Risk of mortality for ventricular arrhythmia in ambulatory LVAD patients.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding the incidence and prognostic significance of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in ambulatory continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. METHODS: Sixty-one consecutive patients from November 1, 2006 through December 31, 2010 with an LVAD and implantable cardioverter defibrillator that survived to discharge from the LVAD implantation admission were studied. Follow-up began from date of discharge with both devices in situ and ended with death, transplant, on June 1, 2011. Pre-LVAD VA history was related to the primary endpoints of post-LVAD VA, mortality, and the combined endpoint of post-LVAD VA/mortality. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 622 days 19 patients (31%) experienced VA (14 episodes of VT, 5 episodes of VF). Pre-LVAD VA was predictive of post-LVAD VA (hazard ratio [HR] 2.91, P = 0.026) and the combined post-LVAD VA/mortality endpoint (HR 2.70, P = 0.021) but only displayed a nonsignificant association with mortality (HR 2.30, P = 0.11). In multivariate analysis, pre-LVAD VA remained a significant predictor of post-LVAD VA (HR 2.84, P = 0.03) and the combined post-LVAD VA/mortality endpoint (HR 2.65, P = 0.025). Post-LVAD VA was the strongest univariate predictor of mortality (HR 13.92, P < 0.001) and remained so after multivariate adjustment (HR 9.69, P = 0.001). Post-LVAD VA occurred at a mean of 1 year from mortality events with 45% within 1 month. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-LVAD VA is a significant predictor of post-LVAD VA but not of mortality. VA in the continuous flow LVAD population carries a significant risk of mortality often within the first month.

Outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have an increased risk for accelerated atherosclerosis. It is unknown, however, whether rheumatoid arthritis also increases in-hospital mortality after a myocardial infarction or influences the therapy patients receive. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of 1,112,676 patients with myocardial infarction in the 2003-2005 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was performed. RESULTS: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis were 39% more likely to receive medical therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.49) than interventional therapy. By using logistic regression, we adjusted for confounding variables to determine the effect of rheumatoid arthritis on the selection of therapy and found that rheumatoid arthritis itself was associated with a 38% increased likelihood of undergoing thrombolysis (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10-1.71) and a 27% increased likelihood of undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.17-1.39). For the primary outcome measure, we determined that patients with rheumatoid arthritis overall had a 24% better in-hospital mortality compared with other patients with a myocardial infarction (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.86), which was 34% better after adjusting for confounding variables (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59-0.74). This better in-hospital mortality was seen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing medical therapy (adjusted OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.75) and percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.32-0.70), but not in patients undergoing thrombolysis or coronary artery bypass grafting. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with myocardial infarction, rheumatoid arthritis was associated with an increased use of thrombolysis and percutaneous coronary intervention. Moreover, patients with rheumatoid arthritis had an in-hospital survival advantage, particularly those undergoing medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Mortality after coronary artery revascularization of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have an increased risk for accelerated atherosclerosis. It is not known, however, whether this disorder is associated with a higher risk of complications after coronary artery revascularization. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients in the 2003-2005 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. To determine whether patients with rheumatoid arthritis had higher in-hospital mortality after coronary artery revascularization, we used logistic regression to adjust for age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, rural-urban residency, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, Charlson comorbidities (including myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and diabetes), elective admission, weekend admission, and primary payer. RESULTS: Among patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization, those with rheumatoid arthritis were 49% less likely to die while hospitalized compared with those without rheumatoid arthritis (odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.65) after adjusting for the above confounders. In subgroup analyses that adjusted for the same confounders, patients with rheumatoid arthritis also had a 61% improvement of in-patient mortality when they underwent percutaneous coronary interventions (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.54) along with a median of 0.32 less days hospitalized (95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.34 days). Similarly, patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting had a 31% improvement of in-patient mortality (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.99), with a median of 1.36 less days hospitalized (95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.12 days). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization, patients with rheumatoid arthritis have an in-hospital survival advantage along with reduced days of hospitalization compared with patients without rheumatoid arthritis.