Effective and Secure Closure after Duodenal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Combination of Endoscopic Ligation with O-Ring Closure and Over-the-Scope Clip.

Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is associated with high incidences of intraoperative complications and delayed adverse events (AEs). Delayed AEs can be reduced by closing the post-ESD defects. We developed a new method of closure after duodenal ESD, combining endoscopic ligation with O-ring closure (E-LOC) with an over-the-scope clip (OTSC) (Band OTSC; B-OTSC). Here, we conducted a single-center, retrospective, observational study to investigate the efficacy and safety of the B-OTSC method for preventing delayed AEs in patients undergoing duodenal ESD. The study included nine patients with superficial nonpapillary duodenal epithelial tumors who underwent ESD and were closed with B-OTSC from February 2021 to February 2023. There were no delayed AEs (0%), the mean (± standard deviation) closure time was 53 ± 21.6 min, the complete closure rate was 100%, and the mean hospital stay was 7.8 ± 1.8 days. The sustained closure rates at postoperative days 3 and 7 were 88.9% and 88.9%, respectively. The historical analysis indicated a significant difference in cost between B-OTSC and conventional OTSC (p < 0.01). In conclusion, B-OTSC was a safe, secure, and cost-effective method of closure after duodenal ESD, even in patients with post-ESD defects of more than half the circumference.

Acceptability of Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Using Multifunctional Snare for Small-sized Gastric Neoplasms: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The most suitable procedure for resecting small-sized gastric neoplasms remains unclear. Endoscopic mucosal resection leads to non-curative resection owing to slippage of the snare, and technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is instrumentally uneconomical. A novel, cost-effective, multifunctional snare called SOUTEN is available as a hybrid ESD (h-ESD) device developed for facilitating ESD. This study aimed to assess the acceptability of h-ESD using the SOUTEN for resecting small-sized gastric neoplasms. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted at our single institution between March 2019 and March 2021. Fifty-seven consecutive patients who underwent h-ESD using SOUTEN for small-sized gastric neoplasms ≤15 mm involving adenoma and tubular-type mucosal carcinoma without ulceration were enrolled. The primary outcome was curative resection rate for h-ESD. Secondary outcomes were the rates of conversion to ESD, rate of total (h-ESD + ESD) curative resection, procedure time, rates of intra-and post- operative complications, and presence of additional knives excluding hemostatic forceps. RESULTS: The curative resection rate of h-ESD was 89.5% (51/57). The total (h-ESD + ESD) curative resection rate was 94.7% (54/57). The mean procedure time was 21.2 (±16.5) minutes. One case of delayed bleeding occurred. Additional knives were applied in two cases. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-efficient h-ESD using SOUTEN can be an acceptable procedure for resecting small- sized gastric neoplasms.

White Spot, a Novel Endoscopic Finding, May Be Associated with Acid-Suppressing Agents and Hypergastrinemia.

White globe appearance (WGA) is defined as a microendoscopic white lesion with a globular shape underlying the gastric epithelium and is considered a marker of gastric cancer. We recently reported that endoscopically visualized white spot (WS) corresponding to WGA appeared on the nonatrophic mucosa of patients with acid-suppressing agents (A-SA) use. We evaluated patients undergoing routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy and divided the patients into an A-SA group (n = 112) and a control group (n = 158). We compared the presence of WS in both groups. We also compared WS-positive- (n = 31) and -negative (n = 43) groups within the A-SA group regarding these patients' backgrounds and serum gastrin concentrations. Comparing the A-SA group with controls, the prevalence of WS was significantly higher (31/112 vs. 2/158; p < 0.001). The number of patients with high serum gastrin concentrations was significantly higher in the WS-positive group (18/31) vs. the WS-negative group (5/43) (p < 0.001). Within the A-SA group, the prevalence of WS was also significantly higher in patients taking potassium-competitive acid blockers vs. proton-pump inhibitors (21/31 vs. 10/31, p < 0.001). The WS-positive group had a significantly greater percentage of patients, with a high serum gastrin level (p < 0.001). WS may be associated with hypergastrinemia and potassium-competitive acid blockers.

Pocket Creation and Ring-thread Traction Facilitates Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Non-experts.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a difficult technique. Counter-traction may facilitate the procedure but its efficacy in non-experts remains unclear. We determined the safety and efficacy of pocket creation and ring-thread traction (PRM) for non-expert colorectal ESD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively compared patients who underwent conventional colorectal ESD (C-group, n=50) or PRM (pocket creation, whole-circumferential cutting, ring-thread traction, submucosal dissection; PRM-group, n=48). All procedures were performed by four non-experts, each with ≤40 experiences of colorectal ESD. RESULTS: Procedural time was significantly shorter in the PRM-group compared with the C-group (p=0.007), with less additional device usage (p<0.001). There also tended to be fewer perforation incidents and muscle injuries in the PRM-group. There were no significant differences in en bloc or R0 resection rates between the groups. CONCLUSION: PRM may be a safe, useful, and cost-effective technique for non-experts learning to perform colorectal ESD.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Neoplasia of the Greater Curvature of the Upper and Middle Stomach: J-shaped Superficial Cutting and Splashed Dissection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a standard treatment for early gastric neoplasia. However, as the upper and middle body of the greater curvature has a rich vasculature and submucosal fibrosis, ESD of neoplasia in these locations requires a specific strategy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the J-shaped superficial cutting and splashed submucosal dissection (JSCS) technique for neoplasia of the greater curvature by comparing ESD using JSCS with conventional ESD. METHODS: Twenty-two patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasia affecting the upper and middle body of the greater curvature were divided into two groups for retrospective analysis. Nine patients underwent conventional ESD (c-Group), while 13 underwent ESD with JSCS (j-Group). Primary outcome was the en bloc resection rate. Secondary outcomes included complete resection (R0) rate, procedure time, perforation rate, total bleeding time, and the total number of massive bleeding events and of hemostatic forceps times applied during ESD. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between both groups (c-Group vs j-Group) in en bloc resection rate, or R0 resection rate. Compared with the c-Group, the j-Group tended to have a decreased mean procedure time (mean 133 minutes vs 74 minutes, p=0.11) and perforation rate (11% vs 0%, p=0.41). Compared with the c-Group, the j-Group had significantly fewer bleeding incidents (13.4 times vs 6.6 times, p=0.0095), shorter total bleeding time (17.6 min vs 7.4 min, p=0.036), and fewer usages of hemostatic forceps (6.3 times vs 2.4 times, p=0.026) during ESD. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic submucosal dissection with JSCS is superior to conventional ESD, as it reduces intraprocedural bleeding. This technique has the potential to become the standard strategy for neoplasia affecting the upper and middle body of the greater curvature.