A phase III randomized trial of gemcitabine-oxaliplatin versus carboplatin-paclitaxel as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) with paclitaxel and carboplatin (PCb) in chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or older were randomized to PCb (paclitaxel 225 mg/m followed by carboplatin area under the curve = 6 on day 1 every 3 weeks) or GEMOX (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m on days 1 and 8 followed by oxaliplatin 130 mg/m on day 1 every 3 weeks) for up to six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), with tumor response rate, overall survival (OS), and quality of life as secondary end points. RESULTS: : The study was terminated after 383 patients had been randomized (371 received treatment) as the incidence of adverse events had exceeded the protocol-specified safety threshold (≥ 20% in either arm). No formal statistical comparisons were conducted. Median PFS was 4.44 months and 4.67 months in the GEMOX and PCb groups, respectively. Objective response rates (complete or partial) were 15.2% and 22.4% in the GEMOX and PCb arms, respectively. Median OS was 9.90 months (GEMOX) and 9.24 months (PCb); post hoc analyses showed median OS in patients aged 70 years or older to be similar to those younger than 70 years. PFS was similar in both groups of patients with adenocarcinoma histology, although OS favored the GEMOX group. Quality of life was improved from baseline in both groups. Toxicity profiles were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: PFS, OS, and objective response rates with GEMOX were similar to PCb. Nevertheless, toxicities limit the adoption of this regimen for routine use in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Oxaliplatin in first-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Platinum doublets are the recommended standard first-line chemotherapy for stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As efficacy outcomes associated with currently approved agents (cisplatin and carboplatin) are broadly similar, the decision about which platinum-based doublet to use is based on other factors such as toxicity. The goals for new platinum agents are to maintain and perhaps improve current efficacy and to improve toxicity. The aim of this article is to review the available clinical data from studies investigating the third-generation platinum analogue oxaliplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC. Information was obtained from the PubMed database and from recent presentations at national and international meetings. Oxaliplatin has been studied as monotherapy and in combination with a wide range of other chemotherapies (vinca alkaloids, taxanes, gemcitabine, and pemetrexed), mainly in phase II trials. Preliminary results from studies in which oxaliplatin-based doublets have been combined with targeted agents (eg, bevacizumab) are now available. In general, the clinical activity observed with oxaliplatin-based therapy is similar to that seen with other currently used platinum regimens, although outcomes vary between individual trials (response rates, 23%-48%; median progression-free survival, 2.7-7.3 months; median overall survival, 7.3-13.7 months). The toxicity profile of oxaliplatin, particularly when compared with cisplatin, makes it an alternative treatment, especially in patients unable to tolerate cisplatin. However, well-conducted randomized phase III trials will be needed to clarify which particular groups of patients with NSCLC may benefit from oxaliplatin-based therapy.

Cost-minimisation analysis of three regimens of chemotherapy (docetaxel-cisplatin, paclitaxel-cisplatin, paclitaxel-carboplatin) for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficiency (the evaluation of efficacy in relation to costs) of three first-line treatment options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (stage IIIB and IV) used in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study: docetaxel/cisplatin (75/75 mg/m(2)/day, 1 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion of docetaxel), paclitaxel/cisplatin (175/75 mg/m(2)/day, 3 or 24 h i.v. infusion of paclitaxel) and paclitaxel/carboplatin (175/400 or 225/400 mg/m(2)/day, 3 h i.v. infusion of paclitaxel). METHODS: The results of the ECOG 1594 phase III clinical trial (Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 19 (2000) 2) demonstrated equivalent efficacy (survival, objective response) between the treatment options. To differentiate between the treatment options, we performed a cost-minimisation analysis, using a pharmacoeconomic model. RESULTS: The average estimated treatment cost per patient (median, 4 cycles) with docetaxel/cisplatin would be 1067836 Spanish pesetas (Ptas) (6418 Euros; 5741 US dollars (USD)), 1365304 or 1439369 Ptas (8205 or 8651 Euros; 7340 or 7738 USD) with paclitaxel/cisplatin (3 or 24 h infusions, respectively), and 1417995 or 1616784 Ptas (8522 or 9717 Euros; 7623 or 8692 USD) (paclitaxel dose of 175 or 225 mg/m(2)/day, respectively) with paclitaxel/carboplatin. CONCLUSION: According to our study, the treatment option docetaxel/cisplatin, with equal efficacy, would result in a cost saving of between 297468 and 548948 Ptas (1788 and 3299 Euros; 1599 and 2951 USD) per patient treated. This difference is mainly due to the lower treatment cost of docetaxel.