Effectiveness of the ABCDEF method for developing an institution-specific pain management clinical resource.

Introduction: Comprehensive treatment strategies improve pain management in hospitalized patients, but no conclusive algorithm is currently available. The Audience, Blueprint, Collaborators, Dissemination, Education, Feedback method for pain management resource development (ABCDEF method) has been proposed as an "executable template" for developing clinical resources customized to local practice environments. Methods: The ABCDEF method was used to develop a proposal for a pain management pamphlet. Thereafter, a "Pocket Resource: Evidence-Based Pain Management and Responsible Opioid Prescribing" was developed according to the proposal. Qualitative retrospective analysis was performed to determine executability of the ABCDEF method for developing this institution-specific pain management resource. Results: Twelve elements of the ABCDEF method were analyzed. Ten were completed according to the ABCDEF method instruction sheet. Of those, the expected outcome was different than actual outcome for four elements. All outcomes that were different than expected expanded either the overall impact or the information incorporated into the finished resource. Conclusions: This qualitative retrospective analysis demonstrates executability of the ABCDEF method to successfully develop an institution-specific pain management resource. This template adds to the resources available to create evidence-based care consistency individualized to local practice environments. Study limitations include the retrospective analysis and a lack of generalizability for the results.

Usefulness of thrombolysis in cardiac arrest secondary to suspected or confirmed pulmonary embolism.

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a form of venous thromboembolism associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Massive PE, characterized by hemodynamic instability, has been reported as a common cause of cardiac arrest. Thrombolytic agents have therefore been identified as a potential rescue therapy to restore circulatory perfusion. This study describes use patterns of systemic thrombolysis in cardiac arrest and corresponding patient outcomes. A multicenter retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate adult patients who received rescue thrombolysis during cardiac arrest for suspected or confirmed PE. A total of 27 patients were included. PE was confirmed in 4 patients (15%). Pulseless electrical activity was the initial rhythm in 21 patients (78%), with a median cardiac arrest duration of 23 minutes in patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) vs 42.5 minutes in patients without ROSC. Among the 11 patients (41%) with ROSC, two (7%) survived to hospital discharge. Notable characteristics of the two survivors included a confirmed PE, an initial presenting rhythm of pulseless electrical activity, and administration of alteplase within 5 minutes of cardiac arrest. We recommend early administration of rescue thrombolysis when there is a high clinical index of suspicion that PE is the cause of the arrest.

Patient preferences for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Limited research has assessed patient preferences for treatment disposition and antibiotic therapy of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) in the emergency department (ED). Understanding patient preference for the treatment of ABSSSI may influence treatment selection and improve satisfaction. METHODS: A survey was conducted across 6 US hospital EDs. Patients with ABSSSI completed a baseline survey assessing preferences for antibiotic therapy (intravenous versus oral) and treatment location. A follow-up survey was conducted within 30-40 days after ED discharge to reassess preferences and determine satisfaction with care. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients completed both baseline and follow-up surveys. Sixty (63.8%) participants had a history of ABSSSI, and 69 (73.4%) were admitted to the hospital. Treatment at home was the most common preference reported on baseline and follow-up surveys. Patients with higher education were 82.2% less likely to prefer treatment in the hospital. Single dose intravenous therapy was the most commonly preferred antibiotic regimen on baseline and follow-up surveys (39.8 and 19.1%, respectively). Median satisfaction scores for care in the ED, hospital, home, and with overall antibiotic therapy were all 8 out of a maximum of 10. CONCLUSIONS: In these patients, the most common preference was for outpatient care and single dose intravenous antibiotics. Patient characteristics including higher education, younger age, and current employment were associated with these preferences. Opportunities exist for improving ABSSSI care and satisfaction rates by engaging patients and offering multiple treatment choices.

Variability in Emergency Medicine Provider Decisions on Hospital Admission and Antibiotic Treatment in a Survey Study for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Opportunities for Antimicrobial Stewardship Education.

BACKGROUND: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are a frequent cause of emergency department (ED) visits. Providers in the ED have many decisions to make during the initial treatment of ABSSSI. There are limited data on the patient factors that influence these provider decisions. METHODS: An anonymous survey was administered to providers at 6 EDs across the United States. The survey presented patient cases with ABSSSIs ≥75 cm2 and escalating clinical scenarios including relapse, controlled diabetes, and sepsis. For each case, participants were queried on their decision for admission vs discharge and antibiotic therapy (intravenous, oral, or both) and to rank the factors that influenced their antibiotic decision. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 130 providers. For simple ABSSSI, the majority of providers chose an oral antibiotic and discharged patients home. The presence of recurrence or controlled diabetes resulted in more variation in responses. Thirty-four (40%) and 51 (60%) providers chose intravenous followed by oral antibiotics and discharged the recurrence and diabetes cases, respectively. Presentation with sepsis resulted in initiation with intravenous antibiotics (122, 95.3%) and admission (125, 96.1%) in most responses. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in responses to certain patient scenarios suggests opportunities for education of providers in the ED and the development of an ABSSSI clinical pathway to help guide treatment.

Comparison of outcomes in patients with intracranial hemorrhage on factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists treated with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate.

The relative clinical efficacy of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in oral anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage is unknown, especially for factor Xa-inhibiting anticoagulants. We report short-term outcomes of patients with oral anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage on vitamin K antagonists and factor Xa inhibitors who were treated with 4F-PCC. This multicenter, observational study involved patients presenting to the emergency department in nine hospitals in an integrated health care delivery system in Texas between July 2013 and December 2015. Forty-two patients diagnosed with oral anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage-24 taking a vitamin K antagonist and 14 taking a factor Xa inhibitor-were treated with 4F-PCC as part of usual care. Study patients had similar baseline demographics, with the exception of suspected etiology of hemorrhage. Outcomes of the vitamin K antagonist group were similar to those of the factor Xa inhibitor group, with no significant differences in overall in-hospital mortality (32.1% vs 14.2%, respectively), length of stay, or rates of hemorrhagic expansion, thromboembolism, or discharge to home. In conclusion, this small sample of patients with oral factor Xa inhibitor and vitamin K antagonist-associated intracranial hemorrhage treated with 4F-PCC had similar mortality and neurological outcomes, with no venous thromboembolic events.