Long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and S1 (GAS) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial contact: Results from a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This study reports the long-term results of a phase II trial evaluating the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and S1 (GAS) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial contact (BRPC-A). METHODS: A multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial was conducted. Patients received six cycles of GAS and patients without progressive disease were intended for R0 resection. RESULTS: Of the 47 patients, 45 (96%) underwent pancreatectomy. At the time of this analysis, all patients were updated with no loss to follow-up. A total of 30 patients died, while the remaining 17 patients were followed for a median of 68.1 months. The updated median overall survival (OS) was 41.0 months, with 2- and 5-year OS rates of 68.0% and 44.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis in the preoperative model showed that a tumor diameter reduction rate ≥10% and a CA19-9 reduction rate ≥95% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remained independently associated with favorable survival. In the postoperative multivariate model, no lymph node metastasis, no major surgical complications, and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: This long-term evaluation of the neoadjuvant GAS trial demonstrated the high efficacy of the regimen, suggesting that it is a promising treatment option for patients with BRPC-A.

Hepatic artery resection in distal cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the safety and oncological outcomes of surgery with hepatic artery resection (HAR) for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: The clinical data of patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma who underwent curative intent surgery at Hiroshima University between March 2009 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Eligible patients were classified according to the presence or absence of HAR (HAR and non-HAR group), and clinicopathological features and disease-free survival rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among the 60 patients analyzed, eight patients had received HAR, and the remaining 52 patients had not. The rate of portal vein resection, T stage, and the number of metastasized lymph nodes in the HAR group were significantly greater than those in the non-HAR group (p < 0.001, p = 0.00695, and p = 0.0480, respectively). Postoperative severe complication was confirmed in one patient, and there were no in-hospital deaths in the HAR group. Seven of 8 patients in the HAR group showed recurrence during follow-up, and of those, six patients showed early recurrence within 1 year postoperatively. The disease-free survival time in the HAR group was significantly shorter than that in the non-HAR group (median: 7.4 m vs. 34.2 m, respectively) (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis and HAR were significant risk factors for predicting the adverse disease-free survival time (hazard ratio (HR), 3.21; p = 0.0142; HR, 4.47; p = 0.0346, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma who underwent surgery with HAR tended to show early recurrences, although HAR could be performed safely.

Mesenteric approach in pancreas-preserving partial duodenectomy for aortic graft-duodenal fistula: a case report.

An aortic graft-duodenal fistula commonly requires graft replacement and duodenectomy. However, the appropriate surgical approach to the duodenum with aortic graft fistula remains unclear. Herein, we describe the case of an 85-year-old male patient who underwent a pancreas-preserving partial duodenectomy using the mesenteric approach for aortic graft-duodenal fistula. The patient presented with hemorrhagic shock and duodenal bleeding 2 years after undergoing open aortic graft replacement. He first underwent emergent endovascular aortic repair with an artificial vascular graft to achieve hemostasis. Although his general condition stabilized following endovascular treatment, duodenal endoscopy revealed an aortic graft-duodenal fistula, exposing the artificial vascular graft via the third portion of the duodenum. As the radical treatment for aortic graft-duodenal fistula, open graft replacement and pancreas-preserving partial duodenectomy were performed using the mesenteric approach which helps to divide the pancreas and duodenum. The patient recovered without any major complications, such as postoperative pancreatic fistula, and was discharged. In conclusion, the mesenteric approach in partial duodenectomy for aortic graft-duodenal fistula could be safely performed. This procedure is useful to approach the duodenum fixed by fistula formation, which may help reduce intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and surgical invasiveness.

Clinicopathological features of gastric cancer after pancreaticoduodenectomy: reporting of three institutional cases and review of the global literature.

PURPOSE: Gastric cancer after pancreaticoduodenectomy was firstly reported in 1995, and the number of reports about this topic has increased in the past years. This review aimed to elucidate the clinicopathological features of this disease. METHODS: Data for 32 cases were obtained using literature search, and three cases in our institution were added. RESULTS: Twenty cases were reported from Japan, and fifteen cases were from the Western countries (Germany: 1 case, France: 2 cases, USA: 12 cases). In Japanese and the Western cases, the most dominant indication for pancreaticoduodenectomy was distal bile duct cancer and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, respectively. The most frequently applied procedure of pancreaticoduodenectomy was pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy, respectively. The median length of time interval from pancreaticoduodenectomy to GC detection tended to be shorter in the Japanese cases (61.5 months vs. 115 months). Of all cases, thirteen (37.1%) patients with gastric cancer showed no abdominal symptoms, and eight were diagnosed at regular gastroscopy. Surgical gastrectomy was performed in 30 patients, and among them, concomitant pancreatectomy was performed in six patients. Four patients received reanastomosis of remnant pancreas using pancreaticojejunostomy. Twenty-two (73.3%) patients had undifferentiated carcinomas, and stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 cancer was identified in 14, six, six, and four patients, respectively. All eight patients who had received routine gastroscopy were T1N0M0 stage 1. CONCLUSION: Gastric cancers after pancreaticoduodenectomy including newly reported Japanese cases and our institutional cases were reviewed to make Japanese studies available to a broader scientific audience. Further investigation is necessary to elucidate the most important carcinogens among the various potential local and systemic factors.

Preoperative risk factors for positivity of peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the era of neoadjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: The preoperative risk factors for positive peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) are unknown, especially in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, the optimal indications for staging laparoscopy (SL) are still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the preoperative risk factors of CY positivity in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with surgical resection and to determine the optimal indications for SL. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 493 patients with PDAC, including 356 treated with upfront surgery and 137 treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The preoperative risk factor for CY positivity was investigated along with stratification according to NAC. RESULTS: Among the 493 patients, 36 (7.3%) were CY-positive. The CY-positive frequency in patients who received and did not receive NAC was 9 (6.6%) and 27 (7.6%), respectively. In the multivariate analyses, no independent preoperative predictive factor was found in patients who received NAC, whereas body and tail PDAC were identified as an independent risk factor for CY positivity in patients who did not receive NAC. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative risk factors of CY-positive PDAC are body and tail PDAC in 356 patients who did not receive NAC. However, there is no useful predictive factor for CY positivity in patients treated with NAC. Based on these results, it was difficult to determine the optimal indication for SL especially in NAC cases.

Prognosis following an extended duration of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess whether the duration of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) chemotherapy has any effect on survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: Of the 290 patients who received adjuvant GS chemotherapy, 100 (34%) received the standard duration (20-29 weeks) and 190 (66%) received an extended duration (≥30 weeks). To reduce selection bias, the prognostic impact (recurrence-free survival [RFS] and overall survival [OS]) based on the duration of adjuvant GS chemotherapy was analyzed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Moreover, to reduce immortal time bias, time-dependent multivariate analyses in which implementation of adjuvant GS chemotherapy was treated as time-varying covariate was also performed. RESULTS: Extended duration of adjuvant GS chemotherapy was significantly correlated with prolonged RFS (P < .001) and OS (P < .001) after IPTW adjustment. Time-dependent multivariate analyses revealed that extended duration of adjuvant GS chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for prolonged RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58, P = .002) and OS (HR, 0.56, P = .005). CONCLUSION: Extended duration (≥30 weeks) of adjuvant GS chemotherapy in patients with PDAC was associated with an improved prognosis. These findings warrant a further prospective trial on PDAC to investigate the survival benefit of extended adjuvant chemotherapy.

Impact of disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 12 on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with surgical resection and perioperative chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: A disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 12 (ADAM12) has been reported to influence tumor progression and chemosensitivity in human cancers. We assessed the prognostic impact of ADAM12 and its predictive value for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with surgical resection. METHODS: ADAM12 expression was immunohistochemically examined in 428 patients with PDAC who underwent surgical resection. The association of ADAM12 expression with clinicopathological factors and survival was also analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with high ADAM12 expression exhibited significantly shorter median disease-free survival (DFS) (high ADAM12: 17.8 vs. low ADAM12: 37.9 months; P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (high ADAM12: 33.1 vs. low ADAM12: 65.0 months; P < 0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed that high ADAM12 expression was an independent risk factor for poor DFS (P < 0.001) and OS (P < 0.001) in all eligible patients. Of 100 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), high ADAM12 expression was significantly associated with poor DFS in a subset of patients treated with the nab-paclitaxel (PTX) neoadjuvant regimen (P = 0.03), whereas the prognostic value of ADAM12 was not evident in patients not treated with nab-PTX (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: A negative prognostic value of high ADAM12 expression was observed in patients with PDAC treated with surgical resection, which was enhanced in patients treated with NAC, including nab-PTX. These results suggested that ADAM12 expression can predict nab-PTX chemosensitivity in PDAC and reflect PDAC progression.

Long-term survival after distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection and hepatic artery reconstruction in the setting of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.

The long-term survival of patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer is extremely poor. We present our experience with a 67-year-old woman who had a 40-mm mass in the body of the pancreas. Tumor infiltration reached the gastroduodenal artery, celiac artery, common hepatic artery, and splenic artery. After 10 courses of FOLFIRINOX, 2 courses of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, and 6 courses of gemcitabine alone, we performed distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection and hepatic artery reconstruction. The bifurcation of the gastroduodenal artery and the proper hepatic artery had to be resected, after which we created 2 anastomoses: proper hepatic-to-middle colic artery, and second jejunal-to-right gastroepiploic artery. Histopathologic examination revealed an Evans grade IIb histologic response to prior treatment and verified the R0 resection status. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 30 after treatment of a grade B pancreatic fistula and is still alive, without recurrence, more than 5 years after initiation of treatment. This patient with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer achieved long-term survival through perioperative multidisciplinary treatment, including distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection and hepatic artery reconstruction. This aggressive procedure could be a treatment option for patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Optimal lymph-node dissection for pancreatic tail cancer.

PURPOSE: The optimal range of lymph-node dissection for pancreatic tail cancer remains unclear. We investigated the location and frequency of lymph-node metastases to identify the correct range of lymph-node dissection for pancreatic tail cancer. METHODS: We analyzed clinical data retrospectively, on patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for resectable left-sided pancreatic cancer, between February, 2006 and March, 2021. Eligible patients were divided into two groups according to the tumor location: those with pancreatic tail cancer (Pt group) and those with pancreatic body or body and tail cancer (non-Pt group). RESULTS: Of the 96 patients analyzed, 61 (64%) were assigned to the Pt group and 35 (36%) were assigned to the non-Pt group. Metastases to stations 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, and 18 were found in 0 (0%), 0 (0%), 0 (0%), 4 (7%), 18 (30%), 2 (4%), and 10 (17%) patients in the Pt group, and in 1 (3%), 4 (12%), 2 (6%), 1 (3%), 18 (51%), 3 (9%), and 6 (17%) patients in the non-Pt group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lymph-node dissection at stations 7, 8, and 9 might not be necessary in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer confined to the pancreatic tail.

Increased clostridium difficile infection in the era of preoperative chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: In recent trend of preoperative chemotherapy, postoperative clostridium difficile infection (CDI) might be increasing in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. This study aimed to elucidate the inducement of postoperative CDI in the new era of preoperative chemotherapy. METHODS: Eligible patients were those who received pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC. Patients were classified into two groups according to the presence or absence of postoperative CDI, and the independently associated factors for postoperative CDI were investigated. Additionally, eligible patients were classified using the identified associated factors, and the duration of preoperative antimicrobial administration and incidence of CDI were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Two hundred PDAC patients were eligible for this study, and postoperative CDI was detected in 15 (7.5%) patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative biliary tract infection (BTI) and chemotherapy (Chemo) were independently associated with postoperative CDI (OR, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.25-13.1; p = 0.0200 and OR, 3.64; 95% CI, 1.14-11.6; p = 0.0209, respectively). The patients were classified into four groups according to the presence or absence of preoperative BTI and Chemo (BTI-/Chemo-, BTI-/Chemo+, BTI+/Chemo- and BTI+/Chemo + group). The median durations of preoperative antimicrobial administration were 0, 2, 8 and 15 days in each group, respectively. Postoperative CDI was detected in 3.7%, 10.0%, 10.5% and 31.3% in each group, respectively, and patients in BTI+/Chemo + group suffered CDI more frequently compared to those in BTI-/Chemo-group (p = 0.00778). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative BTI and chemotherapy might induce postoperative CDI for PDAC patients.

Neoadjuvant therapy contributes to nodal downstaging of pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the impact of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (BR/LAPC) on the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) nodal status. METHODS: The medical records of BR/LAPC patients who underwent surgery with curative intent were retrospectively reviewed. The nodal status was compared between patients who underwent upfront surgery (UFS) and those who received NAT. Moreover, clinicopathological factors and prognostic factors for overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: In all, 200 patients with BR/LAPC, 78 with UFS, and 122 with NAT were enrolled. The nodal status was significantly lower in patients after NAT than after UFS (p = 0.011). A multivariate analysis of overall survival showed that UFS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, p = 0.024) and N2 status (HR 2.69, p < 0.001) were independent poor prognostic factors. The median serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level after NAT in N2 patients was 105 U/mL, which was significantly higher than that of patients with N0 (p = 0.004) and N1 (p = 0.008) status. CONCLUSION: Patients with BR/LAPC who underwent surgery after NAT had significantly lower N2 status and better prognosis than patients who underwent UFS. Elevated CA19-9 levels after NAT indicated a higher nodal status.

A phase II study of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/S-1 combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial contact.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial contact (BRPC-A) is extremely poor, and effective preoperative treatment is indispensable. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel and S-1 (GAS), for patients with BRPC-A. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicentre, single-arm, phase II study was performed. Patients were administered 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine on day 1, 125 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel on day 1 and 60-100 mg/day S-1 on days 1-7 during a 14-day cycle. Patients were then assessed for resectability and response to treatment after six cycles. The primary end-points were 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and median OS time (trial registration: jRCTs061180045, UMIN000016630). RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with BRPC-A were eligible for the present study. Six courses of neoadjuvant GAS regimen were completed in all eligible patients. The rate of grade III/IV toxicities occurred in 14 (30%) patients during the neoadjuvant GAS regimen. The response and disease control rates were 43% and 96%, respectively. Forty-five (96%) patients received potentially curative pancreatectomy, whereas two did not owing to disease progression. R0 resection was performed in 40 (86%) of 47 eligible patients. Eleven (24%) patients experienced postoperative major complications (>grade III), including one mortality. The 2-year OS rate and median OS time among 47 eligible patients were 70.1% and 41.0 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The neoadjuvant GAS chemotherapy regimen for BRPC-A showed good efficacy with mild toxicity, resulting in a high R0 resection rate and prolonged survival in patients with BRPC-A.

Identification of Preoperative Risk Factors for Poor Survival in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Upfront Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to identify preoperative risk factors for poor survival in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with upfront surgery. METHODS: Medical records of 268 patients with resectable PDAC defined by resectability status who underwent upfront surgery were reviewed retrospectively. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify preoperative risk factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Moreover, a binary logistic regression model was built to determine preoperative independent risk factors of 2- and 3-year recurrence and survival. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses identified CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL, p < 0.001) as an independent risk factor for poor RFS, and worse performance status (1 or 2, p = 0.03), platelet:lymphocyte ratio (<150, p = 0.04), and preoperative CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL, p < 0.001) as independent risk factors for poor OS. Moreover, preoperative CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL) was the only independent risk factor identified for 2- and 3-year recurrence and survival. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Preoperative CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL) was the most reliable preoperative predictive factor for poor survival in resectable PDAC treated with upfront surgery. These findings warrant further clinical trials investigating efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy targeting the subset of patients with resectable PDAC who have elevated preoperative CA19-9, namely, those with high risk of poor prognosis.

Is surgery justified for elderly patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? Reappraisal from a viewpoint of comorbidity and organ function.

PURPOSE: The benefit of surgery for older patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) has not been established and the differences in the general condition of younger vs. older patients remain unclear. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative surgery for EHCC were divided into two groups according to age: those younger than 75 years old (younger group) and those aged 75 years or older (older group). We analyzed the clinical data of the two groups retrospectively. RESULTS: Among the 116 patients analyzed, 45 (38.8%) were in the older group. Regarding comorbidity, only cardiac disease was significantly more common in the older patients; however, the cardiac function of the two groups was identical. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of kidney and lung disease, but renal function was significantly deteriorated and the incidence of the mixed ventilatory defect was significantly greater in the older group. The overall 5-year survival rates for the younger and older groups were 52.4% vs. 50.4% of all cholangiocarcinoma patients (p = 0.458), 42.4% vs. 51.3% of those with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (p = 0.718), and 69.0% vs. 49.1% of those with distal cholangiocarcinoma (p = 0.534), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Improved survival after surgery can be expected in well-selected older cholangiocarcinoma patients. Comorbidities were not necessarily reflected in organ function, with precise organ function assessment being more important when selecting surgical candidates.

Prognostic Value of Peritoneal Lavage Cytology in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Stratified by the Resectability Status.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains controversial. We assessed the prognostic impact of CY status stratified by resectability in PDAC patients treated with surgical resection. METHODS: Clinical data from 440 patients with PDAC who underwent surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed to examine the association of CY status with clinicopathological factors and survival. RESULTS: Positive CY status (CY+) was found in 30 patients (7%). These patients had significantly worse overall survival in both the resectable (R) (P = 0.002) and borderline resectable (BR) (P < 0.001) groups. The median survival time of CY+ patients in the R and BR groups was 25.6 and 6.7 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that CY+ was an independent prognostic factor in the BR group (P < 0.001) but not in the R group (P = 0.08). In the R group, CY+ patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly longer overall survival than those without adjuvant chemotherapy (34.3 vs. 9.8 months, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of CY+ patients in the BR group was extremely poor. In the R group, surgical resection combined with adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the prognosis of CY+ patients.

Preoperative risk factors for para-aortic lymph node positivity in pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the preoperative risk factors for para-aortic lymph node (PALN) positivity, including micrometastasis, in pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Medical records of patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent curative resection were retrospectively reviewed, and the relationships between preoperative risk factors and PALN positivity were identified. Clinicopathological and prognostic factors for overall survival were analyzed. Micrometastasis was investigated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: 400 patients were enrolled. PALN positivity by hematoxylin and eosin staining, micrometastasis, and negative were found in 46 (11%), 32 (8%), and 322 (81%) patients, respectively. The median overall survival times of patients with PALN positivity, including micrometastasis, was 22.5 months. Multivariate logistic regression identified borderline or locally advanced status (p=0.037), elevated preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level (p<0.001), larger tumor size ≥30 mm (p=0.001) and larger PALN size ≥10 mm (p=0.019) as independent preoperative risk factors of PALN positivity. Multivariate overall survival analysis demonstrated borderline or locally advanced status (p=0.013), elevated preoperative CA19-9 level (p<0.001) and PALN positivity (p=0.048) were independent poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Borderline or locally advanced status, elevated preoperative CA19-9 level, and larger tumor and PALN size were risk factors for PALN positivity, and thus, they may contribute to the optimization of preoperative treatments for patients with potential PALN positivity.

Survival impact of distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic body carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The survival benefit associated with distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) for patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic body carcinoma is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of DP-CAR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic body carcinoma. METHODS: Medical records of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP, n = 102) and DP-CAR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 32) between 2008 and 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: All patients who underwent DP-CAR had tumor contact with the celiac axis. Of these, 30 patients underwent preoperative embolization of the common hepatic artery. The pretreatment tumor size of patients who underwent DP-CAR was larger (P < 0.001), and rates of blood transfusion (P = 0.003) and postoperative complications (P = 0.016) were higher in patients who underwent DP-CAR compared with patients who underwent DP. The 5-year survival rate of patients who underwent DP and DP-CAR were 50.6% and 41.1%, respectively (median survival time, 65.9 vs 37.0 months). For all 134 patients, pretreatment serum CA19-9 levels (P < 0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001), and lymph node status (P = 0.035) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: DP-CAR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic body carcinoma may bring the same survival impact as DP, despite increased morbidity.

The prognostic impact of peritoneal washing cytology for otherwise resectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients.

The clinical importance of peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) for cholangiocarcinoma patients remains unclear. The clinical data of 137 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients who received PWC and curative surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 137 patients analyzed, five (3.6%) had positive PWC, and 132 (96.4%) had negative PWC. The median survival time in patients with negative PWC was 6.45 years, and the overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 86.5%, 75.3%, and 51.6%, respectively. The median survival time in patients with positive PWC was 2.56 years, and the overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 60.0%, 60.0%, and 40.0%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that positive lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001), positive perineural invasion (P = 0.014) and no use of adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001), but not positive PWC were independently associated with a worse overall survival. In conclusion, surgery and subsequent chemotherapy might be a therapeutic option for cholangiocarcinoma patients with positive PWC.

Prognostic significance of dissecting the nerve plexus around the common hepatic artery in pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the positivity rate of the nerve plexus (NPL) around the common hepatic artery (CHA), as well as the impact of dissecting the NPL-CHA, during surgical resection of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Clinicopathological factors, including hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry, were compared between the resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) and borderline resectable PC (BRPC) groups. Moreover, the relationship between the NPL-CHA status and overall survival (OS) was investigated. RESULTS: In this study, 136 eligible patients were divided into the RPC (72) and BRPC (64) groups. In the RPC group, all patients were negative for H&E staining and microinvasion, whereas 13 (20%) and five patients (8%) were positive for H&E staining and microinvasion, respectively, in the BRPC group. The median OS times in the NPL-CHA-positive and -negative groups were 29.8 and 60.2 months, respectively (p = 0.088). The multivariate analysis of OS indicated an elevated initial carbohydrate antigen 19-9, lymph node (LN) metastasis, and lack of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), which independently predicted poor outcomes. In the BRPC subgroup, contact with the CHA on preoperative computed tomography (CT) was a high-risk factor for NPL-CHA positivity. CONCLUSION: NPL-CHA positivity was only present in the BRPC group. In the absence of CT evidence of CHA contact, NPL-CHA dissection may not have survival benefits.