Evaluation of the Atellica® UAS 800: a new member of the automated urine sediment analyzer family.

BACKGROUND: In 2017 the Atellica® UAS 800 urine sediment analyzer was introduced by Siemens Healthineers. We investigated its applicability in the standardization and automation of the laboratory urinalysis workflow, including the prediction of urine culture outcome and glomerular pathology. METHODS: We evaluated the performance characteristics of the Atellica® UAS 800 and its correlation with the iQ200 (Beckman Coulter). In addition, we studied the agreement between Atellica® UAS 800 and CLINITEK Novus® and determined the predictive value of bacteria and leukocyte counts for urine culture outcome. Furthermore, we investigated the ability of Atellica® UAS 800 to identify pathological casts and dysmorphic erythrocytes in comparison to manual microscopy. RESULTS: Erythrocyte and leukocyte analyses indicated high intra- and inter-run precisions and good correlations with the iQ200. We found that the Atellica® UAS 800 detects bacteria with higher sensitivity than the iQ200. The Atellica® UAS 800 and CLINITEK Novus® showed a high degree of conformity. We determined seven combinations of clinical cut-off values of bacteria and leukocytes for predicting urine culture outcome with sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values of 95%, 52%, and 93%, respectively. Using the Atellica® UAS 800, hyaline casts, erythrocyte casts, leukocyte casts, and dysmorphic erythrocytes were correctly recognized in 76%, 22%, 2%, and 39% of the samples, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Atellica® UAS 800 is a robust, fast, and user-friendly analyzer, which accurately quantifies erythrocytes, leukocytes, bacteria and squamous epithelial cells, and may be utilized for predicting positive urine cultures. The detection of clinically important pathological casts and dysmorphic erythrocytes proved insufficient.

Current state of the morphological assessment of urinary erythrocytes in The Netherlands: a nation-wide questionnaire.

Background The morphological assessment of urinary erythrocytes (uRBC) is a convenient screening tool for the differentiation of nephrological (dysmorphic) and urological (isomorphic) causes of hematuria. Considering the morphological heterogeneity, this analysis is often perceived as difficult. There is no clear (inter)national consensus and there is a lack of external quality assessment programs. To gain insight into the heterogeneity within and between laboratories, we scrutinized the current state of this analysis in Dutch medical laboratories. Methods The laboratories, affiliated with the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Medical Laboratories, were invited to participate in a web-based survey, consisting of two questionnaires. The first one provided information about the institution and laboratory organization, and the second explored the variability in the morphological analysis of uRBC on the basis of categorization of 160 uRBC images. Statistical analysis was premised on binomial significance testing and principal component analysis. Results Nearly one third of the Dutch medical laboratories (65/191) with 167 staff members participated in the survey. Most of these laboratories (83%) were an integral part of secondary care. The statistical analysis of the evaluations of the participants in comparison to the consensus (three experts from two different medical laboratories) suggested a great degree of heterogeneity in the agreement. Nearly half of the participants consciously disagreed with the consensus, whereas one fifth demonstrated a random relationship with it. Conclusions In Dutch medical laboratories, results from morphological analysis of uRBC are heterogeneous, which point out the necessity for standardization and harmonization.