A study of otolith function in patients with orthostatic dizziness.

BACKGROUND: Orthostatic dizziness (OD) is the dizziness that occurs when moving from a sitting or a supine to a standing position. It is typically thought to be connected to orthostatic hypotension (OH). The otolithic control of respiratory and cardiovascular system through vestibulosympathetic reflex has been the focus of considerable recent interest. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the orthostatic dizziness and otolith organ function. METHODS: This study was carried on 50 adults aged from 18 to 50 years with normal peripheral hearing. Subjects were divided into two groups: controls (GI): 20 healthy adults and study group (GII): 30 patients who were complaining of OD. Patients were submitted to; blood pressure measurement in sitting and standing positions, combined vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) and subjective visual vertical and horizontal tests (SVV) and (SVH). RESULTS: The study group showed abnormal absent cVEMP, oVEMP. There were also statistically significant differences of P13 and N23 latencies and (P13N23) amplitudes between the two groups in the left ears. Both groups differed significantly in SVH values deviated to the left side. Study group were further subdivided into ten patients with OH and 20 patients with OD without OH. The both study subgroups showed abnormal absent cVEMP, oVEMP and abnormal SVH. OH patients showed statistically significant differences of cVEMP waves P13, N23 latencies in the left ears when compared with the control. CONCLUSIONS: Otolith malfunction may be the cause of orthostatic dizziness (OD) in patients with and without orthostatic hypotension.

Auditory cortical processing in cochlear-implanted children with different language outcomes.

PURPOSE: Behavioral evaluation of language development is an important index for the usefulness of cochlear implantation. However, it could not apply to infants and very young children. It is useful to adopt an objective measure to examine speech discrimination in this population. Thus, the current study aimed to predict the different behavioral language performance (good versus poor) in cochlear implant (CI) recipients through the auditory cortical assessment of speech discrimination with mismatch negativity (MMN). METHODS: The study comprised 40 CI children who were divided into two groups according to their behavioral language evaluation outcomes: 20 good and 20 poor CI performers. They were age, gender, and socioeconomically matched. The MMN was examined and compared between both groups with finding out the relationship between MMN and different variables. RESULTS: MMN existed in all good performers and 87.5% of the poor performers. There were significantly shorter latency, larger amplitude, and a larger area of MMN in the good performers. The MMN results correlated with a significant predictive effect on the behavioral measures of language evaluation. CONCLUSION: The MMN is a clinically applicable objective measure of speech discrimination proficiency. Hence, it could be useful in CI programming and auditory cortical monitoring during rehabilitation.