Diagnostic yield of exome and genome sequencing after non-diagnostic multi-gene panels in patients with single-system diseases.

BACKGROUND: Though next-generation sequencing (NGS) tests like exome sequencing (ES), genome sequencing (GS), and panels derived from exome and genome data (EGBP) are effective for rare diseases, the ideal diagnostic approach is debated. Limited research has explored reanalyzing raw ES and GS data post-negative EGBP results for diagnostics. RESULTS: We analyzed complete ES/GS raw sequencing data from Mayo Clinic's Program for Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases (PRaUD) patients to assess whether supplementary findings could augment diagnostic yield. ES data from 80 patients (59 adults) and GS data from 20 patients (10 adults), averaging 43 years in age, were analyzed. Most patients had renal (n=44) and auto-inflammatory (n=29) phenotypes. Ninety-six cases had negative findings and in four cases additional genetic variants were found, including a variant related to a recently described disease (RRAGD-related hypomagnesemia), a variant missed due to discordant inheritance pattern (COL4A3), a variant with high allelic frequency (NPHS2) in the general population, and a variant associated with an initially untargeted phenotype (HNF1A). CONCLUSION: ES and GS show diagnostic yields comparable to EGBP for single-system diseases. However, EGBP's limitations in detecting new disease-associated genes underscore the necessity for periodic updates.

Implementation of genomic medicine for rare disease in a tertiary healthcare system: Mayo Clinic Program for Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases (PRaUD).

BACKGROUND: In the United States, rare disease (RD) is defined as a condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals. Collectively, RD affects an estimated 30 million Americans. A significant portion of RD has an underlying genetic cause; however, this may go undiagnosed. To better serve these patients, the Mayo Clinic Program for Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases (PRaUD) was created under the auspices of the Center for Individualized Medicine (CIM) aiming to integrate genomics into subspecialty practice including targeted genetic testing, research, and education. METHODS: Patients were identified by subspecialty healthcare providers from 11 clinical divisions/departments. Targeted multi-gene panels or custom exome/genome-based panels were utilized. To support the goals of PRaUD, a new clinical service model, the Genetic Testing and Counseling (GTAC) unit, was established to improve access and increase efficiency for genetic test facilitation. The GTAC unit includes genetic counselors, genetic counseling assistants, genetic nurses, and a medical geneticist. Patients receive abbreviated point-of-care genetic counseling and testing through a partnership with subspecialty providers. RESULTS: Implementation of PRaUD began in 2018 and GTAC unit launched in 2020 to support program expansion. Currently, 29 RD clinical indications are included in 11 specialty divisions/departments with over 142 referring providers. To date, 1152 patients have been evaluated with an overall solved or likely solved rate of 17.5% and as high as 66.7% depending on the phenotype. Noteworthy, 42.7% of the solved or likely solved patients underwent changes in medical management and outcome based on genetic test results. CONCLUSION: Implementation of PRaUD and GTAC have enabled subspecialty practices advance expertise in RD where genetic counselors have not historically been embedded in practice. Democratizing access to genetic testing and counseling can broaden the reach of patients with RD and increase the diagnostic yield of such indications leading to better medical management as well as expanding research opportunities.

Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency: 10-Year Experience at a Single Referral Center (2009-2018).

In 2008, newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) began as a pilot study in Wisconsin and has recently been added to every state's newborn screen panel. The incidence of SCID is estimated at 1 per 58,000 births which may suggest infrequent NBS SCID screen positive results in states with low annual birth rates. In this study, we report our center's experience with NBS positive SCID screen referrals over a 10-year period. A total of 68 full-term newborns were referred to our center for confirmatory testing. Of these referrals, 50% were false positives, 12% were SCID diagnoses, 20% syndromic T cell lymphopenia (TCL) disorders, and 18% non-SCID, non-syndromic TCL. Through collaboration with our newborn screening lab, second-tier targeted gene sequencing was performed for newborns with SCID screen positive results from communities with known founder pathogenic variants and provided rapid genetic confirmation of SCID and non-SCID TCL disorders. Despite extensive genetic testing, two of the eight (25%) identified newborns with SCID diagnoses lacked a definable genetic defect. Additionally, our referrals included ten newborns who were otherwise healthy newborns with idiopathic TCL and varied CD3+ T cell number longitudinal trajectories. Collectively, referrals to our single site over a 10-year period describe a broad spectrum of medically actionable and idiopathic TCL disorders which highlight the importance of clinical immunology expertise in all states, demonstrate efficiencies and challenges for second-tier genetic testing, and further emphasize the need to development standardized evaluation algorithms for non-SCID TCL.