Current Status of Hemostatic Agents and Sealants in Urologic Surgical Practice.

There has been a recent and near exponential increase in the use of hemostatic agents and sealants to supplement the rapidly evolving methods in the surgical management of urologic patients. This article reviews the use of hemostatic agents and sealants in current urologic practice.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy vs laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass: redefining the minimally invasive 'gold standard'.

OBJECTIVE: To identify differences between the ablative and extirpative minimally invasive techniques of laparoscopic cryoablation (LC) and robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN), respectively, in treating small renal tumours in terms of safety, peri-operative morbidity and early oncological outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2008 and April 2012 56 patients underwent LC and from October 2010 to April 2012, 47 patients underwent RPN using the Da Vinci robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Data on intra-operative, postoperative and oncological outcomes were collected prospectively, and were analysed and compared for both groups. RESULTS: The median patient ages were 69 and 60 for the LC and RPN groups, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in disease stage, but there was a significant difference in tumour size, with patients in the RPN group having larger tumours. The mean operating times were 146 and 159 min for the LC and RPN groups, respectively (P = 0.094) and the mean blood loss was 47 and 94 mL for the LC and the RPN groups, respectively (P = 0.251). The median length of hospital stay (1 day) was the same for both groups and the mean warm ischaemia time was 23 min in the RPN group. The marginal change in preoperative and 6-week postoperative renal function was recorded: the mean postoperative increase in serum creatinine was 5.4 mmol/L in the LC group and 9.2 mmol/L in the RPN group. Of the 47 patients in the RPN group, two (4.3%) were converted to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy because of difficulty in controlling bleeding during hilar dissection. Only two patients (3.6%) had recurrence in the LC group, both of whom were treated with re-cryoablation. A total of 5.4% of patients in the LC and 4.3% in the RPN group had Clavien grade I postoperative complications, one patient in the LC group had a Clavien grade II complication, while 1.8 and 4.3% of patients had Clavien IIIb in the LC and RPN groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that LC is a successful, minimally invasive and safe treatment option for the management of small renal tumours, but the apparently similar characteristics of RPN suggest that an increasing proportion of patients, whatever their age or medical comorbidities, may be reasonably offered a robot-assisted extirpative procedure with the likely benefit of lower risk of local recurrence and need for retreatment.

An objective scoring system for laparoscopic nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The current first-line recommended modality for nephrectomy is by the laparoscopic approach. This is one of the most frequent laparoscopic interventions conducted in urology. From a skills acquisition and delivery perspective in minimally invasive urologic surgery, there is a paucity of objective scoring systems for advanced laparoscopic urologic procedures. We developed a system of direct observation with structured criteria to evaluate the surgical conduction of laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN). We tested the application and preliminary validity of the scoring system. METHODS: Sixty cases of prerecorded LN performed in four teaching hospitals were each analyzed by four mentors. Each mentor scored each case based on a 100-point scoring systemthat comprised 20 key steps for LN (each step ranging 0 to 5). Steps included port placement and safety checks in addition to the actual case. In addition, a negative marking system based on a 50-point index scoring system was deployed such that technically unsound techniques were penalized. The sum of the two resulted in the final score. The final scores independently submitted for each recorded case were analyzed and compared. The system was then used to predict the experience of a surgeon for 10 pilot cases. The cases included a mix of five fellows and five experienced laparoscopic urologic surgeons. The cases were blinded to the independent assessors. A further 20 cases involving 10 cases performed by a trainee who sufficiently completed training (as deemed by the recent award of a certificate of specialist training in urology) vs one who is not ready were reviewed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the scores submitted by each of the four mentors for each of the cases observed. There was a strong correlation between overall score and seniority/experience of the performing surgeon of each case; ie, it was able to predict whether an experienced surgeon or laparoscopic fellow performed the case. It was able to predict accurately between a trainee who sufficiently completed training vs one who is "not ready." CONCLUSION: The scoring system was a reliable tool for assessing the performance of LN and accurately predicts the level of experience of the surgeon. This system could be a useful supplementary tool for assessing the baseline skill and progress of trainees.

Ex-vivo training model for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has recently been applied successfully in the performance of a host of surgical procedures. Preliminary consensus from the experts is that this mode of surgery is technically challenging and requires expertise. The transition from trainee to practicing surgeon, especially in complex procedures with challenging learning curves, takes time and mentor-guided nurturing. However, the trainee needs to use platforms of training to gain the skills that are deemed necessary for undertaking the live human case. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to demonstrate a step-by-step means of how to acquire the necessary instrumentation and build a training model for practicing steeplechase exercises in LESS for urological surgeons and trainees. The tool built as a result of this could set the platform for performance of basic and advanced skills uptake using conventional, bent and articulated instruments. A preliminary construct validity of the platform was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A box model was fitted with an R-Port(™) and camera. Articulated and conventional instruments were used to demonstrate basic exercises (e.g. glove pattern cutting, loop stacking and suturing) and advanced exercises (e.g. pyeloplasty). The validation included medical students (M), final year laparoscopic fellows (F) and experienced consultant laparoscopic surgeons (C) with at least 50 LESS cases experience in total, were tested on eight basic skill tasks (S) including manipulation of the flexible cystoscope (S1), hand eye coordination (S2), cutting with flexible scissors (S3), grasping with flexible needle holders (S4), two-handed maneuvers (S5), object translocation (S6), cross hand suturing with flexible instruments (S7) and conduction of an ex-vivo pyeloplasty. RESULTS: The successful application of the box model was demonstrated by trainee based exercises. The cost of the kit with circulated materials was less than £150 (Pounds Sterling). The noncamera handling skills (S2-S8) of the ex-vivo training model for LESS can distinguish between laparoscopically naïve fellows and experienced consultants in LESS. S4-S8 showed the highest level of construct validity, by accurately differentiating among the M, F and C groups. CONCLUSION: LESS requires a significant amount of skill and has an inherent steep learning curve. The ex-vivo model described provides a cost-effective means that a trainee or training unit can build for optimising preliminary skill acquisition in LESS for urological trainees. It has construct validity in several tasks. Such platform models should be tested further with an emphasis on rapid sequence uptake of optimal skills, prior to undertaking the live human case.

Initial treatment costs of organ-confined prostate cancer: a general perspective.

With the increasing prevalence of prostate cancer and evolving methods for the definitive treatment of OCPCa, health economic analyses will be critically important, albeit difficult to carry out. Preliminary studies point to RPP as the most cost-effective treatment for OCPCa. The quickest postoperative recovery, in experienced hands, occurs in RARP and RPP, with ORPP having a slightly, but statistically in significant, shorter hospital stay. It should be stressed that initial treatment costs are not the only important factor in healthcare costs. Readmission for early and late complications and the loss of productivity resulting from variation in time to return to work, need also to be considered. Loss of productivity may also vary in cost between different institutions and countries depending upon the proportion of patients employed. Further large-scale multicentre studies are necessary to assess this.

Hydroflotation magnetic-aided endolumenal navigation-preliminary platform in ex-vivo setting for the next paradigm in minimally invasive urologic surgery.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Navigation of endolumenal devices, such as image rendering capsules, have been described for diagnostic purposes in the animal, and more recently, human models. In urology, the ureter is a prime lumenal structure that often needs to be explored for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. A novel device using a flotation mechanism in a water-filled environment was developed and its navigation achieved with magnetic-aided guidance. The device was tested for propulsion and real-time control in the ex-vivo setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An endolumenal bionic worm (EBW) with a magnetic core was developed and introduced into synthetic lumens (SL) and supermarket chicken lumenal structures. The latter involved the gastrointestinal lumenal tissue of supermarket chickens; ie, the ex-vivo equivalent of a ureteral substitute lumen (USL). Navigation was graded by achievement of the EBW in propulsion to premarked sites, ability to remain static when necessary, and trauma to the USL. The structures were observed under the microscope for breech after the exercises. Navigation was observed in 10 SLs and 10 USLs. RESULTS: The EBW was successfully steered using the magnetic guidance system with hydroflotation. Observation of endolumenal surfaces did not reveal evidence of trauma in either model. CONCLUSION: Hydroflotation magnetic-aided endolumenal navigation (HMAEN) of a microdevice was achieved endolumenally with targeted real-time control and with no observed trauma to the structures. HMAEN could potentially be used to guide devices like the EBW to permit diagnostic and therapeutic ureteroscopy including biopsy of ureteral and renal pelvis lesions, thus ushering in the platform for the next paradigm in endolumenal urologic procedures.

Single-port 'scarless' laparoscopic nephrectomies: the United Kingdom experience.

OBJECTIVE: To present the UK experience to date with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) simple nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five female patients underwent LESS nephrectomy; three procedures were carried out with the umbilicus as the port of entry (U-LESS). RESULTS: All cases were completed uneventfully. The operative duration was 45-150 min and blood loss was negligible. There were no conversions to conventional multi-port laparoscopy or open surgery. Recovery was uneventful with only minor complications in two patients; convalescence was rapid. CONCLUSION: LESS nephrectomy offers a safe, cosmetic alternative to conventional multi-port laparoscopy, with younger female patients being especially happier with the 'scarless' outcome of U-LESS. LESS certainly appears to be more in these situations.

Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery: preliminary advances in renal surgery.

We reviewed the preliminary advances in laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) as applied to renal surgery, and analyzed current publications based on animal models and human patients. We searched published reports in major urological meeting abstracts, Embase and Medline (1966 to 25 August 2008), with no language restrictions. Keyword searches included: 'scarless', 'scar free', 'single port/trocar/incision', 'intraumbilical', and 'transumbilical', 'natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery' (NOTES), 'SILS', 'OPUS' and 'LESS'. The lessons learnt from the studies using the porcine model are that further advances in instrumentation are essential to achieve optimum results, and that testing survival in animals is also necessary to further expand the NOTES and LESS techniques. Further advances in instrument technology together with increasing experience in NOTES and LESS approaches have driven the transition from porcine models to human patients. In the latter, studies show that the techniques are feasible provided that both optimal surgical technical expertise with advanced skills, and optimal instrumentation, are available. The next step towards minimal access/minimally invasive urological surgery is NOTES and LESS. It is inevitable that LESS will be extended to involve more complex and technically demanding procedures such as laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy.

Devices for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology.

The quest to make minimally invasive techniques even more 'minimal' has generated a drive within the surgical community to explore novel ways of achieving this. This has led to surgeons attempting to either decrease the number of trocars placed through the abdominal wall or eliminate them completely. This led to the evolution of several approaches, including natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), single port access surgery and one port umbilical surgery (OPUS) or E-NOTES. The most recent consensus on nomenclature involves the term laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). The transition from multiple port access surgery to single port access surgery represents a paradigm shift in reconstructive and extirpative surgery and is a testament to the recent advances in surgical technology. Successful LESS involves the use of articulating or bent instrumentation via a single large-caliber trocar or small, adjacent trocars. Advances in technology have led to the development of new laparoscopic access ports (R-Port and Quadriport by Advanced Surgical Concepts, Wicklow, Ireland; and Uni-X Single Port, PNavel Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA) capable of permitting several instruments to be inserted through multiple channels incorporated in, and as part of, a larger single port. The development of articulating and bent instrumentation permits triangulation intracorporeally despite the close proximity of several instruments via a single port. Currently, commercially available instruments can be broadly divided into articulating laparoscopic graspers and shears (Real Hand, Novare Surgical Systems, Cupertino, CA, USA; and Autonomy Laparo-angle, Cambridge Endo, Framingham, MA, USA), endoshears (Cambridge Endo), and laparoscopic needle drivers (Cambridge Endo). Despite the preliminary optimistic results in the outcomes of LESS, an experienced laparoscopic skill set is essential for the safe and effective completion of surgery.

Evaluation of a commercial vascular clip: risk factors and predictors of failure from in vitro studies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess risk factors and predictors of failure of the Hem-o-lok(TM) vascular clip (Weck Closure Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) using vessels harvested from a porcine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Vessels of various diameters were harvested from a porcine model, clipped at 90 degrees or 45 degrees using the Hem-o-lok clip and then cut either flush or with a 1-mm cuff. The vessels were then connected to a burst-pressure device and pressures required to burst the clip or to cause it to leak were measured. RESULTS: The Hem-o-lok clip leaked or burst when the vessel to which it was applied was cut flush. The clip became even more likely to fail if the angle of application of the clip was not at 90 degrees to the vessel surface. CONCLUSION: The Hem-o-lok vascular clip is safe if it is applied at 90 degrees to the vessel surface and, more importantly, if a 1-mm cuff is left between the clip and the point at which the vessel is divided. We would therefore discourage the practice of not leaving this cuff of tissue, in an attempt to maximize vessel length during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Patterns of urethral injury and immediate management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The management of urethral trauma remains controversial. The purpose of this review is to provide a concise account of the patterns of urethral injury and the current trends of its immediate management. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have identified types of pelvic fractures associated with a higher risk of urethral injury. Recognition of these fractures coupled with timely radiographic imaging has facilitated the earlier diagnosis of urethral injury and ensured that serious long-term sequelae are minimized. In highly selected cases of complete anterior and posterior urethral disruption primary realignment by a combined antegrade and retrograde endoscopic approach is increasingly being considered as a management option to restore early urethral continuity. Urethral trauma secondary to penetrating gunshot wounds and penile fracture requires immediate surgical exploration and repair. SUMMARY: The urologist involved in the management of genitourinary tract trauma needs to recognize the patterns of urethral injury, especially those associated with certain pelvic fractures. A judicious and systematic approach coupled with a conscious effort to minimize short and long-term sequelae of all urethral injuries will ensure optimal results. There is a need for a consensus on the optimal management of each of the vast arrays of urethral injuries.

Initial clinical evaluation of a new pneumatic intracorporeal lithotripter.

OBJECTIVE: To test the clinical efficacy of the StoneBreaker (LMA Urology, Gland, Switzerland), a novel device which is much more compact and ergonomic than other current intracorporeal pneumatic lithotripters, and more powerful, generating contact pressures of up to 2.9 MPa, thereby enabling better pneumatic fragmentation and removal of stones during percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PCNL), ureteroscopic stone fragmentation (USF) and vesical stone lithotripsy (VL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 102 patients, comprising 49 PCNLs, 48 USFs and 5 VLs, treated using the StoneBreaker. The stone size, position, number of shocks required to fragment the stone to effect complete clearance, and degree of retropulsion were documented in each case; any evidence of urothelial trauma was noted. RESULTS: All stones were satisfactorily fragmented and all patients rendered stone-free. Very few shocks were required, and documented retropulsion was minor. There was no evidence of consequential urothelial trauma at the end of any procedure. CONCLUSION: The StoneBreaker appears to be a safe, effective, robust and compact device for intracorporeal lithotripsy.