Sustained Cognitive Improvement in Patients over 65 Two Years after Cochlear Implantation.

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term benefits of cochlear implantation (CI) on cognitive performance, speech perception, and psychological status in post-lingually deafened patients older than 65 (n = 33). Patients were consecutively enrolled in this prospective study and assessed before, one year after, and two years after CI for speech perception, depressive symptoms, perceived stress, and working memory and processing speed. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) was used for the latter. Thirty-three patients (fourteen men and nineteen women) were included. The scores indicating "hearing in quiet" and "hearing with background noise" improved significantly one year after CI and remained so two years after CI. The sound localization scores improved two years after CI. The depressive symptoms and perceived stress scores were low at the study's onset and remained unchanged. Working memory improved significantly two years after CI, while processing speed improved significantly one year after CI and was maintained after that. The improvement in working memory and processing speed two years after CI suggests there is a sustained positive effect of auditory rehabilitation with CI on cognitive abilities.

Improvement of Working Memory and Processing Speed in Patients over 70 with Bilateral Hearing Impairment Following Unilateral Cochlear Implantation.

Several studies demonstrated the association of hearing disorders with neurocognitive deficits and dementia disorders, but little is known about the effects of auditory rehabilitation on the cognitive performance of the elderly. Therefore, the research question of the present study was whether cochlear implantation, performed in 21 patients over 70 with bilateral severe hearing impairment, could influence their cognitive skills. The measuring points were before implantation and 12 months after the first cochlear implant (CI) fitting. Evaluation of the working memory (WMI) and processing speed (PSI) was performed using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 4th edition (WAIS-IV). The audiological assessment included speech perception (SP) in quiet (Freiburg monosyllabic test; FMT), noise (Oldenburg sentence test; OLSA), and self-assessment inventory (Oldenburg Inventory; OI). Twelve months after the first CI fitting, not only the auditory parameters (SP and OI), but also the WMI and PSI, improved significantly (p < 0.05) in the cohort. The presented results imply that cochlear implantation of bilaterally hearing-impaired patients over 70 positively influences their cognitive skills.

White Matter Lesions as Possible Predictors of Audiological Performance in Adults after Cochlear Implantation.

The presented prospective study investigated whether structural brain damage, measured with the Fazekas score, could predict hearing rehabilitation outcomes with cochlear implantation (CI). With a follow-up period of 24 months, this study included 49 bilaterally, postlingually hearing impaired CI candidates for unilateral CI (67.3 ± 8.7 years; 20 men, 29 women) older than 50 at the time of implantation. The differences in the predictive value between two age groups, 50-70 year-olds (mid-age; n = 26) and over 70-year-olds (elderly; n = 23), were analyzed. The patients were evaluated using speech perception (SP) measured in quiet (Freiburg monosyllabic test; FMT) and noise (Oldenburg sentence test; OLSA). The subjective hearing ability was assessed using Oldenburg inventory (OI). The Fazekas PVWM score predicted postoperative speech perception two years after CI in the mid-age population. The periventricular white matter lesions (PVWM) could explain 27.4% of the speech perception (FMT) variance. Our findings support the hypothesis about the influence of pre-existing WMLs on CI outcome. We recommend the evaluation of Fazekas score as a predictive factor for post-implantation hearing ability.

Duration of deafness impacts auditory performance after cochlear implantation: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Hearing loss is a highly disabling condition. Cochlear implantation is an established remedy if conventional hearing aids have failed to alleviate the level of disability. Unfortunately, cochlear implant (CI) performance varies dramatically. This study aims to examine the effects of duration of deafness (DoD) prior to cochlear implantation and the postoperative duration of implant experience with resulting hearing performance in postlingually deaf patients. METHODS: A systematic literature review and two meta-analyses were conducted using the search terms cochlear implant AND duration deafness. Included studies evaluate the correlation between the DoD and auditory performance after cochlear implantation using monosyllabic and sentence tests. Correlation coefficients were determined using Pearson's correlation and Spearman rho. RESULTS: A total of 36 studies were identified and included data on cochlear implantations following postlingual deafness and postoperative speech testing of hearing outcomes for 1802 patients. The mean age ranged from 44 to 68 years with a DoD of 0.1 to 77 years. Cochlear implant use varied from 3 months to 14 years of age. Speech perception, which was assessed by sentence and monosyllabic word perception, was negatively correlated with DoD. Subgroup analyses revealed worse outcomes for longer DoD and shorter postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSION: DoD is one of the most important factors to predict speech perception after cochlear implantation in postlingually deaf patients. The meta-analyses revealed a negative correlation between length of auditory deprivation and postoperative sentence and monosyllabic speech perception. Longer DoD seems to lead to worse CI performance, whereas more experience with CI mitigates the effect.

Single-centre experience and practical considerations of the benefit of a second cochlear implant in bilaterally deaf adults.

PURPOSE: Bilateral cochlear implant (CI) implantation is increasingly used in the auditory rehabilitation of bilaterally deafened adults. However, after successful unilateral implantation, objective patient counselling is essential. METHODS: We investigated the extra benefit of a second CI in adults in terms of health-related quality of life, tinnitus, stress, anxiety, depression, quality of hearing, and speech recognition. Hearing ability was assessed by using the Freiburg monosyllable speech discrimination test (FB MS) and the Oldenburg sentence test with azimuth variations. In a prospective patient cohort, we administered validated questionnaires before a CI, after a first CI and after a second CI implantation. RESULTS: The study included 29 patients, made up of nine women and 20 men. The median time between the first and the second implantation was 23 months. The mean total NCIQ score and TQ before a CI improved significantly after both implantations. Stress, anxiety, and depression were stable over time and were not significantly affected by CI implantations. Speech recognition with noise significantly improved after the first and again after the second CI. Correlation analysis showed a strong connection between auditory performance and HRQoL. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that a unilateral CI benefitted many fields and that the second sequential CI leads again to additional improvement. Bilateral CI implantation should, therefore, be the standard form of auditory rehabilitation in deafened adults.

Rational surgical neck management in total laryngectomy for advanced stage laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas.

PURPOSE: Controversies exist in regard to surgical neck management in total laryngectomies (TL). International guidelines do not sufficiently discriminate neck sides and sublevels, or minimal neck-dissection nodal yield (NY). METHODS: Thirty-seven consecutive primary TL cases from 2009 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed in terms of local tumor growth using a previously established imaging scheme, metastatic neck involvement, and NY impact on survival. RESULTS: There was no case of level IIB involvement on any side. For type A and B tumor midline involvement, no positive contralateral lymph nodes were found. Craniocaudal tumor extension correlated with contralateral neck involvement (OR: 1.098, p = 0.0493) and showed increased involvement when extending 33 mm (p = 0.0134). Using a bilateral NY of ≥ 24 for 5-year overall survival (OS) and ≥ 26 for 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) gave significantly increased rate advantages of 64 and 56%, respectively (both p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This work sheds light on regional metastatic distribution pattern and its influence on TL cases. An NY of n ≥ 26 can be considered a desirable benchmark for bilateral selective neck dissections as it leads to improved OS and DFS. Therefore, an omission of distinct neck levels cannot be promoted at this time.

Binaural Hearing Rehabilitation Improves Speech Perception, Quality of Life, Tinnitus Distress, and Psychological Comorbidities.

OBJECTIVES: To determine and compare the benefit of binaural hearing rehabilitation via cochlear implantation (CI) on speech perception, assessment of auditory abilities, tinnitus distress, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychological comorbidities in patients suffering from asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) as well as bilaterally-deafened and sequentially bilaterally-implanted patients. METHODS: 53 patients were implanted between 2011 and 2016. 24 AHL patients were implanted unilaterally, using a hearing aid on the other side. 29 bilaterally-deafened patients were sequentially implanted bilaterally. Speech perception, subjective hearing quality, HRQoL, tinnitus distress, anxiety, depressiveness, perceived stress level and coping abilities were evaluated before implantation, as well as 6 and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Before CI, AHL and bilaterally-deaf patients showed significant differences regarding assessment of auditory abilities, speech discrimination, tinnitus distress and HRQoL. 24 months after CI both groups significantly improved in those scales. We could not find a significant difference between the groups after 2 years. Tinnitus distress significantly decreased 6 and 24 months postoperatively in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the long-term benefit of binaural hearing rehabilitation in AHL and bilaterally-deaf patients not only regarding speech perception but also HRQoL, tinnitus distress and subjective hearing quality. Bilaterally-deafened patients present lower scores preoperatively, but they did not differ from AHL patients 2 years after CI. Up to now, this is the first study evaluating the outcome of CI in AHL patients compared to bilaterally-implanted patients and demonstrating the benefit of binaural hearing rehabilitation in these specific groups.

Multifactorial positive influence of cochlear implantation on patients with single-sided deafness.

OBJECTIVES: Single-sided deafness (SSD) is an extreme case with profound unilateral hearing loss in the poorer ear and regular hearing in the other ear. The aim of this study is to investigate the impairment in the daily life of SSD patients and the influence of cochlear implants (CI) on their health-related quality of life (HRQoL), the impact on existing tinnitus distress and psychological comorbidities, and audiometric parameters. METHODS: In total, 21 patients (8 male and 13 female) were included, and the Charité Test Battery was applied for all patients. Data on HRQoL were collected with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire and the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) Survey. Tinnitus distress was assessed with the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ). Data with regard to psychological comorbidities were collected using four validated questionnaires. Speech perception was assessed with the Freiburg Monosyllable Test (FMS), the Oldenburg Sentence Test (OLSA), and the Oldenburg Inventory (OI). RESULTS: HRQoL improved in the subdomain social interactions. Tinnitus distress dropped significantly 6 months postoperatively. SSD patients preoperatively showed elevated levels of stress, depressive symptoms, and anxiety. Postoperatively, these psychological symptoms improved with regard to stress, tension, and demands. The audiometry tools revealed a significant improvement in directional hearing (OI), speech perception in silence, and in the speech intelligibility threshold (OLSA). CONCLUSION: There was an improvement in HRQoL and a reduction of tinnitus and cognitive distress. The preoperatively elevated stress level decreased significantly, and psychological comorbidities such as depressive symptoms and anxiety all improved postimplantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2 Laryngoscope, 130:500-506, 2020.

Hearing Implants in the Era of Digitization. / Hörimplantate im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung.

The last years' developments could show that the rehabilitation with hearing implants is a field with the highest potential for development and innovation in otorhinolaryngology. New or extended indications were seen with developments of implants, new surgical techniques, and respective rehabilitation strategies.With the background of limited resources, the increasing number of subjects suffering from hearing disorders, the extended indications and thus the increasing number of CI carriers as well as the need of life-long CI follow-up are one of the major challenges of the future. In order to cope with this situation, completely new strategies are required beside a close interdisciplinary cooperation and continuous development of the therapy. In this context, digitization of all these processes plays a key role.This manuscript will describe and discuss the current developments from the perspective of a cochlea implant (CI) providing hospital. The contribution will elucidate manifold digital applications that may be implemented in all phases of CI provision, starting with patient information about the possibilities of hearing screening and preoperative evaluation up to life-long follow-up and clinical research.The focus is mainly placed on specific applications that play a particular role in the development of digital progresses and structures in the context of cochlea implantation and that are crucial for understanding the further development.The options of simplified fitting result for example from automated MAP creation (artificial intelligence); remote care networks (telemedicine, apps) foster the active contribution of the patients themselves and allow completely new types of location-independent healthcare (automated technical implant control, individual settings, upgrades). Central databases may create backups of the current MAP (for example in cases of repair), and document technical data and the hearing performance. Some applications described here, are already implemented in the routine, others are currently being developed.Understanding the possibilities of digitization and their implementation in the context of hearing rehabilitation with hearing implants as well as the recognition of the enormous potential for effective, time-efficient structures is essential in order to use this potential. We as ENT specialists are important protagonists in the healthcare system and beside our high specific expertise we have to meet the requirements of our qualification with regard to digital applications so that we might actively contribute to the success of this process.

Long-term Benefit of Unilateral Cochlear Implantation on Quality of Life and Speech Perception in Bilaterally Deafened Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implantation (CI) is a common treatment modality for unilaterally and bilaterally deafened patients as well as patients with severe to profound hearing loss. The aim of our study is the complex evaluation of the improvement and influence of health related quality of life (HRQoL) and auditory performance in cochlear implant patients during a long-term follow-up. METHODS: Sixty-one bilaterally, postlingually deafened patients with unilateral CI were included in this prospective study. Assessment tools for auditory performance and HRQoL included the Freiburg Monosyllabic Speech test, Oldenburg Inventory (OI) questionnaire, Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) and 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Data were collected before CI, at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The assessment tools for speech perception yielded a statistically significant improvement in the Freiburg Monosyllabic Speech test scores and of all subdomain scores of the OI during the 6-month follow-up period. The subdomain scores of the NCIQ and the psychological score of the SF-36 also improved significantly during this follow-up period. All results remained stable thereafter during the 12- and 24-month follow-up. There was a statistically significant correlation between subjective speech perception and HRQoL after CI. CONCLUSION: This is the first prospective study to show results in regard to speech perception and HRQoL and their correlation during a 2-year follow-up after unilateral CI in bilaterally deafened patients. Our results for speech perception and HRQoL showed a significant improvement during the 6-month follow-up that remained stable thereafter during a 24-month follow-up, even after finishing the hearing rehabilitation program.

Age-Dependent Psychological Factors Influencing the Outcome of Cochlear Implantation in Elderly Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Increasing number of older adults undergo cochlear implantation (CI). Accumulating evidence implicates that the outcome of implantation may not only depend on physical and psychological health status of patients but also on their age. In the present work, we analyzed the elderly (70-80) and very old (80+) patients who underwent CI regarding their hearing abilities, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and psychological comorbidities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients were included in this prospective study. The patients were split into two groups: 70-80 years-old (n = 62) and ≥ 80 years-old (n = 24). Hearing performance was assessed with Freiburg monosyllabic test and Oldenburg inventory (OI); the health-related quality of life was measured with Nijmegen Cochlear Implantation Questionnaire (NCIQ); depressive symptoms with General Depression Scale (ADS-L); stress with Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) and anxiety with General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). RESULTS: Prior to CI, the hearing performance (Ol) impacted positively the HRQoL of both groups whereas the perceived stress (PSQ) had a negative impact. Six months after implantation, the HRQoL of 70-80 group was still positively influenced by the hearing performance (Ol) whereas HRQoL of 80+ group was influenced by stress perception (negative impact) and anxiety (positive impact). Twelve months later, anxiety and depressive symptoms correlated negatively with HRQoL of both age groups. Hearing performance had the positive and anxiety the negative impact on HRQoL in both groups but in addition, the 80+ group seemed to benefit from an increased level of anxious symptoms. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients, the outcome of CI depends on their psychological status. Differences found between the age groups imply a need for an age-group targeted psychological counselling, which might further improve outcome of CI.

Asymmetric hearing loss and the benefit of cochlear implantation regarding speech perception, tinnitus burden and psychological comorbidities: a prospective follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: We determined the audiological outcome, the subjective and objective hearing quality in patients suffering from asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). Furthermore, we evaluated psychological comorbidities and tinnitus burden before and after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: 44 AHL patients were unilaterally implanted with a multichannel cochlear implant between 2011 and 2016. Speech discrimination (Freiburg Monosyllable Word Test, Oldenburg Sentence Test) was measured before, 6 and 12 months after implantation. Subjective hearing quality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), tinnitus burden, anxiety, depressiveness, perceived stress level and coping abilities were evaluated before implantation, 6 and 12 months postoperative using specific validated questionnaires (Oldenburg Inventory, Nijmegen Cochlear Implantation Questionnaire, Tinnitus Questionnaire, General Anxiety Disorder-7, Depression Scale, Perceived Stress Questionnaire and Cope Inventory). RESULTS: Subjective and objective hearing quality, speech discrimination and health-related quality of life were significantly increased in AHL patients. Tinnitus burden significantly decreased over the 12 postoperative months. No significant alteration was observed for anxiety, depressiveness, coping abilities and stress level. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that cochlear implantation achieves hearing rehabilitation, increases HRQoL and decreases tinnitus burden in patients suffering from AHL. Subjective hearing quality increased, while tinnitus burden significantly decreased 6 and 12 months after implantation. HRQoL in AHL patients is an important factor to focus on and is significantly increased postoperatively. In contrast, general anxiety, depressiveness, coping abilities and perceived stress level remained unaffected.

Meta-analysis of subjective complaints of vertigo and vestibular tests after cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative vertigo is a common complaint after cochlear implantation, but published incidence rates differ vastly. The aim of the present study was to investigate both subjective complaints of vertigo before and after cochlear implantation and related vestibular diagnostic tests on cochlear implant candidates. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic literature search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement in PubMed, Cochrane Register, and EMBASE. REVIEW METHODS: We presented 116 eligible studies investigating subjective complaints of vertigo after cochlear implantation and/or related vestibular diagnostic tests. We conducted three meta-analyses of 46 eligible studies with matched pre- and postoperative data to calculate the odds ratio of new vertigo onset, as well as the impairment of vestibular receptors measured by nystagmography and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP). Postoperative vertigo was calculated from 95 studies and further subdivided by mean age with pooled data. RESULTS: We observed a significant increase in postoperative vertigo and significant impairment of nystagmography and cVEMP detection. Vertigo after cochlear implantation was reported in 9.3% of the patients with a continuous increase in patient age at surgery. In a subgroup of studies, new onset of vertigo was found in 17.4% of the patients. In addition, 7.2% of the patients had persisting vertigo complaints, whereas 11.6% described an altered vertigo quality and 7.7% had their preoperative complaints resolved. A comparison of round window approach and cochleostomy revealed significantly increased vertigo after cochleostomy. Both insertion methods showed similar effects in nystagmography and cVEMP testing. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation has a significant impact on subjective vertigo and vestibular receptor function. This is affected by the patient's age at the time of surgery. The surgical technique (round window or cochleostomy) may influence the outcome, but this requires further investigation. Younger patients may compensate better following vestibular dysfunction. Perioperative testing is required to correlate vestibular impairment and subjective complaints. Laryngoscope, 2018 Laryngoscope, 128:2110-2123, 2018.

Head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma in children: a 20-year retrospective study at a tertiary referral center.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS) of the head and neck in pediatric patients with regard to clinical presentation, treatment, and survival. METHODS: Data were retrospectively obtained from patient charts with regard to RMS of the head and neck diagnosed between 1996 and 2016 at a tertiary referral center. Clinical course, treatment modalities, and side effects were analyzed. Survival analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (17 male, 11 female) with a mean age at diagnosis of 6.8 ± 5.0 years have been included. Fourteen patients (50%) presented with painless swelling in the head and neck region and nine patients (32.1%) presented with cranial nerve deficit at initial diagnosis. The location of the majority of rhabdomyosarcomas was orbital (N = 9; 32.1%), followed by parapharyngeal (n = 4; 14.2%) and sinonasal (n = 3; 10.7%). All patients (n = 28; 100%) received polychemotherapy, additional adjuvant radiation therapy was carried out in 24 patients (85.7%), and surgery was performed in 12 cases (42.9%). The 5-year overall survival was 91.3%, and median progression-free survival was 46 ± 67.4 months. Common side effects resulting from chemotherapy and radiation therapy included neutropenia, mucositis, nausea and vomiting, and radiodermatitis, long-term side effects included microsomia and facial mutilation. CONCLUSION: Multimodality treatment of rhabdomyosarcomas of the head and neck in pediatric patients may lead to a 5-year overall survival of up to 91.3%.

Cochlear Implantation of Bilaterally Deafened Patients with Tinnitus Induces Sustained Decrease of Tinnitus-Related Distress.

OBJECTIVE: Tinnitus is a common symptom of hearing impairment. Patients who are bilaterally hard of hearing are often affected by tinnitus. However, they cannot undergo any of the standard tinnitus therapies, since they rely on hearing. Cochlear implantation (CI) used to treat severe hearing disabilities, such as bilateral hearing loss, was also shown to reduce tinnitus. Our goal was to determine if CI induces sustained reduction of tinnitus. We performed prospective, longitudinal analyses of tinnitus-related distress in a uniform group of bilaterally deafened patients after CI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The homogenous sample consisted of 41 patients who met the inclusion criteria and were consecutively included in this study. The impact of unilateral CI on tinnitus-related distress, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and hearing abilities was studied with validated instruments. The follow-up appointments were scheduled at 6, 12, and 24 months after CI surgery. During the appointments, hearing abilities were estimated with monosyllabic Freiburg test, whereas the tinnitus-related distress, the HRQoL, and the subjective hearing were measured with standard questionnaires [Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), Nijmegen Cochlear Implantation Questionnaire, and Oldenburg Inventory, respectively]. RESULTS: Tinnitus-related distress decreased significantly from the mean TQ score of 35.0 (SD = 19.6) prior to surgery to the mean TQ = 27.54 (SD = 20.0) 6 months after surgery and remained sustained low until the end of follow-up period. In addition, CI significantly improved the hearing abilities and the HRQoL of all patients. CONCLUSION: The results from our prospective study suggest that in a homogenous sample of bilaterally deafened, implanted patients who report having tinnitus prior to surgery, CI alone not only improves the hearing abilities but also significantly reduces the tinnitus-related distress and improves the HRQoL in a sustained way.

A novel classification scheme for advanced laryngeal cancer midline involvement: implications for the contralateral neck.

PURPOSE: There are insufficient data concerning risk factors for contralateral regional metastases in laryngeal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and risk factors for contralateral lymph node metastases and their dependence on midline involvement of the primary tumor in patients with advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: 58 consecutive patients (8 females, 50 males; mean age 64.2 ± 9.8 years; AJCC stage III disease in 43.1%, IVA disease in 54.4%) undergoing primary total laryngectomy with bilateral neck dissection between 2002 and 2016 have been retrospectively investigated at one of the largest university medical centers in Europe. Preoperative staging computed tomography (CT) scans were analyzed for midline involvement of the primary laryngeal cancer. As a result, a classification scheme has been established (type A: clear, type B: involved, type C: exceeded, and type D: bilateral/origin side indeterminable). RESULTS: Contralateral lymph node metastases (pN2c necks) were found in six cases (10.3%), from which four were diagnosed with type D (23.5% of type D cases), and one each with type B and type C midline involvement. In cases with no midline involvement (type A), a risk ratio reduction of 100% was seen. CT-based midline typing resulted in fourfold increased sensitivity for predicting contralateral metastases compared to conventional staging. Positive nodal status (pN+) significantly reduced overall and disease-free survival (HR 2.706, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As a consequence, for type A category, a contralateral neck dissection might be avoidable accompanied by a reduction in surgical complications and operating time.

Rapid Positive Influence of Cochlear Implantation on the Quality of Life in Adults 70 Years and Older.

The deteriorating ability to communicate has a negative impact on quality of life in the aging population. Cochlear implantation is increasingly used to treat hearing impairment and to restore the ability to communicate. Here, in a sample of 79 adults (70 years and older), we explored the effect of cochlear implantation on the health-related quality of life via the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, auditory performance for speech recognition comparing scores on the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test and Oldenburg Inventory and tinnitus-related distress using the German version of the Tinnitus Questionnaire. We observed that the health-related quality of life and auditory performance increased significantly after cochlear implantation for the study cohort. After implantation, tinnitus-related distress declined significantly for the group. Our results support the concept of cochlear implantation treatment positively influencing the quality of life, restoring the auditory performance in older adults and reducing stress related to tinnitus. Importantly, positive effects were seen as early as 6 months after cochlear implantation, corroborating the rationale for cochlear implantation in adults 70 years and older.

Impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life and mental comorbidity in patients aged 80 years.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of cochlear implantation in elderly patients (80 or older) with progressive bilateral deafening. The measured outcomes included the quality of life, speech understanding, tinnitus distress, stress level, anxiety, and depressiveness. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Seventeen 80+ years (mean 82.9 ± 2.7 years) patients with progressive, postlingual, bilateral deafness were unilaterally implanted with multichannel cochlear implants. Data about their health-related quality of life (Nijmegen Cochlear Implantation Questionnaire) and their comorbidities were collected using specific validated questionnaires (tinnitus questionnaire, General Anxiety Disorder-7, Depression Scale, Perceived Stress Questionnaire). The speech understanding was assessed with the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test, whereas the subjective hearing was evaluated with the Oldenburg Inventory. RESULTS: After the surgery, not only the subjective hearing but also health-related quality of life, speech understanding, and tinnitus distress of the implanted patients improved significantly. The perceived stress, general anxiety, and depressiveness were low or normal prior and after surgery. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a significant improvement in the quality of life and speech understanding in a group of elderly patients who underwent cochlear implantation. An additional positive indicator of a promising hearing rehabilitation was a significant improvement of the tinnitus distress. Perceived stress level, general anxiety, and the depressiveness of implanted patients were low and remained unaffected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 126:2811-2816, 2016.

Nodal yield of neck dissections and influence on outcome in laryngectomized patients.

The appropriate extent of neck dissection (ND) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) continues to be investigated. This study aimed to determine whether the extent of ND as measured by nodal yield (NY) is a prognostic factor in patients undergoing primary total laryngectomy (TL) for advanced laryngeal SCC. A retrospective review at a tertiary referral centre identified 54 patients who underwent TL with elective (n = 39, cN0) or therapeutic (n = 15, cN+) ND with curative intent between 2002 and 2014. Survival analysis was obtained via regression analysis, calculated for overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Stage-independent 5-year OS was 32.1 %. Mean NY was 18.67 (standard deviation 9.898; range 0-45). The rate of cervical lymph node metastasis on pathology (pN+) was 27.8 %. Uni- and multivariate regression analysis detected no association between NY and OS or DFS (P ≥ 0.05). Advantages in OS and DFS were seen among patients without cervical lymph node metastasis (pN0) in comparison to those with pN+ necks (OS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.179; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.046-0.693; P = 0.013, and DFS: HR 0.190; 95 % CI 0.061-0.590; P = 0.004). ND resulted in pathologic upstaging of the neck in seven patients and downgrading in eight; increasing NY was not associated with an increased probability of a change in nodal stage. No significant association was found between NY and OS or DFS in patients undergoing TL with ND as primary therapy for advanced laryngeal SCC.