 26.8%; p = 0.02), a higher rate of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections (23/104, 22.1% vs. 329/2316, 14.2%; p = 0.04) and a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (17.7 ± 0.8 vs. 14.5 ± 0.2; p < 0.0001). There was an increased rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolation with increasing APACHE II score. Independent predictors of isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by LR included APACHE II score and days of hospitalization prior to diagnosis. Crude in-hospital mortality was similar between groups: Pseudomonas aeruginosa 14/104 (13.5%) and 276/2316 (11.9%), p = 0.79. After controlling for age, gender, APACHE II, prior transfusion, immunosuppression status, solid organ transplant status, healthcare-association, and days of hospitalization prior to diagnosis, the isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was not associated with mortality. Conclusion: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is infrequently isolated and overall not associated with mortality. Nonetheless, there may be a population that merits empiric anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa therapy: those with APACHE II ≥20 or a significant length of hospitalization prior to diagnosis.

The emerging role of stimulator of interferons genes signaling in sepsis: Inflammation, autophagy, and cell death.

Stimulator of interferons genes (STING) is an adaptor protein that plays a critical role in the secretion of type I interferons and pro-inflammatory cytokines in response to cytosolic nucleic acid. Recent research indicates the involvement of the STING pathway in uncontrolled inflammation, sepsis, and shock. STING signaling is significantly up-regulated in human sepsis, and STING agonists are suggested to contribute to the pathogenesis of sepsis and shock. Nevertheless, little is known about the consequences of activated STING-mediated signaling during sepsis. It has been shown that aberrant activation of the STING-dependent way can result in increased inflammation, type I interferons responses, and cell death (including apoptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis). In addition, autophagy modulation has been demonstrated to protect against multiple organs injuries in animal sepsis model. However, impaired autophagy may contribute to the aberrant activation of STING signaling, leading to uncontrolled inflammation and cell death. Here we present a comprehensive review of recent advances in the understanding of STING signaling, focusing on the regulatory mechanisms and the roles of this pathway in sepsis.

Complications during intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: Focus on risk identification and prevention.

Intrahospital transportation of critically ill patients is associated with significant complications. In order to reduce overall risk to the patient, such transports should well organized, efficient, and accompanied by the proper monitoring, equipment, and personnel. Protocols and guidelines for patient transfers should be utilized universally across all healthcare facilities. Care delivered during transport and at the site of diagnostic testing or procedure should be equivalent to the level of care provided in the originating environment. Here we review the most common problems encountered during transport in the hospital setting, including various associated adverse outcomes. Our objective is to make medical practitioners, nurses, and ancillary health care personnel more aware of the potential for various complications that may occur during patient movement from the intensive care unit to other locations within a healthcare facility, focusing on risk reduction and preventive strategies.