Radioresistant Pulmonary Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Lesions From Nonlung Primaries: Impact of Histology and Dose-Fractionation on Local Control After Radiation Therapy.

Purpose: We investigated whether pulmonary metastases from historically considered radioresistant primaries would have inferior local control after radiation therapy than those from nonradioresistant nonlung primaries, and whether higher biologically effective dose assuming alpha/beta=10 (BED10) would be associated with superior local control. Methods and Materials: We identified patients treated with radiation therapy for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive pulmonary disease to 1 to 5 lung metastases from nonlung primaries in 2013 to 2020 at a single health care system. Radioresistant primary cancers included colorectal carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and sarcoma. Nonradioresistant primary cancers included breast, bladder, esophageal, pancreas, and head and neck carcinomas. The Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), new metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results: Among 114 patients, 73 had radioresistant primary cancers. The median total dose was 50 Gy (IQR, 50-54 Gy) and the median number of fractions was 5 (IQR, 3-5). Median follow-up time was 59.6 months. One of 41 (2.4%) patients with a nonradioresistant metastasis experienced local failure compared with 18 of 73 (24.7%) patients with radioresistant metastasis (log-rank P = .004). Among radioresistant metastases, 12 of 41 (29.2%) patients with colorectal carcinoma experienced local failure compared with 6 of 32 (18.8%) with other primaries (log-rank P = .018). BED10 ≥100 Gy was associated with decreased risk of local recurrence. On univariable analysis, BED10 ≥100 Gy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.263; 95% CI, 0.105-0.656; P = .004) was associated with higher LRFS, and colorectal primary (HR, 3.060; 95% CI, 1.204-7.777; P = .019) was associated with lower LRFS, though these were not statistically significant on multivariable analysis. Among colorectal primary patients, BED10 ≥100 Gy was associated with higher LRFS (HR, 0.266; 95% CI, 0.072-0.985; P = .047) on multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Local control after radiation therapy was encouraging for pulmonary metastases from most nonlung primaries, even for many of those classically considered to be radioresistant. Those from colorectal primaries may benefit from testing additional strategies, such as resection or systemic treatment concurrent with radiation.

Dose-Volume Predictors of Radiation Pneumonitis After Thoracic Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) is a common treatment for thoracic tumors, typically delivered as 60 Gy in 15 fractions. We aimed to identify dosimetric risk factors associated with radiation pneumonitis in patients receiving HFRT at 4 Gy per fraction, focusing on lung V20, mean lung dose (MLD), and lung V5 as potential predictors of grade ≥2 pneumonitis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients were treated with thoracic HFRT to 60 Gy in 15 fractions or 72 Gy in 18 fractions at a single health care system from 2013 to 2020. Tumors near critical structures (trachea, proximal tracheobronchial tree, esophagus, spinal cord, or heart) were considered central (within 2 cm), and those closer were classified as ultracentral (within 1 cm). The primary endpoint was grade ≥2 pneumonitis. Logistic regression analyses, adjusting for target size and dosimetric variables, were used to establish a dose threshold associated with <20% risk of grade ≥2 pneumonitis. RESULTS: During a median 24.3-month follow-up, 18 patients (16.8%) developed grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis, with no significant difference between the 2 dose regimens (17.3% vs 16.3%, P = .88). Four patients (3.7%) experienced grade ≥3 pneumonitis, including 2 grade 5 cases. Patients with grade ≥2 pneumonitis had significantly higher lung V20 (mean 23.4% vs 14.5%, P < .001), MLD (mean 13.0 Gy vs 9.5 Gy, P < .001), and lung V5 (mean 49.6% vs 40.6%, P = .01). Dose thresholds for a 20% risk of grade ≥2 pneumonitis were lung V20 <17.7%, MLD <10.6 Gy, and V5 <41.3%. Multivariable analysis revealed a significant association between lung V20 and grade ≥2 pneumonitis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: To minimize the risk of grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis when delivering 4 Gy per fraction at either 60 Gy or 72 Gy, it is advisable to maintain lung V20<17.7%. MLD <10.6 Gy and V5<41.3% can also be considered as lower-priority constraints. However, additional validation is necessary before incorporating these constraints into clinical practice or trial planning guidelines.

DCIS: Risk Assessment in the Molecular Era.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents 20% of all breast cancers. The treatment paradigm for the majority of patients with DCIS consists of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (RT), with adjuvant endocrine therapy offered for hormone-receptor positive disease. RT after BCS reduces the risk of in-breast recurrence, decreasing subsequent in-situ and invasive cancers by ≥50%, with 10-year breast-cancer specific survival outcomes approaching 98%. As local control rates are high, treatment efforts have focused on selective de-escalation of care. Traditionally, clinicians have used clinical-pathologic features (ie, grade, age, size, margin width) to guide selection of low-risk DCIS patients in whom postoperative RT may be omitted. More recently, genomic molecular assays including the Oncotype DX Breast DCIS Score and DCISionRT have been developed to provide individualized assessment of predicting RT benefit after BCS. These molecular assays have the potential for personalized risk assessment, particularly when used in combination with existing clinical-pathologic features for risk assessment. This article reviews the current status and existing published literature on DCIS molecular-risk assessment tools and their potential for guiding postoperative RT recommendations in the BCT setting. In addition, current trials studying omission of definitive surgery for low-risk DCIS are discussed.

Breast Cancer Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: the Radiation Oncology Perspective.

Purpose of Review: The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused disruption in healthcare throughout the world. The limitations placed on hospital resources and the need to limit potential exposure to SARS-CoV-2 for both patients and healthcare staff have affected oncologic care for patients with breast cancer (BC), including radiation therapy (RT). This review highlights published guidelines regarding the provision of radiotherapy for BC patients and their adoption by radiation oncology centers. Recent Findings: Multiple international and national consortiums plus select institutions have published formal recommendations regarding radiation therapy for BC during the COVID-19 pandemic. They embody the principles of limiting in-person visits, proper triage, and the judicious use of delay, abbreviation, or omission of RT as appropriate. Summary: Since the start of the pandemic, multiple publications have provided guidance regarding RT for BC during this challenging time. The pandemic has led to increased use of telemedicine and abbreviated radiation therapy courses in the setting of BC, which are likely to persist. Future research is needed to establish the effect of these changes on oncologic outcomes.

Optimal Management for Residual Disease Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

OPINION STATEMENT: Treatment sequencing in early-stage breast cancer has significantly evolved in recent years, particularly in the triple negative (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive subsets. Instead of surgery first followed by chemotherapy, several clinical trials showed benefits to administering systemic chemotherapy (and HER2-targeted therapies) prior to surgery. These benefits include more accurate prognostic estimates based on the extent of residual cancer that can also guide adjuvant treatment, and frequent tumor downstaging that can lead to smaller surgeries in patients with large tumors at diagnosis. Patients with extensive invasive residual cancer after neoadjuvant therapy are at high risk for disease recurrence, and two pivotal clinical trials, CREATE-X and KATHERINE, demonstrated improved recurrence free survival with adjuvant capecitabine and ado-trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) in TNBC and HER2-positive residual cancers, respectively. Patients who achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) have excellent long-term disease-free survival regardless of what chemotherapy regimen induced this favorable response. This allows escalation or de-escalation of adjuvant therapy: patients who achieved pCR could be spared further chemotherapy, while those with residual cancer could receive additional chemotherapy postoperatively. Ongoing clinical trials are testing this strategy (CompassHER2-pCR: NCT04266249). pCR also provides an opportunity to assess de-escalation of locoregional therapies. Currently, for patients with residual disease in the lymph nodes (ypN+), radiation therapy entails coverage of the undissected axilla, and may include supra/infraclavicular/internal mammary nodes in addition to the whole breast or chest wall, depending on the type of surgery. Ongoing trials are testing the safety of omitting post-mastectomy breast and post-lumpectomy nodal irradiation (NCT01872975) as well as omitting axillary lymph node dissection (NCT01901094) in the setting of pCR. Additionally, evolving technologies such as minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in the blood during follow-up may allow early intervention with "second-line systemic adjuvant therapy" for patients with molecular relapse which might prevent impending clinical relapse.

Standard Tangential Radiation Fields Do Not Provide Incidental Coverage to the Internal Mammary Nodes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the incidental dose delivered to the internal mammary nodes (IMNs) in patients treated with tangential 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and to identify potential parameters that may affect the IMN mean dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study cohort consisted of 362 consecutively treated patients with breast cancer in our center between January 2015 and July 2017 who had received adjuvant whole-breast radiation therapy or postmastectomy radiation with or without a supraclavicular ± axillary field and without intentional inclusion of the IMN chain. The clinical target volume (CTV) for the IMNs was contoured per the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 3509/3510 protocol and was then divided into 3 subregions: upper, mid, and lower thirds. The planning target volume for the IMNs was generated by adding 5 mm to the CTV. The primary endpoint was to assess the V40 (volume receiving 40 Gy) to the IMN planning target volume and its potential influencing parameters using a linear regression model. RESULTS: The mean (±standard deviation) dose to the CTV IMN chain was 36% ± 28.7%. The Kruskal-Wallis test demonstrated significant differences in the median dose delivered to each level: upper third (7.2%), mid third (21.5%), and lower third (41.7%) (P < .001). The mean V40 IMN planning target volume was 14.2% (standard deviation, 18.7%). Presternal fat thickness (regression coefficient [RC] = -16.4; P < .001), postmastectomy radiation (RC = 24; P < .001), reconstruction after mastectomy (RC = -22.4; P < .001), and the addition of a supraclavicular field (RC = 8.8; P = .03) were all significantly associated with IMN mean dose. CONCLUSIONS: For patients receiving standard breast/chest wall tangential radiation fields, the IMN chain is not incidentally covered with therapeutic doses in the vast majority of cases. Therefore, if regional nodal radiation is intended to include the IMNs, contouring and careful plan review are necessary to ensure adequate therapeutic coverage.

Is Proton Therapy a "Pro" for Breast Cancer? A Comparison of Proton vs. Non-proton Radiotherapy Using the National Cancer Database.

Background: Limited data exists demonstrating the clinical benefit of proton radiotherapy (PRT) in breast cancer. Using the National Cancer Database, we evaluated predictors associated with PRT use for patients with breast cancer. An exploratory analysis also investigates the impact of PRT on overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients with non-metastatic breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy from 2004 to 2014 were identified. Patients were stratified based on receipt of PRT or non-PRT (i.e., photons ± electrons). A logistic regression model was used to determine predictors for PRT utilization. For OS, Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed using Cox proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 724,492 patients were identified: 871 received PRT and 723,621 received non-PRT. 58.3% of the PRT patients were group stage 0-1. Median follow-up time was 62.2 months. On multivariate logistic analysis, the following factors were found to be significant for receipt of PRT (all p < 0.05): academic facility (odds ratio [OR] = 2.50), South (OR = 2.01) and West location (OR = 12.43), left-sided (OR = 1.21), ER-positive (OR = 1.59), and mastectomy (OR = 1.47); pT2-T4 disease predicted for decrease use (OR = 0.79). PRT was not associated with OS on MVA for all patients: Hazard Ratio: 0.85, p = 0.168. PRT remained not significant on MVA after stratifying for subsets likely associated with higher heart radiation doses, including: left-sided (p = 0.140), inner-quadrant (p = 0.173), mastectomy (p = 0.095), node positivity (p = 0.680), N2-N3 disease (p = 0.880), and lymph node irradiation (LNI) (p = 0.767). Conclusions: Receipt of PRT was associated with left-sided, ER+ tumors, mastectomy, South and West location, and academic facilities, but not higher group stages or LNI. PRT was not associated with OS, including in subsets likely at risk for higher heart doses. Further studies are required to determine non-OS benefits of PRT. In the interim, given the high cost of protons, only well-selected patients should receive PRT unless enrolled on a clinical trial.

Radiotherapy in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are uncommon mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Up to one-third of GISTs are malignant with a high rate of metastasis. Surgical resection is the mainstay of care for patients with resectable disease. Imatinib mesylate, a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the current standard of care for GISTs that cannot be completely resected or in cases of metastatic GIST. Although often overlooked, radiation therapy is a viable option for select patients with GIST. We report the case of a patient with unresectable GIST who was treated with local radiotherapy and achieved long-term response. We also present a review of the literature regarding the use of radiotherapy in the treatment of GIST. GIST has been shown to be a radiosensitive tumor. Radiotherapy can offer long-term local control and should be considered in the adjuvant or palliative setting. The role of radiotherapy delivered concurrently with imatinib in the treatment of GIST may warrant further investigation.

Cervical osteomyelitis caused by Burkholderia cepacia after rhinoplasty.

Burkholderia cepacia, previously known as Pseudomonas cepacia, has been implicated in vertebral osteomyelitis in patients who are intravenous drug abusers. We report a case of acute vertebral osteomyelitis in a non-intravenous drug user, following an elective rhinoplasty.