p62 Promotes the Mitochondrial Localization of p53 through Its UBA Domain and Participates in Regulating the Sensitivity of Ovarian Cancer Cells to Cisplatin.

Chemotherapeutic drug-induced p53-dependent crosstalk among tumor cells affects the sensitivity of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic drugs, contributing to chemoresistance. Therefore, pharmacological targeting of p53 may contribute to overcoming drug resistance. The localization of p53 is closely related to its function. Thus, we assessed the effect of p62 on the coordination of p53 mitochondrial localization under chemotherapeutic drug treatment in ovarian cancer cells. We found that the combined use of the proteasome inhibitor epoxomicin and cisplatin led to the accumulation of p53 and sequestosome1(p62) in the mitochondria, downregulated mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) transcription, inhibited mitochondrial functions, and ultimately promoted apoptosis by enhancing cisplatin sensitivity in ovarian cancer cells. Moreover, the ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain of p62 was involved in regulating the mitochondrial localization of p53. Our findings suggest that the interaction between p62 and p53 may be a mechanism that determines the fate of tumor cells. In conclusion, p62 coordinated the mitochondrial localization of p53 through its UBA domain, inhibited mtDNA transcription, downregulated mitochondrial function, and promoted ovarian cancer cell death. Our study demonstrates the important role of p53 localization in tumor cell survival and apoptosis, and provides new insights into understanding the anti-tumor mechanism of targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome system in tumor cells.

The Mitochondrial PHB2/OMA1/DELE1 Pathway Cooperates with Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress to Facilitate the Response to Chemotherapeutics in Ovarian Cancer.

Interactions between the mitochondrial inner and outer membranes and between mitochondria and other organelles closely correlates with the sensitivity of ovarian cancer to cisplatin and other chemotherapeutic drugs. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Recently, the mitochondrial protease OMA1, which regulates internal and external signals in mitochondria by cleaving mitochondrial proteins, was shown to be related to tumor progression. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of OMA1 on the response to chemotherapeutics in ovarian cancer cells and the mouse subcutaneous tumor model. We found that OMA1 activation increased ovarian cancer sensitivity to cisplatin in vivo and in vitro. Mechanistically, in ovarian cancer, OMA1 cleaved optic atrophy 1 (OPA1), leading to mitochondrial inner membrane cristae remodeling. Simultaneously, OMA1 induced DELE1 cleavage and its cytoplasmic interaction with EIF2AK1. We also demonstrated that EIF2AK1 cooperated with the ER stress sensor EIF2AK3 to amplify the EIF2S1/ATF4 signal, resulting in the rupture of the mitochondrial outer membrane. Knockdown of OMA1 attenuated these activities and reversed apoptosis. Additionally, we found that OMA1 protease activity was regulated by the prohibitin 2 (PHB2)/stomatin-like protein 2 (STOML2) complex. Collectively, OMA1 coordinates the mitochondrial inner and outer membranes to induce ovarian cancer cell death. Thus, activating OMA1 may be a novel treatment strategy for ovarian cancer.

Glucose deprivation promotes apoptotic response to S1 by enhancing autophagy in human cervical cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: S1 is a novel BH3 mimetic that can induce death in some types of cancer cells, such as melanoma B16, ovarian cancer SKOV3, and U251 glioma cells. S1 inhibits Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 expression and induces cancer cell apoptosis. Cancer cell survival is highly dependent on glucose. Here, we observed the effect of glucose deprivation on the apoptotic response to S1 in human cervical cancer (HeLa) cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Earle's balanced salt solution (EBSS) was used to simulate glucose deprivation. MTT assay was used to analyze the cell survival rate, and Hoechst 33342 dye was used to detect the apoptosis in HeLa cells. Western blotting was used to detect the expression of ER stress and autophagy relative proteins. In addition, lysosomes were observed with Lyso-Tracker staining by confocal microscopy. RESULTS: S1 decreased cell distribution density and survival rate, and MTT assay showed that EBSS enhanced the inhibitory effects of S1 on HeLa cell growth. Hoechst 33342 dye showed that S1 led to pyknosis, fragmentation, and strong staining in HeLa cell nuclei, and EBSS enhanced these effects. Western blotting indicated that EBSS enhanced the expression of apoptosis-related proteins (cytochrome C, caspase-3, and poly[ADP-ribose] polymerase 1) induced by S1 in HeLa cells. S1 decreased p62 expression and increased the autophagosome-associated protein LC3-II expression, which indicated that S1 induced autophagy in HeLa cells. EBSS enhanced S1-induced autophagy in HeLa cells. Furthermore, autophagy inhibitor chloroquine enhanced S1-induced apoptosis in HeLa cells. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that EBSS exacerbates S1-induced autophagy and severe autophagy induced by EBSS and S1 could lead to apoptosis in HeLa cells. The results also suggest that EBSS enhances the sensitivity of HeLa cells to S1-induced apoptosis and that autophagy plays an important role in this process.