Low valsalva leak-point pressure and success of retropubic urethropexy.

The aim of this study was to determine whether an isolated low Valsalva leak-point pressure (VLPP) is predictive of intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) and can be an independent risk factor for retropubic urethropexy failure in patients with a normal maximal urethral closure pressure (MUCP). Twenty-four women with urodynamically proven genuine stress incontinence with low VLPP (<60 cmH2O) and normal MUCP (>20 cmH2O) were evaluated subjectively and objectively by complex urodynamic testing before and after undergoing a modified Burch urethropexy. Success rates were then compared to historical success rates for subjects with ISD treated with retropubic urethropexy using an exact one-sample test for binomial proportions. Patients were followed postoperatively for a mean of 11.1 months, with a range of 5-16 months. Twenty-two of the 24 (91.7%) were continent on postoperative cystometry. This differs significantly from the published success rates of 50% (P < 0.001), if a low VLPP alone were predictive of ISD. Retropubic urethropexy was successful in the majority of our patients with genuine stress incontinence with a low VLPP and normal MUCP.

Determinants of voiding after three types of incontinence surgery: a multivariable analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the time to normal voiding in women after various surgical procedures for genuine stress urinary incontinence (GSUI) or urethral hypermobility. METHODS: One hundred one women had bladder neck suspensions. Suprapubic catheters were used in 94 women and intermittent self-catheterization in seven to manage urinary retention after surgery. We used a standardized protocol to record days to adequate postoperative voiding. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to determine clinical, urodynamic, and surgical factors that independently influenced time to adequate postoperative voiding. RESULTS: Women met the criteria for adequate voiding a mean of 7.1 days after modified open Burch procedures (n = 43), 9.5 days after anterior colporrhaphies with suburethral plication (n = 24), and 19.1 days after vaginal wall sling procedures (n = 34). The type of bladder neck suspension was independently associated with increasing time to void (P =.001). Multivariable regression analysis determined other factors significantly associated with longer time to adequate postoperative voiding: advancing age, previous vaginal bladder neck suspension, increasing volume at first sensation on bladder filling, higher postvoid residual urine volume (preoperative), and postoperative cystitis. Detrusor pressure, abdominal straining on pressure flow voiding study, and other concurrent surgeries were not significantly associated with postoperative voiding time in this model. CONCLUSIONS: Time to adequate voiding after bladder neck suspension was influenced by type of surgical procedure, postoperative cystitis, and several demographic and urodynamic factors. This study does not support using pressure flow studies to predict women at risk of voiding dysfunction.

Interobserver variation in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse.

The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver agreement of two grading systems for pelvic organ prolapse: the vaginal profile and the International Continence Society (ICS) draft proposal. Forty-nine consecutive women referred for evaluation of urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse were studied. Patients were first examined by a physician and a nurse clinician using the vaginal profile, followed by an examination according to the technique described in the ICS draft proposal for standardization of terminology (1994). kappa statistic and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used to determine interobserver variability for the ICS system by overall stage, by stage-specific comparison, and by specific anatomic location. The vaginal profile was evaluated by obtaining a kappa for overall degree of prolapse, stage-specific comparison and by anatomic area. The kappa for the ICS stage was 0.79 (P < 0.001), and the kappa for the vaginal profile by area of greatest prolapse was 0.68 (P < 0.001), indicating substantial interobserver agreement for both systems. The ICS system was noted to have substantial interobserver agreement by a stage-specific comparison. All anatomic locations of the ICS staging system were found to correlate significantly, and a high degree of interobserver precision was found. The vaginal profile also showed significant interobserver agreement by overall degree of prolapse, by specific degree of prolapse, and by anatomic area. It was concluded that both the proposed ICS staging system and the traditional vaginal profile show significant interobserver agreement both by overall stage, stage-specific analysis and specific location. The registered nurse examination correlated well with the physician examination, indicating that the most important factor in obtaining reproducible results may be definition and close attention to examination technique.

The role of endocervical curettage at cervical conization for high-grade dysplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk of invasive cancer above the location where the conization specimen was taken in patients with an endocervical curettage (ECC) positive for dysplasia at conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and to determine if any pathologic features may influence this risk. METHODS: The charts of 104 patients who underwent cervical conization for high-grade dysplasia followed by repeat conization or hysterectomy at Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Women's Hospital between January 1986 and December 1992 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with invasive cancer or glandular dysplasia on the initial conization were excluded. The ECC performed immediately after conization biopsy (conization ECC) was benign in 63 patients and contained dysplasia in 41. All available conization ECC specimens that contained dysplasia were evaluated for volume of dysplasia and degree of cytologic atypia. Fisher exact test was used for statistical comparison between and within groups. RESULTS: Invasive cancer was not present in any patients in the benign ECC group but was present in nine (22%) patients in the dysplasia group (P < .0001); five of these patients had microinvasion (no more than 3 mm of stromal invasion and no lymph-vascular space involvement) and four had frank invasion. Comparison of patients with involved endocervical margins revealed that none of 37 patients in the benign ECC group versus eight of 27 patients in the dysplasia group had invasive cancer (P < .0005). All patients with invasion were 35 years or older and all patients with frank invasion were 50 years or older. Neither volume nor cytologic grade of dysplasia in the ECC was predictive of invasion in the residual cervix. CONCLUSIONS: An ECC at conization positive for dysplasia is an important predictor of invasion in the residual cervix of patients whose conization reveals high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and should be routinely performed. Women 50 years or older with both a positive endocervical margin and conization ECC should undergo repeat conization before further therapy. Women under 50 years of age should undergo repeat conization if fertility is not desired; otherwise, close follow-up is necessary to exclude the presence of an invasive lesion in the residual cervix.