Pivotal role of inflammation in vascular endothelial dysfunction of hyperlipidemic rabbit and effects by atorvastatin.

AIMS: To evaluate the role of inflammation in vascular endothelial function of hyperlipidemic rabbits and atorvastatin's effects on it. METHODS: 22 rabbits were divided into high-fat diet and atorvastatin plus high-fat diet group. Basic levels of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), nitric oxide (NO), endothelin-1 (ET-1), fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin and endothelial function were measured when grouping. Eight weeks later, all above parameters were remeasured and repeated again at days 1, 4 and 7 after atorvastatin withdrawal. RESULTS: Eight-week high-fat diet could not cause the changes of FBG and insulin, but significantly induce increased blood lipids as well as inflammatory markers, imbalance between ET-1 and NO, and direct endothelial dysfunction, which could be significantly improved by atorvastatin therapy but could not be well controlled to near baseline. Abrupt withdrawal of atorvastatin caused sharp increase of inflammatory markers and endothelial dysfunction at days 4 and 7 after atorvastatin withdrawal independent of the changes of blood lipids. CONCLUSIONS: High-fat diet could cause endothelial dysfunction associated with inflammation, and atorvastatin could counter-regulate it. Sudden withdrawal of statins could induce rebound of inflammatory response and endothelial dysfunction independent of changes of lipids, which may be responsible for increased cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease after withdrawing statins.

Potential proarrhythmic effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy during perioperative period: data from a single cardiac center.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) could improve heart function, symptom status, quality of life and reduce hospitalization and mortality in patients with severe heart failure (HF) with optimal medical management. However, the possible adverse effects of CRT are often ignored by clinicians. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of CRT over a 6-year period was made in a single cardiac center. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were treated with CRT(D) device, aged (57 ± 11) years, with left ventricular ejection fraction of (32.1 ± 9.8)%, of which 4 (7%) developed ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) or junctional tachycardia after operation. Except for one with frequent ventricular premature beat before operation, the others had no previous history of ventricular arrhythmia. Of the 4 patients, 3 had dilated cardiomyopathy and 1 had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and tachycardia occurred within 3 days after operation. Sustained, refractory VT and subsequent VF occurred in one patient, frequent nonsustained VT in two patients and nonparoxysmal atrioventricular junctional tachycardia in one patient. VT was managed by amiodarone in two patients, amiodarone together with beta-blocker in one patient, and junctional tachycardia was terminated by overdrive pacing. During over 12-month follow-up, except for one patient's death due to refractory heart and respiratory failure in hospital, the others remain alive and arrhythmia-free. CONCLUSIONS: New-onset VT/VF or junctional tachycardia may occur in a minority of patients with or without prior history of tachycardia after biventricular pacing. Arrhythmia can be managed by conventional therapy, but may require temporary discontinuation of pacing. More observational studies should be performed to determine the potential proarrhythmic effect of CRT.