RESUMO
The present study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy between conventional smear (CS) and liquid-based preparation (LBP) in endoscopic ultrasonography-fine needle aspiration cytology (EUS-FNAC) of pancreatic lesions. Using 31 eligible studies, the diagnostic accuracy of cytologic examination in CS and LBP was evaluated through a conventional meta-analysis and diagnostic test accuracy review. Overall concordance rates were 82.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79.8-85.5%) and 94.0% (95% CI, 84.4-97.8%) in CS and LBP, respectively. CS with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) showed a higher concordance rate than CS without ROSE. In CS, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 89.8% (95% CI, 85.2-93.1%) and 95.0% (95% CI, 90.0-97.6%), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio (OR) and area under curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were 90.32 (95% CI, 43.85-147.11) and 0.945, respectively. In LBP, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 80.9% (95% CI, 69.7-88.7%) and 99.9% (95% CI, 1.5-100.0%), respectively. The diagnostic OR and AUC of the SROC curve were 57.21 (95% CI, 23.61-138.64) and 0.939, respectively. Higher concordance rates were found in CS with ROSE and LBP in EUS-FNAC of pancreatic lesions. Regardless of the cytologic preparation method, EUS-FNAC is a useful and accurate diagnostic tool for pancreatic lesions.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological significance of PD-L1 expression and its impact on phospho-Forkhead box O 1 (pFOXO1) expression in colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Immunohistochemical analysis for PD-L1 and pFOXO1 was performed on 265 human CRC tissues. PD-L1 expression was evaluated in the tumor and immune cells. The impact of PD-L1 expression on survival was investigated in relation to the pattern of pFOXO1 expression. RESULTS: PD-L1 was expressed in 25 (9.4%) and 41 (17.7%) patients in the tumor and immune cells of the 265 CRC tissues, respectively. PD-L1 expression in immune cells (I-PD-L1) was significantly correlated with less lymphatic invasion, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis and lower pT and pTNM stages. Additionally, there was a significant correlation between PD-L1 expression in tumor cells (T-PD-L1) and tumor location (right colon), but not the other clinicopathological characteristics. pFOXO1 expression was significantly lower in CRC with high I-PD-L1 expression than in CRC with low or negative I-PD-L1 expression. However, there was no significant correlation between pFOXO1 and T-PD-L1 expression in CRC. Patients with positive pFOXO1 and low or negative I-PD-L1 expression exhibited the worst survival among patients with CRC. CONCLUSION: Collectively, our results indicate that I-PD-L1 expression was significantly correlated with favorable tumor behaviors and better survival. In addition, patients with high I-PD-L1 and low pFOXO1 expressions had a favorable prognosis than those with other I-PD-L1 and pFOXO1 expression patterns.
