Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nat Biotechnol ; 19(12): 1176-8, 2001 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11731789

RESUMO

Since the landmark study of Wilmut et al. describing the birth of a cloned lamb derived from a somatic cell nucleus, there has been debate about the donor nucleus cell cycle stage required for somatic cell nuclear transfer (NT). Wilmut et al. suggested that induction of quiescence by serum starvation was critical in allowing donor somatic cells to support development of cloned embryos. In a subsequent report, Cibelli et al. proposed that G0 was unnecessary and that calves could be produced from actively dividing fibroblasts. Neither study conclusively documented the importance of donor cell cycle stage for development to term. Other laboratories have had success with NT in several species, and most have used a serum starvation treatment. Here we evaluate methods for producing G0 and G1 cell populations and compare development following NT. High confluence was more effective than serum starvation for arresting cells in G0. Pure G1 cell populations could be obtained using a "shake-off" procedure. No differences in in vitro development were observed between cells derived from the high-confluence treatment and from the "shake-off" treatment. However, when embryos from each treatment were transferred to 50 recipients, five calves were obtained from embryos derived from "shake-off" cells, whereas no embryos from confluent cells survived beyond 180 days of gestation. These results indicate that donor cell cycle stage is important for NT, particularly during late fetal development, and that actively dividing G1 cells support higher development rates than cells in G0.


Assuntos
Clonagem de Organismos , Fibroblastos/citologia , Animais , Antimetabólitos/farmacologia , Bromodesoxiuridina/metabolismo , Bovinos , Ciclo Celular , Linhagem Celular , Núcleo Celular/metabolismo , Sobrevivência Celular , Células Cultivadas , Meios de Cultura Livres de Soro/farmacologia , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Fase G1 , Fase de Repouso do Ciclo Celular , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Biol Reprod ; 64(5): 1487-93, 2001 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11319156

RESUMO

The effects of cell cycle stage and the age of the cell donor animal on in vitro development of bovine nuclear transfer embryos were investigated. Cultures of primary bovine fibroblasts were established from animals of various ages, and the in vitro life span of these cell lines was analyzed. Fibroblasts from both fetuses and calves had similar in vitro life spans of approximately 30 population doublings (PDs) compared with 20 PDs in fibroblasts obtained from adult animals. When fibroblasts from both fetuses and adult animals were cultured as a population, the percentage of cells in G1 increased linearly with time, whereas the percentage of S-phase cells decreased proportionately. Furthermore, the percentage of cells in G1 at a given time was higher in adult fibroblasts than in fetal fibroblasts. To study the individual cells from a population, a shake-off method was developed to isolate cells in G1 stage of the cell cycle and evaluate the cell cycle characteristics of both fetal and adult fibroblasts from either 25% or 100% confluent cultures. Irrespective of the age, the mean cell cycle length in isolated cells was shorter (9.6-15.5 h) than that observed for cells cultured as a population. Likewise, the length of the G1 stage in these isolated cells, as indicated by 5-bromo-deoxyuridine labeling, lasted only about 2-3 h. There were no differences in either the number of cells in blastocysts or the percentage of blastocysts between the embryos reconstructed with G1 cells from 25% or 100% confluent cultures of fetal or adult cell lines. This study suggests that there are substantial differences in cell cycle characteristics in cells derived from animals of different ages or cultured at different levels of confluence. However, these factors had no effect on in vitro development of nuclear transfer embryos.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Ciclo Celular , Embrião de Mamíferos/fisiologia , Fibroblastos/ultraestrutura , Técnicas de Transferência Nuclear , Animais , Bovinos , Contagem de Células , Divisão Celular , Células Cultivadas , Clonagem de Organismos , Técnicas de Cultura , Feminino , Fase G1 , Fase S , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...