Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms-Associated Perimyocarditis After Initiation of Anti-tuberculosis Therapy: A Case Report.

A 34-year-old female who was recently placed on anti-tuberculosis medication with rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and levofloxacin therapy for suspected tuberculosis reinfection presented with subjective fevers, rash, and generalized fatigue. Labs showed signs of end-organ damage with eosinophilia and leukocytosis. One day later, the patient became hypotensive with a worsening fever, and an electrocardiogram showed new diffuse ST segment elevations with an elevated troponin. An echocardiogram revealed a reduction in ejection fraction with diffuse hypokinesis, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed circumferential myocardial edema with subepicardial and pericardial inflammation. Prompt diagnosis of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome using the European Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (RegiSCAR) criteria and discontinuation of therapy was initiated. Due to the hemodynamic instability of the patient, the patient was started on systemic corticosteroids and cyclosporine, with the improvement of her symptoms and rash. A skin biopsy was performed, which revealed perivascular lymphocytic dermatitis, consistent with DRESS syndrome. As the patient's ejection fraction improved spontaneously with corticosteroids, the patient was discharged with oral corticosteroids, and a repeat echocardiogram showed full recovery of ejection fraction. Perimyocarditis is a rare complication of DRESS syndrome that is associated with degranulation and the release of cytotoxic agents into myocardial cells. Early discontinuation of offending agents and initiation of corticosteroids are essential to rapid recovery of ejection fraction and improved clinical outcomes. Multimodality imaging, including MRI, should be used to confirm perimyocardial involvement and guide the necessity for mechanical support or transplant. Further research should be on the mortality of DRESS syndrome with and without myocardial involvement, with an increased emphasis on cardiac evaluation in DRESS syndrome.

Anticoagulation for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and End-Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis: A National Survey.

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have a significant increased risk of embolic stroke. Patients with end-stage renal disease who are on dialysis have an increased risk of both embolic stroke and bleeding. Stroke-prevention studies with the use of anticoagulation for AF patients have excluded patients on dialysis, so there remains no consensus on their management. We developed and implemented a pan-Canadian multidisciplinary survey to explore the current beliefs and practices concerning patients with AF on dialysis. We developed an online investigator-designed survey with both quantitative and qualitative responses with the use of a secure university-affiliated electronic service. The survey was distributed to physicians via the QxMD platform and directly to internal medicine, cardiology, and nephrology residency program directors for distribution to faculty members. 130 participants responded, including 46 cardiologists, 45 nephrologists, 30 general internists, and 9 other physicians. The preferred anticoagulant was warfarin. The CHADS2 score used to initiate anticoagulation was highly variable, with specialties differing in use of a CHADS2 threshold of ≥ 1 (P < 0.001) and the impact of previous transient ischemic attack/stroke (P = 0.02). Calciphylaxis history affected the decision to prescribe anticoagulation. Specialties differed in thresholds used to consider direct oral anticoagulants for dialysis patients, with nephrologists more likely to prescribe anticoagulation at higher CHADS2 scores. Our survey demonstrated significant heterogeneity of anticoagulation use for stroke prevention in patients with AF on dialysis. Physician specialty and patient risk profiles contributed to the observed variability. This study reemphasises the need for clinical trials, large observational studies, and consensus guidelines to address evident equipoise.

What factors contribute to uncontrolled gout and hospital admission? A qualitative study of inpatients and their primary care practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: To provide deeper insight into why patients are admitted to hospital with gout and discover potential targets for better disease control. DESIGN: Data from semi-structured interviews were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Eleven inpatients from a tertiary institution in the Australian Capital Territory of Australia and their respective general practitioners (GPs) were invited to participate in the semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Despite significant pain and disability that accompanied acute flares, patients continue to experience shame in seeking treatment and regarded gout as being not particularly important. Other barriers included patients' poor continuity of care with and lack of confidence in GPs, suboptimal management in outpatient and inpatient settings, poor understanding of disease and treatment, and misconceptions held by both patients and physicians leading to uncontrolled disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to optimal gout management including patient and health practitioner factors have produced a complex effect which has led to a cycle of treatment avoidance behaviours and recurrent hospitalisations for severe acute gout flares. These barriers could be addressed using a multipronged approach guided by the chronic care model which has been applied in a variety of other chronic diseases with improved patient and professional-level outcomes. Managing gout according to best practice for chronic disease is more likely to prevent recurrent hospitalisations and improve health outcomes in patients with gout.

The effect of epiregulin on epidermal growth factor receptor expression and proliferation of oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.

BACKGROUND: Epiregulin (EPR) is a novel member of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family. It has been shown to promote wound healing in oral epithelium, enhance proliferation of other epithelial tissues, and is involved in several epithelial-related malignancies such as colorectal, lung, and bladder carcinoma. More recently, EPR transcripts were found to be high in a study on archival oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) specimens. This implies that EPR may be responsible for the progression of OSCC. The aim of this was to elucidate the effects of EPR on (i) cell morphological changes, (ii) cell proliferation and (iii) receptor expression of the H-series OSCC cell lines. METHODS: The clinicopathological origin and the expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and ErbB4 receptors of the H-series cell lines were initially characterised. Based on these parameters, two of the H-series cell lines, namely H103 and H357 were selected for downstream experiments. The cell lines were treated with 1 ng/ml, 10 ng/ml, and 20 ng/ml of EPR for 24 and 48 hours in all subsequent experiments. Untreated cells acted as the control which was used for comparison with each treated group. The cell morphological changes, cell proliferation and receptor expression of the OSCC cell lines were evaluated using phase contrast microscopy, 5-bromo-2'-deoxy-uridine (BrdU) assays and flow cytometry respectively. The results were compared and analysed using the student t-test. RESULTS: There were no appreciable morphological changes in the cells regardless of the dose of EPR tested nor between the different timelines. There were no significant changes in cell proliferation after EPR treatment. As for the effect of EPR on receptor expression, 20 ng/ml of EPR significantly reduced the density of EGFR expression (p value = 0.049) in the H103 cell line after the 24-hour treatment. No other statistically significant changes were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that EPR had no effect on the morphology and proliferativity of OSCC cells. However, the significant decline in EGFR expression after EPR treatment suggests that EPR might play an important role in the regulation of EGFR expression and hence OSCC progression.