Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 33(5): 777-783, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31868656

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a wide range of rehabilitation protocols after knee arthroscopic procedures, mainly based on specialist exercises. They comprise of specific stages and key moments but should also be individualized and adjusted to the patient's needs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the BodyFlow device impact on physical and psychological functioning of the subjects after knee arthroscopy. METHODS: Ninety three patients were randomly divided into the study and control group. Each study group subject performed mild electrostimulation using the BodyFlow device for three weeks, five times a day for 20 minutes along with the standard rehabilitation protocol. Control group subjects were treated according to the standard rehabilitation protocol after knee arthroscopy. Healthy and operated lower limb size, a range of the knee joint motion, and the flexor and extensor strength were measured 3, 6, and 9 weeks after arthroscopy. At each measurement, the SF-36 and KOOS surveys were collected. RESULTS: On study day 21, a positive, statistically significant, difference in the knee joint size, range of flection and extension, flexor and extensor strength as well as all KOOS survey subscales and physical functioning categories included in the SF-36 survey was observed. On study day 63, positive effects persisted and significant differences in other categories included in the SF-36 survey were observed. CONCLUSION: Application of mild electrostimulation using the BodyFlow device has a positive impact on the swelling in the knee joint region, range of motion, extensor and flexor strength as well as physical, psychological, and social functioning.


Assuntos
Artroscopia/reabilitação , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Joelho/fisiologia , Joelho/cirurgia , Articulação do Joelho/fisiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Wiad Lek ; 69(6): 758-764, 2016.
Artigo em Polonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28214811

RESUMO

Calcaneal spur is one of the most common disorders associated with foot pain. According to appearance of pain in each step during the day, it is important to find the most effective method of treatment. This article is a review of medical reports about non-operative treatment method. It shows that ultrasound therapy was the most common physical intervetion used so far, and mostly occurs to be effective. However one of the comparative studies improves higher efficiency of phonopheresis. Another comparative study, shows higher efficiency of combined ultrasound and laser therapy, than exclusive laser therapy. There haven't been found any articles that would evaluate efficacy of electrotherapy and short wave diathermy (electric field) in the treatment of mentioned disorder. Studies that describe the effect of ESWT treatment were also analyzed in this article, and all of them confirm its effectiveness in heel spur therapy, showing no side-effects. Cryotherapy also causes positive effect in treatment of this disorder. However Cryoultrasound therapy that uses the energy of two interconnected terapeutic techniques which is cryotherapy and ultrasounds, proved to be more effective.


Assuntos
Esporão do Calcâneo/terapia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Crioterapia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Ondas de Choque de Alta Energia/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Terapia a Laser , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia por Ultrassom
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...