Progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in ankylosing spondylitis: a 10-year prospective study.

Chronic systemic inflammation contributes to increased CVD burden in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Since long-term follow-up data on subclinical atherosclerosis acceleration are lacking, we examined its progression in contemporary AS patients during 10 years. Fifty-three (89% male, aged 50.4 (36.3-55.9) years,) non-diabetic, CVD-free AS patients and 53 age-sex-matched non-diabetic, control individuals were re-evaluated after 9.2-10.2 years by ultrasonography for carotid/femoral atheromatosis, pulse wave velocity (PWV) and intima-media thickness (IMT), performed by the same operator/protocol. New atheromatic plaque formation, PWV deterioration, and IMT increase were associated only with classical CVD risk factors, as reflected by the heartSCORE (age, gender, smoking status, blood pressure and cholesterol levels) by multivariate analysis, rather than disease presence. However, among AS patients, despite remission/low disease activity at follow-up end in 79%, atheromatosis progression was associated by multivariate analysis with higher BASDAI scores (p = 0.028), independently of biologic therapies administered in 2/3 of them. Moreover, in AS patients, but not in controls, PWV values at baseline were associated with plaque progression during the 10-year follow-up after taking into account baseline heartSCORE and plaque burden status (p = 0.033). Despite comparable prevalence of both hypertension and hypercholesterolemia at baseline between patients and controls, a lower percentage of AS patients had achieved "adequate" CVD risk factor control at follow-up end (11% vs 25% respectively, p = 0.076). Classical CVD risk factors and residual disease activity account for the progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in AS, pointing to the unmet needs in the contemporary management of these patients.

Outcomes of COVID-19 Omicron variant in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide Greek cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with RA were at increased risk for COVID-19-associated hospitalization and death during the first year of the pandemic in Greece. We aimed to examine their outcomes after the SARS-Cov-2 Omicron, a more contagious but with milder clinical impacts variant, prevailed. METHODS: A retrospective, nationwide study was conducted between 1 January 2022 and 30 June 2022 in all RA patients under treatment and matched (1:5) on age, sex and region of domicile random general population comparators. Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalizations and deaths, anti-rheumatic medications, prior COVID-19, vaccinations and anti-viral medications were recorded. RESULTS: Among 34 182 RA patients, infections (n = 5569, 16.29%), hospitalizations (n = 489, 1.43%) and deaths (n = 106, 0.31%) were more frequent than among comparators. Incidence rates per 1000 person/years of infection [IRR (95% CI):1.19 (1.16, 1.23)], hospitalization [IRR (95% CI):2.0 (1.82, 2.24)], and death [IRR (95% CI):1.81 (1.44, 2.27)] were increased in RA despite better vaccination coverage (89% vs 84%) and more frequent use of anti-viral medications (2.37% vs 1.08). Logistic regression analysis after correcting for age, sex, vaccinations, prior COVID-19, and anti-viral medications in SARS-CoV-2 infected RA patients and comparators revealed increased risk of hospitalization (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.79, 2.27) and death [OR: 1.73, (95% CI: 1.36, 2.20)] in RA. Among infected RA patients, rituximab treatment conferred increased risks for hospitalization [OR: 6.12, (95% CI: 2.89, 12.92)] and death [OR: 12.06 (95% CI: 3.90, 37.31)], while JAK inhibitors increased only hospitalization risk [OR: 2.18 (95% CI: 1.56, 3.06)]. CONCLUSION: RA remains a risk factor for hospitalization and death in an era of a relatively low COVID-19 fatality rate, pointing to the need of perseverance in vaccination programs and wider use of anti-viral medications.

Arterial stiffness tested by pulse wave velocity and augmentation index for cardiovascular risk stratification in antiphospholipid syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Arterial stiffness (ArS) has emerged as a predictor of future cardiovascular events in the general population. We aimed to assess ArS in patients with thrombotic APS versus diabetes mellitus (DM) and healthy controls (HC) and identify predictors of increased ArS in APS. METHODS: ArS was evaluated by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and augmentation index normalized to 75 beats/min (AIx@75) using the SphygmoCor device. Participants also underwent carotid/femoral ultrasound for atherosclerotic plaque detection. We used linear regression to compare ArS measures among groups and assess ArS determinants in the APS group. RESULTS: We included 110 patients with APS (70.9% female, mean age 45.4 years), 110 DM patients and 110 HC, all age/sex matched. After adjustment for age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors and plaque presence, APS patients exhibited similar cfPWV [ß = -0.142 (95% CI -0.514, 0.230), p = 0.454] but increased AIx@75 [ß = 4.525 (95% CI 1.372, 7.677), p = 0.005] compared with HC and lower cfPWV (p < 0.001) but similar AIx@75 (p = 0.193) versus DM patients. In the APS group, cfPWV was independently associated with age [ß = 0.056 (95% CI 0.034, 0.078), p < 0.001], mean arterial pressure (MAP) [ß = 0.070 (95% CI 0.043, 0.097), p < 0.001], atherosclerotic femoral plaques [ß = 0.732 (95% CI 0.053, 1.411), p = 0.035] and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I IgM positivity [ß = 0.696 (95% CI 0.201, 1.191), p = 0.006]. AIx@75 was associated with age [ß = 0.334 (95% CI 0.117, 0.551), p = 0.003], female sex [ß = 7.447 (95% CI 2.312, 12.581), p = 0.005] and MAP [ß = 0.425 (95% CI 0.187, 0.663), p = 0.001]. CONCLUSION: APS patients exhibit elevated AIx@75 vs HC and similar to DM patients, indicating enhanced arterial stiffening in APS. Given its prognostic value, ArS evaluation may help to improve cardiovascular risk stratification in APS.

The impact of traditional cardiovascular risk factor control on 7-year follow-up atherosclerosis progression in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: The 2022 EULAR recommendations for cardiovascular risk management in patients with rheumatic disorders, including SLE, call for rigorous management of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF). The impact of CVRF target attainment on atherosclerotic plaque progression hasn't been previously evaluated in prospective ultrasound studies. METHODS: A total of 115 patients with SLE and 1:1 age and sex-matched healthy controls who had a baseline carotid and femoral ultrasound examination in our cardiovascular research unit were invited for a 7-year follow-up assessment of new plaque development. We aimed to compare the incidence of plaque progression between SLE patients and controls and reveal the extent to which it is affected by the attainment of European Society of Cardiology (ESC) targets for modifiable CVRFs (blood pressure, smoking status, body weight, lipids and physical activity), and disease-related features (disease duration, disease activity, autoantibodies, treatments). RESULTS: Eighty-six SLE patients and 42 controls had a 7-year follow-up carotid and femoral plaque examination. New plaque development was observed in 32/86 patients vs 8/42 controls (P = 0.037). Patients with SLE had a 4-fold higher risk for plaque progression than controls (OR: 4.16, CI: 1.22, 14.19, P = 0.023), adjusting for potential confounders. Multivariate regression analyses showed a 50% decrease in plaque progression for every modifiable CVRF fulfilling ESC targets (OR: 0.56, CI: 0.34, 0.93, P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Patients with SLE develop a rapid progression of atherosclerotic plaques which may be drastically reduced by CVRF target attainment according to ESC guidelines.

Cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a cross-sectional performance analysis of nine clinical risk prediction tools.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the performance of cardiovascular risk (CVR) prediction models reported by European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology and European Society of Cardiology recommendations to identify high-atherosclerotic CVR (ASCVR) patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: Six models predicting the risk of a first cardiovascular disease event (first-CVD) (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE); modified-SCORE; Framingham risk score; Pooled Cohorts Risk Equation; Prospective Cardiovascular Münster calculator; Globorisk), three risk prediction models for patients with a history of prior arterial events (recurrent-CVD) (adjusted Global APS Score (aGAPSS); aGAPSSCVD; Secondary Manifestations of Arterial Disease (SMART)) and carotid/femoral artery vascular ultrasound (VUS) were used to assess ASCVR in 121 APS patients (mean age: 45.8±11.8 years; women: 68.6%). We cross-sectionally examined the calibration, discrimination and classification accuracy of all prediction models to identify high ASCVR due to VUS-detected atherosclerotic plaques, and risk reclassification of patients classified as non high-risk according to first-CVD/recurrent-CVD tools to actual high risk based on VUS. RESULTS: Spiegelhalter's z-test p values 0.47-0.57, area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUROC) 0.56-0.75 and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) 0.01-0.35 indicated moderate calibration, poor-to-acceptable discrimination and negligible-to-moderate classification accuracy, respectively, for all risk models. Among recurrent-CVD tools, SMART and aGAPSSCVD (for non-triple antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients) performed better (z/AUROC/MCC: 0.47/0.64/0.29 and 0.52/0.69/0.29, respectively) than aGAPSS. VUS reclassified 34.2%-47.9% and 40.5%-52.6% of patients classified as non-high-ASCVR by first-CVD and recurrent-CVD prediction models, respectively. In patients aged 40-54 years, >40% VUS-guided reclassification was observed for first-CVD risk tools and >50% for recurrent-CVD prediction models. CONCLUSION: Clinical CVR prediction tools underestimate actual high ASCVR in APS. VUS may help to improve CVR assessment and optimal risk factor management.

Application of EULAR and European Society of Cardiology recommendations with regard to blood pressure and lipid management in antiphospholipid syndrome.

BACKGROUND: To examine blood pressure (BP) and lipid treatment eligibility in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) according to European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommendations. METHODS: Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), modified-SCORE, diabetes mellitus (DM)-equivalent risk classifiers (DIME) and disease-related classifiers -type of thrombotic events (APSevents), antiphospholipid-antibody profile (aPLprofile) and adjusted Global APS Score for cardiovascular disease- were used to calculate predicted low-moderate, high and very-high cardiovascular risk (CVR) in 111 patients with APS without prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular events or DM. Actual CVR (AR) was determined according to ESC guidelines, including carotid/femoral plaque presence. In low-moderate SCORE-predicted risk patients, classification ability and agreement for BP or lipid treatment was tested with Matthews' correlation coefficient (MCC) and Cohen's kappa, respectively, using the AR classes as reference qualifiers. RESULTS: SCORE underestimated high/very-high-AR in >50% of cases. SCORE-guided BP/lipid treatment eligibility was 4.2%/12.6% for high, 10.5%/16.8% for very-high AR patients, while 5.3% of low-moderate AR cases were eligible for lipid-lowering therapy. For BP treatment, MCC was higher using DIME for low-moderate and very-high-risk (0.33 and 0.32, respectively), and using modified-SCORE+APSevents (MCC=0.25) for high-risk patients. Eligibility agreement was better with DIME+APSevents or aPLprofile (kappa=0.51) for high-risk, and DIME (kappa=0.31) for very-high-risk patients. For lipid treatment, both classification ability and eligibility agreement were stronger with SCORE (or modified-SCORE)+APSevents in low-moderate (MCC/kappa=0.43/0.41) and very-high risk (MCC/kappa=0.30/0.30), and with DIME+aPLprofile (MCC/kappa=0.50/0.50) in high-risk patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Multimodal risk assessment including disease-related and cardiometabolic features used for high-risk diseases such as DM can improve CVR management in APS.

Generic and disease-adapted cardiovascular risk scores as predictors of atherosclerosis progression in SLE.

OBJECTIVE: Studies show that generic cardiovascular risk (CVR) prediction tools may underestimate CVR in SLE. We examined, for the first time to our knowledge, whether generic and disease-adapted CVR scores may predict subclinical atherosclerosis progression in SLE. METHODS: We included all eligible patients with SLE without a history of cardiovascular events or diabetes mellitus, who had a 3-year carotid and femoral ultrasound follow-up examination. Five generic (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), Framingham Risk Score (FRS), Pooled Cohort Risk Equation, Globorisk, Prospective Cardiovascular Münster) and three 'SLE-adapted' CVR scores (modified Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (mSCORE), modified Framingham Risk Score (mFRS), QRESEARCH Risk Estimator V.3 (QRISK3)) were calculated at baseline. The performance of CVR scores to predict atherosclerosis progression (defined as new atherosclerotic plaque development) was tested with Brier Score (BS), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), while rank correlation was tested with Harrell's c-index. Binary logistic regression was also applied to examine determinants of subclinical atherosclerosis progression. RESULTS: Twenty-six (21%) of 124 included patients (90% female, mean age 44.4±11.7 years) developed new atherosclerotic plaques after a mean of 39.7±3.8 months' follow-up period. Performance analysis showed that plaque progression was better predicted by the mFRS (BS 0.14, AUROC 0.80, MCC 0.22) and QRISK3 (BS 0.16, AUROC 0.75, MCC 0.25). c-Index showed no superiority for discrimination between mFRS and QRISK3. In the multivariate analysis, QRISK3 (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.30 to 13.78, p=0.016) among the CVR prediction scores and age (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.21, p<0.001), cumulative glucocorticoid dose (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07, p=0.010) and antiphospholipid antibodies (OR 3.66, 95% CI 1.24 to 10.80, p=0.019) among disease-related CVR factors were independently associated with plaque progression. CONCLUSIONS: Application of SLE-adapted CVR scores such as QRISK3 or mFRS, as well as monitoring for glucocorticoid exposure and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, can help to improve CVR assessment and management in SLE.

Lipid management in systemic lupus erythematosus according to risk classifiers suggested by the European Society of Cardiology and disease-related risk factors reported by the EULAR recommendations.

BACKGROUND: The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommended that lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) should follow general population guidelines. We examined the eligibility for LLT in SLE according to Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), with and without the addition of vascular ultrasound (VUS) and disease-related features. METHODS: 210 patients with SLE without prior cardiovascular events, diabetes or antiphospholipid syndrome underwent cardiovascular risk assessment with SCORE. LLT eligibility was evaluated in low-risk and moderate-risk patients following European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Atherosclerotic plaques on carotid ultrasound (cUS)) and carotid and femoral ultrasound (cfUS), prolonged disease duration (PDD, ≥10 years), failure to achieve lupus low disease activity state (LLDASno), cumulative glucocorticoid 'cardiovascular harm' dose (GCCVH, optimal cut-off to predict ultrasound-detected plaques) and antiphospholipid antibody positivity (aPLpos) were tested as SCORE risk enhancers for classification ability (phi coefficient) and agreement (Cohen's kappa) using SCORE plus cfUS as a reference modality for LLT eligibility. RESULTS: Plaques were detected in 9.9% of low-risk cases and 54.6% of moderate-risk cases. SCORE alone would indicate 0% of low-risk patients and 3% of moderate-risk patients for LLT eligibility. According to SCORE+cfUS, 9.9% of low-risk patients and 57.6% of moderate-risk patients, respectively, would be eligible for LLT based on ESC guidelines. Ιn low-risk/moderate-risk patients, phi values for SCORE+PDD, GCCVH (cut-off ≥11 g), LLDASno and aPLpos in antiplatelet-naïve antiphospholipid antibody-positive (aPLpos/APT-) cases were 0.06/0.13, 0.23/0.20, 0.07/0.16 and 0.06/0.33, respectively. Agreement for LLT eligibility to SCORE+cfUS was better for SCORE+PDD in moderate-risk patients and for SCORE+cUS in both groups of patients. SCORE+GCCVH and SCORE+aPLpos showed at least fair agreement (kappa ≥0.20) to SCORE+cfUS in low-risk or moderate-risk and in aPLpos/APT- moderate-risk patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Disease-related and VUS features, in addition to SCORE, may help to improve LLT decision making in SLE. GCCVH and aPLpos improve LLT eligibility similarly and to a greater degree than PDD or LLDASno.

Different COVID-19 outcomes among systemic rheumatic diseases: a nation-wide cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated risk of hospitalization and death in RA, AS, PsA, SLE and SSc in comparison with the general population during the first year of the pandemic, and compare their overall mortality with 2019. METHODS: Interlinking nationwide electronic registries, we recorded confirmed COVID-19-associated infections, hospitalizations and deaths, and all-cause deaths between 1 March 2020 and 28 February 2021 in all adults with RA, AS, PsA, SLE and SSc under treatment (n = 74 970, median age 67.5, 51.2, 58.1, 56.2 and 62.2 years, respectively) and in random comparators from the general population matched (1:5) on age, sex and region of domicile. Deaths from all causes during 2019 were also recorded. RESULTS: Compared with the general population, incidence rates (IR) for COVID-19-associated hospitalization were higher in RA [IR ratio (IRR) 1.71(1.50-1.95)], SLE [2.0 (1.4-2.7)] and SSc [2.28 (1.29-3.90)], while COVID-19-associated death rates were higher in RA [1.91 (1.46-2.49)]. When focusing only on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-infected subjects, after adjusting for age and gender, the odds ratio for COVID-19 associated death was higher in RA [1.47 (1.11-1.94)] and SSc [2.92 (1.07-7.99)] compared with the general population. The all-cause mortality rate compared with the general population increased in RA during the first year of the pandemic (IRR 0.71) with reference to 2019 (0.59), and decreased in SSc (IRR 1.94 vs 4.36). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 may have a more severe impact in patients with systemic rheumatic disease than in the general population. COVID-19-related mortality is increased in subgroups of patients with specific rheumatic diseases, underscoring the need for priority vaccination and access to targeted treatments.

SLICC-Frailty Index is independently associated with impaired physical function, activities of daily living and quality of life measures.

OBJECTIVE: The SLICC Frailty Index (SLICC-FI) was developed to assess health deficits including disease activity, organ damage, comorbidities and functional status. We examined any relationship between SLICC-FI and objective physical function measures, activities of daily living performance and quality of life in SLE. METHODS: SLICC-FI was estimated using data from patient files and patient-reported questionnaires. Jamar Dynamometer, pinch gauge and Purdue pegboard test measured grip strength, pinch strength and dexterity, respectively. Activities of daily living performance was assessed by the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and HAQ. Quality of life was evaluated by LupusQol questionnaire. RESULTS: This cross-sectional study included 240 SLE patients (90% female, mean (s.d.) age: 47.63 (13.01), median (IQR) disease duration: 9 (4-16)). Mean (s.d.) SLICC-FI was 0.09 (0.06). Forty-three (17.9%) patients were classified as robust, 105 (43.8%) as relatively less fit, 77 (32.1%) as least fit and 15 (6.2%) as frail. In univariate analysis, SLICC-FI was significantly associated with DASH and HAQ with an inverse association with grip strength, pinch strength and all purdue scores (all P < 0.001). A negative correlation was found between SLICC-FI score and all LupusQoL domain scores (all P < 0.001). All associations remained statistically significant in multivariate regression analysis, after adjustment for age, disease duration, SLEDAI-2K, SLICC, immunosuppressives, corticosteroids and Charlson score. CONCLUSION: SLICC-FI is independently associated with poor physical function and activities of daily living performance and impaired quality of life and may help to identify patients in need of additional interventions beyond routine care.

Cardiovascular disease detection using machine learning and carotid/femoral arterial imaging frameworks in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

The study proposes a novel machine learning (ML) paradigm for cardiovascular disease (CVD) detection in individuals at medium to high cardiovascular risk using data from a Greek cohort of 542 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis, or diabetes mellitus, and/or arterial hypertension, using conventional or office-based, laboratory-based blood biomarkers and carotid/femoral ultrasound image-based phenotypes. Two kinds of data (CVD risk factors and presence of CVD-defined as stroke, or myocardial infarction, or coronary artery syndrome, or peripheral artery disease, or coronary heart disease) as ground truth, were collected at two-time points: (i) at visit 1 and (ii) at visit 2 after 3 years. The CVD risk factors were divided into three clusters (conventional or office-based, laboratory-based blood biomarkers, carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes) to study their effect on the ML classifiers. Three kinds of ML classifiers (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Linear Discriminant Analysis) were applied in a two-fold cross-validation framework using the data augmented by synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) strategy. The performance of the ML classifiers was recorded. In this cohort with overall 46 CVD risk factors (covariates) implemented in an online cardiovascular framework, that requires calculation time less than 1 s per patient, a mean accuracy and area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 98.40% and 0.98 (p < 0.0001) for CVD presence detection at visit 1, and 98.39% and 0.98 (p < 0.0001) at visit 2, respectively. The performance of the cardiovascular framework was significantly better than the classical CVD risk score. The ML paradigm proved to be powerful for CVD prediction in individuals at medium to high cardiovascular risk.

Atherosclerosis progression in antiphospholipid syndrome is comparable to diabetes mellitus: a 3 year prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune thrombophilia leading to life-threatening cardiovascular events. Cross-sectional data support that APS is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis, but this has not been confirmed in prospective studies. We aimed to compare the rate of atherosclerosis progression over a 3 year period between patients with APS, diabetes mellitus (DM) and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: Eighty-six patients with APS [43 with primary APS (PAPS), 43 with SLE-related APS (SLE-APS)] and an equal number of age- and sex-matched patients with DM and HCs who underwent a baseline US of the carotid and femoral arteries were invited for a 3 year follow-up evaluation for atherosclerotic plaque progression. Multivariate analysis was performed for the assessment of determinants of plaque progression after adjustment for disease-related and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Seventy-four APS patients (74.3% female, 38 with PAPS), 58 DM patients and 73 HCs were included. APS patients exhibited a 3.3-fold higher risk of new atherosclerotic plaque formation compared with HCs (P = 0.031), similar to that in DM [odds ratio (OR) 3.45, P = 0.028]. In APS patients, plaque development risk was higher in SLE-APS vs PAPS (OR 7.75, P = 0.038) and was independently associated with the presence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors as expressed by the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation risk (OR 2.31, P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: APS is characterized by accelerated rates of subclinical atherosclerosis to a degree comparable to DM, which is more pronounced in SLE-APS patients. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors are major determinants of this risk, warranting aggressive management as in other disorders with high cardiovascular risk.

Tahini consumption affects blood pressure and endothelial function in healthy males.

Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) is rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids, proteins, vitamin E, and lignans. Recent studies have highlighted the antioxidant, antihypertensive, hypolipidemic, and appetite-control properties of sesame seeds and sesame oil. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding the effect of tahini (sesame paste) consumption on human health. Thus, the aim is to investigate the postprandial effect of tahini consumption on blood pressure, endothelial function, and arterial stiffness. Twenty healthy men with mean age of 28 y and mean BMI of 25.81 kg/m2 were included. After a 12-h fast, baseline blood was collected, participants consumed 50 g of tahini, and blood collection was repeated 4 h postprandially. Assessment of blood pressure, pulse rate, hemodynamic parameters, and endothelial function was performed at baseline and at the end of the trial. Blood samples were used for the quantification of intercellular cell-adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell-adhesion molecule-1, and E-selectin levels at baseline and 4 h postprandially. A statistically significant decrease in diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.010) and pulse rate (p = 0.002) was observed 4 h after tahini consumption. Significant increases in serum triglycerides (p < 0.001) and flow-mediated dilatation were observed (p = 0.022) 4 h postprandially. No changes were observed in other indices measured at the end of the intervention compared with baseline. This is the first study to report that tahini consumption can lower blood pressure and pulse rate and improve endothelial function, suggesting a healthy snack in place of others with a less desirable lipid profile.

All-cause mortality in systemic rheumatic diseases under treatment compared with the general population, 2015-2019.

OBJECTIVES: To compare current all-cause mortality rates in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and systemic sclerosis (SSc) versus general population. METHODS: In this population-based, retrospective cohort study, anonymised data on 11 186 586 citizens, including all patients with RA (42 735, 79% female), AS (9707, 43% female), PsA (13 779, 55% female), SLE (10 440, 89% female) and SSc (2277, 88% female), (median age of 64/47/54/53/59 years at study entry, respectively), under prescribed treatment between 2015 and 2019, were extracted from the electronic database covering nearly 99% of the Greek population. RESULTS: After 1:5 (patients:general population) matching for gender/age, we found that survival was worse in SSc, followed by SLE and inflammatory arthritis. Compared with the general population HRs for death increased from the first 3 years to 5 years of observation possibly due to increases in disease duration: RA (from 0.63 to 1.13 (95% CI: 1.05 to 1.22), AS (from 0.62 to 1.01, (95% CI: 0.76 to 1.33)), PsA (from 0.68 to 1.06, (95% CI: 0.88 to 1.28)), SLE (from 1.52 to 1.98, (95% CI: 1.67 to 2.33)) and SSc (from 2.27 to 4.24, (95% CI: 3.19 to 5.63)). In both SLE and SSc mortality was increased in men than women and in patients younger than 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: Survival rates over 5 years in inflammatory arthritis under treatment are currently becoming comparable (AS/PsA) or slightly higher (RA) than those of the general population. However, all-cause mortality is almost twofold and fourfold higher in SLE and SSc, respectively, being even higher for male and younger patients.

Impaired hand function and performance in activities of daily living in systemic lupus erythematosus, even in patients achieving lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS).

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to examine hand function and performance in activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with SLE vs healthy controls, and any associations with demographic and disease-related characteristics. METHODS: Hand function (grip strength, pinch strength and dexterity) and ADL performance were evaluated in 240 patients with SLE and 122 age- and biological sex-matched healthy controls. Grip strength, pinch strength and dexterity were measured by Jamar dynamometer, pinch gauge and Purdue pegboard test, respectively. Self-reported ADL performance was assessed by disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) and HAQ. Regression analysis was performed to assess the determinants of hand dysfunction. RESULTS: All hand function and ADL performance variables were significantly impaired in the entire SLE cohort and the subgroup of patients achieving lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS; n = 157) compared with healthy subjects (P < 0.05). Joint pain, often underestimated in SLE, was the major determinant of hand function and ADL performance in multiple regression models. In addition, age was correlated with grip strength and Purdue scores, gender with grip strength, arthritis with DASH and HAQ, and use of immunosuppressives with DASH, HAQ and grip strength. Likewise, in patients in LLDAS, painful joints were correlated with DASH and HAQ, age with grip strength and Purdue (P < 0.001), gender with grip strength, and immunosuppressives with HAQ and grip strength. CONCLUSION: Hand function and performance of daily activities are significantly impaired in SLE, even in patients who achieve LLDAS, suggesting the need for their evaluation and management in clinical practice.

A Multifactorial Approach in Type 2 Diabetes Over 3 Years Decelerates Progression of Subclinical Arterial Disease in Routine Clinical Practice.

The beneficial effect of multifactorial treatment of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors (RFs) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) is well established from randomized clinical trials. We prospectively evaluated the impact of such treatment in a real-world setting, on the development of subclinical arterial damage (SAD), as determined by structural/functional noninvasive biomarkers of vascular pathology (atheromatosis, carotid hypertrophy, arteriosclerosis). We prospectively studied 116 persons with T2D, treated with a multifactorial approach for CV RFs at a tertiary medical center, and 324 individuals without diabetes, for 3.2 years. The primary outcome was changes in vascular biomarkers related to SAD. At baseline, participants in the diabetes group had higher prevalence of SAD. At study end, the changes in clinical, biochemical, and lifestyle characteristics, as well as antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatments, were comparable between the 2 groups. During follow-up, classical CV RFs (smoking, blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, triglycerides) and behavioral features were significantly improved in both groups. Multivariate analysis, after adjusting for all classic CV RFs and use of antihypertensive/lipid-lowering therapies, demonstrated that all evaluated SAD biomarkers were similarly changed in the 2 groups. In conclusion, implementation of a multimodality approach of T2D treatment is feasible and efficacious in decelerating progression of SAD in routine clinical practice.

Underperformance of clinical risk scores in identifying vascular ultrasound-based high cardiovascular risk in systemic lupus erythematosus.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of eight clinical risk prediction scores to identify individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, as defined by the presence of atherosclerotic plaques. METHODS: CVD risk was estimated in 210 eligible SLE patients without prior CVD or diabetes mellitus (female: 93.3%, mean age: 44.8 ± 12 years) using five generic (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), Framingham Risk Score (FRS), Pooled Cohort Risk Equations (ASCVD), Globorisk, Prospective Cardiovascular Münster Study risk calculator (PROCAM)) and three 'SLE-adapted' (modified-SCORE, modified-FRS, QRESEARCH risk estimator, version 3 (QRISK3)) CVD risk scores, as well as ultrasound examination of the carotid and femoral arteries. Calibration, discrimination and classification measures to identify high CVD risk based on the presence of atherosclerotic plaques were assessed for all risk models. CVD risk reclassification was applied for all scores by incorporating ultrasound results. RESULTS: Moderate calibration (p-value range from 0.38 to 0.63) and discrimination (area under the curve 0.73-0.84), and low-to-moderate sensitivity (8.3-71.4%) and classification ability (Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) 0.25-0.47) were observed for all risk models to identify patients with plaques at any arterial site as high-risk. MCC was improved for modified-FRS versus FRS (0.43 vs 0.36), but not for modified-SCORE versus SCORE (0.25 vs 0.25). Based on plaque presence, CVD risk was upgraded to high-risk in 10%, 16.1%, 20.5%, 21.5%, 24%, 28.2% and 28.6% of cases classified as non-high-risk by QRISK3, modified-FRS, Globorisk, FRS/PROCAM, ASCVD, modified-SCORE and SCORE, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the five generic and three 'SLE-adapted' clinical risk scores underestimated high CVD risk defined by atherosclerotic plaque presence in patients with SLE.

Higher depression rates and similar cardiovascular comorbidity in psoriatic arthritis compared with rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: We explore the spectrum of comorbidities in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients in comparison with other high comorbidity-burden diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: Two hundred and fifteen PsA patients, cross-sectionally collected from two tertiary hospitals, were compared with 215 RA and 215 DM patients (age/sex-matched, similar disease duration). Cardiovascular risk factors [hypertension, current smoking, hyperlipidaemia, obesity (body mass index (BMI) ⩾30)], coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs; combined CAD and stroke), depression, osteoporosis and malignancies were recorded. Odds ratios (ORs) for stroke, CAD and MACE were adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, smoking, hyperlipidaemia, BMI, glucocorticoids use and those for depression were adjusted for age, sex, disease duration, skin involvement and smoking. Within the PsA group, associations between comorbidities and demographic/clinical features were assessed. RESULTS: Depression [OR (95% confidence interval (CI)): 3.02 (1.57-5.81)], obesity [OR (95% CI): 2.83, (1.65-4.86)] and hyperlipidaemia [OR (95% CI): 1.96 (1.32-2.90)] were more prevalent in PsA compared with RA, while no differences were observed for CAD, stroke, MACE and malignancies. Depression [OR (95% CI): 4.85 (2.37-9.93)] and osteoporosis [OR (95% CI): 6.22 (1.33-29.2)] were more common in PsA than in DM. Hypertension, but not the other cardiovascular risk factors, was more frequent in DM [OR (95% CI) 0.49 (0.33-0.74)]. However, prevalence of stroke, CAD and MACE did not differ between PsA and DM. Within PsA group, depression was associated with age [OR (95% CI): 1.03 (0.99-1.06)], female sex [OR (95% CI): 3.47 (1.51-7.99)] and smoking [OR (95% CI): 2.78 (1.31-5.88)] while MACEs were associated with age [OR (95% CI): 1.08 (1.00-1.17)], male sex [OR (95% CI) for females: 0.26 (0.06-1.23) and hypertension [OR (95% CI): 6.07 (1.12-33.0)]. No differences were recorded in comorbidities between the different PsA phenotypes. CONCLUSION: Depression was more prevalent in PsA compared with RA and DM, while cardiovascular comorbidity was comparable to both groups, supporting the need for their assessment and management.

Underperformance of clinical risk scores in identifying vascular ultrasound-based high cardiovascular risk in systemic lupus erythematosus.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of eight clinical risk prediction scores to identify individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, as defined by the presence of atherosclerotic plaques. METHODS: CVD risk was estimated in 210 eligible SLE patients without prior CVD or diabetes mellitus (female: 93.3%, mean age: 44.8 ± 12 years) using five generic (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), Framingham Risk Score (FRS), Pooled Cohort Risk Equations (ASCVD), Globorisk, Prospective Cardiovascular Münster Study risk calculator (PROCAM)) and three 'SLE-adapted' (modified-SCORE, modified-FRS, QRESEARCH risk estimator, version 3 (QRISK3)) CVD risk scores, as well as ultrasound examination of the carotid and femoral arteries. Calibration, discrimination and classification measures to identify high CVD risk based on the presence of atherosclerotic plaques were assessed for all risk models. CVD risk reclassification was applied for all scores by incorporating ultrasound results. RESULTS: Moderate calibration (p-value range from 0.38 to 0.63) and discrimination (area under the curve 0.73-0.84), and low-to-moderate sensitivity (8.3-71.4%) and classification ability (Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) 0.25-0.47) were observed for all risk models to identify patients with plaques at any arterial site as high-risk. MCC was improved for modified-FRS versus FRS (0.43 vs 0.36), but not for modified-SCORE versus SCORE (0.25 vs 0.25). Based on plaque presence, CVD risk was upgraded to high-risk in 10%, 16.1%, 20.5%, 21.5%, 24%, 28.2% and 28.6% of cases classified as non-high-risk by QRISK3, modified-FRS, Globorisk, FRS/PROCAM, ASCVD, modified-SCORE and SCORE, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the five generic and three 'SLE-adapted' clinical risk scores underestimated high CVD risk defined by atherosclerotic plaque presence in patients with SLE.

Differential performance of nailfold video capillaroscopic parameters in the diagnosis and prognosis of systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: The contribution of nailfold video capillaroscopy (NVC) in identifying patients with Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) at risk for systemic sclerosis (SSc) is well established. Herein we comparatively assess the performance of different capillaroscopic parameters in diagnosing SSc among patients with RP and evaluate the prognostic capacity of NVC in SSc. METHODS: At baseline we clinically and capillaroscopically evaluated 242 consecutive patients referred to our department for NVC (138 with SSc); 175 were reevaluated after 3.38±1.47 years. Sixty-two healthy volunteers served as controls. Capillaroscopy pattern (normal/early/active/late) was qualitatively defined. Capillary loss, dilated, giant or ramified capillaries and micro-haemorrhages were scored semi-quantitatively. RESULTS: Capillary loss score had the highest diagnostic accuracy at discriminating patients with an SSc-spectrum disorder from patients with RP of different etiology and controls, as defined by ROC curve analysis [AUC (95% CI)=0.905 (0.869-0.942)], followed by dilatation score [0.863 (0.818-0.907)] and giant score [0.835 (0.787-0.884)]. By contrast, micro-haemorrhages [0.720 (0.662-0.779)] and ramifications scores [0.604 (0.539-0.670)] performed worse. Multivariate analysis in 94 SSc patients indicated that active (OR=3.305, p=0.043) and late (OR=6.900, p=0.023) baseline capillaroscopy pattern predicted occurrence of a combined adverse disease outcome [forced vital capacity (FVC) deterioration>10% and/or DLCO deterioration>15% and/or mRSS deterioration>3.5 and/or first occurrence of digital ulcers and/or death)] at 3 year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Dilatation score performs best of all semi-quantitative NVC parameters in diagnosing SSc. In addition, our study confirms earlier reports that worse capillaroscopy pattern at baseline correlates with higher likelihood for adverse prognosis.