Síndrome miasteniforme de Lambert-Eaton / Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome

Introducción: El síndrome miasteniforme de Lambert-Eaton (LEMS) es una patología paraneoplásica (T-LEMS) o idiopática autoinmunitaria (NT-LEMS) ocasionada por autoanticuerpos contra los canales de calcio dependientes del voltaje presinápticos de la unión neuromuscular. El 60% de los T-LEMS se asocia a carcinoma de pulmón de células pequeñas. Una puntuación Dutch-English LEMS Tumor Association Prediction (DELTA-P) mayor de 3 denota un riesgo elevado de dicha asociación. El diagnóstico precoz fundado en los hallazgos clínicos, estudios neurofisiológicos y dosificación de títulos de anticuerpos en el suero permite iniciar tempranamente el tratamiento sintomático y la búsqueda oncológica. Son escasos los informes de pacientes con LEMS en Latinoamérica. Objetivo: Describir las características de pacientes con LEMS de un centro privado de Buenos Aires, Argentina, y compararlas con las de otras series publicadas. Pacientes y métodos: Se revisaron historias clínicas de 13 pacientes con LEMS con hallazgos clínicos, electromiograma compatible y/o anticuerpos positivos. Se realizó seguimiento hasta descartar o confirmar una neoplasia asociada de acuerdo con los algoritmos recomendados. Resultados: Cuatro pacientes presentaron diagnóstico de T-LEMS, dos de ellos con carcinoma de pulmón de células pequeñas. De los nueve pacientes con NT-LEMS, cinco presentaron una puntuación DELTA-P de 3 y 4. Nueve pacientes presentaron la tríada clínica clásica desde el inicio. Todos los pacientes presentaron en el electromiograma hallazgos compatibles con defecto de placa neuromuscular presináptico. El 70% mejoró sintomáticamente con piridostigmina. Conclusiones: Los hallazgos clínicos, junto con los estudios neurofisiológicos compatibles, resultan suficientes para el diagnóstico de LEMS. No pudo replicarse la relación entre puntuación DELTA-P y riesgo de carcinoma de pulmón de células pequeñas...(AU)

Introduction: Early diagnosis based on clinical findings, neurophysiological studies and serum antibody titres allows early initiation of symptomatic treatment and oncological screening. Reports of patients with LEMS in Latin America are scarce. Aim: This article aims to describe the characteristics of patients with LEMS from a private centre in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and to compare them with those of other series that have been published. Patients and methods: The medical records of 13 patients with LEMS with clinical findings, compatible electromyogram and/or positive antibodies were reviewed. Follow-up was performed until associated neoplasia was ruled out or confirmed according to the recommended algorithms. Results: Four patients were diagnosed with T-LEMS, two of them with small-cell lung carcinoma. Of the nine patients with NT-LEMS, five had a DELTA-P score of 3 and 4. Nine patients presented with the classic clinical triad from the onset of the disease. All patients had electromyogram findings compatible with presynaptic neuromuscular plaque defect. Of the total, 70% improved symptomatically with pyridostigmine. Conclusions: The clinical findings, together with compatible neurophysiological studies, are sufficient for the diagnosis of LEMS. The relationship between the DELTA-P score and the risk of small-cell lung carcinoma could not be replicated. Symptomatic treatment with pyridostigmine represents an effective therapeutic alternative.(AU)

[Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome]. / Síndrome miasteniforme de Lambert-Eaton.

INTRODUCTION: Early diagnosis based on clinical findings, neurophysiological studies and serum antibody titres allows early initiation of symptomatic treatment and oncological screening. Reports of patients with LEMS in Latin America are scarce. AIM: This article aims to describe the characteristics of patients with LEMS from a private centre in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and to compare them with those of other series that have been published. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 13 patients with LEMS with clinical findings, compatible electromyogram and/or positive antibodies were reviewed. Follow-up was performed until associated neoplasia was ruled out or confirmed according to the recommended algorithms. RESULTS: Four patients were diagnosed with T-LEMS, two of them with small-cell lung carcinoma. Of the nine patients with NT-LEMS, five had a DELTA-P score of 3 and 4. Nine patients presented with the classic clinical triad from the onset of the disease. All patients had electromyogram findings compatible with presynaptic neuromuscular plaque defect. Of the total, 70% improved symptomatically with pyridostigmine. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical findings, together with compatible neurophysiological studies, are sufficient for the diagnosis of LEMS. The relationship between the DELTA-P score and the risk of small-cell lung carcinoma could not be replicated. Symptomatic treatment with pyridostigmine represents an effective therapeutic alternative.

TITLE: Síndrome miasteniforme de Lambert-Eaton.Introducción. El síndrome miasteniforme de Lambert-Eaton (LEMS) es una patología paraneoplásica (T-LEMS) o idiopática autoinmunitaria (NT-LEMS) ocasionada por autoanticuerpos contra los canales de calcio dependientes del voltaje presinápticos de la unión neuromuscular. El 60% de los T-LEMS se asocia a carcinoma de pulmón de células pequeñas. Una puntuación Dutch-English LEMS Tumor Association Prediction (DELTA-P) mayor de 3 denota un riesgo elevado de dicha asociación. El diagnóstico precoz fundado en los hallazgos clínicos, estudios neurofisiológicos y dosificación de títulos de anticuerpos en el suero permite iniciar tempranamente el tratamiento sintomático y la búsqueda oncológica. Son escasos los informes de pacientes con LEMS en Latinoamérica. Objetivo. Describir las características de pacientes con LEMS de un centro privado de Buenos Aires, Argentina, y compararlas con las de otras series publicadas. Pacientes y métodos. Se revisaron historias clínicas de 13 pacientes con LEMS con hallazgos clínicos, electromiograma compatible y/o anticuerpos positivos. Se realizó seguimiento hasta descartar o confirmar una neoplasia asociada de acuerdo con los algoritmos recomendados. Resultados. Cuatro pacientes presentaron diagnóstico de T-LEMS, dos de ellos con carcinoma de pulmón de células pequeñas. De los nueve pacientes con NT-LEMS, cinco presentaron una puntuación DELTA-P de 3 y 4. Nueve pacientes presentaron la tríada clínica clásica desde el inicio. Todos los pacientes presentaron en el electromiograma hallazgos compatibles con defecto de placa neuromuscular presináptico. El 70% mejoró sintomáticamente con piridostigmina. Conclusiones. Los hallazgos clínicos, junto con los estudios neurofisiológicos compatibles, resultan suficientes para el diagnóstico de LEMS. No pudo replicarse la relación entre puntuación DELTA-P y riesgo de carcinoma de pulmón de células pequeñas. El tratamiento sintomático con piridostigmina representa una alternativa terapéutica eficaz.

Differential diagnosis in acute inflammatory myelitis.

INTRODUCTION: Establishing differential diagnosis between different inflammatory causes of acute transverse myelitis (ATM) can be difficult. The objective of this study was to see which clinical, imaging or laboratory findings best contribute to confirm ATM etiology. METHODS: We reviewed clinical history, MRI images, CSF and serum laboratory tests in a retrospective study of patients presenting ATM. Univariate and multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed for each of the items listed above. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two patients were analyzed in the study: 68 with multiple sclerosis (MS), 67 presenting idiopathic myelitis (IM; 23 of which were recurrent), 21 who developed positive systemic-antibodies associated myelitis (SAb-M) and 16 with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). The following factors were associated with increased risk of developing MS: lower values in the modified Rankin scale at admission; positive oligoclonal bands (OCB); higher spinal cord lesion load; presence of brain demyelinating lesions; and disease recurrence. Longitudinally extended (LE) lesions, brain demyelinating lesions, and recurrences also contributed to final diagnosis of NMOSD. Multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis showed presence of LE lesions increased risk of NMOSD and recurrence of ATM. Whereas, brain demyelinating lesions, and presence of OCB increased risk of MS. CONCLUSIONS: ATM etiology may be clarified on the basis of spinal cord and brain MRI findings, together with CSF biochemistry and serum laboratory test results, allowing more timely and exact diagnosis as well as specific therapy for cases of uncertain origin.

Clinical and imaging features distinguishing Susac syndrome from primary angiitis of the central nervous system.

INTRODUCTION: To assess clinical and/or imaging features useful to distinguish between Susac syndrome (SuS) and primary angiitis of central nervous system (PACNS). METHODS: Multicenter retrospective analysis of two cohorts of Argentine patients diagnosed with SuS and PACNS. RESULTS: 13 patients diagnosed with SuS (6 women and 7 men, mean age 35 ±â€¯10 years) and 15 with PACNS (10 women and 5 men, mean age 44 ±â€¯18 years) were analyzed. Cognitive impairment (11 out of 13 patients vs. 5 out of 15, p = .006), ataxia (7 out of 13 vs. 2 out of 15, p = .042) and auditory disturbances (7 out of 13 vs. 0 out of 15, p = .003) were more frequent in SuS patients; whereas seizures were more frequent in PACNS patients (8 out of 15 vs. 1 out of 13, p = .035). On MRI, corpus callosum (CC) involvement was observed more often in SuS, with abnormalities in CC genu, in 13 out of 13 SuS patients vs. only 2 out of 15 PACNS patients (p < .001); in CC body these were present in 13 out of 13 SuS patients vs. 1 out of 15 PACNS patients, (p < .001); and in CC splenium in 12 out of 13 Sus patients vs. 1 of 15 PACNS, p < .001). Cortical lesions were more frequent in PACNS patients (10 out of 15 vs. 3 out of 13 SuS patients, p = .02), as were hemorrhages (5 out of 15 vs. 0 out of 13 SuS, p = .04) and multiple basal ganglia infarcts (7 out of 15 vs. 1 out of 13 Sus, p = .037). CONCLUSION: Specific clinical and/or MRI findings may help distinguish SuS from PACNS with potential therapeutic implications.