A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial of Plecanatide, a Uroguanylin Analog, in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of plecanatide, a guanylate cyclase-C (GC-C) agonist and the first uroguanylin analog approved for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). METHODS: This phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized 1,394 patients with CIC. Patients received either plecanatide (3 or 6 mg) or placebo, orally, once daily, for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients who were durable overall complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) responders over the 12-week treatment period. Patients were instructed to record their daily bowel movements, stool consistency scores, and abdominal symptoms in an electronic diary. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were collected. RESULTS: Each dose of plecanatide resulted in a significantly greater percentage of durable overall CSBM responders (21.0%, 3 mg; 19.5%, 6 mg) as compared with placebo (10.2%; P<0.001 for both). Plecanatide (3 and 6 mg) also significantly increased mean weekly CSBM frequency from baseline (increase of 2.5 and 2.2/week, respectively) vs. placebo (1.2/week; P<0.001 for both) and mean weekly spontaneous bowel movement frequency (increase of 3.2 and 3.1/week, respectively) vs. placebo (1.3/week; P<0.001, for both) over the 12-week treatment period. Both plecanatide doses significantly improved all secondary and additional efficacy endpoints. The most common AE, diarrhea, occurred in 1.3% (placebo), 5.9% (3 mg) and 5.7% (6 mg) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Plecanatide significantly improved constipation and its related symptoms with a low rate of adverse events. These results suggest that plecanatide will be a useful treatment option in the management of CIC. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01982240.

A Selective Estrogen Receptor Beta Agonist for the Treatment of Hot Flushes: Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a selective estrogen receptor beta (ERß) agonist, Dr. Tagliaferri's Menopause Formula (MF102), to treat the symptoms of menopause. METHODS: An open-label trial of MF102 taken for 12 weeks by 30 postmenopausal women aged 40-65 years, who experienced a minimum of five moderate to severe hot flushes per day. The primary efficacy outcome was a change in the frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes from baseline to week 12. A change in the frequency of hot flushes that woke participants from their sleep from baseline to 12 weeks was a secondary endpoint. Lipid profile and endometrial thickness were also evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty postmenopausal women with an average of nine moderate to severe hot flushes per day were treated with MF102 4 g/day; 27 participants completed the study. The median percent reduction in moderate to severe hot flushes was 71% (p < 0.001). The median percent reduction in hot flushes that woke participants from their sleep was 54% (p < 0.001). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and total cholesterol both declined significantly from baseline. There were no serious adverse events, reports of abnormal uterine bleeding, or significant changes in double-wall endometrial thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with MF102 resulted in a marked decrease in the frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes, was well-tolerated, and demonstrated no safety concerns.

Randomized, double-blind, multicenter safety and efficacy study of rifalazil compared with azithromycin for treatment of uncomplicated genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.

A randomized, double-blind study comparing single-dose chlamydia therapies of oral rifalazil (25 mg) and azithromycin (1 g) was conducted in 82 women with uncomplicated genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. The microbiologic cure rate of C. trachomatis with rifalazil (n = 33) was 84.8% at the visit on day 22 to 26 (test-of-cure visit), versus 92.1% with azithromycin (n = 38), and the number of treatment failures in each group was 5 and 3, respectively. The difference in cure rate was -7.3%, with a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of -22.5, and thus, noninferiority was not established at the prespecified margin (lower limit of CI of -15%). The overall treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and treatment-related TEAE rates were lower in the rifalazil group (68% and 55%) than in the azithromycin group (71% and 62%), respectively. Subjects classified as treatment failures at day 22 to 26 had a lower mean plasma concentration of rifalazil at the visit on day 8 to 12 than those classified as treatment cures, but this difference was not significant; however, the levels were similar for both groups at the visit on day 22 to 26. A single 25-mg dose of rifalazil was well tolerated and eradicated C. trachomatis in most of these women with uncomplicated genital C. trachomatis infection. (The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under registration no. NCT01631201).

Assessment of ospemifene or lubricants on clinical signs of VVA.

INTRODUCTION: Ospemifene is a new oral estrogen receptor agonist/antagonist with tissue-selective effects approved for the treatment of moderate to severe dyspareunia, a symptom of postmenopausal vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA). AIM: The aim of the study is to assess ospemifene or lubricant use on the clinical signs of VVA. METHODS: Subjects in three double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials were randomized to ospemifene or placebo. In two of the trials, women were provided nonhormonal lubricants for use as needed, and a preplanned evaluation of the frequency of lubricant use was performed. Additionally, a post hoc placebo group analysis for impact of lubricant use or nonuse on physiologic effects of the percentage of superficial and parabasal cells (maturation index) and vaginal pH was conducted. A secondary preplanned end point included visual examination of the vagina (clinical signs of vaginal dryness, petechiae, pallor, friability, and redness of the mucosa) comparing change from baseline to end of treatment for the ospemifene 60-mg/day group and vs. placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end points in the phase 3 clinical trials included the percentage of superficial cells, parabasal cells, vaginal pH, and most bothersome symptoms compared with placebo. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in physiologic effects between placebo lubricant users vs. nonusers in either 12-week study. Compared with baseline, substantially more subjects receiving ospemifene 60 mg/day than placebo showed complete resolution of clinical signs of VVA after 12 and 52 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Ospemifene substantially improved clinical signs of VVA. Within the placebo group, there was no difference in physiologic effects in lubricant users vs. nonusers. Based on gynecologic evaluation of the vagina, benefits were apparent at 12 weeks and sustained for 52 weeks in the ospemifene-treated subjects with significant improvement over placebo. In these three clinical trials, in contrast to ospemifene-treated women, placebo subjects who utilized lubricants had no improvement in their underlying vaginal physiology.

Norethindrone acetate 1.0 milligram and ethinyl estradiol 10 micrograms as an ultra low-dose oral contraceptive.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of an extended-duration, combined hormonal oral contraceptive pill (OCP) that reduces the estrogen exposure by almost half compared with other OCPs. METHODS: This open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter study used an ultra low-dose OCP (1.0 mg norethindrone acetate and 10 micrograms ethinyl E2). The OCP was administered in a regimen of 24 days of a 28-day cycle followed by 10 micrograms ethinyl E2 for 2 days and an inactive tablet for 2 days. The study included healthy, heterosexually active women aged 18-45 years who were at risk of pregnancy. RESULTS: The discontinuation rate was 41.7% (692/1,660 patients). Twenty-six pregnancies occurred in 1,555 participants during 15,596 at-risk cycles, resulting in a Pearl Index of 2.2 and a cumulative pregnancy rate of 2.1 for the overall population. Participants experienced an average of 2.6 days of intracyclic (unscheduled) bleeding or spotting per cycle over treatment cycles 213. Intracyclic bleeding was more common in users new to OCPs than in users switching from another OCP and in women aged 18-35 years compared with those aged 36 years or older. The frequency of bleeding episodes decreased after cycle 2 and throughout treatment in all subpopulations. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study demonstrate that this ultra low-dose OCP regimen is effective in preventing pregnancy with a safety and tolerability profile that is comparable with that reported for other low-dose OCPs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00391807. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Solifenacin plus tamsulosin combination treatment in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Alpha blockers are prescribed to manage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Antimuscarinics are prescribed to treat overactive bladder (OAB). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety of a combination of solifenacin (SOLI) and tamsulosin oral controlled absorption system (TOCAS) in men with LUTS and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study in men aged >45 yr with LUTS and BOO for ≥3 mo, total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥8, BOO index ≥20, maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)) ≤12 ml/s, and voided volume ≥120 ml. INTERVENTIONS: Once-daily coadministration of TOCAS 0.4 mg plus SOLI 6 mg, TOCAS 0.4 mg plus SOLI 9 mg, or placebo for 12 wk. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary (safety) measurements: Q(max) and detrusor pressure at Q(max) (P(det)Q(max)). Other safety assessments included postvoid residual (PVR) volume. Secondary end points included bladder contractile index (BCI) score and percent bladder voiding efficiency (BVE). An analysis of covariance model compared each TOCAS plus SOLI combination with placebo. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Both active treatment groups were noninferior to placebo at end of treatment (EOT) for P(det)Q(max) and Q(max). Mean change from baseline PVR was significantly higher at all time points for TOCAS 0.4 mg plus SOLI 6 mg, and at weeks 2, 12, and EOT for TOCAS 0.4 mg plus SOLI 9 mg versus placebo. Both treatment groups were similar to placebo for BCI and BVE. Urinary retention was seen in only one patient receiving TOCAS 0.4 mg plus SOLI 6 mg. Limitations of the study were that prostate size and prostate-specific antigen level were not measured. CONCLUSIONS: TOCAS 0.4 mg plus SOLI 6 mg or 9 mg was noninferior to placebo at EOT for P(det)Q(max) and Q(max) in men with LUTS and BOO, and there was no clinical or statistical evidence of increased risk of urinary retention.

Safety and efficacy of WC2031 versus vibramycin for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have raised concern about efficacy of azithromycin for Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Research investigating new antibiotic regimens for chlamydia has been sparse, especially regimens that may reduce adherence difficulties with the recommended twice-daily doxycycline regimen. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicenter trial with the objective of evaluating the safety and efficacy of WC2031 (doxycycline hyclate delayed-release 200-mg tablet) orally once daily for 7 days versus Vibramycin (doxycycline hyclate capsule) 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days for treatment of uncomplicated urogenital chlamydia. Men and nonpregnant women aged 19-45 years with a urogenital chlamydial diagnosis or a sexual partner with chlamydia were eligible. The primary outcome was microbial cure by nucleic acid amplification testing at day 28. Noninferiority of WC2031 was inferred if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference in cure rates was >-10%. RESULTS: A total of 495 subjects were randomized. The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population with evaluable efficacy consisted of 323 subjects. Baseline patient characteristics did not differ between the mITT groups. Microbial cure rates for WC2031 were 95.5% (95% CI, 92.3-98.8) versus 95.2% (95% CI, 92.0-98.4) for Vibramycin (95% CI for the difference in cure rates, -4.3% to 4.9%). Types of adverse events were comparable. Nausea and vomiting occurred less frequently with WC2031 than with Vibramycin (13% vs 21% and 8% vs 12%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: WC2031 was noninferior to Vibramycin for uncomplicated urogenital chlamydia treatment, better tolerated, and demonstrated comparable safety. WC2031 could improve treatment adherence over twice-daily Vibramycin. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01113931.

Estradiol gel 0.1% relieves vasomotor symptoms independent of age, ovarian status, or uterine status.

OBJECTIVE: Data from a pivotal efficacy trial have been reanalyzed to explore the impact of age, uterine status, and ovarian status on the efficacy of estradiol gel 0.1% (Divigel) for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. METHODS: Post hoc analyses were performed on data from a phase III clinical trial of estradiol gel 0.1%. These analyses explored the effects of age (<50, 50-59, ≥60 y) and uterine and ovarian status (intact or absent) on the change from baseline to week 12 in the frequency and severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms. The effects of age, uterine status, and ovarian status were investigated for each individual dose (1.0, 0.5, and 0.25 g) of estradiol gel 0.1% (separately and pooled) compared with those of placebo. RESULTS: Treatment with any dose of estradiol gel 0.1% reduced both the frequency and severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from baseline regardless of age, uterine status, or ovarian status. Women 50 years or older, regardless of uterine or ovarian status, treated with estradiol gel 0.1% showed improvement in vasomotor symptoms compared with women given matched placebo. No interactions were detected between estradiol gel 0.1% treatment and age, uterine status, or ovarian status on vasomotor symptom frequency or severity. CONCLUSIONS: Estradiol gel 0.1% treatment numerically decreased the frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms in healthy, postmenopausal women independent of age, uterine status, or ovarian status. To our knowledge, these data are the first to directly explore the effects of age, hysterectomy, and oophorectomy on the efficacy of transdermal estrogen therapy.

Transdermal estradiol gel 0.1% for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three doses of estradiol gel 0.1% (Divigel, a novel formulation consisting of 1 mg estradiol per 1 g transdermal gel) to reduce the frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms and signs of vulvar and vaginal atrophy associated with menopause. DESIGN: A total of 488 postmenopausal women were evaluated in a 12-week study comparing placebo with estradiol gel 0.1% at doses of 1.0, 0.5, and 0.25 mg/day, with estimated daily deliveries of 0.027, 0.009, and 0.003 mg of estradiol, respectively. Primary endpoints were the change from baseline in daily frequency and severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms. Change from baseline in the signs of vulvar and vaginal atrophy (vaginal pH and percentage of superficial cells) was also assessed. RESULTS: Treatment with estradiol gel 0.1% showed statistically significant reductions in frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms from baseline compared with placebo as early as Week 2 that were maintained throughout treatment. Signs of vulvar and vaginal atrophy were also significantly improved from baseline with all three doses of estradiol gel 0.1% compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose transdermal estradiol gel 0.1% is an effective treatment for relief of vasomotor symptoms, as well as signs of vulvar and vaginal atrophy, associated with menopause. Estradiol gel 0.1% offers multiple dosing options to individualize patient therapy, including the lowest available effective dose (0.25 mg estradiol, delivering 0.003 mg/d estradiol) to treat the vasomotor symptoms of menopause.

Low-dose estradiol spray to treat vasomotor symptoms: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of a transdermal estradiol (E2) spray in women with postmenopausal vasomotor symptoms. METHOD: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted. Postmenopausal women (N=454) with at least eight moderate-to-severe hot flushes per day applied daily, one, two, or three E2 (90 microliter spray contains 1.53 mg E2) or matching placebo sprays. The primary efficacy endpoints were mean change from baseline in frequency and severity of moderate-to-severe hot flushes at weeks 4 and 12. RESULTS: All three E2 groups showed a significant decrease in hot flushes at weeks 4 and 12 compared with their placebo groups (P<.010). The mean change in frequency at week 12 was eight fewer flushes per day for women in the E2 groups and between four and six fewer flushes for women in the placebo groups. Women in the three- and two-E2 spray groups demonstrated significant (P<.050) reductions in severity score at weeks 4 and 12; women in the one-spray group showed significant reductions at week 5. At week 12, the majority (74-85%) of women on E2 showed at least a 50% hot flush frequency reduction as compared with 46% in the placebo group. The systemic E2 delivery rates at week 12 were approximately 0.021 mg/d, 0.029 mg/d, and 0.040 mg/d for the one-, two-, and three-spray doses, respectively. Common adverse events were similar to those previously reported with other transdermal products. Treatment-related application site reaction rate was similar to placebo (1.3% compared with 1.8%). CONCLUSION: The three dose levels of E2 spray achieved efficacy at 0.021-0.040 mg/d delivery rates. The spray is a well-tolerated, new, convenient method of delivering low-dose E2 transdermally. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00122200. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Relief of hot flushes with new plant-derived 10-component synthetic conjugated estrogens.

OBJECTIVE: A study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 3 different doses of synthetic conjugated estrogens B, a new plant-derived 10-component conjugated estrogens product, for the treatment of menopausal vasomotor symptoms. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Highly symptomatic menopausal women (N = 281) received 12 weeks of a once-daily oral treatment with 0.3 mg, 0.625 mg, or 1.25 mg of 10-component synthetic conjugated estrogen or placebo. Patients recorded the daily frequency and severity of hot flushes. Statistical analyses compared results at weeks 4, 8, and 12 with baseline values. RESULTS: Statistically significant reductions (P <.05) in the frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms were observed for all 3 dosage strengths of 10-component synthetic conjugated estrogen compared with placebo. The most commonly reported adverse events in all treatment groups were headaches. No difference in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events was seen between placebo and 10-component synthetic conjugated estrogen groups. CONCLUSION: The 0.3-mg, 0.625-mg and 1.25-mg dose strengths of 10-component synthetic conjugated estrogen significantly reduced the frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms compared with placebo, and were well tolerated during this 12-week study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I