Comparison of the Effects of OPRM1 A118G Polymorphism Using Different Opioids: A Prospective Study.

CONTEXT: µ-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) A118G polymorphism (rs1799971) causes loss of N-glycosylation sites at the extracellular domain of µ-opioid receptors. G-allele carriers show a limited response to morphine; however, studies investigating the impact of A118G polymorphism on the efficacy of opioids other than morphine are limited. OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of A118G polymorphism on the efficacy of various opioids. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled 222 in-patients administered one of the following opioid therapies for cancer pain as part of an opioid introduction or rotation strategy: tapentadol extended-release tablets, methadone tablets, hydromorphone controlled-release tablets, oxycodone controlled-release tablets, or transdermal fentanyl patches. The impact of A118G polymorphism on the difference in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form score on days three, seven, and 14 from baseline was compared among the groups. RESULTS: Overall, 81, 74, and 67 patients had the AA, AG, and GG genotypes, respectively, with an OPRM1 A118G G-allele variant frequency of 0.47. The reduction in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form score after opioid therapy initiation did not differ significantly among the patients with the three A118G genotypes treated with tapentadol (p = 0.84) or methadone (p = 0.97), whereas it was significantly smaller in G-allele carriers than that in AA homozygous patients treated with hydromorphone (p < 0.001), oxycodone (p = 0.031), or fentanyl (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tapentadol and methadone may be more suitable than hydromorphone, oxycodone, and fentanyl for G-allele carriers due to their dual mechanism of action and low susceptibility to OPRM1 A118G polymorphism.

Differences in the Analgesic Effect of Opioids on Pain in Cancer Patients With Spinal Metastases.

Background: Spinal metastasis pain includes both inflammatory and neuropathic pain, and opioids, which have only a µ-opioid receptor-stimulating effect, are generally less effective in neuropathic pain. However, no previous study has been conducted for the comparisons of the efficacy of opioids in treating spinal metastasis pain. Objective: To compare the efficacy of tapentadol and methadone with other opioids for back pain caused by a metastatic spinal tumor. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting/Subjects: A total of 274 patients were enrolled, who started a tapentadol extended-release tablet, methadone tablet, hydromorphone extended-release tablet, oxycodone extended-release tablet, or transdermal fentanyl patch for cancer pain due to spinal metastasis in Japan from January 1, 2013 to October 31, 2021. Measurements: The primary endpoint, the difference in the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores before and seven days after each opioid administration, was compared among the five groups. Results: In patients with numbness, a decrease of the NRS score on day seven compared with before starting each opioid was significantly higher in the tapentadol group than those in the hydromorphone, oxycodone, and fentanyl groups and comparable to that in the methadone group. In patients without numbness, no significant differences were observed in decreases of the NRS scores on day seven among the five groups. Conclusions: Tapentadol and methadone may be more effective than hydromorphone, oxycodone, and fentanyl for cancer pain due to spinal metastasis with numbness.

Identification of Factors Contributing to Methadone-Induced Daytime Sleepiness in Cancer Patients and Proposal of the Conversion Ratio from Other Opioids to Oral Methadone: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: When methadone is used to treat cancer pain, the Japanese health insurance system recommends to determine the starting dose according to the equivalency conversion table based on the morphine-equivalent daily dose (MEDD) of prior opioids proposed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Owing to the wide range in variability of the conversion table, methadone increases the incidence of daytime sleepiness. Objective: To identify the factors associated with daytime sleepiness and propose a conversion ratio from pretreatment MEDD to oral methadone that decreases the risk of daytime sleepiness. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting/Subjects: One hundred patients who started oral methadone to relieve cancer pain at Ashiya Municipal Hospital (Hyogo, Japan) from January 1, 2013, to August 31, 2022, were enrolled. Measurements: The primary endpoint, the conversion ratio from pretreatment MEDD to oral methadone without daytime sleepiness, was determined using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The incidence of daytime sleepiness within seven days of methadone initiation was 40.0%. The factors identified as contributing to daytime sleepiness were pretreatment MEDD (odds ratio [OR]: 0.941, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.916-0.966, p <0.001) and methadone dose (OR: 1.395, 95% CI: 1.178-1.652, p <0.001). The conversion ratio from pretreatment MEDD to oral methadone was 0.24, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.909 (p <0.001). Conclusions: Daytime sleepiness developed when methadone dose is high relative to pretreatment MEDD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to suggest the conversion ratio from pretreatment MEDD to oral methadone without causing daytime sleepiness.