Detailed Long-term Dynamics of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio under Biologic Treatment Reveals Differential Effects of Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha and Interleukin 12/23 Antagonists.

Psoriasis is thought to be associated with a reduced life expectancy through systemic inflammation. A comparative, retrospective analysis of neutrophil-to-lympho-cyte ratio, a biomarker of systemic inflammation and cardiovascular risk, under 196 treatments with tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin-12/23 antagonists was performed. Neutrophil-to-lympho-cyte ratio decreased significantly within 3 months of initiation of treatment and remained stable at reduced levels for at least 33 months. Dynamics were more pronounced and neutrophil-to-lympho-cyte ratio under treatment was lower in patients treated with tumour necrosis factor-α compared with interleukin-12/23 antagonists (geometric mean (95% confidence interval): 2.03 (1.9, 2.1) vs 2.63 (2.2, 3.2), respectively, p = 0.014). tumour necrosis factor-α antagonist treatment and baseline neutrophil-to-lympho-cyte ratio were independent predictors of a median low cardiovascular risk neutrophil-to-lympho-cyte ratio (< 2.15) during treatment (odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.53 (0.4-0.8) and 4.68 (1.0-19.1), p = 0.001 and p = 0.032, respectively). These results demonstrate a rapid and sustained reduction in biomarkers of systemic inflammation under biologic treatment. Furthermore, these data suggest class-specific effects on systemic inflammation, which may be relevant for the prevention of psoriasis co-morbidity by systemic treatment.

Evaluation of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index as a Proxy for Bio-markers of Systemic Disease under Treatment with Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha and Interleukin 12/23 Antagonists in Patients with Psoriasis: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 186 Treatment Cycles.

The efficacy of psoriasis treatments is usually evaluated using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). However, there is a lack of systematic statistical assessments of PASI as a proxy for systemic disease in individual patients. Therefore, a retrospective study of 186 treat-ments with adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab for psoriasis (341 patient-years) was performed. While PASI significantly and independently correlated with biomarkers of systemic inflammation (especially neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein), the strengths were only weak-to-moderate and varied considerably inter-individually. A decrease in PASI indicated a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio decrease and a C-reactive protein decrease or stable low margin C-reactive protein in ≥ 80%. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of PASI 0 and PASI 2.75 (optimal Youden Index) for low cardiovascular risk C-reactive protein were 24%, 92%, 85%, and 62%, 61%, 76%, respectively. Performance was similar using absolute thresholds and PASI 100 or PASI 75, and overall worse for low cardiovascular risk neutrophil-to-lympho-cyte ratio and if psoriasis arthritis was present. In conclusion, PASI allows robust low-order estimates of systemic inflammation, but cannot substitute for laboratory biomarkers for more precise assessments.

Long-term safety of combination treatment with methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonists versus TNF-α antagonists alone in psoriatic patients.

Methotrexate, a folic acid analog, is the conventional systemic anti-psoriatic agent most commonly chosen for combination with biologics in the treatment of psoriasis. Real-world long-term safety data of this combination versus biologic treatment alone in dermatological practice are sparse. Here, we present results of a comparative retrospective study of laboratory dynamics and adverse events in psoriatic patients receiving a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonist (adalimumab or etanercept) with and without concomitant methotrexate (176 treatment courses, mean duration of 629 days). Co-treatment with methotrexate significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with a decrease of leukocyte, neutrophil and erythrocyte counts and an increase of glutamate pyruvate transaminase (GPT) (Pearson correlation, n > 148). The relative risk for a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 1-2 laboratory adverse event was significantly elevated to 1.11 for anemia and 1.16 for a GPT increase if the patients received concomitant methotrexate at the time the laboratory test was performed. Combination treatment was given for equal or more than 30% of the time (MTX≥30% ) during 12% of the treatment courses. During these treatment courses, dynamics of leukocyte (-8.1%), neutrophil (-8.1%), erythrocyte (-3.2%) counts and GPT (+16.9%) from baseline to average under treatment were significantly more pronounced. CTCAE grade 3-4 laboratory adverse events occurred in 9.5% and 5.2% of treatment courses with and without MTX≥30% , respectively (p = 0.70), and affected transaminases in 90% of the cases. Methotrexate was discontinued due to CTCAE grade 3-4 laboratory adverse events in 4.25% of the treatment courses with MTX of 30% or more. Elevated baseline γ-glutamyl transferase levels significantly predicted the occurrence of CTCAE grade 3-4 laboratory adverse events and should trigger investigations for pre-existing liver disease or alcohol abuse. In conclusion, our comparative data supplement previous short-term studies and support a tolerable long-term safety profile of the combination treatment. However, given the additional toxicities and low evidence for benefits, alternative options such as biologic monotherapy or switching to a different biologic should be considered in a dermatological setting.

Routine Laboratory Parameter Dynamics and Laboratory Adverse Events in Psoriasis Patients on Long-term Treatment with Adalimumab, Etanercept, and Ustekinumab.

Only limited data on laboratory parameter dynamics and safety under prolonged biologic treatment in a "real-world" scenario are available for recommendations on screening and monitoring. This study is a retrospective analysis of routine parameter dynamics and laboratory adverse events (LAE) in psoriasis patients on long-term treatment (n = 199) with tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α-antagonists (adalimumab, etanercept), and the interleukin (IL)12/23-antagonist ustekinumab. Overall, neutrophil (PMN) counts (-11%) and triglycerides (+9%) changed considerably. TNF-α-antagonists and ustekinumab differentially affected lymphocyte counts (+13% and ±0%, respectively). Dynamics were pronounced during the first 180 days of treatment. In 340 treatment-years, 15 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) III-IV° LAE were recorded (11 involved liver enzymes). They prompted alteration of the biologic regime in only 2 cases. Age, sex, previous systemic treatments, and psoriatic arthritis did not significantly predict LAE. Liver enzyme and triglyceride screening may be warranted in some instances. Our data suggest that unguided monitoring of other routine laboratory parameters is unnecessary under long-term biologic treatment.

Baseline anti-dsDNA concentrations and previous treatments predict response to Adalimumab and Etanercept: a retrospective investigation of 146 psoriasis patients.

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab and Etanercept are TNF-α antagonists commonly used for treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and psoriatic-arthritis. Reliable instruments to assist the selection of patients for a specific treatment in a real-world scenario are unavailable. OBJECTIVE: To identify patient characteristics and baseline laboratory parameters predicting response to Adalimumab- and Etanercept-treatment. METHODS: We report a retrospective observational study including 116 and 64 psoriasis-patients treated with Adalimumab and Etanercept, respectively, at a dermatological outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Thirty four patients contributed data to both biologics. First occurrence of either loss-of-response or serious-side-effects (LOR/SSE) was chosen as clinical endpoint and predictors were identified using Cox-regression. RESULTS: Baseline anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) concentrations, number of previous treatments with TNF-α antagonists in general and previous treatment with Etanercept in particular significantly predicted LOR/SSE to Adalimumab. The predictive effect of baseline anti-dsDNA was conserved in TNF-α antagonist naïve patients. Number of previous systemic treatments other than TNF-α antagonists significantly predicted LOR/SSE to Etanercept. Age and baseline psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) did not predict response to either biologic in a clinically significant manner. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that treatment with Adalimumab may promise best results in psoriasis-patients with (A) low baseline anti-dsDNA concentrations, and (B) no previous TNF-α antagonist treatment. A clinically significant predictive effect of age and baseline PASI on response to Adalimumab and Etanercept is unlikely.