Diagnostic accuracy between readers for identifying electrographic seizures in critically ill adults.

OBJECTIVE: Electrographic seizures in critically ill patients are often equivocal. In this study, we sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of electrographic seizure annotation in adult intensive care units (ICUs) and to identify affecting factors. METHODS: To investigate diagnostic accuracy, interreader agreement (IRA) measures were derived from 5,769 unequivocal and 6,263 equivocal seizure annotations by five experienced electroencephalogram (EEG) readers after reviewing 74 days of EEGs from 50 adult ICU patients. Factors including seizure equivocality (unequivocal vs. equivocal) and laterality (generalized, partial, or bilaterally independent), cyclicity (cyclic vs. noncyclic), persistency (occurrence of status epilepticus), and patient consciousness level (coma vs. noncoma) were further investigated for their influence on IRA measures. RESULTS: On average, 70% of seizures marked by a reference reader overlapped, at least in part, with those marked by a test reader (any-overlap sensitivity, AO-Sn). Agreed seizure duration between reader pairs (overlap-integral sensitivity, OI-Sn) was 62%, while agreed nonseizure duration (overlap-integral specificity, OI-Sp) was 99%. A test reader would annotate one additional seizure not overlapping with a reference reader's annotation in every 11.7 h of EEG, that is, the false-positive rate (FPR) was 0.0854/h. Classifying seizure patterns into unequivocal and equivocal improved specificity and FPR (unequivocal patterns) but compromised sensitivity only for equivocal patterns. Sensitivity of all and unequivocal annotations was higher for patients with status epilepticus. Specificity was higher for partial than for bilaterally independent unequivocal seizure patterns, and lower for cyclic all seizure patterns. SIGNIFICANCE: Diagnosing electrographic seizures in critically ill adults is highly specific and moderately sensitive. Improved criteria for diagnosing electrographic seizures in the ICU are needed.

Evidence-based review of the role of aprotinin in blood conservation during orthopaedic surgery.

Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor with antifibrinolytic properties that has been approved as a blood-conserving drug in cardiac surgery by the United States Food and Drug Administration. On the basis of the current evidence from Level-I trials, we make a grade-A recommendation for use of the high-dose aprotinin regimen in hip and spine surgery. Because of conflicting data, the low-dose aprotinin therapy as well as the use of aprotinin in patients with cancer cannot be recommended (grade-I recommendation). High-quality randomized trials are necessary to determine the optimal (and minimal) therapeutic dose of aprotinin and the optimal time of aprotinin administration during surgery.

Evidence-based review of the use of cryosurgery in treatment of basal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Cryosurgery has been used to treat basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and it has many technical advantages over other methods. It is therefore important to establish its efficacy as a treatment for BCC. OBJECTIVE: To review systematically the body of literature reporting on the efficacy of cryosurgery of BCC in terms of recurrence rates and cosmetic results. METHODS: A review is given of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CancerLit, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies that examined cyosurgery in treatment of BCC patients. RESULTS: We found 13 noncontrolled prospective studies and 4 randomized clinical trials comparing cryosurgery to other methods of treatment for BCC. Because of the inability to double blind or placebo control treatment of BCC, none of the studies met criteria for A and B grade evidence, as defined by Sackett. Therefore, all studies were assigned grade C. CONCLUSIONS: According to the best evidence, recurrence rates of BCC treated with cryosurgery are low (less than 10%). Except in one study, recurrence rates are calculated based on clinical, rather than histologic diagnosis, which may cause the rates to appear somewhat lower than they actually are, especially with a short follow-up period. Cosmetic results of cryosurgery treatment reported in literature are described as good by most investigators. Overall, there are sufficient data to consider cryosurgery as a reasonable treatment for BCC. There are no good studies, however, comparing cryosurgery with other modalities, particularly with Mohs surgery, excision, or electrodessication and curretage so that no conclusion can be made whether cryosurgery is as efficacious as other methods. Also, there is no evidence on whether curetting the lesions before cryosurgery affects the efficacy of treatment.