A Review of Electrolyte, Mineral, and Vitamin Changes After Traumatic Brain Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the prevalence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in both civilian and military populations, the management guidelines developed by the Joint Trauma System involve minimal recommendations for electrolyte physiology optimization during the acute phase of TBI recovery. This narrative review aims to assess the current state of the science for electrolyte and mineral derangements found after TBI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used Google Scholar and PubMed to identify literature on electrolyte derangements caused by TBI and supplements that may mitigate secondary injuries after TBI between 1991 and 2022. RESULTS: We screened 94 sources, of which 26 met all inclusion criteria. Most were retrospective studies (n = 9), followed by clinical trials (n = 7), observational studies (n = 7), and case reports (n = 2). Of those, 29% covered the use of some type of supplement to support recovery after TBI, 28% covered electrolyte or mineral derangements after TBI, 16% covered the mechanisms of secondary injury after TBI and how they are related to mineral and electrolyte derangements, 14% covered current management of TBI, and 13% covered the potential toxic effects of the supplements during TBI recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of mechanisms and subsequent derangements of electrolyte, mineral, and vitamin physiology after TBI remains incomplete. Sodium and potassium tended to be the most well-studied derangements after TBI. Overall, data involving human subjects were limited and mostly involved observational studies. The data on vitamin and mineral effects were limited, and targeted research is needed before further recommendations can be made. Data on electrolyte derangements were stronger, but interventional studies are needed to assess causation.

A Narrative Review of Existing and Developing Biomarkers in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury for Potential Military Deployed Use.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in both adult civilian and military populations. Currently, diagnostic and prognostic methods are limited to imaging and clinical findings. Biomarker measurements offer a potential method to assess head injuries and help predict outcomes, which has a potential benefit to the military, particularly in the deployed setting where imaging modalities are limited. We determine how biomarkers such as ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S100B, neurofilament light chain (NFL), and tau proteins can offer important information to guide the diagnosis, acute management, and prognosis of TBI, specifically in military personnel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a narrative review of peer-reviewed literature using online databases of Google Scholar and PubMed. We included articles published between 1988 and 2022. RESULTS: We screened a total of 73 sources finding a total of 39 original research studies that met inclusion for this review. We found five studies that focused on GFAP, four studies that focused on UCH-L1, eight studies that focused on tau proteins, six studies that focused on NFL, and eight studies that focused on S100B. The remainder of the studies included more than one of the biomarkers of interest. CONCLUSIONS: TBI occurs frequently in the military and civilian settings with limited methods to diagnose and prognosticate outcomes. We highlighted several promising biomarkers for these purposes including S100B, UCH-L1, NFL, GFAP, and tau proteins. S100B and UCH-L1 appear to have the strongest data to date, but further research is necessary. The robust data that explain the optimal timing and, more importantly, trending of these biomarker measurements are necessary before widespread application.

A scoping review of two decades of pediatric humanitarian care during wartime.

ABSTRACT: Humanitarian care is a vital component of the wartime mission. Children comprise a significant proportion of casualties injured by explosives and penetrating weapons. Children face a variety of unique injury patterns in the combat setting as high-powered firearms and explosives are rarely seen in the civilian setting. We sought to perform a scoping review of pediatric research from the recent US-led wars in Afghanistan, and Iraq conflicts beginning in 2001. We used Google Scholar and PubMed to identify pediatric combat literature published between 2001 and 2022. We utilized the PRISMA-ScR Checklist to conduct this review. We identified 52 studies that met inclusion for this analysis-1 prospective observational study, 50 retrospective studies, and 1 case report. All the original research studies were retrospective in nature except for one. We identified one prospective study that was a post hoc subanalysis from an overall study assessing the success of prehospital lifesaving interventions. Most of the articles came from varying registries created by the United States and British militaries for the purposes of trauma performance improvement. The deployed health service support mission often includes treatment of pediatric trauma patients. The deployed health service support mission often includes treatment of pediatric trauma patients. We found that available literature from this setting is limited to retrospective studies except for one prospective study. Our findings suggest that pediatric humanitarian care was a significant source of medical resource consumption within both of the major wars. Further, many of the lessons learned have directly translated into changes in civilian pediatric trauma care practices highlighting the need for collaborative scientific developments between the military and civilian trauma programs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review/Meta-Analyses; Level III.

A Narrative Review of Traumatic Pneumothorax Diagnoses and Management.

BACKGROUND: Correct identification and rapid intervention of a traumatic pneumothorax is necessary to avoid hemodynamic collapse and subsequent morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this clinical review is to summarize the evaluation and best treatment strategies to improve outcomes in combat casualties. Blunt, explosive, and penetrating trauma are the 3 etiologies for causing a traumatic pneumothorax. Blunt trauma tends to be more common, but all etiologies require similar treatment. The current standard to diagnose pneumothorax is through imaging to include ultrasound, chest x-ray, or computed tomography. A physical exam aids in the diagnosis especially when few other resources are available. Recent studies on the treatment of a small, closed pneumothorax involve conservative care, which includes close observation of the patient and monitoring supplemental oxygen. For a large, closed pneumothorax, conservative treatment is still a possible option, but manual aspiration may be required. Less often, a needle or tube thoracostomy is needed to reinflate the lung. Large, open pneumothoraxes require the most invasive treatment with current guidelines recommending tube thoracostomy. More invasive management options can result in higher rates of complications. Given the significant variability in practice patterns, most notable in resource limited settings, the areas for potential research are presented.