Detection of Vertebral Mass and Diagnosis of Spinal Cord Compression in Computed Tomography With Deep Learning Reconstruction: Comparison With Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To compare the impact of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and hybrid-iterative reconstruction (hybrid-IR) on vertebral mass depiction, detection, and diagnosis of spinal cord compression on computed tomography (CT). METHODS: This retrospective study included 29 and 20 patients with and without vertebral masses. CT images were reconstructed using DLR and hybrid-IR. Three readers performed vertebral mass detection tests and evaluated the presence of spinal cord compression, the depiction of vertebral masses, and image noise. Quantitative image noise was measured by placing regions of interest on the aorta and spinal cord. RESULTS: Deep learning reconstruction tended to improve the performance of readers with less diagnostic imaging experience in detecting vertebral masses (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = .892-.966) compared with hybrid-IR (AUC = .839-.917). Diagnostic performance in evaluating spinal cord compression in DLR (AUC = .887-.995) also improved compared with that in hybrid-IR (AUC = .866-.942) for some readers. The depiction of vertebral masses and subjective image noise in DLR were significantly improved compared with those in hybrid-IR (P < .041). Quantitative image noise in DLR was also significantly reduced compared with that in hybrid-IR (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Deep learning reconstruction improved the depiction of vertebral masses, which resulted in a tendency to improve the performance of CT compared to hybrid-IR in detecting vertebral masses and diagnosing spinal cord compression for some readers.

Assessing the Effects of Deep Learning Reconstruction on Abdominal CT Without Arm Elevation.

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) on image quality of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in patients without arm elevation compared with hybrid-iterative reconstruction (Hybrid-IR) and filtered back projection (FBP). Methods: In this retrospective study, axial images of 26 patients who underwent CT without arm elevation were reconstructed using DLR, Hybrid-IR, and FBP. Streak artifact index (SAI) was calculated by dividing the standard deviation of CT attenuation in the liver or spleen by that in fat. Two other blinded radiologists evaluated streak artifacts on images (in the liver, spleen, and kidney), depiction of liver vessels, subjective image noise, and overall quality. They were also asked to detect space-occupying lesions other than cysts in the liver, spleen, and kidney. Results: The SAI (liver/spleen) in DLR images was significantly reduced compared with Hybrid-IR and FBP. Regarding qualitative image analysis, streak artifacts in the 3 organs, qualitative image noise, and overall quality in DLR images were rated by both readers as significantly improved compared with Hybrid-IR (P ≤ .012) and FBP (P < .001). Both blinded readers detected more lesions on DLR images than on Hybrid-IR and FBP ones. Conclusion: DLR resulted in significantly better-quality abdominal CT images in patients scanned without elevating their arms with reducing streak artifacts compared with Hybrid-IR and FBP.