Body mass index standard deviation score and obesity in children with type 1 diabetes in the Nordic countries. HbA1c and other predictors of increasing BMISDS.

BACKGROUND: Intensified insulin therapy may increase body weight and cause obesity. This study compared body mass index standard deviation score (BMISDS) and obesity rate in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, and uncovered predictors for increasing BMISDS. METHODS: Data registered in the Nordic national childhood diabetes databases during the period 2008-2012 on children below 15 years with T1D for more than 3 months were compiled, including information on gender, age, diabetes duration, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ), insulin dose, severe hypoglycemia (SH), treatment modality, height and weight. The Swedish reference chart for BMI was used for calculating BMISDS. RESULTS: Totally, 11 025 children (48% females) (30 994 registrations) were included. Medians by the last recorded examination were: age, 13.5 years; diabetes duration, 4.3 years; HbA1c , 7.9% (63 mmol/mol); insulin dose, 0.8 IU/kg/d and BMISDS, 0.70. Obesity rate was 18.5%. Adjusted mean BMISDS (BMISDS adj) was inversely related to HbA1c and directly to diabetes duration. Higher BMISDS adj was found in those with an insulin dose above 0.6 IU/kg/d, and in girls above 10 years. Pump users had higher BMISDS adj than pen users, and patients with registered SH had higher BMISDS adj than patients without SH (both P < .001). CONCLUSION: Obesity rate in children with T1D in the Nordic countries is high, however, with country differences. Low HbA1c , long diabetes duration, higher insulin dose, pump treatment and experiencing a SH predicted higher BMISDS. Diabetes caregivers should balance the risk of obesity and the benefit of a very low HbA1c.

Pregnancy outcome following exposure to permethrin and use of teratogen information.

NIX is a 1% permethrin creme rinse used for the treatment of head lice. There are no studies regarding human exposure during pregnancy. The primary objective of this study was to examine the safety of permethrin exposure during pregnancy. The secondary objective was to examine how teratogen information is perceived and used by women who requested information regarding this product. Women who had called the Motherisk and MotherSafe Programs to inquire about exposure to permethrin during pregnancy were followed-up to ascertain the outcome of their pregnancies. These women were compared with another group who had not been exposed to any known teratogenic drugs. Women who decided not to use permethrin were administered an additional questionnaire. We enrolled 147 women and completed outcomes on 113 pregnancies of women who had used permethrin some time during their pregnancy. There were 106 live births, six spontaneous abortions, one therapeutic abortion, and one major malformation in the women who used permethrin in the first trimester. The mean birthweight was 3540 +/- 492 g and the mean gestational age was 40 +/- 1 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences between the exposed and comparison groups in any of the pregnancy outcomes. Of the 34 women who chose not to use permethrin and who completed the additional questionnaire, 18 (52%) did not use permethrin because they did not feel the information was sufficiently reassuring. The results of this study suggest that the use of permethrin products during pregnancy appears to be relatively safe because there was no increase in the rates of major malformations. We also found that some women will not use a product during pregnancy unless they can receive a 100% guarantee that it will not harm their baby.