A combination of HNF-4 and Foxo1 is required for reciprocal transcriptional regulation of glucokinase and glucose-6-phosphatase genes in response to fasting and feeding.

Glucokinase (GK) and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) regulate rate-limiting reactions in the physiologically opposed metabolic cascades, glycolysis and gluconeogenesis, respectively. Expression of these genes is conversely regulated in the liver in response to fasting and feeding. We explored the mechanism of transcriptional regulation of these genes by nutritional condition and found that reciprocal function of HNF-4 and Foxo1 plays an important role in this process. In the GK gene regulation, Foxo1 represses HNF-4-potentiated transcription of the gene, whereas it synergizes with HNF-4 in activating the G6Pase gene transcription. These opposite actions of Foxo1 concomitantly take place in the cells under no insulin stimulus, and such gene-specific action was promoter context-dependent. Interestingly, HNF-4-binding elements (HBEs) in the GK and G6Pase promoters were required both for the insulin-stimulated GK gene activation and insulin-mediated G6Pase gene repression. Indeed, mouse in vivo imaging showed that mutating the HBEs in the GK and G6Pase promoters significantly impaired their reactivity to the nutritional states, even in the presence of intact Foxo1-binding sites (insulin response sequences). Thus, in the physiological response of the GK and G6Pase genes to fasting/feeding conditions, Foxo1 distinctly decodes the promoter context of these genes and differently modulates the function of HBE, which then leads to opposite outcomes of gene transcription.

pH profile of cytochrome c-catalyzed tyrosine nitration.

In the present study, we investigated how cytochrome c catalyzed the nitration of tyrosine at various pHs. The cytochrome c-catalyzed nitration of tyrosine occurred in proportion to the concentration of hydrogen peroxide, nitrite or cytochrome c. The cytochromec-catalyzed nitration of tyrosine was inhibited by catalase, sodium azide, cystein, and uric acid. These results show that the cytochrome c-catalyzed nitrotyrosine formation was due to peroxidase activity. The rate constant between cytochrome c and hydrogen peroxide within the pH range of 3-8 was the largest at pH 6 (37 degrees C). The amount of nitrotyrosine formed was the greatest at pH 5. At pH 3, only cytochromec-independent nitration of tyrosine occurred in the presence of nitrite. At this pH, the UV as well as visible spectrum of cytochrome c was changed by nitrite, even in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, probably via the formation of a heme iron-nitric oxide complex. Due to this change, the peroxidase activity of cytochrome c was lost.

Induction of myeloperoxidase and nitrotyrosine formation in a human eosinophilic leukemia cell line, EoL-1.

The human eosinophilic leukemia cell line, EoL-1, differentiated with butyrate as an eosinophilic cellular model was evaluated for peroxidase-dependent tyrosine nitration. Butyrate suppressed cell growth and induced eosinophilic granules in EoL-1 cells after 9 days of culture. Peroxidase activity was detected biochemically and histochemically from 3-day cultures and it increased in a time dependent manner. This peroxidase activity was inhibited by cyanide. Nitrotyrosine formation catalysed by peroxidase using hydrogen peroxide and nitrite was detected at a high level similar to that of mature eosinophils. However, no expression of eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) was detected by RT-PCR or immunocytochemistry. In contrast, the induction of myeloperoxidase (MPO) by butyrate was clearly detected by RT-PCR, Northern blot, and immunocytochemical staining. These results suggest that butyrate induces MPO rather than EPO in EoL-1 cells and that the formation of nitrotyrosine in butyrate-induced cells is dependent on MPO.

Immunohistochemical artifact for nitrotyrosine in eosinophils or eosinophil containing tissue.

Immunohistochemical artifacts for nitrotyrosine were investigated in eosinophils with regard to fixatives. Immunoreactivity for nitrotyrosine was revealed in separated eosinophils and in gastric mucosa fixed with periodate, lysine-paraformaldehyde (PLP). The increase in immunoreactivity by PLP was due to periodate itself, a component of PLP. Nitrotyrosine formed by peroxidase using NO2- and H2O2 or by peroxynitrite was not completely inhibited by 100 mM dithionite but the immunoreactivity for nitrotyrosine antibodies by PLP was completely inhibited by 5.7 mM dithionite. Although untreated eosinophils or ovalbumin (OVA) did not show protein tyrosine nitration in a standard Western blot, the treatment of the blotted membrane with PLP increased the reactivities of proteins from eosinophils with anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies. The increase in immunoreactivity of OVA with anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies by PLP did not change with pre-treatment with dithionite but was abolished by treatment with dithionite after PLP fixation. In HPLC assays, periodate did not generate nitrotyrosine from L-tyrosine and aminotyrosine. These results suggest that the treatment of eosinophils or eosinophil-containing tissues with PLP fixative augments the immunoreactivity of nitrotyrosine antibodies with eosinophils due to the formation of epitopes similar to nitrotyrosine by an oxidation reaction of periodate, which evokes an artifact in nitrotyrosine immunohistochemistry.