Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 39(2): 107-12, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20100923

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The multidetector CT (MDCT) findings of facial trauma in victims of interpersonal violence were assessed. METHODS: All MDCT requests for suspected facial injury during a 62 month period were retrieved; 727 cases met the inclusion criteria. Images were interpreted by two researchers by consensus. RESULTS: Of the 727 patients (aged 15-86 years old, mean 37), 583 (80.2%) were male and 144 (19.8%) female. Of all the patients, 74% had a fracture, and of these 44% had multiple non-contiguous fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Violence is a very common cause of facial injury. Nasal and orbital fractures predominate. Males are more often involved; they are younger, sustain fractures more often and significantly more often present with high-energy fracture patterns. LeFort fractures are often unilateral or asymmetrical, and are frequently accompanied by other, clinically significant fractures. Up to 25% of patients with fractures do not have paranasal sinus effusions.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/instrumentação , Violência , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Acta Radiol ; 49(8): 912-7, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18608021

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography is an accurate imaging method for internal shoulder derangements and rotator cuff pathologies. Both anterior and posterior contrast injection techniques, under palpatory, fluoroscopic, or ultrasonographic guidance have been described in the literature. However, clinical comparisons of the injection techniques remain few. PURPOSE: To compare the performance of anterior and posterior ultrasonography (US)-guided arthrography injections of the shoulder regarding patient discomfort and influence on diagnostic MR reading, and to illustrate the typical artifacts resulting from contrast leakage in the respective techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 43 MR arthrographies were prospectively randomized into anterior and posterior US-guided contrast injections and performed by two radiologists, with the study of artifacts from contrast leakage. Pain from the injections was assessed by a survey utilizing a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: Of the 23 anterior injections, nine caused contrast artifacts in the subscapular tendon, and in three the leakage extended further anteriorly. Of the 20 posterior injections, 12 showed injection artifacts of the rotator cuff, extending outside the cuff in seven. Two of the anterior and none of the posterior artifacts compromised diagnostic quality. In posterior injections, the leakage regularly occurred at the caudal edge of the infraspinatus muscle and was easily distinguishable from rotator cuff tears. All patients completed the pain survey. Mean VAS scores were 25.0 (median 18, SD 22) for anterior, and 25.4 (median 16, SD 25) for posterior injections. The two radiologists achieved different mean VAS scores but closely agreed as to anterior and posterior VAS scores. CONCLUSION: Arthrography injections were fairly simple to perform under US guidance. Patient discomfort for anterior and posterior injections was equally minor. A tailored approach utilizing anterior or posterior injections, depending on anticipated shoulder pathology, is recommended. Because in posterior injections all artifacts were posterior and readily recognizable, it seems especially suitable for suspected anterior rotator cuff, joint capsule, and labral pathologies.


Assuntos
Artrografia/métodos , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Articulação do Ombro/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Ombro/patologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Artrografia/efeitos adversos , Artefatos , Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Extravasamento de Materiais Terapêuticos e Diagnósticos , Feminino , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Cápsula Articular/diagnóstico por imagem , Cápsula Articular/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/induzido quimicamente , Dor/diagnóstico , Medição da Dor/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Manguito Rotador/diagnóstico por imagem , Manguito Rotador/patologia , Ultrassonografia
3.
Acta Radiol ; 48(7): 741-3, 2007 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17729004

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance arthrography is a well-established diagnostic method in degenerative and traumatic disorders of the shoulder. Some radiologists prefer to apply a local anesthetic to the skin prior to performing the joint puncture. However, no information regarding the efficacy of local anesthetics exists. PURPOSE: To assess patient discomfort in arthrography injection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A patient survey (n = 74) utilizing a visual analog scale (VAS) measured the intensity of pain in arthrography injection by those receiving local anesthetics (n = 36) versus those who did not (n = 38). RESULTS: Mean VAS scores were 20.8 (median 10.5, SD 24.3) for those receiving local anesthetics versus 19.3 (median 13.0, SD 20.7) for those who did not (P = 0.83, Mann-Whitney U test). CONCLUSION: Routine use of local anesthesia of the skin in arthrography injection is unnecessary.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Gadolínio/administração & dosagem , Injeções Intra-Articulares/efeitos adversos , Dor de Ombro/etiologia , Dor de Ombro/prevenção & controle , Artrografia/efeitos adversos , Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Gadolínio/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/efeitos adversos , Medição da Dor , Dor de Ombro/patologia
4.
Acta Radiol ; 48(4): 449-55, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17453528

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings in facial trauma in adults who accidentally fall from heights. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of the MDCT scans of 2413 cases requested by emergency-room physicians for suspected facial injury, 155 (age 15.3-76.7, mean 42.0 years; 134 male, 21 female) met the criteria of falling from heights. These were reviewed by two researchers by consensus. RESULTS: Of these 155, 118 (104 male, 14 female) had 247 fractures, while 37 had no fracture. The fractures were classified into 13 categories, the zygomatic complex being the region most frequently involved. Mean falling height, known in 132 of 155 cases, was 5.7 m (range 0.4-25) in all, 6.0 m (0.4-25) in those suffering a fracture, and 5.0 m (range 0.4-13) in those without a fracture. Patients with Le Fort II, Le Fort III, or frontal bone fractures had fallen higher and frequently had associated skull base fractures, but with considerable overlap in falling heights. Zygomatic arch and nasal bone fractures rarely occurred solitarily. CONCLUSION: In a fall-from-height injury, nasal bone and zygomatic arch fractures indicate the presence of more severe fractures. Height cannot solely predict injury probability. Clear sinus sign is a valuable aid in assessing midface trauma in falls from heights.


Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas , Traumatismos Faciais/diagnóstico por imagem , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Ossos Faciais/diagnóstico por imagem , Ossos Faciais/lesões , Feminino , Osso Frontal/diagnóstico por imagem , Osso Frontal/lesões , Humanos , Masculino , Fraturas Maxilares/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osso Nasal/diagnóstico por imagem , Osso Nasal/lesões , Base do Crânio/lesões , Fraturas Zigomáticas/diagnóstico por imagem
5.
Acta Radiol ; 48(1): 104-11, 2007 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17325934

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether non-contrast multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for suspected acute knee fractures can also be used to evaluate cruciate ligament pathology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 42 patients (17-65 years) underwent four-section MDCT. The images were independently evaluated at clinical workstations by four radiologists. They assessed the integrity (normal or torn) and the best slice direction (axial, sagittal, or coronal) for visualization of the cruciate ligaments. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), performed within 4 weeks (mean 6 days) in relation to MDCT, was considered the gold standard. RESULTS: Ligament integrity at MDCT: the mean interobserver proportion of agreement for a normal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was 0.73, for a torn ACL 0.41, for a normal posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) 0.96, and for a torn PCL 0.54. Interobserver variation for ACL was significant (P = 0.0136-0.0260), but insignificant for PCL (P = 0.3389-0.7212). Intra-observer variation was insignificant. Visualization was best in the axial and sagittal direction for ACL and PCL, respectively. At MRI, 29 normal, one partially, and 12 completely torn ACLs, and 37 normal, four partially and one completely torn PCL were found. CONCLUSION: MDCT can detect an intact ACL and PCL with good specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value. The assessment of torn ligaments is unreliable.


Assuntos
Traumatismos do Joelho/diagnóstico , Ligamentos Articulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Ligamentos Articulares/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagem , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/patologia , Feminino , Finlândia , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Joelho/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Ligamento Cruzado Posterior/diagnóstico por imagem , Ligamento Cruzado Posterior/patologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
6.
Acta Radiol ; 45(7): 751-9, 2004 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15624519

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To analyze multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) cervical spine findings in trauma patients with advanced ankylosing spondylitis (AS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using PACS, 2282 cervical spine MDCT examinations requested by emergency room physicians were found during a period of 3 years. Of these patients, 18 (16 M, aged 41-87, mean 57 years) had advanced AS. Primary imaging included radiography in 12 and MRI in 11 patients. RESULTS: MDCT detected one facet joint subluxation and 31 fractures in 17 patients: 14 transverse fractures, 8 spinous process fractures, 2 Jefferson's fractures, 1 type I and 2 type II odontoid process fractures, and 1 each: atlanto-occipital joint fracture and C2 laminar fracture plus isolated transverse process and facet joint fractures. Radiographs detected 48% and MRI 60% of the fractures. MRI detected all transverse and odontoid fractures, demonstrating spinal cord abnormalities in 72%. CONCLUSION: MDCT is superior to plain radiographs or MRI, showing significantly more injuries and yielding more information on fracture morphology. MRI is valuable, however, in evaluating the spinal cord and soft-tissue injuries. Fractures in advanced AS often show an abnormal orientation and are frequently associated with spinal cord injuries. In these patients, for any suspected cervical spine injuries, MDCT is therefore the imaging modality of choice.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilite Anquilosante/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Espondilite Anquilosante/complicações
7.
J Bone Joint Surg Br ; 86(8): 1146-51, 2004 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15568528

RESUMO

In type-II fractures of the odontoid process, the treatment is either conservative in a halo vest or primary surgical stabilisation. Since nonunion, requiring prolonged immobilisation or late surgery, is common in patients treated in a halo vest, the identification of those in whom this treatment is likely to fail is important. We reviewed the data of 69 patients with acute type-II fractures of the odontoid process treated in a halo vest. The mean follow-up was 12 months. Conservative treatment was successful, resulting in bony union in 32 (46%) patients. Anterior dislocation, gender and age were unrelated to nonunion. However, nonunion did correlate with a fracture gap (> 1 mm), posterior displacement (> 5 mm), delayed start of treatment (> 4 days) and posterior redisplacement (> 2 mm). We conclude that patients presenting with these risk factors are unlikely to achieve bony union by treatment in a halo vest. They deserve careful attention during the follow-up period and should also be considered as candidates for primary surgical stabilisation.


Assuntos
Fraturas não Consolidadas/etiologia , Processo Odontoide/lesões , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Processo Odontoide/cirurgia , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco
8.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 120(7-8): 448-51, 2000.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10968537

RESUMO

The aim of this study is to compare the results of non-operative and anterior operative treatment of cervical burst and flexion teardrop fractures. Sixty-nine consecutive patients treated during 1980 to 1995 were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-four of them had been treated with skull traction or halo-vest and 35 with anterior decompression, bone grafting and fixation by an anterior Caspar plate. Neurological functioning on admission and at the end of the follow-up was assessed by using Frankel's classification. Kyphosis and spinal canal encroachment by retropulsed fragments were measured radiographically. Operatively treated patients recovered more often with at least one Frankel grade (P = 0.027) and presented less narrowing of the spinal canal (P = 0.0006) and kyphotic deformity (P = 0.00003) at the end of the followup. In comparison with the conservative methods, the operative Caspar technique provided superior decompression and fixation as well as promoted the healing of cord injuries caused by burst and flexion teardrop fractures.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Aparelhos Ortopédicos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Tração , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transplante Ósseo , Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Descompressão Cirúrgica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exame Neurológico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Compressão da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Compressão da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fusão Vertebral
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...