Free light chain UV quantification compared with immunochemical measurement: How dimers and monomers may influence the results.

Serum κ and λ free light chain (FLC) levels are important for the management of plasma cell disorders. Immunochemical measurements on automated platforms with different reagents occasionally return different results that make them not interchangeable. The reasons for this behaviour are not clear and it is not known which result is the most accurate. The aim of the study is to quantify naturally occurring FLCs with a reference method (UV absorbance) in a sample devoid of other sources of UV absorbance. This was possible on a particular urine sample containing only lambda FLC proteins, dialyzed to clear it from low molecular weight UV absorbing compounds. The sample was submitted to Fast Protein Liquid Chromatography separation with a size-exclusion column in order to separate the FLC monomers and dimers. FLCs were also measured with the Freelite and N Latex FLC methods and the results were compared. The results demonstrated that the amount of FLC calculated on the basis of UV absorbance was overestimated by both immunochemical methods, and that the amount measured by the two reagents was affected by the different proportions of dimers or monomers. The present findings may be useful for the comprehension of the immunochemical measurement of FLC.

Inter-assay variability in automated serum free light chain assays and their use in the clinical laboratory.

Serum κ and λ free light chain levels are markers of plasma cell proliferation, and their measurements have been included in recent guidelines by the International Myeloma Working Group for the management of patients with plasma cellular dyscrasias. Five in vitro diagnostic methods for the immunochemical quantification of serum free light chains (FLC) are available, three based on polyclonal antibodies (Freelite®, The Binding Site; FLC ELISA κ and λ, Sebia; human κ and λ FLC, Diazyme Laboratories) and two on monoclonal antibodies (N Latex FLC, Siemens Healthineers; Seralite®, Sebia). Several studies have shown that these methods cannot be used interchangeably for the follow-up of patients because measured κ and λ FLC concentrations may differ significantly, especially at high levels. Because no international reference material for the measurement of FLC is available, it is not possible to establish which method is the most accurate. For this reason, knowledge about the analytical and diagnostic performances of the assays used is important. The aim of this review is to describe the main analytical features of the κ and λ FLC assays and how they may influence the clinical use of these parameters.

Different immunoreactivity of monomers and dimers makes automated free light chains assays not equivalent.

Background The automated immunochemical serum free light chains (FLC) assays, Freelite (a polyclonal antiserum) and N Latex FLC (a mixture of monoclonal antibodies), are not interchangeable, as they may provide different results on a same sample. This study was aimed to establish if the calibrators contain FLC oligomers, and if different reactivity against monomers and dimers contributes to the discrepancy. Methods Gel filtration chromatography fractions of the calibrators were subjected to a Western blot (WB) and analyzed by each reagent. The procedure was repeated after pretreating the N Latex FLC calibrator with the reducing agent dithiothreitol (DTT). Results Both calibrators contain FLC dimers and monomers. Both reagents detect (with different sensitivity) FLC kappa monomers and dimers; instead, Freelite detects only FLC lambda dimers, while N Latex FLC detects only FLC monomers. After DTT treatment, only the N Latex lambda still detects FLC with reduced protein thiols, while the reactivity of all other reagents is abolished. Conclusions Due to their different reactivity against FLC monomers and oligomers, the Freelite and N Latex FLC are calibrated against different components of their own calibrators, making the two reagents not equivalent. The redox status of FLC determines the immunoreactivity not only of FLC dimers, but also of the monomers.