[Anticonvulsant add-on therapy with Eslicarbazepine acetate : Results of the EPOS-study in adults in Germany]. / Antikonvulsive Zusatztherapie mit Eslicarbazepinacetat : Ergebnisse der EPOS-Studie bei Erwachsenen in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Due to inadequate seizure control achieved with antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy and the considerable side effects at high required doses, patients with partial-onset seizures (POS) often require AED combination therapy. Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is licensed as an add-on therapy for POS and has a favorable tolerability profile. OBJECTIVES: To investigate retention, utilization, reported efficacy, safety and tolerability as well as effects on health-related quality of life using ESL as an add-on treatment to an established monotherapy in a real-world adult population with POS in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A subgroup analysis was performed on the data derived from the German study sites that had participated in an international, non-interventional, open-label study conducted in eight European countries (eslicarbazepine acetate in partial-onset seizures, EPOS). Adult patients with POS whose physician had decided to prescribe add-on treatment with ESL to an established monotherapy were followed over a total period of approximately six months (three visits: baseline and after periods of approximately three and six months). Data collection included patient retention, reported efficacy, safety and tolerability as well as quality of life (QOLIE-10). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The subgroup analysis included 104 patients which had been enrolled at 38 German study sites. After 6 months, retention of ESL add-on therapy was 86.5 %, with 44.7 % of patients reporting seizure freedom over the 3 months prior to this visit. The overall tolerability of ESL add-on therapy was favorable: 32 adverse events (AE) were reported in 20 patients (19.2 %), while only two events in two patients were considered serious. No new safety signals were detected.

Real-world data on eslicarbazepine acetate as add-on to antiepileptic monotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess retention, tolerability, and safety, efficacy and effects on quality of life (QoL) of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) add-on treatment over 6 months in a real-world adult population with partial-onset seizures. METHODS: This non-interventional, multicenter, prospective study was performed in eight European countries. Adult patients (n = 247) for whom the physician had decided to initiate ESL as add-on to an existing antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy were invited to participate. The study comprised three visits: baseline, and after 3 and 6 months. Data on ESL retention, efficacy, tolerability, safety, and QoL were collected. RESULTS: After 6 months, the retention rate of ESL was 82.2%, and 81.8% of patients reported a reduction of seizure frequency of at least 50%; 39.2% of patients reported seizure freedom at this time. The mean QOLIE-10 score improved from 2.9 (SD ± 0.8) at baseline to 2.1 (SD ± 0.8) after 6 months. 109 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 57 patients (26.0%); the majority were rated as related to ESL by the investigator and led to a discontinuation of ESL in 25 patients (11.4%). Eight patients (3.7%) suffered at least one serious AE. The most frequently reported AEs were dizziness, headache, convulsion, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that ESL was well tolerated and efficacious as add-on therapy to one baseline AED. The use of ESL in patients less refractory than those included in previous clinical trials led to higher responder and seizure freedom rates. No new safety issues were observed.

Positive and negative psychotropic effects of levetiracetam.

OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to observe behavioral changes in patients receiving levetiracetam (LEV), a newer antiepileptic drug (AED), and to answer the question of whether LEV exerts a specific effect on impulse control and aggression. METHODS: We asked 288 consecutive patients with epilepsy on LEV (90% polytherapy, mean dose=2689 mg) and 135 relatives whether LEV caused a positive or negative behavioral change. Forty-three patients on other AEDs served as a control group. Ratings were related to patient characteristics, efficacy, dose, drug load, bidirectional ratings of change in behavioral domains, and questionnaires on personality (Fragebogens zur Persönlichkeit bei zerebralen Erkrankungen) and impulsivity (Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11). RESULTS: LEV was rated as very effective by 40% of the patients. In contrast to only 9% of the controls, a considerable number of patients reported a behavioral change while taking LEV (12% very negative, 25% negative, 16% positive, 6% very positive). Negative ratings were due to loss of self-control, restlessness, sleep problems, and, most importantly, aggression. Positive ratings were due to increased energy, vigilance, and activation. Increases in psychomotor speed, concentration, and remote memory indicated subjectively experienced positive effects on cognition. The proxy reports indicated reliable self-reports. Reported change was not related to type of epilepsy, co-therapy, dose, drug load, or psychiatric history. Negative effects were, however, associated with poorer seizure control, mental retardation, indicators of an organic psychosyndrome, and nonplanning impulsiveness. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that LEV exerts a dose-independent stimulating effect that can be positive or negative. Aggression is a prominent feature. Lack of efficacy, mental retardation, and presumably also pre-intake disposition (organic psychosyndrome, impulsivity) may be helpful in predicting whether additional activation under LEV will be positive or negative.