Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anaesthesia ; 71(3): 285-90, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26682721

RESUMO

We used 20 ml ropivacaine 0.75% for ankle blocks before foot surgery in 90 participants who we allocated in equal numbers to: perineural dexamethasone 8 mg and intravenous saline 0.9%; perineural saline 0.9% and intravenous dexamethasone 8 mg; or perineural and intravenous saline 0.9%. Dexamethasone increased the median (IQR [range]) time for the return of some sensation or movement, from 14.6 (10.8-18.8 [5.5-38.0]) h with saline to 24.1 (19.3-29.3 [5.0-44.0]) h when given perineurally, p = 0.00098, and to 20.9 (18.3-27.8 [8.8-31.3]) h when given intravenously, p = 0.0067. Dexamethasone increased the median (IQR [range]) time for the return of normal neurology, from 17.6 (14.0-21.0 [9.5-40.5]) h with saline to 27.5 (22.0-36.3 [7.0-53.0]) h when given perineurally, p = 0.00016, and to 24.0 (20.5-32.3 [13.0-42.5]) h when given intravenously, p = 0.0022. Dexamethasone did not affect the rates of block success, postoperative pain scores, analgesic use, or nausea and vomiting. The route of dexamethasone administration did not alter its effects.


Assuntos
Amidas , Anestésicos Locais , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Pé/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ropivacaina , Cloreto de Sódio/administração & dosagem , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Anaesthesia ; 64(1): 54-9, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19087008

RESUMO

A questionnaire survey examining rapid sequence induction techniques was sent to all anaesthetists in Wales. The questionnaire presented five common clinical scenarios: emergency appendicectomy; elective knee arthroscopy with a symptomatic hiatus hernia; elective knee arthroscopy with an asymptomatic hiatus hernia; elective Caesarean section; and emergency laparotomy for bowel obstruction. Completed surveys were received from 421 anaesthetists, a 68% response rate. Rapid sequence induction was chosen by 398/400 respondents (100%) for bowel obstruction, 392/399 (98%) for Caesarean section, 388/408 (95%) for appendicectomy, 328/395 (83%) for symptomatic hiatus hernia but only 98/399 (25%) for asymptomatic hiatus hernia (p < 0.001). Trainees were more likely to use a rapid sequence induction technique than consultants and staff grades for the appendicectomy (p = 0.025), symptomatic hiatus hernia (p = 0.004) and asymptomatic hiatus hernia (p = 0.001) scenarios and were also more likely to use a thiopental-suxamethonium combination for rapid sequence induction (p < 0.001).


Assuntos
Anestesia Geral/métodos , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Bloqueio Neuromuscular/métodos , Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Obstétrica/métodos , Apendicectomia , Cesárea , Emergências , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Hérnia Hiatal/complicações , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Masculino , Pneumonia Aspirativa/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Tiopental , País de Gales
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...