Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
1.
MMWR Surveill Summ ; 73(4): 1-18, 2024 06 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833409

RESUMO

Problem/Condition: Elimination of tuberculosis (TB) is defined as reducing TB disease incidence in the United States to less than 1 case per million persons per year. In 2022, TB incidence in the United States was 2.5 TB cases per 100,000 persons. CDC's TB program developed a set of national TB indicators to evaluate progress toward TB elimination through monitoring performance of state and city TB program activities. Examining TB indicator data enables state- and city-level TB programs to identify areas for program evaluation and improvement activities. These data also help CDC identify states and cities that might benefit from technical assistance. Period Covered: The 5-year period for which the most recent data were available for each of five indicators: 1) overall TB incidence (2018-2022), 2) TB incidence among non-U.S.-born persons (2018-2022), 3) percentage of persons with drug susceptibility results reported (2018-2022), 4) percentage of contacts to sputum acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear-positive TB patients with newly diagnosed latent TB infection (LTBI) who completed treatment (2017-2021), and 5) percentage of patients with completion of TB therapy within 12 months (2016-2020). Description of System: The National TB Indicators Project (NTIP) is a web-based performance monitoring tool that uses national TB surveillance data reported through the National TB Surveillance System and the Aggregate Reports for TB Program Evaluation. NTIP was developed to facilitate the use of existing data to help TB program staff members prioritize activities, monitor progress, and focus program improvement efforts. The following five indicators were selected for this report because of their importance in Federal TB funding allocation and in accelerating the decline in TB cases: 1) overall TB incidence in the United States, 2) TB incidence among non-U.S.-born persons, 3) percentage of persons with drug susceptibility results reported, 4) percentage of contacts to sputum AFB smear-positive TB cases who completed treatment for LTBI, and 5) percentage of patients with completion of TB therapy within 12 months. For this report, 52 TB programs (50 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City) were categorized into terciles based on the 5-year average number of TB cases reported to National TB Surveillance System. This grouping allows comparison of TB programs that have similar numbers of TB cases and allocates a similar number of TB programs to each category. The following formula was used to calculate the relative change by TB program for each indicator: [(% from year 5 - % from year 1 ÷ % from year 1) × 100]. Results: During the 5-year period for which the most recent data were available, most TB programs had improvements in reducing overall TB incidence (71.2%) and increasing the percentage of contacts receiving a diagnosis of LTBI who completed LTBI treatment (55.8%); the majority of programs (51.0%) also had improvements in reducing incidence among non-U.S.-born persons. The average percentage of persons with drug susceptibility results reported in most jurisdictions (28 of 52, [53.9%]) met or exceeded the 5-year national average of 97% (2018-2022). The percentage of contacts to sputum acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear-positive TB patients with newly diagnosed latent TB infection (LTBI) who completed treatment increased in 29 of 52 (55.8%) jurisdictions from 2017 to 2021, signifying that, for most jurisdictions, steps have been taken to enhance performance in this area. The average percentage of patients with completion of TB therapy within 12 months was at or above the national average of 89.7% in approximately two-thirds (32 of 52 [61.5%]) of jurisdictions. Interpretation: This report is the first to describe a 5-year relative change for TB program performance. These results suggest that TB programs are making improvements in activities that help identify persons with TB and LTBI and ensure patients complete treatment in a timely manner. Public Health Action: Use of NTIP data from individual TB programs enables a more detailed examination of trends in program performance and identification of areas for program improvement. Assessing indicator trends by TB program provides an opportunity to gain a better understanding of program performance in comparison to other programs. It can also facilitate communication between programs regarding successes and challenges in program improvement. This information is valuable for TB programs to allocate resources effectively and provide additional context on TB control for public health policymakers.


Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Tuberculose , Humanos , Tuberculose/epidemiologia , Tuberculose/prevenção & controle , Tuberculose/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Incidência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Tuberculose Latente/epidemiologia , Tuberculose Latente/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose Latente/diagnóstico
2.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 36(7): e175-e180, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28030527

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Post-exposure prophylaxis administered to infants shortly after birth prevents approximately 90% of cases of perinatal hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends that all pregnant women be tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at an early prenatal visit during each pregnancy to detect active infection with HBV. This study sought to determine the proportion and characteristics of pregnant women tested\not tested according to Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations. METHODS: We analyzed MarketScan databases to assess prenatal HBsAg testing among women with commercial and Medicaid health care coverage according to demographic and clinical characteristics. Pregnant women 15-44 years of age continuously enrolled in a health plan in the MarketScan database during 2013 and 2014 and with a live birth in 2014 were included. RESULTS: Among commercially insured women, 239,955 (87.7%) received HBsAg testing and 59.6% were tested during their first trimester. Among Medicaid-enrolled women, 57,268 (83.6%) received HBsAg testing and 39.4% were tested during their first trimester. Among women with high risk pregnancies, HBsAg testing occurred in 87.3% of those with commercial insurance and 84.8% with Medicaid. Testing also varied by maternal age; among women with commercial insurance, testing was greatest among women 26-44 years of age, and among women with Medicaid, testing was greatest among younger women (15-25 years). Testing was lowest among women residing in the Northeast (commercial insurance only). CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal HBsAg testing identifies HBV-infected pregnant women so their infants can receive timely immunoprophylaxis. Efforts to optimize HBsAg testing among all pregnant women are needed to further prevent perinatal HBV transmission.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Superfície da Hepatite B/sangue , Hepatite B/diagnóstico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Hepatite B/epidemiologia , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Nascido Vivo/epidemiologia , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Gravidez de Alto Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 15: 511, 2015 Nov 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26573461

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: School-located vaccination against influenza (SLV-I) has the potential to improve current suboptimal influenza immunization coverage for U.S. school-aged children. However, little is known about SLV-I's cost-effectiveness. The objective of this study is to establish the cost-effectiveness of SLV-I based on a two-year community-based randomized controlled trial (Year 1: 2009-2010 vaccination season, an unusual H1N1 pandemic influenza season, and Year 2: 2010-2011, a more typical influenza season). METHODS: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis on a two-year randomized controlled trial of a Western New York SLV-I program. SLV-I clinics were offered in 21 intervention elementary schools (Year 1 n = 9,027; Year 2 n = 9,145 children) with standard-of-care (no SLV-I) in control schools (Year 1 n = 4,534 (10 schools); Year 2 n = 4,796 children (11 schools)). We estimated the cost-per-vaccinated child, by dividing the incremental cost of the intervention by the incremental effectiveness (i.e., the number of additionally vaccinated students in intervention schools compared to control schools). RESULTS: In Years 1 and 2, respectively, the effectiveness measure (proportion of children vaccinated) was 11.2 and 12.0 percentage points higher in intervention (40.7 % and 40.4 %) than control schools. In year 2, the cost-per-vaccinated child excluding vaccine purchase ($59.88 in 2010 US $) consisted of three component costs: (A) the school costs ($8.25); (B) the project coordination costs ($32.33); and (C) the vendor costs excluding vaccine purchase ($16.68), summed through Monte Carlo simulation. Compared to Year 1, the two component costs (A) and (C) decreased, while the component cost (B) increased in Year 2. The cost-per-vaccinated child, excluding vaccine purchase, was $59.73 (Year 1) and $59.88 (Year 2, statistically indistinguishable from Year 1), higher than the published cost of providing influenza vaccination in medical practices ($39.54). However, taking indirect costs (e.g., averted parental costs to visit medical practices) into account, vaccination was less costly in SLV-I ($23.96 in Year 1, $24.07 in Year 2) than in medical practices. CONCLUSIONS: Our two-year trial's findings reinforced the evidence to support SLV-I as a potentially favorable system to increase childhood influenza vaccination rates in a cost-efficient way. Increased efficiencies in SLV-I are needed for a sustainable and scalable SLV-I program.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/economia , Influenza Humana/economia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comércio/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/economia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Método de Monte Carlo , New York , Pais , Características de Residência , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/economia , Estações do Ano , Estudantes , Vacinação/economia
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(33): 889-96, 2015 Aug 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26313470

RESUMO

The reduction in morbidity and mortality associated with vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States has been described as one of the 10 greatest public health achievements of the first decade of the 21st century. A recent analysis concluded that routine childhood vaccination will prevent 322 million cases of disease and about 732,000 early deaths among children born during 1994-2013, for a net societal cost savings of $1.38 trillion. The National Immunization Survey (NIS) has monitored vaccination coverage among U.S. children aged 19-35 months since 1994. This report presents national, regional, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage estimates for children born from January 2011 through May 2013, based on data from the 2014 NIS. For most vaccinations, there was no significant change in coverage between 2013 and 2014. The exception was hepatitis A vaccine (HepA), for which increases were observed in coverage with both ≥1 and ≥2 doses. As in previous years, <1% of children received no vaccinations. National coverage estimates indicate that the Healthy People 2020 target* of 90% was met for ≥3 doses of poliovirus vaccine (93.3%), ≥1 dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) (91.5%), ≥3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) (91.6%), and ≥1 dose of varicella vaccine (91.0%). Coverage was below target for ≥4 doses of diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP), the full series of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine, hepatitis B (HepB) birth dose,† ≥4 doses pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), ≥2 doses of HepA, the full series of rotavirus vaccine, and the combined vaccine series.§ Examination of coverage by child's race/ethnicity revealed lower estimated coverage among non-Hispanic black children compared with non-Hispanic white children for several vaccinations, including DTaP, the full series of Hib, PCV, rotavirus vaccine, and the combined series. Children from households classified as below the federal poverty level had lower estimated coverage for almost all of the vaccinations assessed, compared with children living at or above the poverty level. Significant variation in coverage by state¶ was observed for several vaccinations, including HepB birth dose, HepA, and rotavirus. High vaccination coverage must be maintained across geographic and sociodemographic groups if progress in reducing the impact of vaccine-preventable diseases is to be sustained.


Assuntos
Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Cápsulas Bacterianas , Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Pré-Escolar , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/administração & dosagem , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus/administração & dosagem , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Vacinas contra Hepatite A/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Lactente , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Poliovirus/administração & dosagem , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem
5.
J Rural Health ; 31(4): 421-30, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25951772

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare among parents of healthy children in urban and rural areas: (1) reported influenza vaccination status; (2) attitudes regarding influenza vaccination; and (3) attitudes about collaborative models for influenza vaccination delivery involving practices and public health departments. METHODS: A mail survey to random samples of parents from 2 urban and 2 rural private practices in Colorado from April 2012 to June 2012. RESULTS: The response rate was 58% (288/500). In the prior season, 63% of urban and 41% of rural parents reported their child received influenza vaccination (P < .001). No differences in attitudes about influenza infection or vaccination between urban and rural parents were found, with 75% of urban and 73% of rural parents agreeing their child should receive an influenza vaccine every year (P = .71). High proportions reported willingness to participate in a collaborative clinic in a community setting (59% urban, 70% rural, P = .05) or at their child's provider (73% urban, 73% rural, P = .99) with public health department assisting. Fewer (36% urban, 53% rural, P < .01) were likely to go to the public health department if referred by their provider. Rural parents were more willing for their child to receive vaccination outside of their provider's office (70% vs. 55%, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: While attitudes regarding influenza vaccination were similar, rural children were much less likely to have received vaccination. Most parents were amenable to collaborative models of influenza vaccination delivery, but rural parents were more comfortable with influenza vaccination outside their provider's office, suggesting that other venues for influenza vaccination in rural settings should be promoted.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/psicologia , Pais/psicologia , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Criança , Colorado , Feminino , Humanos , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Relações Pais-Filho , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
6.
Am J Prev Med ; 47(5): 624-8, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25217817

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Vaccination promotion strategies are recommended in Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) settings for eligible children at risk for under-immunization due to their low-income status. PURPOSE: To determine coverage levels of WIC and non-WIC participants and assess effectiveness of immunization intervention strategies. METHODS: The 2007-2011 National Immunization Surveys were used to analyze vaccination histories and WIC participation among children aged 24-35 months. Grantee data on immunization activities in WIC settings were collected from the 2010 WIC Linkage Annual Report Survey. Coverage by WIC eligibility and participation status and grantee-specific coverage by intervention strategy were determined at 24 months for select antigens. Data were collected 2007-2011 and analyzed in 2013. RESULTS: Of 13,183 age-eligible children, 5,699 (61%, weighted) had participated in WIC, of which 3,404 (62%, weighted) were current participants. In 2011, differences in four or more doses of the diphtheria, tetanus toxoid, and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine by WIC participation status were observed: 86% (ineligible); 84% (current); 77% (previous); and 69% (never-eligible). Children in WIC exposed to an immunization intervention strategy had higher coverage levels than WIC-eligible children who never participated, with differences as great as 15% (DTaP). CONCLUSIONS: Children who never participated in WIC, but were eligible, had the lowest vaccination coverage. Current WIC participants had vaccination coverage comparable to more affluent children, and higher coverage than previous WIC participants.


Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Programas de Imunização , Adolescente , Adulto , Pré-Escolar , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/uso terapêutico , Definição da Elegibilidade , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/métodos , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Vacina contra Sarampo/uso terapêutico , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
7.
Prev Med ; 69: 110-6, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25152506

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness and feasibility of public-private collaboration in delivering influenza immunization to children. METHODS: Four pediatric and four family medicine (FM) practices in Colorado with a common public health department (PHD) were randomized at the beginning of baseline year (10/2009) to Intervention (joint community clinics and PHD nurses aiding in delivery at practices); or control involving usual care without PHD. Generalized estimating equations compared changes in rates over baseline between intervention and control practices at end of 2nd intervention year (Y2=5/2011). Barriers to collaboration were examined using qualitative methods. RESULTS: Overall, rates increased from baseline to Y2 by 9.2% in intervention and 3.2% in control (p<.0001), with significant increases in both pediatric and FM practices. The largest increases were seen among school-aged and adolescent children (p<.0001 for both), with differences for 6-month-old to 5-year-old children and for children with high-risk conditions not reaching significance. Barriers to collaboration included uncertainty regarding the delivery of vaccine supplies, concerns about using up all purchased vaccine by practices, and concerns about documentation of vaccination if collaboration occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of barriers, public-private collaboration resulted in significantly higher influenza immunization rates, particularly for older, healthy children who visit providers less frequently.


Assuntos
Comportamento Cooperativo , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Administração em Saúde Pública , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Colorado , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pediatria
8.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 63(34): 741-8, 2014 Aug 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25166924

RESUMO

In the United States, among children born during 1994-2013, vaccination will prevent an estimated 322 million illnesses, 21 million hospitalizations, and 732,000 deaths during their lifetimes. Since 1994, the National Immunization Survey (NIS) has monitored vaccination coverage among children aged 19-35 months in the United States. This report describes national, regional, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage estimates for children born January 2010-May 2012, based on results from the 2013 NIS. In 2013, vaccination coverage achieved the 90% national Healthy People 2020 target for ≥ 1 dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) (91.9%); ≥ 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) (90.8%); ≥ 3 doses of poliovirus vaccine (92.7%); and ≥ 1 dose of varicella vaccine (91.2%). Coverage was below the Healthy People 2020 targets for ≥ 4 doses of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine (DTaP) (83.1%; target 90%); ≥ 4 doses of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) (82.0%; target 90%); the full series of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (Hib) (82.0%; target 90%); ≥ 2 doses of hepatitis A vaccine (HepA) (54.7%; target 85%); rotavirus vaccine (72.6%; target 80%); and the HepB birth dose (74.2%; target 85%). Coverage remained stable relative to 2012 for all of the vaccinations with Healthy People 2020 objectives except for increases in the HepB birth dose (by 2.6 percentage points) and rotavirus vaccination (by 4.0 percentage points). The percentage of children who received no vaccinations remained below 1.0% (0.7%). Children living below the federal poverty level had lower vaccination coverage compared with children living at or above the poverty level for many vaccines, with the largest disparities for ≥ 4 doses of DTaP (by 8.2 percentage points), full series of Hib (by 9.5 percentage points), ≥ 4 doses of PCV (by 11.6 percentage points), and rotavirus (by 12.6 percentage points). MMR coverage was below 90% for 17 states. Reaching and maintaining high coverage across states and socioeconomic groups is needed to prevent resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Distribuição por Idade , Cápsulas Bacterianas , Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Pré-Escolar , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Hepatite A/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Vacina contra Coqueluche/administração & dosagem , Vigilância da População , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacina contra Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
Am J Prev Med ; 47(1): 1-8, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24750973

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have found reminder/recall to be effective in increasing immunization rates, little guidance exists regarding the specific ages at which it is optimal to send reminder/recall notices. PURPOSE: To assess the relative effectiveness of centralized reminder/recall strategies targeting age-specific vaccination milestones among children in urban areas during June 2008-June 2009. METHODS: Three reminder/recall strategies used capabilities of the Michigan Care Improvement Registry (MCIR), a statewide immunization information system: a 7-month recall strategy, a 12-month reminder strategy, and a 19-month recall strategy. Eligible children were randomized to notification (intervention) or no notification groups (control). Primary study outcomes included MCIR-recorded immunization activity (administration of ≥1 new dose, entry of ≥1 historic dose, entry of immunization waiver) within 60 days following each notification cycle. RESULTS: A total of 10,175 children were included: 2,072 for the 7-month recall, 3,502 for the 12-month reminder, and 4,601 for the 19-month recall. Immunization activity was similar between notification versus no notification groups at both 7 and 12 months. Significantly more 19-month-old children in the recall group (26%) had immunization activity compared to their counterparts who did not receive a recall notification (19%). CONCLUSIONS: Although recall notifications can positively affect immunization activity, the effect may vary by targeted age group. Many 7- and 12-month-olds had immunization activity following reminder/recall; however, levels of activity were similar irrespective of notification, suggesting that these groups were likely to receive medical care or immunization services without prompting.


Assuntos
Programas de Imunização/métodos , Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Alerta , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Humanos , Lactente , Michigan , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Tempo , População Urbana
10.
MMWR Suppl ; 63(1): 7-12, 2014 Apr 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24743661

RESUMO

The Presidential Childhood Immunization Initiative was developed in 1993 to address major gaps in childhood vaccination coverage in the United States. Eliminating the cost of vaccines as a barrier to vaccination was one strategy of the Childhood Immunization Initiative; it led to Congressional legislation that authorized creation of the Vaccines for Children program (VFC) in 1994. CDC analyzed National Immunization Survey data for 1995-2011 to evaluate trends in disparities in vaccination coverage rates between non-Hispanic white children and children of other racial/ethnic groups. VFC has been effective in ireducing disparities in vaccination coverage among U.S. children. CDC's Office of Minority Health and Health Equity selected the intervention analysis and discussion that follows to provide an example of a program that has been effective in reducing childhood vaccination coverage-related disparities in the United States. At its inception in 1994, VFC was implemented in 78 Immunization Action Plan areas that covered the entire United States; within each area, concerted efforts were made to improve childhood vaccination coverage. The findings in this report demonstrate that there have been no racial/ethnic disparities in vaccine coverage for measles-mumps-rubella and poliovirus in the United States since 2005. Disparities in coverage for the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis/diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine were absent, declining, or inconsistent during this period, depending on the racial/ethnic group examined. The results in this report highlight the effectiveness of VFC.


Assuntos
Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Pré-Escolar , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Lactente , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estados Unidos
11.
J Sch Nurs ; 30(5): 332-9, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24407317

RESUMO

During 2010-2011, varicella vaccination was an added requirement for school entrance in Wyoming. Vaccination exemption rates were compared during the 2009-2010 and 2011-2012 school years, and impacts of implementing a new childhood vaccine requirement were evaluated. All public schools, grades K-12, were required to report vaccination status of enrolled children for the 2009-2010 and 2011-2012 school years to the Wyoming Department of Health. Exemption data were analyzed by exemption category, vaccine, county, grade, and rurality. The proportion of children exempt for ≥ 1 vaccine increased from 1.2% (1,035/87,398) during the 2009-2010 school year to 1.9% (1,678/89,476) during 2011-2012. In 2011, exemptions were lowest (1.5%) in urban areas and highest (2.6%) in the most rural areas, and varicella vaccine exemptions represented 67.1% (294/438) of single vaccination exemptions. Implementation of a new vaccination requirement for school admission led to an increased exemption rate across Wyoming.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições Acadêmicas/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Wyoming
12.
Am J Public Health ; 104(1): e39-44, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24228668

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the use of a statewide immunization information system (IIS) to target influenza vaccine reminders to high-risk children during a pandemic. METHODS: We used Michigan's IIS to identify high-risk children (i.e., those with ≥ 1 chronic condition) aged 6 months to 18 years with no record of pH1N1 vaccination among children currently or previously enrolled in Medicaid (n = 202,133). Reminders were mailed on December 7, 2009. We retrospectively assessed children's eligibility for evaluation and compared influenza vaccination rates across 3 groups on the basis of their high-risk and reminder status. RESULTS: Of the children sent reminders, 53,516 were ineligible. Of the remaining 148,617 children, vaccination rates were higher among the 142,383 high-risk children receiving reminders than among the 6234 high-risk children with undeliverable reminders and the 142,383 control group children without chronic conditions who were not sent reminders. CONCLUSIONS: Midseason reminders to parents of unvaccinated high-risk children with current or past Medicaid enrollment were associated with increased pH1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccination rates. Future initiatives should consider strategies to expand targeting of high-risk groups and improve IIS reporting during pandemic events.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Sistemas de Alerta , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doença Crônica , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Lactente , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
Am J Prev Med ; 46(1): 1-9, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24355665

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination coverage for U.S. school-aged children is below the 80% national goal. Primary care practices may not have the capacity to vaccinate all children during influenza vaccination season. No real-world models of school-located seasonal influenza (SLV-I) programs have been tested. PURPOSE: Determine the feasibility, sustainability, and impact of an SLV-I program providing influenza vaccination to elementary school children during the school day. DESIGN: In this pragmatic randomized controlled trial of SLV-I during two vaccination seasons, schools were randomly assigned to SLV-I versus standard of care. Seasonal influenza vaccine receipt, as recorded in the state immunization information system (IIS), was measured. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Intervention and control schools were located in a single western New York county. Participation (intervention or control) included the sole urban school district and suburban districts (five in Year 1, four in Year 2). INTERVENTION: After gathering parental consent and insurance information, live attenuated and inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines were offered in elementary schools during the school day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on receipt of ≥1 seasonal influenza vaccination in Year 1 (2009-2010) and Year 2 (2010-2011) were collected on all student grades K through 5 at intervention and control schools from the IIS in the Spring of 2010 and 2011, respectively. Additionally, coverage achieved through SLV-I was compared to coverage of children vaccinated elsewhere. Preliminary data analysis for Year 1 occurred in Spring 2010; final quantitative analysis for both years was completed in late Fall 2012. RESULTS: Results are shown for 2009-2010 and 2010-2011, respectively: Children enrolled in suburban SLV-I versus control schools had vaccination coverage of 47% vs 36%, and 52% vs 36% (p<0.0001 both years). In urban areas, coverage was 36% vs 26%, and 31% vs 25% (p<0.001 both years). On multilevel logistic analysis with three nested levels (student, school, school district) during both vaccination seasons, children were more likely to be vaccinated in SLV-I versus control schools; ORs were 1.6 (95% CI=1.4, 1.9; p<0.001) and 1.5 (95% CI=1.3, 1.8; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Delivering influenza vaccine during school is a promising approach to improving pediatric influenza vaccination coverage. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.govNCT01224301.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Instituições Acadêmicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Multivariada , Serviços de Saúde Escolar
14.
Vaccine ; 31(17): 2156-64, 2013 Apr 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23499607

RESUMO

School-located vaccination against influenza (SLV-I) has been suggested to help meet the need for annual vaccination of large numbers of school-aged children with seasonal influenza vaccine. However, little is known about the cost and cost-effectiveness of SLV-I. We conducted a cost-analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis based on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an SLV-I program implemented in Monroe County, New York during the 2009-2010 vaccination season. We hypothesized that SLV-I is more cost effective, or less-costly, compared to a conventional, office-located influenza vaccination delivery. First and second SLV-I clinics were offered in 21 intervention elementary schools (n=9027 children) with standard of care (no SLV-I) in 11 control schools (n=4534 children). The direct costs, to purchase and administer vaccines, were estimated from our RCT. The effectiveness measure, receipt of ≥1 dose of influenza vaccine, was 13.2 percentage points higher in SLV-I schools than control schools. The school costs ($9.16/dose in 2009 dollars) plus project costs ($23.00/dose) plus vendor costs excluding vaccine purchase ($19.89/dose) was higher in direct costs ($52.05/dose) than the previously reported mean/median cost [$38.23/$21.44 per dose] for providing influenza vaccination in pediatric practices. However SLV-I averted parent costs to visit medical practices ($35.08 per vaccine). Combining direct and averted costs through Monte Carlo Simulation, SLV-I costs were $19.26/dose in net costs, which is below practice-based influenza vaccination costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated to be $92.50 or $38.59 (also including averted parent costs). When additionally accounting for the costs averted by disease prevention (i.e., both reduced disease transmission to household members and reduced loss of productivity from caring for a sick child), the SLV-I model appears to be cost-saving to society, compared to "no vaccination". Our findings support the expanded implementation of SLV-I, but also the need to focus on efficient delivery to reduce direct costs.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/economia , Influenza Humana/economia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Instituições Acadêmicas , Vacinação/economia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Eficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/transmissão , Masculino , Método de Monte Carlo , New York , Pediatria/economia , Estações do Ano
15.
J Sch Nurs ; 28(5): 344-51, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22786984

RESUMO

This study qualitatively assesses the acceptability and feasibility of a school-located vaccination for influenza (SLIV) project that was conducted in New York State in 2009-2011, from the perspectives of project participants with different roles. Fourteen in-depth semistructured interviews with participating schools' personnel and the mass vaccinator were tape-recorded and transcribed. Interviewees were randomly selected from stratified lists and included five principals, five school nurses, two school administrators, and two lead personnel from the mass vaccinator. A content analysis of transcripts from the interviews was completed and several themes emerged. All participants generally found the SLIV project acceptable. School personnel and the vaccinator viewed the SLIV project process as feasible and beneficial. However, the vaccinator identified difficulties with third-party billing as a potential threat to sustainability.


Assuntos
Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas contra Influenza/economia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições Acadêmicas , Criança , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/economia , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Gravação em Fita
16.
Public Health Rep ; 126 Suppl 2: 33-8, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21812167

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to model the effect that a targeted immunization visit at 18 months of age could have on immunization rates of preschool-aged children in a sample of pediatric practices. METHODS: We conducted retrospective chart reviews in six practices of all active patients aged 18-30 months. Up-to-date (UTD) status was defined as receipt of four diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis, three polio, one measles-mumps-rubella, three hepatitis B, and one varicella vaccines. Haemophilus influenza tybe b vaccine was not included due to a shortage in vaccine supply during the time of the study. Practice vaccination rates were determined at 17 months, 18 months, and the age at assessment. Of those not UTD at 17 months, the percentage of children who could be brought UTD with one visit was calculated for each practice. This calculated rate was compared with the measured rate at 18 months of age and at the age of assessment. RESULTS: At each practice, we reviewed 183-616 charts (median = 382). Observed UTD immunization rates at 17 months ranged from 26% to 64% (median = 38%) and increased 3 to 27 percentage points (median = 6) from age 17 months to 18 months and 9 to 39 percentage points (median = 17) from age 17 months to the age at assessment. A simulated vaccination visit at 18 months of age could improve the UTD rates from 27 to 61 percentage points (median = 44). CONCLUSION: Practice-based interventions aimed at encouraging an 18-month well-child visit that emphasizes delivery of vaccines have the potential to substantially increase timely vaccination rates among individual practices.


Assuntos
Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Esquemas de Imunização , Padrões de Prática Médica/organização & administração , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Masculino , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
17.
Qual Prim Care ; 19(3): 147-54, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21781430

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Immunisation coverage of children by 19 months of age in US primary care practices is below the desired goal of 80%. In order to improve this rate, primary care providers must first understand the specific processes of immunisation delivery within their office settings. This paper aims to identify key components in identifying strategies for quality improvement (QI) of immunisation delivery. METHODS: We surveyed a South Carolina Pediatric Practice Research Network (SCPPRN) representative for each of six paediatric practices. The surveys included questions regarding immunisation assessment, medical record keeping, opportunities for immunisation administration and prompting. Subsequently, research staff visited the participating practices to directly observe their immunisation delivery process and review patient charts in order to validate survey responses and identify areas for QI. RESULTS: Most survey responses were verified using direct observation of actual practice or chart review. However, observation of actual practice and chart review identified key areas for improvement of immunisation delivery. Although four practices responded that they prompted for needed immunisations at sick visits, only one did so. We also noted considerable variation among and within practices in terms of immunising with all indicated vaccines during sick visits. In addition, most practices had multiple immunisation forms and all administered immunisations were not always recorded on all forms, making it difficult to determine a child's immunisation status. CONCLUSIONS: For any QI procedure, including immunisation delivery, providers must first understand how the process within their practice actually occurs. Direct observation of immunisation processes and medical record review enhances survey responses in identifying areas for improvement. This study identified several opportunities that practices can use to improve immunisation delivery, particularly maintaining accurate and easy-to-locate immunisation records and prompting for needed immunisations during sick visits.


Assuntos
Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Formulários e Registros/organização & administração , Controle de Formulários e Registros/normas , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Imunização/métodos , Imunização/normas , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Visita a Consultório Médico , Pediatria/métodos , Pediatria/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Sistemas de Alerta/normas , Sistemas de Alerta/estatística & dados numéricos , South Carolina
18.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 15(6): 459-63, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19823149

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Examine impact of provider chart audits and parental outreach in improving immunization coverage among children not up-to-date (NUTD) for immunizations in Philadelphia's immunization information system (IIS). METHODS: We identified 10-month-old children NUTD for age-appropriate immunizations using Philadelphia's IIS. Immunization rates at 10, 13, and 19 months were compared before and after contact with providers and parents. RESULTS: Of 5 610 children NUTD in the IIS at 10 months and living in areas with populations at risk for underimmunization, provider chart audits indicated that 3 612 (64%) were actually up-to-date (UTD); the majority of these (2 203) received additional age-appropriate immunizations and were also UTD at 19 months. Of 1 998 children truly NUTD at 10 months, half received overdue immunizations by 13 months following contact with parents via telephone, postcards, and home visits, but only 23 percent were UTD for age-appropriate vaccines at 19 months. CONCLUSIONS: Provider chart audits improved IIS data completeness, indicating that providers need to submit more complete and timely data to the IIS. Outreach to parents likely contributed to half of the children NUTD at 10 months receiving overdue immunizations by 13 months. However, most were again NUTD at 19 months, indicating that outreach efforts should be continued through 19 months or until children are brought UTD. Furthermore, in spite of outreach, about half of the NUTD children were not brought UTD by 13 or 19 months. New strategies should be developed to ensure that these children receive recommended vaccinations.


Assuntos
Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Bem-Estar do Lactente , Sistemas de Informação , Auditoria Médica , Cooperação do Paciente , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , Philadelphia , Sistema de Registros
19.
Am J Infect Control ; 36(8): 582-7, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18926312

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination is the primary method for preventing influenza and its complications. Characteristics of influenza vaccination coverage among high-risk children (HRC) during the 2002-2003 influenza season are described. METHODS: Children aged 1 to 17 years continuously enrolled in private health insurance plans during the 2002-2003 influenza season and entered in MarketScan paid claims databases were included. Children were partitioned into 2 groups: high-risk children and nonhigh-risk children (non-HRC) based on their diagnosis history since 1998. The influenza vaccination coverage rates of both groups during the 2002-2003 influenza season were assessed by demographic, child, and provider-related variables. RESULTS: The influenza vaccination coverage rate was 4.63% among all sampled children. Overall, influenza vaccination coverage rates were higher among HRC (11.74%) than non-HRC (3.31%). Among children ages 12 to 23 months, HRC had lower coverage than non-HRC, but, from age 2 years onward, HRC consistently had higher coverage than non-HRC. Influenza vaccination coverage varied by geographic area, with higher coverage among children living within metropolitan areas and in the Western and the Northeast regions of the United States. Children receiving vaccination under a comprehensive insurance plan had significantly lower coverage than children served by all other plan types. CONCLUSION: Influenza vaccination coverage during the 2002-2003 influenza season was very low among all children, leaving many children at risk for influenza and influenza-related complications. Coverage was influenced by child age, insurance plan type, and area of residence.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Geografia , Humanos , Lactente , Cobertura do Seguro , Estados Unidos
20.
J Infect Dis ; 197 Suppl 2: S76-81, 2008 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18419414

RESUMO

We reviewed progress toward adoption of day care and school entry requirements in each state and the District of Columbia (DC) and compared varicella vaccination coverage by state to year of implementation of day care entry requirements. By the start of the 2006-2007 school year, 46 states (92%) and DC had implemented entry requirements for varicella vaccination. Between 1997 and 2005, national varicella vaccination coverage among children 19-35 months of age increased from 25.8% to 87.9%. Implementation of day care entry requirements in 2000 or earlier was associated with higher vaccination coverage (> or =90%; P=.002). Implementation of day care and school entry requirements for varicella vaccination is an important strategy for achieving and maintaining high vaccination coverage among preschool- and school-aged children in the United States. The newly adopted vaccine policy recommendation of 2 doses of varicella vaccine for all school-aged children should be incorporated into the states' school entry requirements.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Varicela/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Instituições Acadêmicas , Estados Unidos , Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...