Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
F1000Res ; 5: 2674, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31231503

RESUMO

Metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is one of the most common cancers with a poor prognosis. To improve prognostic models of mCRPC, the Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods (DREAM) Consortium organized a crowdsourced competition known as the Prostate Cancer DREAM Challenge. In the competition, data from four phase III clinical trials were utilized. A total of 1600 patients' clinical information across three of the trials was used to generate prognostic models, whereas one of the datasets (313 patients) was held out for blinded validation. The previously introduced prognostic model of overall survival of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients treated with docetaxel or prednisone (so called Halabi model) was used as a performance baseline. This paper presents the model developed by the team TYTDreamChallenge and its improved version to predict the prognosis of mCRPC patients within the first 30 months after starting the treatment based on available clinical features of each patient. In particular, by replacing our original larger set of eleven features with a smaller more carefully selected set of only five features the prediction performance on the independent validation cohort increased up to 5.4 percent. While the original TYTDreamChallenge model (iAUC=0.748) performed similarly as the performance-baseline model developed by Halabi et al. (iAUC=0.743), the improved post-challenge model (iAUC=0.779) showed markedly improved performance by using only PSA, ALP, AST, HB, and LESIONS as features. This highlights the importance of the selection of the clinical features when developing the predictive models.

2.
Anticancer Res ; 34(11): 6581-4, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25368261

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Cancer pain management in a hospice setting was studied in the present article. Drug treatments were studied at five time points: at the time of transfer to hospice, at 2nd day, two weeks, and two months following transfer to hospice care, as well as one day before death. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of 138 consecutive cancer patients treated in hospice in 2010 were studied regarding the drugs given during their stay. The most common cancer was gastro-intestinal cancer (33%), followed by lung (16%) and breast cancer (11%). Data were collected from patients' records and coded in a validated manner for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The median length of stay in hospice was 14 days (range=2-376 days). Upon transfer, 63% of patients were administered regularly-dosed opioids, 76.8% during the second day at hospice, and 89.9% of the patients received opioids one day prior to death. A significant change was observed in the more frequent subcutaneous administration during hospice stay (p<0.0001). Break-through pain was recorded on the second day in hospice by 52 % of patients, and by 76% on the day prior to death. CONCLUSION: Individual patients' needs determined the dose range, but this was not the case for administration route of strong opioids during hospice care.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida , Neoplasias/complicações , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Assistência Terminal , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/terapia , Dor/etiologia , Prognóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...