Swallowing function and weight change observed in a phase I/II study of external-beam radiation, brachytherapy and concurrent chemotherapy in localized cancer of the esophagus (RTOG 9207).

BACKGROUND: A multi-institutional, prospective study was designed to determine the feasibility and tolerance of combined-modality chemotherapy, external-beam irradiation, and esophageal brachytherapy in a potentially curable group of patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Swallowing function and weight were assessed before and after treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Planned treatment was with 50 Gy of external-beam irradiation (25 fractions/5 weeks) followed 2 weeks later by esophageal brachytherapy (either a high dose rate of 5 Gy at weeks 8, 9, and 10 for a total of 15 Gy or a low dose rate of 20 Gy at week 8). Chemotherapy was given weeks 1, 5, 8, and 11 with cisplatinum, 75 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil, 1,000 mg/m2/24 hours in a 96-hour infusion. Swallowing was graded from 0 (no dysphagia) to 4 (complete obstruction for solids and liquids). Weight "loss" or weight gain was defined as a change in 3-month post- to pretherapy weight of < or = 5% or > 5%, respectively. RESULTS: The estimated survival rate at 1 and 2 years was 49% and 31%, respectively, and the estimated median survival was 11 months. Swallowing before treatment was graded as grade 1 in 14 patients, grade 2 in 22 patients, grade 3 in nine patients, and grade 4 in four patients. Swallowing grade after treatment was reported as improved in 29 patients (59%), unchanged in 12 patients (24.5%), and worse in eight patients (16.5%). The bestimproved dysphagia score after treatment in the 29 patients reporting improvement was grade 0 in 19 patients, grade 1 in five patients, grade 2 in four patients, and grade 3 in one patient. A posttreatment weight in 42 evaluable patients was categorized as a loss in 29 patients (69%), a gain in four patients (9.5%), and stable in nine patients (21.5%). Weight loss was significantly correlated with high swallowing grade, low performance status, and absence of a feeding tube. CONCLUSIONS: Swallowing function after brachytherapy and concurrent chemoradiation therapy is satisfactory in most surviving patients. Ninety-two percent of patients were able to swallow at least liquids at some point after therapy. Future plans are to compare this with other cooperative group studies that utilized chemoradiation or surgery, without brachytherapy.

Using treatment interruptions to palliate the toxicity from concurrent chemoradiation for limited small cell lung cancer decreases survival and disease control.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We analyzed the impact on survival outcomes of treatment interruptions due to toxicity arising during the concurrent phase of chemotherapy/radiotherapy (ChT/RT) for our limited-stage small-cell cancer (LSCLC) population over the past 10 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1989 to 1999, 215 patients received treatment for LSCLC, consisting of six cycles of alternating cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin or epirubicin/vincristine (CAV; CEV) and etoposide/cisplatin (EP). Thoracic RT was started with EP at either the second or third cycle (85% of patients). RT dose was either 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks or 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, delivered to a target volume encompassing gross disease and suspected microscopic disease with a 2 cm margin. Treatment breaks arising during concurrent ChT+RT were used to manage severe symptomatic or hematologic toxicities. We used the interruptions in thoracic RT as the 'marker' for any concurrent break and measured 'break duration' by the total length of time (in days) RT was interrupted, since that also signaled that ChT could be re-initiated. Patient results were analyzed for the impact of interruptions/treatment prolongation on overall and disease-free survival. RESULTS: For all patients, 2-year and 5-year overall and disease-specific survivals were 22.7 and 7.2, 27.6 and 9.3%, respectively; overall and disease-specific median survivals were 14.7 months each. A total of 56 patients (26%) had treatment breaks due to toxicity. Hematologic depression caused the majority of breaks (88%). The median duration of breaks was 5 days (range 1-18). Patients with and without interruptions were compared for a range of prognostic factors and were not found to have any significant differences. Comparing interrupted/uninterrupted courses, median survivals were 13.8 versus 15.6 months, respectively, and 5-year overall survivals were 4.2 versus 8.3%, respectively. There was a statistical difference between overall survival curves which favored the uninterrupted group (P=0.01). When comparing a series of prognostic variables, multivariable analysis found that the most significant factor influencing survival in the present study was the presence of treatment breaks (P=0.006). There was a trend for development of any recurrence in the patients with breaks (P=0.08). When controlling for the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in the two groups, the rate of failure in the chest was higher in the patients with RT breaks (58 vs. 33%). The rate of failure in the brain was dependent on the use of PCI only. CONCLUSIONS: Interruptions in treatment to palliate the toxicity from concurrent chemoradiation result in poorer local control and decreased survival.

A phase I/II study of external beam radiation, brachytherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy for patients with localized carcinoma of the esophagus (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 9207): final report.

BACKGROUND: A multiinstitutional, prospective study of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) was designed to determine the feasibility and toxicity of chemotherapy, external beam radiation, and esophageal brachytherapy (EB) in a potentially curable group of patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. A preliminary analysis indicated a 17% 1-year actuarial risk of treatment-related fistulas. A final analysis of this study was considered important to determine the median survival time, local control, and late toxicity associated with this treatment regimen. METHODS: Planned treatment was 50 grays (Gy) of external beam radiation (25 fractions given over 5 weeks) followed 2 weeks later by EB (either high-dose-rate 5 Gy during Weeks 8, 9, and 10, for a total of 15 Gy, or low-dose-rate 20 Gy during Week 8). Chemotherapy was given during Weeks 1, 5, 8, and 11, with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m(2)/24 hours in a 96-hour infusion. RESULTS: Of the 49 eligible patients, 45 (92%) had squamous histology and 4 (6%) had adenocarcinoma. Forty-seven patients (96%) completed external beam radiation plus at least 2 courses of chemotherapy, whereas 34 patients (69%) were able to complete external beam radiation, EB, and at least 2 courses of chemotherapy. The estimated survival rate at 12 months was 49%, with an estimated median survival of 11 months. Life-threatening toxicity or treatment-related death occurred in 12 (24%) and 5 (10%) cases, respectively. Treatment-related esophageal fistulas occurred in 6 cases (12% overall, 14% of patients starting EB) at 0.5-6.2 months from the first day of brachytherapy, leading to death in 3 cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, severe toxicity, including treatment-related fistulas, occurred within 7 months of brachytherapy. Based on the 12% incidence of fistulas, the authors continue to urge caution in employing EB, particularly when used in conjunction with chemotherapy.

HIV complicates the management of oncological emergencies: a case involving the superior vena cava syndrome.

An association exists between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and an increased incidence of lung cancer. Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is an oncological emergency seen in the presence of chest tumours. We report on an otherwise well HIV-positive male who presented with SVCS due to lung cancer. He was commenced on dexamethasone and radiotherapy with curative intent. Treatment was complicated by accelerated steroid- and radiation-induced morbidity. The patient died of disseminated aspergillosis after receiving 27 of 35 planned radiotherapy fractions. The management of SVCS in those with HIV is challenging and requires the judicious use of steroids, antifungal prophylaxis and palliative radiotherapy doses.

Preoperative radiation with concurrent 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion for locally advanced unresectable rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the percentage of complete responders and the resectability rate for patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the rectum treated by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusional chemotherapy and pelvic radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 1992 and June 1996, 29 patients with a diagnosis of locally advanced unresectable rectal cancer received preoperative 5 FU by continuous intravenous infusion at a dose of 225 mg/m2/day concurrent with pelvic radiation (median 54 Gy/28 fractions). All patients were clinical stage T4 on the bases of organ invasion or tumor fixation. Median time for surgical resection was 6 weeks. RESULTS: Median follow-up for the group was 28 months (range 5-57 months). Six patients were felt to be persistently unresectable or developed distant metastases and did not undergo surgical resection. Of the 29 patients, 23 proceeded to surgery, 18 were resectable for cure, 13 by abdominoperineal resection, 3 by anterior resection and 2 by local excision. Of the 29 patients, 4 (13%) had a complete response, and 90% were clinically downstaged. Of the 18 resected patients, 1 has died of his disease, 17 are alive, and 15 disease-free. The regimen was well tolerated; there was only one treatment-related complication, a wound dehiscence. CONCLUSION: The combination of 5 FU infusion and pelvic radiation in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer is well tolerated and provides a baseline for comparison purposes with future combinations of newer systemic agents and radiation.

Prospectively randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk colon cancer.

PURPOSE: This study had two major goals: (1) to assess the effectiveness of a regimen of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus levamisole plus leucovorin as postoperative surgical adjuvant therapy for patients with high-risk colon cancer, and (2) to evaluate 6 months versus 12 months of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with poor-prognosis stage II or III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with either intensive-course 5-FU and leucovorin combined with levamisole, or a standard regimen of 5-FU plus levamisole. Patients were also randomly assigned to receive either 12 months or 6 months of chemotherapy, which resulted in four treatment groups. RESULTS: Eight hundred ninety-one of 915 patients entered (97.4%) were eligible. The median follow-up duration is 5.1 years for patients still alive. There was a difference among the four treatment groups with respect to patient survival, and a significant duration-by-regimen interaction was observed. Specifically, standard 5-FU plus levamisole was inferior to 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole when treatment was given for 6 months (5-year survival rate, 60% v 70%; P < .01). CONCLUSION: There was no significant improvement in patient survival when chemotherapy was given for 12 months compared with 6 months. When chemotherapy was given for 6 months, standard 5-FU plus levamisole was associated with inferior patient survival compared with intensive-course 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole. These data suggest that 5-FU plus levamisole for 6 months should not be used in clinical practice, whereas 6 months of treatment with 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole is effective.

Risk factors associated with mucositis in cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil.

Oral mucositis is a dose-limiting toxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). This prospective cohort study investigated factors associated with mucositis in patients receiving 5-FU for cancer of the digestive tract. Sixty-three patients (mean age 65 years) completed self-administered questionnaires and had interviews, oral examinations and unstimulated whole salivary flow measurements at baseline and follow-up appointments. The duration of follow-up was 2 months. Predictor variables included sociodemographic data, body surface area, diabetes, smoking, alcohol consumption, salivary flow, oral hygiene, presence of prostheses, performance status, regimen of cytotoxic drugs, hematological data, and herpes simplex virus antibody titer. Forty-six per cent of patients developed at least one episode of oral mucositis during cytotoxic treatment. Pearson's chi-square analysis showed that mucositis was significantly associated with xerostomia at baseline, xerostomia during chemotherapy, and lower baseline neutrophil counts (P < or = 0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that xerostomia at baseline (odds ratio, OR = 10.0), or baseline neutrophil level under 4000 cells/mm3 (OR = 3.9) were significant predictors of mucositis. Taking into account the effect of neutrophil level at baseline, xerostomia during chemotherapy (OR = 4.5) was also a significant predictor of mucositis. The results showed that xerostomia and lower baseline neutrophil levels are significantly associated with oral mucositis. These variables should be taken into consideration in the design of intervention studies to reduce the frequency and severity of mucositis. More research is required to investigate the role of saliva and neutrophils in the pathogenesis of chemotherapy-induced mucositis.

Superior vena cava obstruction in small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To identify prognostic or treatment factors influencing the response of superior vena cava obstruction (SVCO), time to SVCO recurrence, and overall survival of SCLC patients with SVCO at presentation; and to assess the role of retreatment in patients with SVCO at recurrent or persistent disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1983 and November 1993, 76 consecutive patients who had small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) with SVCO were treated in our institution. Analysis was done according to the disease status at diagnosis of SVCO. The first analysis concerned a group of 50 patients who had SVCO at initial presentation. The second analysis concerned a group who had SVCO as a manifestation of persistent or recurrent disease. RESULTS: In the first analysis, 93% had significant improvement in symptoms of SVCO after chemotherapy and 94% after mediastinal radiation. Response is almost universal despite a wide range of radiation fractionation and total dose used. Seventy percent remained SVCO-free before death. Thirty percent developed recurrence of SVCO symptoms 1-16 months (median 8) after the start of initial treatment. Those who received combined chemotherapy and radiation had a longer time to SVCO recurrence (p = 0.018) compared to those who received chemotherapy alone. This effect is mainly seen in limited-stage patients. The presence of SVCO recurrence tends to have an adverse effect on the overall survival (p = 0.077) irrespective of the time when the recurrences occurred (p = 0.296). The median survival of this whole group of 50 patients in the first analysis was 9.5 months, and the 2-year survival was 10%. Stage was strongly predictive of survival (p < 0.001). Sixteen percent (3 of 19) of the patients with limited-stage diseases were long-term survivors (two patients survived 35 months and one survived 70 months). The early mortality from SVCO was 2%. In the second analysis, 85% had previously been treated with chemotherapy alone. The response rate of SVCO in the analysable patients (n = 39) was 77%. There was no significant difference in the response rate of SVCO to treatment comparing patients treated by chemotherapy first or mediastinal radiation first (p = 0.653), but most patients [82% (32 of 39)] received radiation as the initially treatment of SVCO. Ninety-three percent (38 of 41) received mediastinal radiation as a part of their ultimate retreatment regimen, and 68% (28 of 41) received mediastinal radiation as their sole retreatment regimen. Thirty-two percent (13 of 41) received chemotherapy as a part of their ultimate retreatment regimen, and only 7% received chemotherapy alone as their sole retreatment regimen. Eighty-three percent (25 of 30) of those whose SVCO responded remained free of SVCO before death, with a median survival of 3 months after recurrent or persistent disease documented. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy or mediastinal radiation is very effective as an initial treatment in SCLC patients with SVCO at presentation and at recurrent or persistent disease. There is no obvious need to use big radiation fraction sizes for the first few radiation treatment as was previously believed. In patients with recurrent or persistent SCLC with SVCO, especially in those who previously received chemotherapy only, we have more experience in incorporating mediastinal radiation as a major component of the palliative regimen with highly effective and durable palliation achieved.

A phase I/II study of external beam radiation, brachytherapy and concurrent chemotherapy in localized cancer of the esophagus (RTOG 92-07): preliminary toxicity report.

PURPOSE: A multi-institutional, prospective study was designed to determine the feasibility and tolerance of external beam irradiation plus concurrent chemotherapy and esophageal brachytherapy (EB) in a potentially curable group of patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Planned treatment was 50 Gy external beam radiation (25 fractions/5 weeks) followed 2 weeks later by EB [either high dose rate (HDR) 5 Gy, weeks 8, 9, and 10, for a total of 15 Gy, or low dose rate (LDR) 20 Gy, week 8]. The protocol was later revised to delete the LDR alternative, owing to poor accrual, and to decrease the HDR dose to 10 Gy (i.e. 5 Gy, weeks 8 and 9). Chemotherapy was given weeks 1, 5, 8, and 11 with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg2/m per 24 h, 96-h infusion. The study closed in January 1995 after 56 patients had been entered on the HDR arm. Six patients were declared ineligible owing to tumor extension to the gastroesophageal junction (three patients) or involved celiac lymph nodes (three patients). Of the 50 eligible patients, the planned EB dose was 15 and 10 Gy in 40 and 10 patients, respectively. Forty-six (92%) of the eligible patients had squamous histology, and three (6%) adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: Life-threatening toxicity or treatment-related death occurred in 13 (26%) and 4 (8%) of the 50 eligible patients, respectively. Treatment-related esophageal fistulas occurred in three patients (12% overall, 14% of patients starting EB) at 0.5-6.2 months from the first day of brachytherapy, leading to death in three. The fourth death was secondary to renal toxicity and infection attributed to chemotherapy. No correlation was found between the development of fistula and location of primary tumor, brachytherapy active length or applicator diameter. So far, 5 of the 6 treatment-related fistulas have occurred following 15 Gy EB. The other fistula occurred after only 5 Gy of a planned 15 Gy was delivered. CONCLUSION: Thirty-five patients (70%) were able to complete external beam, EB, and at least two courses of chemotherapy. Estimated survival rate at 12 months is 48%, with an estimated 11-month median survival rate. Survival following external beam radiation plus concurrent chemotherapy and EB does not appear to be significantly different from survival seen following external beam radiation and chemotherapy only. The development of six fistulas in the 35 patients completing EB is of concern. Based on the high incidence of fistulas, we urge extreme caution in employing EB as a boost following concurrent external beam radiation and chemotherapy.