Outcomes of treatment with short dental implants compared with standard-length implants: a retrospective clinical study.

BACKGROUND: The size of dental implants is a key success factor for appropriate osseointegration. Using shorter implants allows the possibility of avoiding complex surgical procedures and reduces the morbidity of treatment. Shorter implants also enable implant-prosthetic rehabilitation after maxillofacial reconstructions where only limited bone is available. In this study, the success rates of short implants were examined and compared to those of standard-sized implants. METHODS: Patients who received dental implants between 2007 and 2016 at the Department of Oro-Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology Semmelweis University were enrolled in the study. Several clinical parameters were recorded and supplemented with radiological examinations. The data were statistically analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with a total of 60 implants were included. The average time after prosthetic loading was 39.33 ± 21.96 months in the group with 8-mm implants and 41.6 ± 27.5 months in the group with > 8-mm implants. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of probing depth (short implants, 2.84 ± 0.09 mm; standard implants, 2.91 ± 0.35 mm) or mean marginal bone loss (short implants, 1.2 ± 1.21-mm mesially and 1.36 ± 1.47-mm distally; standard implants: 0.63 ± 0.80-mm mesially and 0.78 ± 0.70-mm distally). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the success rate of short dental implants was comparable to that of standard-sized implants. Consequently, it can be claimed that the long-term success of short dental implants does not differ significantly from the long-term success of standard implants.

Periodontitis as a risk for oral cancer: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The aetiology of oral cancer is multifactorial, as various risk factors (genetics, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors) contribute to its development. Data in the literature suggest that people with periodontal disease have an increased risk of developing oral cancer, and the severity of periodontitis correlates with the appearance of oral squamous cell carcinoma. The aim of this study was to revise the non-genetic risk factors that may influence the development of OC, while focusing on the dental and periodontal status and OH. METHODS: Two hundred patients (hundred diagnosed with oral cancer and hundred without oral cancer) were enrolled in our case-control study, to evaluate the association between oral cancer and the presence and severity of periodontitis, while examining several risk factors that might be responsible for oral cancer formation. A questionnaire customised for oral cancer patients was used to obtain the socioeconomic and lifestyle risk factors that may influence the development of oral squamous cell carcinoma. The dental and periodontal status along with the level of oral hygiene was recorded quantitatively. The chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests and logistic regression were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: By considering both the case and the control groups, a significant correlation was found between the incidence of oral cancer and some socioeconomic factors and lifestyle habits, such as the sex, age, education and alcohol consumption of an individual. The mean value of the Silness-Löe plaque index was significantly higher in the case population. The number of completely edentulous patients was higher among the oral cancer population. The incidence of oral cancer was 57.1% in patients with periodontal disease. In comparison, the incidence of oral squamous cell carcinoma was only 28.6% among the patients without periodontitis. Most of the oral cancer patients (72.1%) had stage 4 periodontitis. On the other hand, the vast majority of the control group (51.6%) had stage 2 periodontitis. CONCLUSION: Periodontitis can be an individual risk factor for oral cancer development. Periodontally compromised individuals should be strictly monitored, especially those with severe periodontitis and coexisting lifestyle risk factors. Maintaining their periodontal health in at-risk patients can minimize cancer risks.

The early loading of different surface-modified implants: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Various surface treatment options have been adopted with the aim to improve osseointegration, reducing the overall treatment time. Implant stability of early loaded implants with different modified surfaces was compared in the present study. METHODS: Patients were selected from the Department of Oro-Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology at Semmelweis University. Patients randomly received SA (alumina sandblasted and acid-etched), NH (bioabsorbable apatite nanocoating) or SLA (large-grit sandblasted and acid-etched) surface implants. Outcome measures were: implant success, implant stability, and periodontal parameters. The implant stability was measured at the time of implant placement (primary stability) and six weeks after (prothesis delivery, secondary stability). Osstell and Periotest were applied to take all the measurements. The primary and secondary stability were compared in the three study groups Finally the periimplant probing depth appearing after three months of loading was checked on 6 points around to the implant-supported prostheses. Shapiro-Wilk and Mann-Whitney tests were used for the comparison between the study groups. RESULTS: A total of 75 implants with different length and diameter were inserted into various positions. One implant failed spontaneously at the fourth week after implant placement. The survival rate was 98,7%. Comparing the primary and secondary stability values, the data were significantly improved in every groups. The difference was the highest in the NH group, however, this difference was not significant compared to the two other groups. Good periodontal parameters were experienced in all the tested implants, independently by the groups. CONCLUSIONS: With the limitation of the present study, all the implants showed improved stability six weeks after implant placement. A trend of higher result was found for the NH group. Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm this preliminary results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13181677; the date of registration: 04/03/2021. Retrospectively registered.

A Study of Prognostic Factors in Young Patients With Non-HPV Oral Cancer in Central Europe.

The etiological factors of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck have been well known for a long time. It is also well known that the incidence of oral cancer diagnosed in younger patients is on the rise. Due to the young age of these patients, the increase in the number of these cases and the fact that many of them neither smoke nor drink alcohol it has been suggested that other factors might be at play in the carcinogenesis of oral cancer. Thus, along the classic etiological factors of smoking and alcohol abuse certain molecular marker anomalies and the human papilloma virus (HPV) have emerged as potential factors. The aim of the present study is to verify the potential prognostic factors and to map the differences in biomarker expression between the young and the old patient groups. In the present study the immunohistochemical profile of samples obtained from oral squamous cell carcinomas was studied and compared with various clinico-pathological parameters. In 88 samples the expressions of p16, p53, Ki67, EGFR were studied with a tissue microarray technique under standard reaction conditions as well as the detection and typing of HPV infection with the Full Spectrum HPV DNA method. The biomarker expression profile of young patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma was compared to that of older patients (above 50). A significant difference was found between the immunohistochemical profile of the young and old patient groups in p16, Ki67 expression. The overall survival and progression free survival were influenced by p16 expression in young age.

[Difficulties in differential diagnosis of dentin dysplasia. Case report]. / A dentin dysplasia differenciáldiagnosztikai nehézségei. Esetismertetés.

In cases of periapical lesions of unknown origin we have to keep in mind the possibility of dentin dysplasia. From the differential diagnostic point of view of differential diagnosis it is important to recognize this disease as it significantly influences the treatment modality. It is an anomaly of unknown etiology that could affect both deciduous and permanent dentition. Dentin dysplasia presentation varies clinically and radiologically. A rare manifestation which affects 1: 100000 patients is spontaneously occurring either as periapical abscess or odontogenic cyst. The affected teeth could become mobile and eventually lost. Dentin dysplasia is a genetic disease which shows autosomal dominant inheritance and characterized by abnormal formation of dentin structure which occurs during tooth development. For this article we have reviewed available literature and PubMed database. Dentin dysplasia increases the risk of early tooth loss and associated with it esthetic and functional disturbances. As a result it can influence the psychological and social status of the patients and affect their quality of life.

[Guidelines on the pharmacotherapy of the dental patient during pregnancy]. / A várandós nok gyógyszeres kezelésének irányelvei a fogorvosi gyakorlatban.

Physiological differences occuring in pregnancy modify certain steps of dental treatments. Since in our everyday practice we meet expectant patients, we have to be aware of what kind of changes does this transitional state require from the dentist, how to do a good timing in the course of dental treatment, which are those medicaments that can be used safely and those which should be avoided. The summerized data in the article are to contribute the safe choice of the possibly necessary antibiotics during the treatments. Besides, dental care should not be delayed due to our doubts about local anestetics, because it may carry serious consequences later. Relying on the most up-to-date facts, moreover, we mention the guidelines of the use of analgesics during pregnancy in dentistry. The treatment of pregnant women does not differ to a high degree from those who are non-pregnant, yet some of its viewpoints need special attention and we have to take them into consideration in order to do the appropriate medical work. Basically, in our opinion, before every dental and dental surgical intervention it is essential to consult with the patient's gynaecologist and in agreement with him/her to determine the course of the medicinal treatment.