Caregiver perceptions and attitudes associated with oral immunotherapy on social media.

Background: Caregiver values and preferences with regard to oral immunotherapy (OIT) for treatment of food allergies are not widely reported. Understanding caregiver perspectives is integral to establishing shared decision-making in the treatment of food allergy. Objective: We aimed to understand caregiver opinions that may influence caregivers in their decisions about OIT through social media. Methods: We searched a popular parenting web site for posts related to OIT from December 2008 to September 2019. We applied a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework to review posts for inclusion, performed thematic content analysis to determine common themes, and calculated frequencies for each theme and subtheme. Posts and comments were included if they contained discussions about OIT for immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy and were excluded if they were duplicates, comments from an original post from the original user, or comments on a nonrelevant original post. Results: Of 1300 posts and comments retrieved, 174 were included (13%). Most were excluded because they did not directly address OIT for food allergy. Relevant posts could fall into multiple themes and were categorized under three main themes: attitudes (n = 128, "I am scared to do OIT but scared not to!"), logistics (n = 168, "We will be doing this once LO [little one] is a little older"), and questions (n = 32, "How does it work?"). Conclusion: Caregivers communicate with each other through social media, expressing attitudes, logistics, and questions about OIT. Understanding these lay perspectives may help guide clinicians in counseling and engage caregivers in decision-making.

Phone It In: A Medical Student Primer on Telemedicine Consultation in Pediatrics.

Introduction: Telephone triage requires a unique skillset that is not universally taught in medical school. This curriculum was developed to introduce third- and fourth-year medical students participating in their pediatrics core clerkship to the benefits, challenges, and mechanics of telephone triage. Methods: After completing a presession textbook reading and listening to a brief lecture, students participated in two telephone role-play scenarios with parents. The exercise required students to recognize the differences in acuity level of patients and provide appropriate guidance, management, and disposition instructions. Following the session, students completed a telephone note. Students evaluated this curriculum at the completion of the clerkship. Results: The majority of the 74 students who completed the 5-point Likert scale evaluation felt that the curriculum met its stated objectives (a score of 4 or 5 given by 82%), increased their knowledge (73%), engaged them (86%), and was of high quality (82%). Students specifically commented that the experience was useful, interactive, and applicable to their clerkship experience and future career. The most common area of constructive feedback was not understanding the purpose of a telephone note. Discussion: This easily implemented curriculum provided a foundational experience in the nuances of triaging and managing pediatric patients via the telephone. This serves as an important framework to prepare students for more complex telemedicine technology.

Improving Medical Students' OSCE Performance in Telehealth: The Effects of a Telephone Medicine Curriculum.

PURPOSE: To report on the implementation of a telephone medicine curriculum as part of the core clerkship in pediatrics for students at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and evaluate the curriculum's effect on student performance on a telephone medicine case as part of a required objective structured clinical exam (OSCE). METHOD: Using a prospective cohort design with a convenience sample of third-year medical students during the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 academic years, the authors compared the OSCE scores of students assigned to the curriculum with both historical and concurrent control groups of students who had not received the curriculum. Additionally, the authors compared the costs of the recommended testing by students in each group using the 2018 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule. RESULTS: Students assigned to the telephone medicine curriculum (students in the intervention group) had a significantly higher mean overall score on the simulated OSCE telephone medicine case compared with the students in the control groups who did not receive the curriculum (the mean score for students in the intervention group was 7.38 vs 6.92 for students in the control groups, P = .02). Additionally, the intervention group had statistically significantly lower costs for their recommended testing compared with the control groups (the median value for tests ordered by students in the intervention group was $27.91 vs $51.23 for students in the control groups, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a dedicated telephone medicine curriculum for medical students improves their overall performance and delivery of high-value care via telephone medicine as part of an OSCE. Medical educators should pursue ongoing research into effective methods for teaching medical students and residents how to navigate digital encounters.

Caregiver-Reported Asthma Control Predicts Future Visits, Independent of Guideline-Based Control Measures.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether caregiver perception of a child's asthma control, independent of guideline-based asthma control assessment, is a predictor of future acute visits. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether caregiver-reported asthma control is an indicator of future risk of acute visit. METHODS: Two study populations of low-income, minority 5- to 17-year-old children with persistent asthma were included. Questionnaires administered at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months captured symptoms, short-acting ß-agonist use, acute visits in the previous 3 months, and caregiver-reported asthma control. Well-controlled, not well-controlled, and very poorly controlled asthma were defined using National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guideline-based assessment. Relationships between caregiver-reported control and acute visits in the subsequent 3 months were examined. RESULTS: At baseline, both populations were predominantly black/African American (91% and 79%) with public insurance (85% and 88%) and very poorly controlled asthma (47% and 50%). In both populations, most caregivers reported that their child's asthma was well controlled (73% and 69%). In both populations, participants whose caregivers reported that their child had uncontrolled asthma had greater odds of having an acute visit in the following 3 months as compared with participants whose caregivers reported that their child's asthma was well controlled, independent of guideline-based control, age, sex, race, controller medication, insurance, and atopy (odds ratio [95% CI], 2.4 [1.4-4.2] and 1.6 [1.1-2.4]). CONCLUSIONS: Among predominantly low-income minority children with asthma, caregiver-reported asthma control may provide information about the risk of future acute visit for asthma that is complementary to guideline-based control assessment.