Radiographic measurements of cervical alignment, fusion and subsidence after ACDF surgery and their impact on clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: Some recent studies indicate correlations between cervical alignment and clinical outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. However, there still are no established criteria for the interpretation of alignment, fusion and subsidence in relation to clinical outcome. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 208 radiographs of patients following ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cage implantation was performed. The measurements were obtained on plain radiographs in lateral and anteroposterior projections as well as flexion/extension radiographs. Cervical alignment was measured using the Gore, Laing and Cobb methods; fusion was evaluated by an assortment of radiographic hallmarks: the presence of bridging bone, the Cobb angle and the distances between the tips and bases of the spinous processes of the operated segments, respectively. For assessment of subsidence, we used the Mochida method in addition to ventral and dorsal segmental height reduction. Correlation analysis between the different radiological characteristics and clinical outcome at a minimum follow-up of 12 months was conducted. RESULTS: Two hundred and eight patients were evaluated for alignment, fusion and subsidence. Cervical alignment using the Gore and Cobb methods correlated among each other, but failed to exhibit significant correlation with clinical outcome. Interpretation of fusion rates varied greatly (43.9 to 89.4%) depending on the criteria used. Pearson coefficients between radiographic presence of pseudarthrosis and the measurements of the spinous process distances (0.595; p < 0.001), the Cobb angles (0.187; p = 0.007) and the presence of bridging bone (0.224; p < 0.001) each exhibited statistical significance. None of the methods employed significantly correlated with clinical outcome. Regarding subsidence, we found rates of 62%, 48% and 27% using the Mochida, ventral and dorsal segmental height reduction assessment methods, respectively. Pearson correlations between pairs of Mochida/ventral (r = 0.39; p = 0.66) and Mochida/dorsal (r = 0.007; p = 0.921) height reduction assessment methods were weak and no significant correlation between subsidence rates and clinical outcome was shown. CONCLUSION: All measured parameters varied depending in the measurement method used. This was most pronounced for fusion. There was a moderate positive correlation between neck pain and subsidence as measured by the Mochida method.

No correlation between radiological and clinical outcome 1 year following cervical arthrodesis.

AIM: To correlate clinical and radiological outcome following one- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages filled with demineralized bone matrix (DBM). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a consecutive patient cohort with degenerative disc disease that underwent ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cages filled with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) between 2010 and 2013 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Changes in the operated segments were measured and compared to radiographs directly after surgery. Clinical outcome was evaluated by a physical examination, pain by visual analog scale (VAS) for arm and neck. Health-related quality of life was measured using the EuroQOL questionnaire (EQ-5D). RESULTS: Of 282 consecutive cases, follow-up data were obtained from 194 (69%) cases. The median age at presentation was 54 years and 91 patients were male (46%). Ninety-eight and 96 patients had one- and two-level surgeries, respectively. Mean VAS pain was reduced from 5.2 ± 3.6 to 2.6 ± 2.4 (p < 0.001) and from 5.8 ± 3.3 to 2.1 ± 2.7 (p < 0.001) in the myelopathy and radiculopathy group, respectively. Fusion was achieved in 79 and 82% of segments in one- and two-level surgeries, respectively. Cervical alignment was better in 10 and 1%, similar in 68 and 76%, worse in 23 and 23% in one- and two-level surgeries, respectively. Subsidence was observed in 44 and 34% of segments in one- and two-level surgeries, respectively. Follow-up operations due to symptomatic adjacent disc disease or implant failure were needed in 13 (7%) and 15 (8%) of cases, respectively. Subsidence, adjacent disc disease, and cervical alignment all had no influence on the clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcome after ACDF with PEEK cages filled with demineralized bone matrix is highly satisfactory. Radiological signs of non-fusion, subsidence, and cervical alignment have no influence on clinical outcome.