Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Intensive Care Med ; 38(10): 966-974, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37186782

RESUMO

Rationale: Bioimpedance may be a useful tool to guide fluid treatment and avoid organ dysfunction related to fluid overload. Objective: We examined the correlation between bioimpedance and organ dysfunction in patients with septic shock. Methods: Prospective observational study of adult intensive care unit patients fulfilling the sepsis-3 criteria. Bioimpedance was measured using a body composition monitor (BCM) and BioScan Touch i8 (MBS). We measured impedance at inclusion and after 24 h and reported the impedance, change in impedance, bioimpedance-derived fluid balance, and changes in bioimpedance-derived fluid balance. Organ markers on respiratory, circulatory, and kidney function and overall disease severity were ascertained on days 1-7. The effect of bioimpedance on the change in organ function was assessed by mixed effects linear models. We considered P < .01 as significant. Measurements and Main Results: Forty-nine patients were included. None of the single baseline measurements or derived fluid balances were associated with the course of organ dysfunction. Changes in impedance were associated with the course of overall disease severity (P < .001; with MBS), and with changes in noradrenaline dose (P < .001; with MBS) and fluid balance (P < .001; with BCM). The changes in bioimpedance-derived fluid balance were associated with changes in noradrenaline dose (P < .001; with BCM), cumulative fluid balances (P < .001; with MBS), and lactate concentrations (P < .001; with BCM). Conclusions: Changes in bioimpedance were correlated with the duration of overall organ failure, circulatory failure, and fluid status. Single measurements of bioimpedance were not associated with any changes in organ dysfunction.


Assuntos
Choque Séptico , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico , Adulto , Humanos , Choque Séptico/complicações , Choque Séptico/terapia , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/etiologia , Composição Corporal , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico/etiologia , Norepinefrina
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 67(3): 319-328, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36537040

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Septic shock is often treated with aggressive fluid resuscitation leading to profound fluid overload. The assessment of fluid status relies on suboptimal measures making treatment difficult. Bioelectrical impedance analysis is an alternative but the validity is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis for fluid measures in patients with septic shock. METHODS: Single-center, prospective observational cohort study. We included adult ICU patients with septic shock. We evaluated the agreement between measures on the left and right side of the patient and measures 1 h apart by two bioelectrical impedance devices. Results are presented as Bland Altman plots with 95% Limits of Agreements (LoA) and as correlations between bioelectrical impedance analysis results and clinical markers of fluids. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included. The agreement between measures on the left and the right side of the patient and after 1 h was overall without bias, but with wide LoA's. Fluid overload 1 h apart showed the most narrow 95% LoA (-2.4-2.9 L). The same wide limits of agreements were observed when comparing devices. For example, total body water with 95% LoA of -14.8 -16.7 L. Correlations between bioelectrical impedance analysis and clinical measures were low but statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with septic shock bioelectrical impedance analysis had no systematic errors or bias, but wide limits of agreement, indicating that the devices have a large and uncorrectable random error. Fluid status by bioelectrical impedance analysis is not sufficiently accurate to guide treatment in this group of patients.


Assuntos
Choque Séptico , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico , Adulto , Humanos , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Hidratação/métodos , Impedância Elétrica
3.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 2022 Feb 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35130489

RESUMO

The minimal health impact observed in large-scale water sanitation and hygiene (WASH) intervention studies motivated us to investigate the contribution of contaminated food and drinking water to the total daily Escherichia coli load ingested by the average adult in a low-income, urban area. Leftover food (food left at room temperature for more than 6 hours) from 32 households was collected eight times at 6-week intervals in 2014-2015 in the low-income area of Arichpur, Dhaka, Bangladesh. In total, 117 samples were obtained from four food types: fish, lentils, rice, and vegetables, which comprise approximately 85.2% of the average adult's personal daily food consumption. Samples were analyzed for E. coli using selective chromogenic media. For an average adult, the daily consumption of the four food types at mean contamination levels of E. coli can contribute 4.45 log colony-forming units (cfu)/day (95% confidence interval 4.06-4.84). Drinking water quality was measured 211 times at the point of drinking, with a mean, median, and maximum contamination of 1.9, 1.2, and 2.82 log E. coli cfu/100 mL, respectively. If the typical adult in Arichpur were able to drink water with 0 E. coli cfu/100 mL, it would only remove < 5.2% of the total E. coli ingested per day with a mean-contaminated diet. These approximations may suggest why insignificant effects have been observed for water quality interventions in similar, low-hygiene settings. In Arichpur, the E. coli contribution from drinking water to the total E. coli load was insufficient to exert a substantial effect.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...