RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of age adapted D-dimer cut-off values can be translated to primary care patients who are suspected of deep vein thrombosis. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross sectional diagnostic study. SETTING: 110 primary care doctors affiliated with three hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 1374 consecutive patients (936 (68.1%) aged >50 years) with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients with D-dimer values below two proposed age adapted cut-off levels (age in years × 10 µg/L in patients aged >50 years, or 750 µg/L in patients aged ≥ 60 years), in whom deep vein thrombosis could be excluded; and the number of false negative results. RESULTS: Using the Wells score, 647 patients had an unlikely clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis. In these patients (at all ages), deep vein thrombosis could be excluded in 309 (47.8%) using the age dependent cut-off value compared with 272 (42.0%) using the conventional cut-off value of 500 µg/L (increase 5.7%, 95% confidence interval 4.1% to 7.8%). This exclusion rate resulted in 0.5% and 0.3% false negative cases, respectively (increase 0.2%, 0.004% to 8.6%).The increase in exclusion rate by using the age dependent cut-off value was highest in the oldest patients. In patients older than 80 years, deep vein thrombosis could be safely excluded in 22 (35.5%) patients using the age dependent cut-off value compared with 13 (21.0%) using the conventional cut-off value (increase 14.5%, 6.8% to 25.8%). Compared with the age dependent cut-off value, the cut-off value of 750 µg/L had a similar exclusion rate (307 (47.4%) patients) and false negative rate (0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Combined with a low clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis, use of the age dependent D-dimer cut-off value for patients older than 50 years or the cut-off value of 750 µg/L for patients aged 60 years and older resulted in a considerable increase in the proportion of patients in primary care in whom deep vein thrombosis could be safely excluded, compared with the conventional cut-off value of 500 µg/L.
