Comparison of the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT and axillary ultrasound for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: FDG-PET/CT is increasingly being used for breast cancer staging. Its diagnostic accuracy in comparison to ultrasound as the standard non-invasive imaging modality for the evaluation of axillary lymph nodes has yet not been evaluated. PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the diagnostic value of full-dose, intravenously contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT and ultrasound for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety patients (one patient with a bilateral carcinoma) (89 women, one man; mean age, 55.5 +/- 16.6 years) suffering from primary breast cancer underwent whole-body FDG-PET/CT and axillary ultrasound. The ipsilateral axillary fossa (n = 91) was evaluated for metastatic spread. The sensitivity, specificity, the positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of both methods were calculated. The sensitivity and accuracy were statistically compared using the McNemar Test (P <0.05). Analyses were made on a patient basis. The number of patients with extra-axillary locoregional lymph node metastases exclusively detected by FDG-PET/CT was evaluated. For axillary lymph node metastases histopathology served as the reference standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases were 54%, 89%, 77%, 74%, and 75%, respectively. For ultrasound it was 38%, 78%, 54%, 65%, and 62%, respectively. FDG-PET/CT was significantly more accurate than ultrasound for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases (P = 0.019). There was no statistically significant difference between the sensitivity of both modalities (P = 0.0578). FDG-PET/CT detected extra-axillary locoregional lymph node metastases in seven patients (8%) that had not been detected by another imaging modality. CONCLUSION: Though more accurate compared to ultrasound for evaluating the axillary lymph node status FDG-PET/CT is only as sensitive as ultrasound when it comes to the detection of axillary lymph node metastases. Due to the low sensitivity FDG-PET/CT cannot act as a substitute for Sentinel lymph node biopsy. FDG-PET/CT is able to detect previously unknown locoregional extra-axillary lymph node metastases.

FDG-PET/CT for the early prediction of histopathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: initial results.

BACKGROUND: Up to about one-quarter of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy do not adequately respond to the given treatment. By a differentiation between responders and non-responders ineffective toxic therapies can be prevented. PURPOSE: To retrospectively test if FDG-PET/CT is able to early differentiate between breast cancer lesions with pathological complete response (pCR) and lesions without pathological complete response (npCR) after two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study 26 breast cancer patients (mean age, 46.9 years ± 9.9 years) underwent a pre-therapeutic FDG-PET/CT scan and a subsequent FDG-PET/CT after the second cycle of NACT. Histopathology of resected specimen served as the reference standard. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of cancer lesions before and after the second cycle of NACT were measured. Two evaluation algorithms were used: (a) pCR: Sinn Score 3 and 4, npCR: Sinn Score 0-2; (b) pCR: Sinn Score 4, npCR: Sinn Score 0-3. The absolute and relative decline of the SUVmax (ΔSUVmax, ΔSUVmax(%))was calculated. Differences of the SUVmax as well as of the SUVmax decline between pCR lesions and npCR lesions were tested for statistical significance P < 0.05. To identify the optimal cut-off value of ΔSUVmax(%) to differentiate between pCR lesions and npCR lesions a receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis was performed. RESULTS: Using evaluation algorithm A the ΔSUVmax was 13.5 (pCR group) and 3.9 (npCR group) (P = 0.006); the ΔSUVmax(%) was 79% and 47%, respectively (P = 0.001). On ROC analysis an optimal cut-off ΔSUVmax(%) of 66% was found. Using evaluation algorithm B the ΔSUVmax was 17.5 (pCR group) and 4.9 (npCR group) (P = 0.013); the ΔSUVmax(%) was 89% and 51%, respectively (P = 0.003). On ROC analysis an optimal cut-off ΔSUVmax(%) of 88% was found. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET/CT may be able to early differentiate between pCR and npCR of primary breast cancer lesions after two cycles of NACT.

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis: focus on the vulva.

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis is a frequent disease with a serious impact on women's quality of life. Mostly, recurrences are caused by identical Candida strains suggesting C. albicans persistence in the female anogenital area. Objectives of the presented work were to identify the site of C. albicans persistence, to determine clinical symptoms and signs related to C. albicans positive vulvar cultures and to introduce a new therapeutic approach in women with RVVC. Women with an acute, culture-confirmed episode of RVVC at time of visit were included in this prospective case series. Swabs were obtained from both vagina and inter-labial sulcus. Women received a combined 20-day regimen of 100 mg oral fluconazole and ciclopiroxolamin cream topically. Follow-up visits were at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Of 139 women, 105 (76%) had at least one C. albicans positive culture from the external vulva. Vulvar positive cultures correlated with pruritus (OR 5.4; P < 0.001), vulvar edema (OR 3.8; P = 0.03) and fissures (OR 2.4; P = 0.03). Recurrence rates were 27%, 33% and 34% (at 6, 9, 12 months, respectively). The external vulva appears to represent a site of C. albicans persistence and source of endogenous re-infection in patients with RVVC. The combined treatment compared favorably with published fluconazole maintenance regimens.

Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic value of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and FDG PET/CT for breast cancer (BC) staging. METHODS: Twenty BC patients underwent whole-body FDG PET/CT and 1.5-T DWI. Lesions with qualitatively elevated signal intensity on DW images (b = 800 s/mm(2)) were rated as suspicious for tumour and mapped to individual lesions and different compartments (overall 552 lesions). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value was determined for quantitative evaluation. Histopathology, MRI findings, bone scan findings, concordant findings between FDG PET/CT and DWI, CT follow-up scans and plausibility served as the standards of reference defining malignancy. RESULTS: According to the standards of reference, breasts harboured malignancy in 11, regional lymph nodes in 4, M1 lymph nodes in 3, bone in 7, lung in 2, liver in 3 and other tissues in 3 patients. On a compartment basis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of malignancies were 94, 99, 98, 97 and 98% for FDG PET/CT and 91, 72, 76, 50 and 96% for DWI, respectively. Of the lesions seen on DWI only, 348 (82%) turned out to be false-positive compared to 23 (11%) on FDG PET/CT. The average lesion ADC was 820 +/- 300 with true-positive lesions having 929 +/- 252 vs 713 +/- 305 in false-positive lesions (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Based on these initial data DWI seems to be a sensitive but unspecific modality for the detection of locoregional or metastatic BC disease. There was no possibility to quantitatively distinguish lesions using ADC. DWI alone may not be recommended as a whole-body staging alternative to FDG PET(/CT). Further studies are necessary addressing the question of whether full-body MRI including DWI may become an alternative to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging.

Tumor-specific correlation of tumor M2 pyruvate kinase in pre-invasive, invasive and recurrent cervical cancer.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of tumor M2 pyrurate kinase (Tu-M2-PK) as a tumor marker in patients with pre-invasive (CIN), invasive (PCC) and recurrent (RCC) cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plasma samples were investigated from 125 patients, comprising 50 cases of CIN (I-III), 51 of PCC (FIGO I-IV) and 24 of RCC, before treatment. Tu-M2-PK levels were determined by using a quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: With the increase in disease severity from CIN to PCC to RCC, levels of Tu-M2-PK significantly increased (p<0.001). Levels of Tu-M2-PK significantly increased with respect to the FIGO stage (p<0.001) and had significantly higher values in node+ patients (p=0.028). There was no significant difference in Tu-M2-PK levels in CIN I-III patients (p=0.626). Patients with distant metastasis had significantly elevated levels of Tu-M2-PK (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Tu-M2-PK can be used as a marker to differentiate between malignant and premalignant cervical lesions. In addition, the concentration of Tu-M2-PK correlates with the clinical stage of the disease.

Diagnostic value of full-dose FDG PET/CT for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate FDG PET/CT and CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer (BC) patients and (2) to evaluate FDG PET/CT as a pre-test for the triage to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). METHODS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV), and accuracy of FDG PET/CT and CT for axillary lymph node metastases were determined in 61 patients (gold standard: histopathology). According to the equation "NPV = specificity (1-prevalence) / [specificity (1-prevalence) + (1-sensitivity) prevalence]" FDG PET/CT was evaluated as a triage tool for SLNB versus ALND. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of FDG PET/CT was 58, 92, 82, 77 and 79% and of CT 46, 89, 72, 71 and 72%, respectively. Patients with an up to approximately 60% risk for axillary lymph node metastases appear to be candidates for SLNB provided that the axilla is unremarkable on FDG PET/CT. CONCLUSION: FDG PET/CT cannot replace invasive approaches for axillary staging but may extend the indication for SLNB.

Breast cancer staging in a single session: whole-body PET/CT mammography.

UNLABELLED: Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of an all-in-one protocol of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography with the diagnostic accuracy of a multimodality algorithm for initial breast cancer staging. METHODS: Forty women (mean age, 58.3 y; range, 30.8-78.4 y; SD, 12 y) with suspected breast cancer were included. For the primary tumor, we compared 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography versus MRI mammography; for axillary lymph node status, 18F-FDG PET/CT versus clinical investigation and ultrasound; and for distant metastases, 18F-FDG PET/CT versus a multimodality staging algorithm. Histopathology and clinical follow-up served as the standard of reference. The Fisher exact test evaluated the significance of differences (P < 0.05). Alterations in patient management caused by 18F-FDG PET/CT were documented. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the detection rate of breast cancer lesions (18F-FDG PET/CT, 95%; MRI, 100%; P = 1). 18F-FDG PET/CT correctly classified lesion focality significantly more often than did MRI (18F-FDG PET/CT, 79%; MRI, 73%; P < 0.001). MRI correctly defined the T stage significantly more often than did 18F-FDG PET/CT (MRI, 77%; 18F-FDG PET/CT, 54%; P = 0.001). 18F-FDG PET/CT detected axillary lymph node metastases in 80% of cases; clinical investigation/ultrasound, in 70%. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.067). Distant metastases were detected with 18F-FDG PET/CT in 100% of cases, and the multimodality algorithm identified distant metastases in 70%. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 1). Three patients had extraaxillary lymph node metastases that were detected only by PET/CT (cervical, retroperitoneal, mediastinal/internal mammary group). 18F-FDG PET/CT changed patient management in 12.5% of cases. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography protocol may be used for staging breast cancer in a single session. This initial assessment of the 18F-FDG PET/CT protocol indicates similar accuracy to MRI for the detection of breast cancer lesions. Although MRI seems to be more accurate when assessing the T stage of the tumor, 18F-FDG PET/CT seems able to more accurately define lesion focality. Although 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography was able to detect axillary lymph node metastases with a high sensitivity, this method cannot soon be expected to replace the combination of clinical examination, ultrasound, and sentinel lymph node biopsy for axillary assessment.