Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial of conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in patients with great saphenous varicose veins.

BACKGROUND: A variety of techniques exist for the treatment of patients with great saphenous vein (GSV) varicosities. Few data exist on the long-term outcomes of these interventions. METHODS: Patients undergoing conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for GSV varicose veins were followed up for 5 years. Primary outcome was obliteration or absence of the treated GSV segment; secondary outcomes were absence of GSV reflux, and change in Chronic Venous Insufficiency quality-of-life Questionnaire (CIVIQ) and EuroQol - 5D (EQ-5D™) scores. RESULTS: A total of 224 legs were included (69 conventional surgery, 78 EVLA, 77 UGFS), 193 (86.2 per cent) of which were evaluated at final follow-up. At 5 years, Kaplan-Meier estimates of obliteration or absence of the GSV were 85 (95 per cent c.i. 75 to 92), 77 (66 to 86) and 23 (14 to 33) per cent in the conventional surgery, EVLA and UGFS groups respectively. Absence of above-knee GSV reflux was found in 85 (73 to 92), 82 (72 to 90) and 41 (30 to 53) per cent respectively. CIVIQ scores deteriorated over time in patients in the UGFS group (0.98 increase per year, 95 per cent c.i. 0.16 to 1.79), and were significantly worse than those in the EVLA group (-0.44 decrease per year, 95 per cent c.i. -1.22 to 0.35) (P = 0.013). CIVIQ scores for the conventional surgery group did not differ from those in the EVLA and UGFS groups (0.44 increase per year, 95 per cent c.i. -0.41 to 1.29). EQ-5D™ scores improved equally in all groups. CONCLUSION: EVLA and conventional surgery were more effective than UGFS in obliterating the GSV 5 years after intervention. UGFS was associated with substantial rates of GSV reflux and inferior CIVIQ scores compared with EVLA and conventional surgery. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00529672 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation versus steam ablation (LAST trial) for great saphenous varicose veins.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to compare endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and endovenous steam ablation (EVSA) for great saphenous varicose veins in a non-inferiority study. METHODS: Patients with primary great saphenous vein reflux were randomized to EVLA (940 nm) or EVSA (SVS™). Primary outcomes were treatment success (vein obliteration or abolition of reflux) [corrected] at 52 weeks, and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were pain, satisfaction with treatment, duration of analgesia use and days lost from daily activities, changes in Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and EQ-5D™ scores after 12 weeks, and complications at 2 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 227 legs were treated (EVSA, 117; EVLA, 110); 36 legs treated with EVSA received a low dose and the remaining 81 a higher dose. At 1 year, the treatment success rate after high-dose EVSA was not inferior to that of EVLA: 92 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 86 to 98) versus 96 (92 to 100) per cent respectively. Changes in VCSS after 12 weeks were similar: -2·69 (95 per cent c.i. -2·34 to -3·04) and -2·51 (-2·10 to -2·93). AVVQ, EQ-5D™ and EQ VAS scores improved equally 12 weeks after both treatments. Patients treated with EVSA reported less postprocedural pain, fewer days of analgesia use, were more satisfied with therapy, and had a shorter convalescence. Complication rates were comparable. CONCLUSION: The 1-year treatment success of high-dose EVSA was not inferior to that of EVLA. Several secondary outcomes were in favour of EVSA. Registration number NCT02046967 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Technical review of endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins.

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, several new treatments of truncal varicose veins have been introduced. Of these new therapies, endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) is one of the most widely accepted and used treatment options for incompetent greater and lesser saphenous veins. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this report is to inform clinicians about the EVLT procedure and to review its efficacy and safety in treatment of truncal varicose veins. Also, we discuss some of the underlying theoretical principles and laser parameters that affect EVLT. METHODS: We carried out a literature review of EVLT;s efficacy and safety. We included reports that included 100 or more limbs with a follow-up of at least 3 months. The principals and procedure of EVLT are described. Of the laser parameters, mode of administration, wavelength, fluence, wattage and pullback speed are discussed. CONCLUSION: EVLT appears to be a very effective and safe option in the treatment of varicose veins but large randomized comparative studies are needed.

[Echo-guided compression sclerotherapy using foam: an improvement in the treatment of varicose veins]. / Echogeleide sclerocompressietherapie met schuim: een aanwinst bij de behandeling van varices.

Recently, echo-guided compression sclerotherapy (ECST) using foam was introduced as an efficient and patient-friendly therapy for the treatment of varicose veins. ECST enables operation under either spinal or general anaesthetic to be avoided. Foam for phlebological use is a volatile mixture of a gas, usually air, and a small quantity of liquid with the characteristics of a detergent or soap, such as polidocanol. The product that is injected has deterging properties. It reduces the surface tension of endothelial cells resulting in the destruction of the vascular wall. The treated vessel is subsequently reduced to a fibrous cord. For small calibre varicose veins, sclerosing fluids are used. In The Netherlands, until relatively recently branch varicosities of the long and short saphenous veins were treated surgically, but ECST using foam can be successfully used to treat wide calibre varicosities. Caution is advised in treating patients who are known to have a history of open foramen ovale because of the higher risk of the occurrence of scotoma and transient cerebral ischaemia.

The treatment of leg telangiectasia.

Leg telangiectasia is more difficult to treat than facial telangiectasia. Investigations may be needed to elucidate the origin of the telangiectasia. In cases of venous insufficiency, investigation of venous haemodynamics is desirable. Treatment is primarily by sclerotherapy, including foam sclerotherapy. Light and laser treatments are also effective, especially for telangiectasia up to 1 mm in diameter. New developments incorporate longer pulse durations, such as frequency-doubled neodynium YAG and diode lasers as well as intense pulsed light. After all treatment methods, compression for 48 h using pads, bandages or hosiery is recommended. As with all cosmetic procedures, patients need to be tutored comprehensively about anticipated results and possible complications or side-effects.