Synthesis and biological activity of GnRH antagonists modified at position 3 with 3-(2-methoxy-5-pyridyl)-alanine.

Degarelix is a potent very long-acting GnRH antagonist after subcutaneous administration. In this paper, we describe the synthesis of two analogs of degarelix incorporating racemic 3-(2-methoxy-5-pyridyl)-alanine (2-OMe-5Pal, 5) at position 3. The two diastereomers were separated by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and the absolute stereochemistry at position 3 in the peptides was determined by enzymatic digestion with proteinase K. These analogs were tested in vitro for their ability to antagonize the GnRH receptor and in vivo for duration of action in a castrated male rat assay. Analog 7 with D2-OMe-5Pal was potent in vitro (IC50 = 5.22 nM); however, analog 8 with L2-OMe-5Pal at position 3 in degarelix lost potency as an antagonist of the human GnRH receptor (IC50 = 36.95 nM). Both the analogs were found to be short-acting in vivo.

Potent and long-acting corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) receptor 2 selective peptide competitive antagonists.

We present evidence that members of the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) family assume distinct structures when interacting with the CRF(1) and CRF(2) receptors. Predictive methods, physicochemical measurements, and structure-activity relationship studies have suggested that CRF, its family members, and competitive antagonists such as astressin [cyclo(30-33)[DPhe(12),Nle(21),Glu(30),Lys(33),Nle(38)]hCRF((12-41))] assume an alpha-helical conformation when interacting with their receptors. We had shown that alpha-helical CRF((9-41)) and sauvagine showed some selectivity for CRF receptors other than that responsible for ACTH secretion(1) and later for CRF2.(2) More recently, we suggested the possibility of a helix-turn-helix motif around a turn encompassing residues 30-33(3) that would confer high affinity for both CRF(1) and CRF(2)(2,4) in agonists and antagonists of all members of the CRF family.(3) On the other hand, the substitutions that conferred ca. 100-fold CRF(2) selectivity to the antagonist antisauvagine-30 [[DPhe(11),His(12)]sauvagine((11-40))] did not confer such property to the corresponding N-terminally extended agonists. We find here that a Glu(32)-Lys(35) side chain to side chain covalent lactam constraint in hCRF and the corresponding Glu(31)-Lys(34) side chain to side chain covalent lactam constraint in sauvagine yield potent ligands that are selective for CRF(2). Additionally, we introduced deletions and substitutions known to increase duration of action to yield antagonists such as cyclo(31-34)[DPhe(11),His(12),C(alpha)MeLeu(13,39),Nle(17),Glu(31),Lys(34)]Ac-sauvagine((8-40)) (astressin(2)-B) with CRF(2) selectivities greater than 100-fold. CRF receptor autoradiography was performed in rat tissue known to express CRF(2) and CRF(1) in order to confirm that astressin(2)-B could indeed bind to established CRF(2) but not CRF(1) receptor-expressing tissues. Extended duration of action of astressin(2)-B vs that of antisauvagine-30 is demonstrated in the CRF(2)-mediated animal model whereby the inhibition of gastric emptying of a solid meal in mice by urocortin administered intraperitoneally at time zero is antagonized by the administration of astressin(2)-B but not by antisauvagine-30 at times -3 and -6 h while both peptides are effective when given 10 min before urocortin.

Expression, purification, and characterization of a soluble form of the first extracellular domain of the human type 1 corticotropin releasing factor receptor.

The first extracellular domain (ECD-1) of the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) type 1 receptor, (CRFR1), is important for binding of CRF ligands. A soluble protein, mNT-CRFR1, produced by COS M6 cells transfected with a cDNA encoding amino acids 1--119 of human CRFR1 and modified to include epitope tags, binds a CRF antagonist, astressin, in a radioreceptor assay using [(125)I-d-Tyr(0)]astressin. N-terminal sequencing of mNT-CRFR1 showed the absence of the first 23 amino acids of human CRFR1. This result suggests that the CRFR1 protein is processed to cleave a putative signal peptide corresponding to amino acids 1--23. A cDNA encoding amino acids 24--119 followed by a FLAG tag, was expressed as a thioredoxin fusion protein in Escherichia coli. Following thrombin cleavage, the purified protein (bNT-CRFR1) binds astressin and the agonist urocortin with high affinity. Reduced, alkylated bNT-CRFR1 does not bind [(125)I-D-Tyr(0)]astressin. Mass spectrometric analysis of photoaffinity labeled bNT-CRFR1 yielded a 1:1 complex with ligand. Analysis of the disulfide arrangement of bNT-CRFR1 revealed bonds between Cys(30) and Cys(54), Cys(44) and Cys(87), and Cys(68) and Cys(102). This arrangement is similar to that of the ECD-1 of the parathyroid hormone receptor (PTHR), suggesting a conserved structural motif in the N-terminal domain of this family of receptors.

Potent somatostatin undecapeptide agonists selective for somatostatin receptor 1 (sst1).

A family of analogues of des-AA(1,2,5)-[DTrp(8)/D2Nal(8)]-SRIF that contain a 4-(N-isopropyl)-aminomethylphenylalanine (IAmp) at position 9 was identified that has high affinity and selectivity for human somatostatin receptor subtype 1 (sst1). The binding affinities of des-AA(1,2,5)-[DTrp(8),IAmp(9)]-SRIF (c[H-Cys-Lys-Phe-Phe-DTrp-IAmp-Thr-Phe-Thr-Ser-Cys-OH], CH-275) (7), des-AA(1,5)-[Tyr(2),DTrp(8),IAmp(9)]-SRIF (CH-288) (16), des-AA(1,2,5)-[Tyr(7),DTrp(8),IAmp(9)]-SRIF (23), and des-AA(1,2,5)-[DTrp(8),IAmp(9),Tyr(11)]-SRIF (25) are about (1)/(7), (1)/(4), (1)/(125), and (1)/(4) that of SRIF-28 (1) to sst1, respectively, about (1)/(65), (1)/(130), <(1)/(1000), and <(1)/(150) that of 1 to sst3, respectively, and about or less than (1)/(1000) that of 1 to the other three human SRIF receptor subtypes. A substitution of DTrp(8) by D2Nal(8) in 7 to yield des-AA(1,2,5)-[D2Nal(8),IAmp(9)]-SRIF (13) and in 16 to yield des-AA(1,5)-[Tyr(2),D2Nal(8),IAmp(9)]-SRIF (17) was intended to increase chemical stability, selectivity, and affinity and resulted in two analogues that were less potent or equipotent with similar selectivity, respectively. Carbamoylation of the N-terminus as in des-AA(1,2,5)-[DTrp(8),IAmp(9),Tyr(11)]-Cbm-SRIF (27) increased affinity slightly as well as improved selectivity. Monoiodination of 25 to yield 26 and of 27 to yield 28 resulted in an additional 4-fold increase in affinity at sst1. Desamination of the N-terminus of 17 to yield 18, on the other hand, resulted in significant loss of affinity. Attempts at reducing the size of the ring with maintenance of selectivity failed in that des-AA(1,4,5,13)-[Tyr(2),DTrp(8),IAmp(9)]-SRIF (33) and des-AA(1,4,5,6,12,13)-[Tyr(2),DTrp(8),IAmp(9)]-SRIF (34) progressively lost affinity for all receptors. Both des-AA(1,2,5)-[DTrp(8),IAmp(9),Tyr(11)]-Cbm-SRIF (27) and des-AA(1,2,5)-[DCys(3),DTrp(8),IAmp(9),Tyr(11)]-Cbm-SRIF (29) show agonistic activity in a cAMP assay; therefore, the structural basis for the agonist property of this family of analogues is not contingent upon the chirality of the Cys residue at position 3 as shown to be the case in 18-membered ring SRIF octapeptides. None of the high affinity structures described here showed receptor antagonism. We have prepared the radiolabeled des-AA(1,2,5)-[DTrp(8),IAmp(9),(125)ITyr(11)]-SRIF ((125)I-25) and des-AA(1,2,5)-[DTrp(8),IAmp(9), (125)ITyr(11)]-Cbm-SRIF ((125)I-27), used them as in vitro tracers, and found them to be superior to des-AA(1,5)-[(125)ITyr(2),DTrp(8),IAmp(9)]-SRIF ((125)I-16) for the detection of sst1 tumors in receptor autoradiography studies.

Design of potent dicyclic (4-10/5-8) gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists.

With the ultimate goal of identifying a consensus bioactive conformation of GnRH antagonists, the compatibility of a number of side chain to side chain bridges in bioactive analogues was systematically explored. In an earlier publication, cyclo[Asp(4)-Dpr(10)]GnRH antagonists with high potencies in vitro and in vivo had been identified.(1) Independently from Dutta et al. (2) and based on structural considerations, the cyclic [Glu(5)-Lys(8)] constraint was also found to be tolerated in GnRH antagonists. We describe here a large number of cyclic (4-10) and (5-8) and dicyclic (4-10/5-8) GnRH antagonists optimized for affinity to the rat GnRH receptor and in vivo antiovulatory potency. The most potent monocyclic analogues were cyclo(4-10)[Ac-DNal(1), DFpa(2),DTrp(3),Asp(4),DArg(6),Xaa(10)]GnRH with Xaa = D/LAgl (1, K(i) = 1.3 nM) or Dpr (2, K(i) = 0.36 nM), which completely blocked ovulation in cycling rats after sc administration of 2.5 microgram at noon of proestrus. Much less potent were the closely related analogues with Xaa = Dbu (3, K(i) = 10 nM) or cyclo(4-10)[Ac-DNal(1), DFpa(2),DTrp(3),Glu(4),DArg(6),D/LAgl(10)]GnRH (4, K(i) = 1.3 nM). Cyclo(5-8)[Ac-DNal(1),DCpa(2),DTrp(3),Glu(5),DArg++ +(6),Lys(8), DAla(10)]GnRH (13), although at least 20 times less potent in the AOA than 1 or 2 with similar GnRHR affinity (K(i) = 0.84 nM), was found to be one of the most potent in a series of closely related cyclo(5-8) analogues with different bridge lengths and bridgehead chirality. The very high affinity of cyclo(5,5'-8)[Ac-DNal(1), DCpa(2),DPal(3),Glu(5)(betaAla),DArg(6),(D or L)Agl,(8)DAla(10)]GnRH 14 (K(i) = 0.15 nM) correlates well with its high potency in vivo (full inhibition of ovulation at 25 microgram/rat). Dicyclo(4-10/5-8)[Ac-DNal(1),DCpa(2),DTrp(3),Asp (4),Glu(5),DArg(6), Lys(8),Dpr(10)]GnRH (24, K(i) = 0.32 nM) is one-fourth as potent as 1 or 2, in the AOA; this suggests that the introduction of the (4-10) bridge in 13, while having little effect on affinity, restores functional/conformational features favorable for stability and distribution. To further increase potency of dicyclic antagonists, the size and composition of the (5-8) bridge was varied. For example, the substitution of Xbb(5') by Gly (30, K(i) = 0.16 nM), Sar (31, K(i) = 0.20 nM), Phe (32, K(i) = 0.23 nM), DPhe (33, K(i) = 120 nM), Arg (36, K(i) = 0.20 nM), Nal (37, K(i) = 4.2 nM), His (38, K(i) = 0.10 nM), and Cpa (39, K(i) = 0.23 nM) in cyclo(4-10/5,5'-8)[Ac-DNal(1),DCpa(2),DPal(3),Asp(4),G lu(5)(Xbb(5')), DArg(6),Dbu,(8)Dpr(10)]GnRH yielded several very high affinity analogues that were 10, ca. 10, 4, >200, 1, ca. 4, >2, and 2 times less potent than 1 or 2, respectively. Other scaffolds constrained by disulfide (7, K(i) = 2.4 nM; and 8, K(i) = 450 nM), cyclo[Glu(5)-Aph(8)] (16, K(i) = 20 nM; and 17, K(i) = 0.28 nM), or cyclo[Asp(5)-/Glu(5)-/Asp(5)(Gly(5'))-Amp(8)] (19, K(i) = 1.3 nM; 22, K(i) = 3.3 nM; and 23, K(i) = 3.6 nM) bridges yielded analogues that were less potent in vivo and had a wide range of affinities. The effects on biological activity of substituting DCpa or DFpa at position 2, DPal or DTrp at position 3, and DArg, DNal, or DCit at position 6 are also discussed. Interestingly, monocyclo(5-8)[Glu(5), DNal(6),Lys(8)]GnRH (18, K(i) = 1. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Design of monocyclic (1-3) and dicyclic (1-3/4-10) gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists.

Careful analysis of the NMR structures of cyclo(4-10)[Ac-Delta(3)Pro(1),DFpa(2),DTrp(3),Asp(4),DNal (6), Dpr(10)]GnRH, dicyclo(4-10/5-8)[Ac-DNal(1),DCpa(2),DTrp(3), Asp(4), Glu(5),DArg(6),Lys(8),Dpr(10)]GnRH, and dicyclo(4-10/5, 5'-8)[Ac-DNal(1),DCpa(2),DPal(3),Asp(4), Glu(5)(Gly),DArg(6),Dbu(8), Dpr(10)]GnRH showed that, in the N-terminal tripeptide, a type II beta-turn around residues 1 and 2 was probable along with a gamma-turn around DTrp(3)/DPal(3). This suggested the possibility of constraining the N-terminus by the introduction of a cyclo(1-3) scaffold. Optimization of ring size and composition led to the discovery of cyclo(1-3)[Ac-DAsp(1),DCpa(2),DLys(3),DNal(6), DAla(10)]GnRH (5, K(i) = 0.82 nM), cyclo(1,1'-3)[Ac-DAsp(1)(Gly), DCpa(2),DOrn(3),DNal(6),DAla(10)]GnRH (13, K(i) = 0.34 nM), cyclo(1, 1'-3)[Ac-DAsp(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DLys(3),DNal(6),DA la(10)]GnRH (20, K(i) = 0.14 nM), and cyclo(1,1'-3)[Ac-DAsp(1)(betaAla), DCpa(2), DOrn(3),DNal(6),DAla(10)]GnRH (21, K(i) = 0.17 nM), which inhibited ovulation significantly at doses equal to or lower than 25 microgram/rat. These results were particularly unexpected in view of the critical role(s) originally ascribed to the side chains of residues 1 and 3.(1) Other closely related analogues, such as those where the [DAsp(1)(betaAla), DOrn(3)] cycle of 21 was changed to [DOrn(1)(betaAla), DAsp(3)] of cyclo(1,1'-3)[Ac-DOrn(1)(betaAla), DCpa(2),DAsp(3),DNal(6),DAla(10)]GnRH (22, K(i) = 2.2 nM) or where the size of the cycle was conserved and [DAsp(1)(betaAla), DOrn(3)] was replaced by [DGlu(1)(Gly), DOrn(3)] as in cyclo(1, 1'-3)[Ac-DGlu(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DOrn(3),DNal(6),DA la(10)]GnRH (23, K(i) = 4.2 nM), were approximately 100 and 25 times less potent in vivo, respectively. Analogues with ring sizes of 18 ¿cyclo(1, 1'-3)[Ac-DGlu(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DLys(3),DNal(6),DA la(10)]GnRH (24)¿ and 19 ¿cyclo(1,1'-3)[Ac-DGlu(1)(betaAla),DCpa(2),DLys( 3),DNal(6), DAla(10)]GnRH (25)¿ atoms were also less potent than 21 with slightly higher K(i) values (1.5 and 2.2 nM, respectively). These results suggested that the N-terminal tripeptide was likely to assume a folded conformation favoring the close proximity of the side chains of residues 1 and 3. The dicyclic analogue dicyclo(1-3/4-10)[Ac-DAsp(1),DCpa(2),DLys(3),Asp (4),DNal(6), Dpr(10)]GnRH (26) was fully active at 500 microgram, with a K(i) value of 1 nM. The in vivo potency of 26 was at least 10-fold less than that of monocyclic cyclo(1-3)[Ac-DAsp(1),DCpa(2),DLys(3),DNal(6), DAla(10)]GnRH (5); this suggested the existence of unfavorable interactions between the now optimized and constrained (1-3) and (4-10) cyclic moieties that must interact as originally hypothesized. Tricyclo(1-3/4-10/5-8)[Ac-DGlu(1),DCpa(2), DLys(3),Asp(4),Glu(5), DNal(6),Lys(8),Dpr(10)] GnRH (27) was inactive at 500 microgram/rat with a corresponding low affinity (K(i) = 4.6 nM) when compared to those of the most potent analogues (K(i) < 0.5 nM).

Design of potent dicyclic (1-5/4-10) gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists.

In three earlier papers, the structures and biological potencies of numerous mono- and dicyclic antagonists of GnRH were reported. Among these, two families, each containing two to four members were identified that had very high antagonist potencies in an antiovulatory assay (within a factor of 2 of those of the most potent linear analogues) and high affinities (K(i) < 0.5 nM) for the rat GnRH receptor (rGnRHR). The most favored cycles bridged the side chains of residues (4-10),(1,2) (5-8),(2) (4-10/5-8),(2) (1-3),(3) and (1-3/4-10).(3) Our goal was to identify a consensus model of bioactive conformations of GnRH antagonists, yet these biocompatible constraints did not sufficiently restrain the spatial location of the N-terminal tripeptide with respect to the C-terminal heptapeptide, due largely to the rotational freedom about the bonds connecting these regions. Examination of models derived from NMR studies of cyclo(4-10) analogues suggested a large number of possible cyclic constraints such as cyclo (0-8), (1-8), or (2-8). All analogues tested with these substitutions were inactive as antiovulatory agents at 1 mg/rat (5-9) and had low affinity for rGnRHR. On the other hand, bridging positions 3 and 8 with a [DAsp(3)] to [Dbu(8)] (12, K(i) = 13 nM) or [Orn(8)] (13, K(i) = 14 nM) in the parent compound cyclo(3-8)[Ac-DNal(1),DCpa(2),DXaa(3), Arg(5),DNal(6),Xbb(8),DAla(10)]GnRH yielded analogues that blocked ovulation at 250 microgram/rat. Analogue 14 (K(i) = 2.3 nM), with a [DAsp(3), Lys(8)] bridge, was fully active at 50 microgram/rat. Loss of potency (>20-fold) was observed with the substitution of [DAsp(3)] in 14 by [DGlu(3)] in 15 (K(i) = 23 nM). Dicyclic analogues possessing the (4-10) cycle and selected (1-6), (2-6), and (2-8) cycles led to analogues that were inactive at doses of 500 microgram/rat or larger. Two analogues with (1-8/4-10) cycles (16, K(i) = 1.1 nM) or (3-8/4-10) cycles (22, K(i) = 17 nM) showed full antiovulatory potency at 250 microgram/rat. None of these substitutions yielded analogues potent enough (>80% inhibition of ovulation at 5 microgram/rat or less and K(i) < 0.5 nM) to be candidates for structural analysis by NMR. On the other hand, four dicyclic (1, 1'-5/4-10) analogues met this criterion: dicyclo(1, 1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Asp(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DTrp(3),Asp(4),Dbu(5 ), DNal(6), Dpr(10)]GnRH (32, K(i) = 0.22 nM), dicyclo(1, 1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Asp(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DNal(3),Asp(4),Dbu(5 ), DNal(6), Dpr(10)]GnRH (34, K(i) = 0.38 nM), dicyclo(1, 1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Asp(1)(betaAla),DCpa(2), DTrp(3),Asp(4),Dbu(5),DNal(6), Dpr(10)]GnRH (40, K(i) = 0.15 nM), and dicyclo(1, 1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Glu(1)(Gly), DCpa(2),DTrp(3),Asp(4),Dbu(5),DNal(6), Dpr(10)]GnRH (41, K(i) = 0.24 nM). Since they differed slightly in terms of the (1,1'-5) bridge length (21 and 22 atoms) and bridgehead configuration, we may hypothesize that they assume similar bioactive conformations that satisfy a very discriminating receptor, since many other closely related analogues were significantly less potent.

Consensus bioactive conformation of cyclic GnRH antagonists defined by NMR and molecular modeling.

Little is known of the conformation of peptide hormones as they interact with their receptors for a number of reasons: peptide hormones are notoriously flexible in solution, their receptors are particularly complex, and there is strong evidence that receptor-ligand interaction leading to activation is a dynamic process. Insights into the active conformation of the decapeptide gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) have been obtained previously from the solution structures of four constrained GnRH antagonists ¿cyclo(1-10)[Ac-Delta(3)-Pro(1),DCpa(2),DTrp(3,6),NMeLeu+ ++(7), betaAla(10)]GnRH (1), cyclo(4-10)[Ac-Delta(3)Pro(1),DFpa(2),DTrp(3), Asp(4),DNal(6),Dpr(10)]GnRH (2), dicyclo(4-10/5-8)[Ac-DNal(1), DCpa(2),DTrp(3),Asp(4),Glu(5),DArg(6),Lys(8),Dpr (10)]GnRH (3), and dicyclo(4-10/5-5'-8)[Ac-DNal(1),DCpa(2),DPal(3), Asp(4),Glu(5)(Gly), DArg(6),Dbu(8),Dpr(10)]GnRH (4)¿. However, the precise location of the N-terminal tripeptide in the highly potent (K(i) < 0.4 nM) 2-4 remained unclear due to the lack of constraints in this region. The NMR structure of the newly discovered and potent (K(i) = 0.24 nM) dicyclo(1-1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Glu(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DTrp(3),As p(4),Dbu(5), DNal(6),Dpr(10)]GnRH (5) now allows the definition of the conformation of this region. A combined computational analysis (consensus forcing) of compounds 2-5, designed to explore the common conformations available to them that are simultaneously consistent with the NMR data corresponding to each compound, leads to a consensus structural model for the GnRH pharmacophore. This model shares some common features with the structure of the nonpeptidic GnRH mimetic T-98475. In the course of that comparative study, two additional contact points to those proposed by the authors are identified, suggesting that this model has predictive value.

Constrained corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) agonists and antagonists with i-(i+3) Glu-Xaa-DXbb-Lys bridges.

We hypothesized that covalent constraints such as side-chain to side-chain lactam rings would stabilize an alpha-helical conformation shown to be important for the recognition and binding of the human corticotropin-releasing factor (hCRF) C-terminal 33 residues to CRF receptors. These studies led to the discovery of cyclo(20-23)[DPhe12,Glu20,Lys23,Nle21,38]hCRF (12-41) and of astressin ¿cyclo(30-33)[DPhe12,Nle21,38,Glu30,Lys33]hCR F(12-41)¿, two potent CRF antagonists, and of cyclo(30-33)[Ac-Leu8,DPhe12,Nle21, Glu30,Lys33,Nle38]hCRF(8-41), the shortest sequence equipotent to CRF reported to date (Rivier et al. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2614-2620 and references therein). To test the hypothesis that the Glu20-Lys23 and Glu30-Lys33 lactam rings were favoring an alpha-helical conformation rather than a turn, we introduced a D-amino acid at positions 22, 31, and 32 in the respective rings. Whereas the introduction of a D-residue at position 31 was only marginally deleterious to potency (ca. 2-fold decrease in potency), introduction of a D-residue at position 22 and/or 32 was favorable (up to 2-fold increase in potency) in most of the cyclic hCRF, alpha-helical CRF, urotensin, and urocortin agonists and antagonists that were tested and was also favorable in linear agonists but not in linear antagonists; this suggested a unique and stabilizing role for the lactam ring. Introduction of a [DHis32] (6) or acetylation of the N-terminus (7) of astressin had a minor deleterious or a favorable influence, respectively, on duration of action. In the absence of structural data on these analogues, we conducted molecular modeling on an Ac-Ala13-NH2 scaffold in order to quantify the structural influence of specific L- and DAla6 and L- and DAla7 substitutions in [Glu5,Lys8]Ac-Ala13-NH2 in a standard alpha-helical configuration. Models of the general form [Glu5,LAla6 or DAla6,LAla7 or DAla7,Lys8]Ac-Ala13-NH2 were subjected to high-temperature molecular dynamics followed by annealing dynamics and minimization in a conformational search. A gentle restraint was applied to the 0-4, 1-5, and 8-12 O-H hydrogen bond donor-acceptor pairs to maintain alpha-helical features at the N- and C-termini. From these studies we derived a model in which the helical N- and C-termini of hCRF form a helix-turn-helix motif around a turn centered at residue 31. Such a turn brings Gln26 in close enough proximity to Lys36 to suggest introduction of a bridge between them. We synthesized dicyclo(26-36,30-33)[DPhe12,Nle21,Cys26,Glu30 ,Lys33,Cys36, Nle38]Ac-hCRF(9-41) which showed significant alpha-helical content using circular dichroism (CD) and had low, but measurable potency ¿0. 3% that of 6 or ca. 25% that of [DPhe12,Nle21,38]hCRF(12-41)¿. Since the 26-36 disulfide bridge is incompatible with a continuous alpha-helix, the postulate of a turn starting at residue 31 will need to be further documented.

Minimal-size, constrained corticotropin-releasing factor agonists with i-(i+3) Glu-Lys and Lys-Glu bridges.

In three earlier publications (Miranda et al. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 1450-1459; 1997, 40, 3651-3658; Gulyas et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 10575-10579) we have hypothesized that covalent constraints such as side-chain-to-side-chain lactam rings would stabilize an alpha-helical conformation shown to be important for the recognition and binding of the CRF C-terminus 30 residues, to CRF receptors. These studies led to the discovery of useful CRF antagonists such as alpha-helical CRF (alpha-hel-CRF) and Astressin both in vitro and in vivo. To test the hypothesis that such lactam rings may also be modulating activation of the receptor when introduced at the N-terminus of CRF, we studied the influence of the successive introduction from residues 4 to 14 of a cyclo(i, i+3)[Lysi-Glu(i+3)] and a cyclo(i,i+3)[Glui-Lys(i+3)] bridge on the in vitro potency of the agonist [Ac-Pro4,dPhe12,Nle21,38]hCRF(4-41) and related compounds. We have also introduced the favored cyclo(Glu30-Lys33) substitution found to be remarkable in several families of antagonists (such as Astressin) and in a number of CRF agonists and investigated the role of residues 4-8 on receptor activation using successive deletions. Earlier studies had shown that in both oCRF and alpha-helical CRF, deletion of residues 1-6, 1-7, and 1-8 led to gradual loss of intrinsic activity (IA) (from 50% IA to <10% IA) resulting in alpha-hel-CRF being a potent competitive antagonist. We show that acetylation of the N-terminus of these fragments generally increases potency by a factor of 2-3 with no influence on IA. While cyclo(30-33)[Ac-Leu8,dPhe12,Nle21, Glu30,Lys33,Nle38]hCRF(8-41) (30) is the shortest reported analogue of CRF to be equipotent to CRF (70% IA), the corresponding linear analogue (31) is 120 times less potent (59% IA). Addition of one amino acid at the N-terminus ¿cyclo(30-33)[Ac-Ser7,dPhe12,Nle21, Glu30,Lys33,Nle38]hCRF(7-41) (28)¿ results in a 5-fold increase in agonist potency and full intrinsic activity (113%). The most favored modifications were also introduced in other members of the CRF family including sauvagine (Sau), urotensin (Utn), urocortin (Ucn), and alpha-hel-CRF. Parallel and consistent results were obtained suggesting that the lactam cyclization at residues 29-32 and 30-33 (for the members of the CRF family with 40 and 41 amino acid residues, respectively) will induce (in the shortened agonists) a structural constraint (alpha-helix) that stabilizes a bioactive conformation similar to that shown in the Astressin family of CRF antagonists and that residue 8 (leucine or isoleucine) bears the sole responsibility for activation of the receptor since deletion of that residue leads to potent antagonists (Gulyas et al. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 10575-10579).

Human growth hormone-releasing hormone hGHRH(1-29)-NH2: systematic structure-activity relationship studies.

Two complete and two partial structure-activity relationship scans of the active fragment of human growth hormone-releasing hormone, [Nle27]-hGHRH(1-29)-NH2, have identified potent agonists in vitro. Single-point replacement of each amino acid by alanine led to the identification of [Ala8]-, [Ala9]-, [Ala15]- (Felix et al. Peptides 1986 1986, 481), [Ala22]-, and [Ala28, Nle27]-hGHRH(1-29)-NH2 as being 2-6 times more potent than hGHRH(1-40)-OH (standard) in vitro. Nearly complete loss of potency was seen for [Ala1], [Ala3], [Ala5], [Ala6], [Ala10], [Ala11], [Ala13], [Ala14], and [Ala23], whereas [Ala16], [Ala18], [Ala24], [Ala25], [Ala26], and [Ala29] yielded equipotent analogues and [Ala7], [Ala12], [Ala17], [Ala20], [Ala21], and [Ala27] gave weak agonists with potencies 15-40% that of the standard. The multiple-alanine-substituted peptides [MeTyr1,Ala15,22,Nle27]-hGHRH(1-29)-NH2 (29) and [MeTyr1,Ala8,9,15,22,28,Nle 27]-hGHRH(1-29)-NH2 (30) released growth hormone 26 and 11 times, respectively, more effectively than the standard in vitro. Individual substitution of the nine most potent peptides identified from the Ala series with the helix promoter alpha-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib) produced similar results, except for [Aib8] (doubling vs [Ala8]), [Aib9] (having vs [Ala9]), and [Aib15] (10-fold decrease vs [Ala15]). A series of cyclic analogues was synthesized having the general formula cyclo(25-29)[MeTyr1,-Ala15,Xaa25,Nle27,Yaa29+ ++]-GHRH(1-29)-NH2, where Xaa and Yaa represent the bridgehead residues of a side-chain cystine or [i-(i + 4)] lactam ring. The ring size, bridgehead amino acid chirality, and side-chain amide bond location were varied in this partial series in an attempt to maximize potency. Application of lactam constraints in the C-terminus of GHRH(1-29)-NH2 identified cyclo(25-29)[MeTyr1,Ala15,DAsp25,Nle27,Orn29+ ++]-hGHRH(1-29)-NH2 (46) as containing the optimum bridging element (19-membered ring) in this region of the molecule. This analogue (46) was 17 times more potent than the standard. Equally effective was an [i-(i + 3)] constraint yielding the 18-membered ring cyclo(25-28)[MeTyr1,Ala15,Glu25,Nle,27Lys28]- hGHRH-(1-29)-NH2 (51) which was 14 times more potent than the standard. A complete [i-(i + 3)] scan of cyclo(i,i + 3)[MeTyr1,Ala15,Glui,Lys(i + 3),Nle27]-hGHRH(1-29)-NH2 was then produced in order to test the effects of a Glu-to-Lys lactam bridge at all points in the peptide. Of the 26 analogues in the series, 11 had diminished potencies of less than 10% that of the agonist standard, 4 were weak agonists (15-40% relative potency), and 4 analogues were equipotent to the standard. The 7 most potent analogues ranged in potency from 3 to 14 times greater than that of the standard and contained the [i-(i + 3)] cycles between residues 4-7, 5-8, 9-12, 16-19, 21-24, 22-25, and 25-28. The combined results from these systematic studies allowed for an analysis of structural features in the native peptide that are important for receptor activation. Reinforcement of the characteristics of amphiphilicity, helicity, and peptide dipolar effects, using recognized medicinal chemistry approaches including introduction of conformational constraints, has resulted in several potent GHRH analogues.

Betidamino acid scan of the GnRH antagonist acyline.

Strong clinical evidence suggests that GnRH antagonists will replace GnRH agonists in a number of indications because of their ability to inhibit gonadotropin secretion as long as an adequate concentration of the analogue is present in the circulation whereas superagonists will take approximately 2 weeks to desensitize the gonadotrophs. Until recently, antagonists were either too weak and/or would release histamine. Azaline B {[Ac-D2Nal1,D4Cpa2,D3Pal3, 4Aph5(atz),D4Aph6(atz),ILys8,DAla10] GnRH} and long-acting members of the azaline family {Ac-D2Nal-D4Cpa-D3Pal-Ser-4Aph(X)-D4Aph(Y) -Leu-ILys-Pro-DAla-NH2}, however, appear to be promising drug candidates. Because these antagonists tend to form gels (due to the formation of beta-sheet structures) and, as a result, are not readily amenable to formulation for long-term delivery, we have investigated ways of increasing hydrophilicity while retaining high potency and lack of histamine releasing activity. Betidamino acids (a contraction of "beta" position and "amide") are N'-monoacylated (optionally, N'-monoacylated and N-mono- or N,N'-dialkylated) aminoglycine derivatives in which each N'-acyl/alkyl group may mimic naturally occurring amino acid side chains or introduce novel functionalities. We have used unresolved N alpha-Boc,N'alpha-Fmoc-aminoglycine, and N alpha-Boc,N'alpha-(CH3)Fmoc-aminoglycine as templates for the introduction of betidamino acids in acyline (Ac-D2Nal-D4Cpa-D3Pal-Ser-4Aph(Ac)-D4Aph(A c)-Leu-Ilys-Pro-DAla-NH2), a long acting member of the azaline B family, to test biocompatibility of these betide derivatives. Diastereomeric peptides could be separated using RP-HPLC in most cases. Biological results obtained in vitro (binding affinity to rat pituitary gland membranes) and in vivo (rat antiovulatory assay, AOA) indicate in most cases small differences in relative potencies (< 5-fold) between the D- and L-nonalkylated betidamino acid-containing acylines. Importantly, most betide diastereomers have high affinity for the GnRH receptor and were equipotent with acyline in the AOA. Greater differences in affinity and potency between diastereomers were observed after introduction of a methyl group on the side chain nitrogen ("beta" position) of the same analogues, with one of the diastereomer having an affinity and a potency in the AOA equivalent to that of acyline. These results suggest that chirality at the alpha-carbon coupled to side chain orientation is important for receptor recognition. The duration of action of some of the most potent analogues was also determined in the castrated male rat in order to measure the extent (efficacy and duration of action) of inhibition of luteinizing hormone release. Data suggest that introduction of a betidamino acid results in reduction of duration of action. Also, introduction of betidamino acids results in peptides with increased hydrophilicity (as determined by elution times on C18 silicas at pH 7.3) compared to that of the parent compound. N'-Methyl substitution results in parallel increase in retention times on C18 silicas as expected.

Constrained corticotropin-releasing factor antagonists with i-(i + 3) Glu-Lys bridges.

Hypothesis driven and systematic structure-activity relationship (SAR) investigations have resulted in the development of effective central nervous system (CNS) antagonists of corticotropin (ACTH)-releasing factor (CRF) such as alpha-helical CRF(9-41) and analogues of our assay standard [DPhe12,Nle21,38]hCRF(12-41). On the other hand, equally potent CRF antagonists that block the hypothalamic/pituitary/adrenal (HPA) axis had not been described until recently. Predictive methods, physicochemical measurements (nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry and circular dichroism spectroscopy), and SAR studies suggest that CRF and its family members (urotensins and sauvagine) assume an alpha-helical conformation when interacting with CRF receptors. To further test this hypothesis, we have systematically scanned the hCRF(9-41) or hCRF(12-41) sequences with an i-(i + 3) bridge consisting of the Glu-Xaa-Xbb-Lys scaffold which we and others had shown could maintain or enhance alpha-helical structure. From this series we have identified seven analogues that are either equipotent to, or 3 times more potent than, the assay standard; in addition, as presented earlier cyclo(30-33)[DPhe12,-Nle21,38,Glu30, Lys33]hCRF(12-41) (astressin) is 32 times more potent than the assay standard in blocking ACTH secretion in vitro (rat pituitary cell culture assay). In vivo, astressin is also significantly more potent than earlier antagonists at reducing hypophysial ACTH secretion in intact stressed or adrenalectomized rats. Since the corresponding linear analogues that were tested are significantly less potent, our interpretation of the increased potency of the cyclic analogues is that the introduction of the side chain to side chain bridging element (Glu30-Lys33, and to a lesser extent that of Glu14-Lys17, Glu20-Lys23, Glu23-Lys26, Glu26-Lys29, Glu28-Lys31, Glu29-Lys32, and Glu33-Lys36) induces and stabilizes in the receptor environment a putative alpha-helical bioactive conformation of the fragment that is not otherwise heavily represented. The effect of the introduction of two favored substitutions [(cyclo(20-23) and cyclo(30-33)] yielded 37 with a potency 8 times that of the assay standard but actually 12 times less than expected if the effect of the two cycles had been multiplicative. These results suggest that the pituitary CRF receptor can discriminate between slightly different identifiable conformations, dramatically illustrating the role that secondary and tertiary structures play in modulating biological signaling through specific protein-ligand interactions.

Three-dimensional solution structure of alpha-conotoxin MII, an alpha3beta2 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-targeted ligand.

alpha-Conotoxin MII, isolated from Conus magus, is a potent peptidic toxin which specifically targets the mammalian neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, alpha3beta2 subtype. The three-dimensional structure of alpha-conotoxin MII in aqueous solution has been determined by two-dimensional 1H NMR spectroscopy. NOE-derived distances, refined by an iterative relaxation matrix approach, as well as dihedral and chirality restraints were used in high-temperature biphasic simulated annealing calculations. Fourteen minimum energy structures out of 50 subjected to the SA simulations were chosen for evaluation; these 14 structures have a final RMS deviation of 0.76 +/- 0.31 and 1.35 +/- 0.34 A for the backbone and heavy atoms, respectively. The overall structure is unusually well-defined due to a large helical component around the two disulfide bridges. The principal backbone folding motif may be common to a subclass of alpha-conotoxins. There are two distinct surfaces on the molecule almost at right angles to one another. One entirely consists of the hydrophobic residues Gly1, Cys2, Cys3, Leu15, and Cys16. The second comprises the hydrophilic residues Glu11, His12, Ser13, and Asn14. These surfaces on the ligand could be essential for the subtype-specific recognition of the receptor.

Dose relationship between GnRH antagonists and pituitary suppression.

While the clinical significance of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists is well recognized, the potential use of GnRH antagonists in humans awaits the availability of potent analogues with no untoward side-effects. We have designed, synthesized and tested several hundred linear and cyclic analogues (agonists and antagonists) of GnRH in different rat models; some have high histamine releasing activity and others have poor solubility in aqueous buffers with a pH > 6.0. Furthermore, we have identified analogues exhibiting short (< 12 h), intermediate (12-72 h) and long (> 72 h) duration of action in the rat (50 micrograms s.c. dose/rat). We have concluded that the basis for such resistance to degradation and elimination must be specific. In order to gain further information on the optimal nature and sterical requirements of side-chains, preliminary experiments were carried out using betidamino acids. Finally, mono- and dicyclic analogues of GnRH with potencies comparable with that of the most potent linear analogues were also obtained. Our approach to the development of such analogues included the use of nuclear magnetic resonance and computational techniques as well as that of state-of-the-art synthetic approaches. We intend to use the information derived from these structure/activity relationship studies to design conformationally-similar peptido-mimetics.

Betidamino acids: versatile and constrained scaffolds for drug discovery.

Betidamino acids (a contraction of "beta" position and "amide") are N'-monoacylated (optionally, N'-monoacylated and N-mono- or N,N'-dialkylated) aminoglycine derivatives in which each N'acyl/alkyl group may mimic naturally occurring amino acid side chains or introduce novel functionalities. Betidamino acids are most conveniently generated on solid supports used for the synthesis of peptides by selective acylation of one of the two amino functions of orthogonally protected aminoglycine(s) to generate the side chain either prior to or after the elongation of the main chain. We have used unresolved Nalpha-tert-butyloxycarbonyl-N'alpha-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl++ + aminoglycine, and Nalpha-(Nalpha-methyl)-tert-butyloxycarbonyl-N'alpha-fluo renylmethoxycarbonyl aminoglycine as the templates for the introduction of betidamino acids in Acyline [Ac-D2Nal-D4Cpa-D3Pal-Ser-4Aph(Ac)-D4Aph(A c)-Leu-Ilys-Pro-DAla-NH2, where 2Nal is 2-naphthylalanine, 4Cpa is 4-chlorophenylalanine, 3Pal is 3-pyridylalanine, Aph is 4-aminophenylalanine, and Ilys is Nepsilon-isopropyllysine], a potent gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, in order to test biocompatibility of these derivatives. Diasteremneric peptides could be separated in most cases by reverse-phase HPLC. Biological results indicated small differences in relative potencies (<5-fold) between the D and L nonalkylated betidamino acid-containing Acyline derivatives. Importantly, most betide diastereomers were equipotent with Acyline. In an attempt to correlate structure and observed potency, Ramachandran-type plots were calculated for a series of betidamino acids and their methylated homologs. According to these calculations, betidamino acids have access to a more limited and distinct number of conformational states (including those associated with alpha-helices, beta-sheets, or turn structures), with deeper minima than those observed for natural amino acids.

Phosphorylation of CREB at Ser-133 induces complex formation with CREB-binding protein via a direct mechanism.

We have characterized a phosphoserine binding domain in the coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP) which interacts with the protein kinase A-phosphorylated, and hence activated, form of the cyclic AMP-responsive factor CREB. The CREB binding domain, referred to as KIX, is alpha helical and binds to an unstructured kinase-inducible domain in CREB following phosphorylation of CREB at Ser-133. Phospho-Ser-133 forms direct contacts with residues in KIX, and these contacts are further stabilized by hydrophobic residues in the kinase-inducible domain which flank phospho-Ser-133. Like the src homology 2 (SH2) domains which bind phosphotyrosine-containing peptides, phosphoserine 133 appears to coordinate with a single arginine residue (Arg-600) in KIX which is conserved in the CBP-related protein P300. Since mutagenesis of Arg-600 to Gln severely reduces CREB-CBP complex formation, our results demonstrate that, as in the case of tyrosine kinase pathways, signal transduction through serine/threonine kinase pathways may also require protein interaction motifs which are capable of recognizing phosphorylated amino acids.

Nature of ligand affinity and dimerization of corticotrophin-releasing factor-binding protein may be detected by circular dichroism.

As the association of corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) with its binding protein (BP) to form a dimer complex (CRF2/BP2) appears to be dependent on the nature of the ligand we have compared the circular dichroism difference spectra after association of the BP with ovine (o) CRF, human (h) CRF and the alpha-helical CRF (9-41) antagonist. All three ligands caused a negative change in molar ellipticity above 210 nm, with oCRF having the least and hCRF the greatest effect. Below 210 nm there was a marked divergence of difference spectra, with the reaction with the natural peptides, hCRF and oCRF, resulting in a positive change in ellipticity, whilst that with the antagonist produced a negative change. In view of the BP spectrum indicating predominantly beta-sheet and the peptides showing mainly alpha-helix these results were interpreted as the changes above 210 nm being due to dimerization and below 210 nm to a change in the conformation of ligand on binding. The opposite change in alpha-helicity of the antagonist observed on binding compared with the two natural CRF peptides could have fundamental pharmacological implications.

Potent, structurally constrained agonists and competitive antagonists of corticotropin-releasing factor.

Predictive methods, physicochemical measurements, and structure activity relationship studies suggest that corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF; corticoliberin), its family members, and competitive antagonists (resulting from N-terminal deletions) usually assume an alpha-helical conformation when interacting with the CRF receptor(s). To test this hypothesis further, we have scanned the whole sequence of the CRF antagonist [D-Phe12,Nle21,38]r/hCRF-(12-41) (r/hCRF, rat/human CRF; Nle, norleucine) with an i-(i + 3) bridge consisting of the Glu-Xaa-Xaa-Lys scaffold. We have found astressin [cyclo(30-33)[D-Phe12,Nle21,38,Glu30,Lys33]r/ hCRF(12-41)] to be approximately 30 times more potent than [D-Phe12,Nle21,38]r/hCRF-(12-41), our present standard, and 300 times more potent than the corresponding linear analog in an in vitro pituitary cell culture assay. Astressin has low affinity for the CRF binding protein and high affinity (Ki = 2 nM) for the cloned pituitary receptor. Radioiodinated [D-125I-Tyr12]astressin was found to be a reliable ligand for binding assays. In vivo, astressin is significantly more potent than any previously tested antagonist in reducing hypophyseal corticotropin (ACTH) secretion in stressed or adrenalectomized rats. The cyclo(30-33)[Ac-Pro4,D-Phe12,Nle21,38,Glu30,Lys33++ +]r/hCRF-(4-41) agonist and its linear analog are nearly equipotent, while the antagonist astressin and its linear form vary greatly in their potencies. This suggests that the lactam cyclization reinstates a structural constraint in the antagonists that is normally induced by the N terminus of the agonist.

Y1 and Y2 receptor selective neuropeptide Y analogues: evidence for a Y1 receptor subclass.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), a 36-residue polypeptide produced abundantly in both nervous and peripheral tissues, appears to play a significant role in the regulation of diverse biological processes, including feeding behavior and cardiovascular and psychotropic functions. The actions of NPY are mediated through effective binding to specific receptors of which two, designated Y1 and Y2, have been well characterized. A shortened cyclic analogue of NPY, des-AA10-17-cyclo-7/21[Cys7,21]NPY, was shown to retain high affinity for both human neuroblastoma SK-N-MC and SK-N-BE2 cell types (expressing Y1 and Y2 receptors, respectively). Increasing the size of the ring (des-AA10-17-cyclo-2/27[Cys2,27]NPY) in the present study produced a high-affinity analogue (Ki = 3.0 vs 0.3 nM for NPY) that bound exclusively to Y2 receptors. Using the feedback from structure-activity relationships, we also describe the optimization of specific substitutions and bridging arrangements leading to the production of other truncated, high-affinity Y1 selective analogues which bind, as does NPY itself, in the low-nanomolar range. Of greatest significance, des-AA10-17-cyclo-7/21[Cys7,21,Pro34]NPY (11) was found to possess agonistic properties with an affinity comparable to that of the native NPY molecule when tested for its ability to inhibit norepinephrine-stimulated cAMP release in SK-N-MC human neuroblastoma cells. Compound 11 also caused an increase in blood pressure in anesthetized rats. However, in two central nervous system models of Y1 receptor function, stimulation of feeding and anxiolytic activity, this analogue was inactive, which suggests the presence of a new subclass of receptors. In summary, the present results demonstrate that residues 10-17 of NPY are not directly involved in either Y1 or Y2 receptor recognition or activation. This suggests that the selectivity of NPY receptors is highly dependent on subtle conformational changes such as the substitution of residue 34 to a proline or the introduction of intramolecular constraints. Additionally, we have produced an analogue of NPY that selectively activates peripheral NPY Y1 receptors.