Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Radiol Prot ; 39(3): 906-919, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31216517

RESUMO

In this document we present the calculation and experimental validation of a source term for 18F-production with a cyclotron for medical applications operating at 18 MeV proton energy and 30 µA proton current. The Monte Carlo codes MCNP6 and FLUKA were used for the calculation of the source term. In addition, the radiation field around the 18O-enriched water target was simulated with the two codes. To validate the radiation field obtained in the simulation, an experimental program has been started using activation samples which are placed close to the water target during an 18F-production run of the cyclotron. After the irradiation, the samples are analysed and the resulting activation is compared to Monte Carlo calculations of the expected sample activation. We find good agreement between simulations and experimental results, with most calculation to experiment (C/E) ratios well between 0.6 and 1.4.


Assuntos
Ciclotrons , Radioisótopos de Flúor/química , Medicina Nuclear , Método de Monte Carlo , Nêutrons
2.
J Radiol Prot ; 36(4): 819-831, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27725341

RESUMO

Calculations of the shielding and estimates of soil activation for a medical cyclotron are presented in this work. Based on the neutron source term from the 18O(p,n)18F reaction produced by a 28 MeV proton beam, neutron and gamma dose rates outside the building were estimated with the Monte Carlo code MCNP6 (Goorley et al 2012 Nucl. Technol. 180 298-315). The neutron source term was calculated with the MCNP6 code and FLUKA (Ferrari et al 2005 INFN/TC_05/11, SLAC-R-773) code as well as with supplied data by the manufacturer. MCNP and FLUKA calculations yielded comparable results, while the neutron yield obtained using the manufacturer-supplied information is about a factor of 5 smaller. The difference is attributed to the missing channels in the manufacturer-supplied neutron source terms which considers only the 18O(p,n)18F reaction, whereas the MCNP and FLUKA calculations include additional neutron reaction channels. Soil activation was performed using the FLUKA code. The estimated dose rate based on MCNP6 calculations in the public area is about 0.035 µSv h-1 and thus significantly below the reference value of 0.5 µSv h-1 (2011 Strahlenschutzverordnung, 9 Auflage vom 01.11.2011, Bundesanzeiger Verlag). After 5 years of continuous beam operation and a subsequent decay time of 30 d, the activity concentration of the soil is about 0.34 Bq g-1.


Assuntos
Ciclotrons , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Doses de Radiação , Proteção Radiológica/métodos , Solo , Humanos , Método de Monte Carlo , Nêutrons , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos
3.
Appl Radiat Isot ; 81: 268-71, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23608142

RESUMO

The paper describes radionuclide impurities (γ-emitters and (3)H) in proton irradiated (18)O enriched water from an Nb target vessel with Nb entrance window, their distribution in different synthesis steps and finally in the PET radiopharmaceuticals [(18)F]Fluoride and [(18)F]FDG.


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste/análise , Contaminação de Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Fluordesoxiglucose F18/química , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Radiometria/métodos , Trítio/análise , Fluordesoxiglucose F18/análise , Raios gama , Alemanha , Teste de Materiais , Doses de Radiação , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/análise , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/química
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...